ANZ Cartel Scandal: Analyzing Ethical Behavior through Organizational Learning Theories
Verified
Added on 2023/04/26
|10
|2400
|293
AI Summary
This report analyzes the ANZ Cartel Scandal of 2015 through the use of organizational learning theory. It identifies obstacles to organizational learning and recommends ethical practices for ANZ Bank to regain its reputation.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION The Learning Organization Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION Table of Contents 1.Introduction.........................................................................................................................2 2.The ANZ Cartel Scandal – An Overview...........................................................................2 3.Analyzing the Ethical Scandal of ANZ Through the Use of Organizational Learning Theories......................................................................................................................................4 4.Recommendations for Ethical Behavior for ANZ Bank.....................................................5 Conclusion..................................................................................................................................6 References..................................................................................................................................7
2THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION 1.Introduction The ANZ Group, or the Australia and New Zealand Group is one of the foremost banks in the country of Australia, enjoying a prominent position by virtue of its market capitalization.ItisthethirdmostwellknownbankinggroupinAustraliaafterthe Commonwealth Bank and the Westpac Banking Corporation. Operations in Australia form a major part of the business of ANZ, with both commercial and retail banking dominating such operations. Even though ANZ is a bank that has been enjoying a good reputation worldwide, and in Australasia for quite some time now, it recently ended up tarnishing its reputation quite a bit by becoming involved in an infamous scandal that came to be known as the ANZ Cartel Scandal of 2015 (Heller and Phillips 2017). In this report, an in-depth analysis is carried out of the notorious Cartel Scandal that ANZ got involved in, by making use of organizational learning theory for this purpose. The report identifies all the obstacles that stand in the way of the process of organizational learning with emphasis on the ANZ Bank and concludes with different and crucial recommendations on the type of ethical practices and ethical standards that ANZ bank can adopt to once again regain its reputation and good name in the world market. 2.The ANZ Cartel Scandal – An Overview The ANZ Bank in the year of 2015 was faced with the mammoth responsibility of raising as much as three billion dollars, the aim of doing so being to increase the bank’s capital reserves by leaps and bounds. The ANZ Bank decided that this is something that it was going to achieve by issuing new shares (Jose et al. 2018). Three renowned investment banks in Australia were roped in by the ANZ Bank for this purpose, namely the Deutsch Bank, Citi Group and JP Morgan. The intention behind this large scale collaboration was to
3THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION try and raise at least an amount close to 2.5. billion dollars out of the 3 billion dollars which was needed by the ANZ Bank. This the collaborators intended to do, by searching out top notch investors, that is institutional investors, who would have the capital as well as the inclination to make a bulk purchase of shares. The residue amount, that is the additional five hundred million dollars that would be needed by the ANZ Bank would be raised or arranged for by making some interesting offers to existing shareholders at the ANZ Bank, who would be invited to purchase around fifteen thousand dollars against each of the extra or additional shares (Wishart and Wardrop 2018). A decision was arrived at, that, what the three banks would do would be to engage in the task of underwriting all of the shares, implying that in return for a large sum of money, the buyers needed for purchasing the shares would be located by the investment banks. If it so happened, that there were no buyers who were interested in purchasing the shares, then the whole cash load is what would then be procured by these investment banks. Yet it needs to be remembered that all the three investment banks were not able to sell all of the shares. They were only able to raise 1.7 billion dollars of the two and a half billion dollars which they had been looking to raise by taking part in the underwriting of shares. The shortfall at the end of it all ended up amounting to as much as $ 800 million. This would be followed by the buying and selling off, of shares by the banks, but on a different date. The cartel had been formed therefore, an alleged cartel in which all three investment banks would take a decision as to how the shortfall that was arising in the bargain, was going to be handled, that is, the subject of how the remaining or residue shares were going to be sold, especially if it proved to be difficult for the banks to get the shares sold at the price at which they wanted to sell these shares. If everything had worked as per plan, then the ANZ Bank share price would be one that would remain very artificially high with no losses being incurred by the other banks in the whole bargain either. The whistle on the cartel was however blown by JP Morgan, and once all the scheming had been discovered by the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION investigating agencies, JP Morgan was spared from the possibility of otherwise being very severely prosecuted (Sahut et al. 2018). 3.Analyzing the Ethical Scandal of ANZ Through the Use of Organizational Learning Theories If organizational learning theories are anything to go by, then the term learning organization alludes to an organization concerns itself wholeheartedly with the learning process, to the development process, as well as the skills and attitudes that need to be made use of extensively in any competitive business environment. The learning process is associated with the development of organizational intellectual capital, which is the competitive and sustainable strength of a learning organization (McShane et al. 2019). Since the cartel was formed on the part of the ANZ Bank in collaboration with the Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan on entirely unethical grounds, it is a collaboration that would have ended up rooting out competition, resulting customers getting ripped off in the process. Customers are known to benefit the most when banks compete heavily against one another, and if there is no competition in the first place, it would result in the long term as well as the short term customers of the ANZ Bank and the other banks, getting ripped off completely (Fichter 2018). All customers of the banks would have been harmed considerably and potentially if they were not in a position to take advantage of the prices that could have been there for them to take advantage of, had the cartel not been formed and the competition not totally killed. Choice and innovation, two very important concepts which are associated with the organizational learning process, would have been undermined by a considerable extent, had the cartel ended up being successful in its operations (Baselga-Pascual et al. 2018).
5THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION The absence of good leadership, and the habit of focusing on self interest rather than the interests of the organization are two of the most crucial obstacles to the process of organizational learning as witnessed at a bank like the ANZ Bank. This is something that was revealed very clearly once the ANZ Cartel failed to be successful in its operations. Those who were working at the top levels of the ANZ Bank’s management were not interested in any way in taking the bank in forward direction. Instead what they wished to do was to accumulate as much profit as possible for themselves. The more the profit they could amass, the better it would be for them. Also, the fact that the ANZ Bank is one that got itself involved in un-ethical activities shows that the communication between the top level management at the bank and the employees working at the bank was very poor. If the employees at the ANZ Bank had got wind of what was going on, they would have dissuaded the top level management at the bank from taking part in such unethical activities in the first place (Kvalnes and Nordal 2018). 4.Recommendations for Ethical Behavior for ANZ Bank Transparent and prudent funds monitoring is something that the ANZ Bank definitely needs to engage in, it wants to avoid unethical behavior on the part of its employees and top level management in the long run. The bank administrators need to be aware of how the bank’s resources are being put to use and if there are specific people who are responsible crucial work at the bank, then their behavior and activities should be monitored so they are not in a position to swindle the bank’s resources in any way (Lassoued et al. 2018). Loans that are sanctioned by the ANZ Bank are those that need to be granted to customers using an ethical and social perspective. The loans given should
6THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION help those who need money for good causes rather than those who are going to use it to make porn films or oppress the poor (Saxena 2018). Every effort needs to be made on the part of the ANZ Bank from not using its power to abuse and to oppress the poor. The bank’s activities are those that need to be directed towards social welfare rather than hurting people who are financially not well positioned. Oppressive clauses for instance should be those that are left out of mortgage agreements by the ANZ Bank (Banks et al. 2018). Moral sensitivity and social imagination need to be deployed by the ANZ Bank for conducting its operations (Saxena 2018). Corporate or business citizenship is the element that must guide ANZ Bank in whatever it does. ANZ bank must do everything in its power in order to make sure that its operations are conducted in the most socially responsible way possible. The bank needs to focus less on the accumulation of profit and more on social welfare (Saxena 2018). Self regulation and integrity both need to be emphasized if the ANZ Bank is to refrain from corruption and unethical practices in the future (Banks et al. 2018). Conclusion The involvement of a prominent and well reputed bank like the ANZ Bank in unethical practices like the ANZ Cartel Scandal of 2015 is something that remains quite unacceptable and shocking. This is one of the best known banks in the country of Australia and the fact that it could get involved in an ethical scandal is very hard to believe and to accept. Every effort needs to be made on the part of the ANZ Bank to carry out operations in
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION as ethical a manner as possible, with the top level management of the bank focusing more improving communication with employees and fostering competition and innovation rather than focusing on self accumulation for profit.
8THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION References Banks, G.C., Gooty, J., Ross, R.L., Williams, C.E. and Harrington, N.T., 2018. Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future.The Leadership Quarterly,29(1), pp.236-251. Baselga-Pascual, L., Trujillo-Ponce, A., Vähämaa, E. and Vähämaa, S., 2018. Ethical Reputation of Financial Institutions: Do Board Characteristics Matter?.Journal of Business Ethics,148(3), pp.489-510 Fichter, R., 2018. Do the right thing! Developing ethical behavior in financial institutions.Journal of Business Ethics,151(1), pp.69-84 Heller, J. and Phillips, G., 2017. An Examination of Post-Crisis Financial Markets Litigation.Journal of Structured Finance,23(1), p.7. Jose,S.,Khare,N.andBuchanan,F.R.,2018.CustomerperceptionsofCSR authenticity.International Journal of Organizational Analysis,26(4), pp.614-629. Kvalnes, Ø. and Nordal, S., 2018. Normalization of Questionable Behavior: An Ethical Root of the Financial Crisis in Iceland.Journal of Business Ethics, pp.1-15 Lassoued, N., Attia, M.B.R. and Sassi, H., 2018. Earnings management in islamic and conventional banks: Does ownership structure matter? Evidence from the MENA region.Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation,30, pp.85-105. McShane, S.L., Von Glinow, M.A.Y. and Von Glinow, M.A., 2019.Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill Education
9THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION Sahut, J.M., Saadi, S., Switzer, L. and Teulon, F., 2018. Ethical finance and governance.Journal of Applied Accounting Research,19(2), pp.202-205. Saurage-Altenloh, S. and Randall, P.M., 2018. The Influence of CSR on B2B Relationships: Leveraging Ethical Behaviors to Create Value. InEthical Standards and Practice in International Relations(pp. 1-21). IGI Global. Saxena, R., 2018. Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethical Issues.Journal of Commerce, Economics & Management,2(1), pp.1-17. Wang, Z., Xu, H. and Liu, Y., 2018. How does ethical leadership trickle down? Test of an integrative dual-process model.Journal of Business Ethics,153(3), pp.691-705 Wishart, D. and Wardrop, A., 2018. What can the Banking Royal Commission achieve: Regulating for good corporate culture?.Alternative Law Journal,43(2), pp.81-88.