INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 Use of Tourism Planning Strategy.........................................................................................1 Use of marketing strategy and technology.............................................................................3 Use of education.....................................................................................................................4 Use of collaboration & partnership........................................................................................4 An evaluation of sustainable tourism strategy........................................................................5 Recommendation for future management of tourism impact.................................................5 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
INTRODUCTION Today, in order to improve and develop economy, every country seeks to increase tourism in its area. This would help in earning high amount of currency of other nations, reducing unemployment and development of communities (Petus and et. al., 2018). But increase in tourism activities also lead to cause high impact on environment and natural resources. Present report is going to critically examine one of the case study based on tourism as – “A Great Barrier Reef” (Adamson and Davis, 2016). Here, discussion is based to overview the statement givenby Wall & Mathieson as “It has been suggested that the impacts of tourism may be large, diverse, growing, vary by gender, difficult to assess and manage”. For this purpose, evaluation is done on the basis of tourism planning strategy, marketing strategy & technology, educational way, collaboration among different group of partners for tourism management. Moreover, further recommendations are also given for reducing impact of tourism. Use of Tourism Planning Strategy Heritages and coral reef area around the world, has been continuously threatened due to a number of factors like natural, anthropogenic and tourism activities (Piggott-McKellar and McNamara, 2017). With ineffective tourism management activities in UK, Australia and other overseas areas, has put adverse impact on river, heritages and other ecosystem (Maclean and et. al., 2017). Here, activities like snorkeling, sailing and diving has considerable the direct impact in coral reefs, while indirect impacts of tourism can be seen through wastage, pollution as well as unsustainable usage of natural resources. In context with coastline of The Great Barrier Reef, increasing tourism with more two million tourists every year has contributed a large impact in terms of local, regional and national development (Case Study: Great Barrier Reef, 2018). But with appropriate management in tourism, the threat has been much reduced from World Heritage site.Afterevaluatingtheanthropogenicfactorsandcauseofpollutionlikeineffective management of tourism activities, in early 1990s, tourism operators of Australia has made a report which has been further submitted to scientific researchers and Marine Park managers (Becken and et. al., 2017).This report provided with regular up-to-date information related to reef health status, tendencies, presence of protected as well as endangered species and more, that gives detail of early alerts of impact on environment. This initiative was termed as ‘Eye on the Reef –Tourism Weekly Monitoring Program'. Here, tour operators are mainly aim to monitor 1
the status of The Great Barrier reef with support of various stakeholders(Farr and et. al., 2016). For this purpose, they have made Strategic Tourism Planning with following main objectives - To develop synergies among tourism operations, research, heritage and conservation management at the Great Barrier Reef. To bring awareness among people, tourism organizations and others for getting their participation towards World Heritage site’s governance. To obtain up-to-date and regular data related to ‘health’ of given Great Barrier Reef, that supports strategic management. The above planning strategies have set regulations and certain code of conducts to protect the national heritages like Great Barrier Reef from impact on tourism activities (Rigby, White and Simpfendorfer, 2016). Regulations care hereby, defined as a framework for appropriate tourism management in order to get sustainable development as well as conservation of natural resources (Kretzschmar and et. al., 2017). These strategies are mainly based on visitor management strategy to manage the number of tourism or visitor centres at destination site, via diverting them towards areas that have a high attraction. In context with Barrier Reef, the visitor management plan is based on Zoning that defines action taken to allocate certain areas for specific activities. Zoning is a kind of regulation that has made under strategic planning and used for preventing tourist to accessfrom restricted areas of Reef (Wolanski, 2018). Some certain laws by considering the safety of visitors are also made such as no smoking rule and not allow to take alcohol that has been implemented on reef boat tours. This would protect marine life animals and species from harmful causes of such activities. Along with this, visitors are also forbaded to carry any personal banned item like cigarette, alcohol or more, for proper tourism management. Thus, concept of zoning provides sustainability in ecological way for the continuation of the traditional activities via recreation, commercialisation and research. This initiative helps in managing and protecting the value of Great Barrier reef by providing a map that includes over 18 different areas listed, where tourism activities like fishing, dying, snorkelling and more, are restricted for visitors. It has helped in protecting the plants, endangered species, animals or habitats that live nearby areas of The Great Barrier Reef and highly affected by bad management of tourism. Similarly, Code of conducts are also acts as which defined a set of certain rules of what is acceptable behaviour of visitors during visiting of tourist destinations. It is mainly designed to 2
