logo

Case Study of Charlie Assignment

   

Added on  2019-10-31

9 Pages2730 Words168 Views
Running head: TAXATIONTaxationName of the StudentName of the UniversityAuthors NoteCourse ID

1TAXATIONTable of ContentsIssue............................................................................................................................................2Law.............................................................................................................................................2Application.................................................................................................................................3Employment duties of an Itinerant Nature:................................................................................5Car parking fringe benefit:.........................................................................................................5FBT on accommodation:............................................................................................................6Conclusion..................................................................................................................................7Reference List:...........................................................................................................................8

2TAXATIONIssueThe main issue of the study have been seen in terms of the evaluation of the differentaspects of tax determination of and know about the impact of Shine Homes and Charlie. Thishas been further determined with the case study of Charlie who is an employee of ShineyHolmes Pty Ltd. has been further seen with the real estate agent. On the contrary Holmes hasbeen able to perform business landscaping to provide 4 wheeler sedan car. As per “Section 6of the Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings and Fringe Benefit Tax Assessment Act 1986” thevarious types of the provision has been seen with the different types of the circumstancesdefined under the fringe benefit taxation rulings (Rootes, 2014).Lawa.“Section 6 of the Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings and Fringe Benefit TaxAssessment Act 1986”b.“Taxation rulings of MT 2027”c.“Section 136 (1)”d.“Sub-section 136 (1) of the Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings of 2027”e.“Section 51 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997”f.“Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings of 2027”g.“Sub-division F of Division 3”h.“Taxation rulings of IT 112”i.“Section 51 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997”j.“Newsom v Robertson (1952) 2 All ER 728; (1952)”k.“Simon in Taylor v Provan (1975) AC 194”l.“FBT Act 1986”m.“Fringe Benefit Tax Act 1986”n.“TR 94/25”o.“Section 5 of the Fringe Benefit Tax Act 1986”p.“Subsection 51 (1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936”q.“Subsection 51 (1) of the ITAA 1997”r.“Section 5 of the Fringe Benefit Tax Act 1986”s.“Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v. FC of T 93”

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Assignment on Taxation PDF
|10
|2794
|114

Report On Case of Taxation Law
|13
|2560
|39

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Assignment
|9
|1446
|44

CSU LAW505 | Taxation DOCS
|8
|1585
|66

Taxation Case Study - Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings
|9
|1661
|41

BFA391 - Taxation - Fringe Benefit Consequences
|10
|2905
|54