logo

Assignment on Taxation PDF

   

Added on  2020-03-23

10 Pages2794 Words114 Views
Running head: TAXATIONTaxationName of the StudentName of the UniversityAuthors NoteCourse ID

1TAXATIONTable of ContentsIssue............................................................................................................................................2Law.............................................................................................................................................2Application.................................................................................................................................3Employment duties of an Itinerant Nature:................................................................................5Car parking fringe benefit:.........................................................................................................5FBT on accommodation:............................................................................................................6Fringe Benefit Tax consequences of Charlie Homes.................................................................6Conclusion:................................................................................................................................7References..................................................................................................................................8

2TAXATIONIssueThe important consideration of the main issue of the tax evaluation has been seen withimpact of tax determination of Shine Homes and Charlie. The main consideration has beenfollowed with Charlie being an employee of Shiney Homes Pty Ltd, who has been employedas a real estate agent. On the other hand Holmes has been seen to perform the landscaping asper the 4 wheeled Sedan. Based on the rulings of “Section 6 of the Miscellaneous TaxationRulings and Fringe Benefit Tax Assessment Act 1986” the main circumstances associatedto the consideration of which particular fringe benefit tax shall be levied on the car(Richardson et al., 2014).Lawa.“Section 6 of the Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings and Fringe Benefit TaxAssessment Act 1986”b.“Taxation rulings of MT 2027”c.“Section 136 (1)”d.“Sub-section 136 (1) of the Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings of 2027”e.“Section 51 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997”f.“Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings of 2027”g.“Sub-division F of Division 3”h.“Taxation rulings of IT 112”i.“Section 51 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997”j.“Newsom v Robertson (1952) 2 All ER 728; (1952)”k.“Simon in Taylor v Provan (1975) AC 194”l.“FBT Act 1986”m.“Fringe Benefit Tax Act 1986”n.“TR 94/25”o.“Section 5 of the Fringe Benefit Tax Act 1986”p.“Subsection 51 (1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936”q.“Subsection 51 (1) of the ITAA 1997”r.“Section 5 of the Fringe Benefit Tax Act 1986”s.“Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v. FC of T 93”

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Case Study of Charlie Assignment
|9
|2730
|168

Report On Case of Taxation Law
|13
|2560
|39

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Assignment
|9
|1446
|44

CSU LAW505 | Taxation DOCS
|8
|1585
|66

Taxation Case Study - Miscellaneous Taxation Rulings
|9
|1661
|41

BFA391 - Taxation - Fringe Benefit Consequences
|10
|2905
|54