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
reduce the negative impact of tourism activities on ecosystem and heritage sites, for improving environmental quality as well. Therefore, for this process, knowledge is being spread to educate visitors and others to follow code of conducts, which may help in regulating tourism behaviour. Code of conducts that have to be followed by visitors include ethical dilemmas such as touching the coral, then picking out of one to take back home as a souvenir etc. which also consider as illegal activity and go behind protected marine reserve (Maclean and et. al., 2017).. Along with this, touching the reef also needed to be avoided for safety of visitors because it may cause danger for them. As reef ecosystem is much fragile in nature therefore, touching kill the organism that dwell on such coral. Similarly, rules are also made for Smoking because it may cause damage to marine life therefore, visitors are also not allowed for smoking. Thus, planning management strategy make able to reduce the negative impact of tourism on Great Barrier reef and other heritage attractions who are also facing same issues. The initiatives taken in the form of establishing strict regulations and code of conduct also lead to minimise overall potential risk that may cause due to ineffective tourism management. Use of marketing strategy and technology The visitor management system which has been developed to provide guidance to tourists about manner in which they can enjoy tourism activities are considered as perfect marketing strategy (Maclean and et. al., 2017). For this purpose, different tools are used to rationalise heritage sites like The Great Britain and marketing via supporting promotion, distribution as well as operation. By strategic management procedure, product differentiation of tourism is also managed which impact by balancing the needs and tourist’s expectations. To bring awareness among travellers about how they have to behave or follow certain rules of tourism, Australian tourism website has been used. It is allocated to Great Barrier Reef that contains data related to services and accommodation like attractions on destination sites, restaurants, rules related to do not touch reefs at coastal areas, and more. Therefore, this website is considered as an effective marketing strategy to reserve Great Barrier reef, where travellers can customise their needs and packages as per rules and regulations (Becken and et. al., 2017). This would help in managing the number of tourists who are visiting the destinations and make tour operator able to control and manage the potential impact of damage. For identifying the trends and monitor health of Great Barrier, technology has also contributed the great rule. With this assistance, information related to restricted areas or activities, tourist attraction areas and more can be provided to 3
visitors through internet services. This would make it easy for visitors to carefully planned their tours and get updated knowledge as well, to sustain tourism. Such internet technology, includes social media channels like You Tube, Facebook, Instagram and more, for increasing awareness about heritage site (Wolanski, 2018). In this regard, a website page is also made on Instagram related to Southern Great Barrier Reef, which provides a link to visitors and bloggers about each posted pictures and status, in order to bring awareness among them. Use of education Education also plays an important role in increasing awareness among people about tourism management strategy. With respect to case study of Great Barrier Reef, education is used as a technique that provide updated information to its visitors before, during and after the visit, in the form of document, maps, a leaflet, books and more via interactive displays. Hereby, sponsors and tour operators uses a wide range of educational strategies that includes signage to inform tourist on endangered area, safety and caution etc. that helps them in protecting themselves and other habitats from dangerous (Kretzschmar and et. al., 2017). There are two visitor centres existsasCairnsVisitorinformationandReefinfoVisitorCentre,whichprovideoverall information about Great Barrier, restricted areas, manner in which tourists must behave. Here, travellers can find information through leaflet with information of regulations and code of conducts. Along with this, local tour guides are also provided to them that educate visitors about negative impact of certain tourism activities and also demonstrate the safety guidance for protection (Wolanski, 2018). This would help in getting cooperation and support of visitors in protecting and reserving rich heritage sites from adverse effect of tourism. Use of collaboration & partnership “The Eye on the Reef – Tourism Weekly Monitoring Program” considered as perfect strategic planning for reserving and protecting the rich heritages from negative impact of tourism (Piggott-McKellar and McNamara, 2017). Hereby, rules and regulations as well as code of conductsshowsappropriatewaywhichcombinedwithflexibletrainingprogrammes, development of technologies and innovative way of marketing etc. for successful inclusion of transferring tourism operations into monitoring and conservation strategies towards World Heritage sites. It alsoillustrates the huge potential for protecting rich heritages like Great Barrier Reef,with highcommitment and long-term cooperation of key partners(Rigby, White and Simpfendorfer, 2016). It includes tourism operators, scientists, government, authorities of World 4
Heritage management, Marine site managers and more, for preserving reef and providing benefit to world and future generation. The main role of all these corporate partners is to preserve reefs by bridging business and the Reef, funding a research project and a tailored collaboration among key partners(Farr and et. al., 2016). For this purpose, different types of corporate partnership have been made like Boeing that strengthen the citizen science and associated organisation having a lot of engagement within rich heritages. They all work to monitor and keep an eye on health of the reef, quality of water, marine debris, species identification, mapping of habitats and more, to get regular and valuable information collected. The investors or charities are also concluded as key partners that gives support by providing funds and resources for delivery of projects to protect as well restore the Reef for future generation(Becken and et. al., 2017). The chairman’s Panel of Australia helps in bringing the respective group of Australian’s like Chief Executives of national and global companies to give their participation towards protection of Great Barrier of Reef. These members are also gained opportunity to be engaged in given educational program for minimising the threats and risks faced by Reefs. An evaluation of sustainable tourism strategy Toprotectand managetherichheritagesincluding GreatBarrier Reef, Australian government and other corporate partners have developed sustainable strategies for its future generation. This Sustainable tourism can be defined as a tourism that taken under consideration about current as well as future economic, environmental and social impacts of tourism (Maclean and et. al., 2017). The program made for Great Barrier Reef i.e. “The Eye on the Reef – Tourism Weekly Monitoring Program” has includes all thesethree developments (Adamson and Davis, 2016). This would can be illustrated by contribution of Economic of Australia to protect The Great Barrier Reef with more than $5.5 billion. Along with this, a number of jobs has been providedtolocalcommunitiesforarningtheireffortsineducatedtouristsaboutvisitor management plan, its procedure and aims for minimising negative impact of tourism over destination sites areas (Petus and et. al., 2018). Environmental the government and Marine authorities also has enforced to ensure the safety ofGreat Barrier reef where, visitors much have information about what they have to do and what they can’t. Recommendation for future management of tourism impact As main factor that demonstrates the ineffectiveness of program run for preserving Great Barrier reef is poor quality of water. Therefore, for the future management of heritage sites and 5
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
the Great Barrier Reef, it is recommended to key partners of Australia and other overseas to concern on quality of water first, that may put a large impact on recovery of health of reefs. They must run programs for Water Quality Management first, in order to protect marine life. For implementing such plan effectively, it is also suggested to partners to develop appropriate investment plan, where funds can be sourced from government authorities. CONCLUSION It has been concluded from this report that ‘Eye on the Reef — Tourism Weekly Monitoring Programme’, has been one of thelargest plan. It is tourism-based coral reef that monitors the regular and up-to-date health of Great Barrier Reef. The collaborations among local, national and international corporate partners have made it possible to earlyto predict or detect the health of reefs and incidental situations like coral bleaching, so that marine live can be improved. 6
REFERENCES Books and Journals Adamson, J. and Davis, M. eds., 2016.Humanities for the Environment: Integrating knowledge, forging new constellations of practice. Taylor & Francis. Becken, S., and et. al., 2017. Monitoring the environment and human sentiment on the Great Barrier Reef: assessing the potential of collective sensing.Journal of environmental management,203, pp.87-97. Farr, M. and et. al., 2016. The importance of water clarity to Great Barrier Reef tourists and their willingness to pay to improve it.Tourism Economics,22(2), pp.331-352. Kretzschmar, A. L., and et. al., 2017. Characterization of Gambierdiscus lapillus sp. nov. (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae): A new toxic dinoflagellate from the Great Barrier Reef (Australia).Journal of phycology.53(2). pp.283-297. Maclean, K and et. al., 2017. Converging disciplinary understandings of social aspects of resilience.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.60(3). pp.519-537. Petus, C. and et. al., 2018. Defining wet season water quality target concentrations for ecosystem conservation using empirical light attenuation models: A case study in the Great Barrier Reef (Australia).Journal of environmental management.213. pp.451-466. Piggott-McKellar, A. E. and McNamara, K. E., 2017. Last chance tourism and the Great Barrier Reef.Journal of Sustainable Tourism.25(3). pp.397-415. Rigby, C. L., White, W. T. and Simpfendorfer, C. A., 2016. Deepwater Chondrichthyan Bycatch of the Eastern King Prawn Fishery in the Southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia.PloS one.11(5). p.e0156036. Wolanski, E., 2018.Physical oceanographic processes of the Great Barrier Reef. CRC Press. Online CaseStudy:GreatBarrierReef.2018.[Online]AvailableThrough:< http://whc.unesco.org/sustainabletourismtoolkit/guide-4-%E2%80%93-case-study- great-barrier-reef-australia>. 7