Brexit: Impact and Implications

This study analyzes the impact of Brexit on the economy of the UK, specifically on land exchanges concerning business organizations. It covers economic, financial, social, political and legal implications of Brexit on both the United Kingdom and the European Union.

Running head: BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
Abstract
The study is focused towards analyzing the impact of Brexit on the economy of the UK.
Specifically, the study is focused towards understanding the impact of Brexit on the land
exchanges that take place concerning business organizations. The various significant aspects of
Brexit are introduced. Moving forward the objectives and the problem statement for the study are
provided. The various relevant literatures on Brexit and its major implications are considered.
The literatures are critically analyzed to form essential perspectives on the given subject. The
study has incorporated research methods that have considered the evaluation and analysis of
secondary data. The methodology is discussed with regards to its significance concerning the
effective analysis of the subject. Subsequently, the discussion of the findings are done through
critical analysis to derive the most important implications. The implications derived point
towards the negative effect of Brexit on the land exchange functions of UK businesses.

2BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
Table of Contents
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................................3
Objectives................................................................................................................................................5
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.........................................................................................................................7
Participants..............................................................................................................................................7
Data Collection........................................................................................................................................7
Data Analysis...........................................................................................................................................7
Reflexivity................................................................................................................................................8
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................21
Findings.................................................................................................................................................21
Analysis..................................................................................................................................................23
Discussion..............................................................................................................................................23
References.................................................................................................................................................25

3BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
INTRODUCTION
On March 21, the EU stretched out the Brexit due date to April 12, 2019, that is if no
arrangement is affirmed. In the event that Parliament endorses May's Brexit bargain, at that point
Brexit will happen on May 22, 2019, that pursued the March 18, 2019, declaration by the
Speaker of the House of Commons reported that there would be no more votes on Prime Minister
May's Brexit bargain (Canessa, 2019). That is after Parliament had voted against it twice. The
renegotiated arrangement depended on a 21-month progress plan May had consulted with the EU
on March 19, 2018. Parliament crushed that arrangement on January 15, 2019. From that point
forward, May has been attempting to get a sharply separated Parliament to concur on what it
needs.
Numerous organizations have effectively arranged for the most exceedingly terrible (Oliver,
2016). On February 11, 2019, the U.K. consented to a reciprocal exchange arrangement with
Switzerland to stay away from levies if there should arise an occurrence of a “no arrangement
Brexit.” A portion of May's rivals inside her Conservative gathering won't be content until they
to dispose of her and arrange a "hard Brexit." That implies leaving the EU without any
confinements other than another organized commerce understanding (Berman, 2016). They
might defer Brexit until December 2019 when they can, by law, vote her out.
A few individuals from the contradicting Labor party are requiring another submission. They
don't need the U.K. to leave the EU by any means. Some different individuals from Labor need a
changed arrangement that keeps the U.K in the EU advertise and acknowledges outsiders. The
United Kingdom’s possible exit from the European Union is what is referred to as the Brexit
(Marsh, 2018). A great challenge has been posed on both the UK and the European Union
following a vote by the British people to have the country exit from the bloc. Exit of the UK

4BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
from the European Union is expected to mark a great change in the country’s economic
relationship with other countries in the bloc (BIRRELL, 2017). For many years, the UK had
enjoyed a close economic cooperation and integration with co-members in the European Union.
This close bond is expected to gradually and eventually break if Britain is to exit from the bloc.
However, the UK might be expected to conceal economic ties and directly negotiate trade with
other countries which are non-members of the European Union.
It is thought that economic considerations are a major influence of the push for the Brexit
(Gietel-Basten, 2016). Some three years ago, the UK prime minister Theresa May categorically
hinted of the countries’ economic interests that would be met, if the country opted out of the
European Union bloc. Since the push for the Brexit started, not much impact has been observed.
Whether or not the Brexit will be deemed a success will depend upon its economic impact.
Several studies have been conducted regarding the possible impacts of the Brexit if the UK
terminates membership with the EU. In the summer of 2018, several researchers suggested that
the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union would lead to the bloc’s breakdown. However,
such claims have proved unfounded as the European Union still exists.
As much as several predictions have been made concerning the impacts of the Brexit, it is
undisputable that predictions do not always have to hold. Several disagreements have ensued
concerning the impacts that the Brexit will have both on the UK’s and European Union’s
economies. Some researchers argue that the Brexit will be of benefit while others argue that the
Brexit will have detrimentally negative impacts on economic growth for the involved parties
(Braniff, 2017). A vast majority of the previous studies anticipated that there will be reduced
economic growth, both in the UK and in the European Union. (Dallago, 2016) found out that the

5BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
financial ability of the UK shall be reduced in that it can no longer obtain loans from the
European Union bloc.
In this way, what ought to be in center is whether the budgetary framework is set up for the
Brexit Withdrawal Agreement not passing Parliament, which would push forward the due date
for being set up for the no arrangement situation. What's more, above all, regardless of whether
the administration itself has put in adequate possibilities to have the capacity to exchange on
WTO terms next March. That would have a greater amount of an impact on money related and
financial soundness than the present evaluation of the effect of Brexit.
Objectives
The purpose of the current study is to investigate the economic implications of the Brexit (a
possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU). In investigating the possible effects of the Brexit,
this report examines the economic and socio-economic role that the UK plays in the European
Union as a member state.
This research paper aims to cover the economic, financial, social, political and legal implications
of the Brexit on both the United Kingdoms and the European Union. The questions addressed by
this research paper are;
 What is the impact of Brexit on the lawful structure of, and the legitimate dangers related
with, land exchanges?
 What effect will Brexit have on land internal speculation volumes?
 What are the suggestions for the financing of the UK business land?
 Will there be huge changes to ecological and wellbeing and security guideline in the UK
following Brexit?

6BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
 Will Brexit affect the arranging procedure for advancement ventures?
General thinking behind this work is a need to survey the examination gap in dissecting the
repercussions of Brexit on the UK and EU economies. This is because the EU and the UK
concurrently play a role on each other’s economies.
Problem statement
Brexit is a condensing for "English exit," alluding to the U.K's. choice in a June 23, 2016 choice
to leave the European Union (EU). The vote's outcome opposed desires and annoyed worldwide
markets, making the British pound tumble to its most reduced dimension against the dollar in 30
years. Previous Prime Minister David Cameron, who called the choice and crusaded for Britain
to stay in the EU, reported his acquiescence the next day. Home Secretary Theresa May
supplanted him as pioneer of the Conservative party and as Prime Minister. Following a snap
decision on June 8, 2017, she stays Prime Minister. The Conservatives lost their out and out
greater part in Parliament, however, and with it – May's pundits contend – an order for a "hard
Brexit," in which Britain leaves the EU's single market and traditions association. (The option is
known as "delicate Brexit.")
The arrangement May consulted with the EU has been dismissed by the House of Commons
multiple times, and Britain has under about fourteen days to think of an arrangement so as to
abstain from slamming out of the coalition without an arrangement on April 12. May has
abandoned winning the help of hardline Brexit supporters in her very own gathering and is
presently planning to achieve a trade off with the primary resistance.
The UK, a member of the European Union is a major player of the EU’s economic and social
policies (TAYLOR-GOOBY, 2017). The contribution of the UK towards the prosperity of the

7BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
EU and that of the EU on the UK cannot be underestimated. The current discussion on the
possibility of the UK’s exit from the European Union could either be successful or could be
destined to fail. It is by the basis of such discussions that we try to explore the possible
repercussions that the Brexit would have on both the UK and the EU. The repercussions are
expected to be vast and would be expected to affect nearly all spheres of life in Europe, as well
as oversees (Jacobs, 2018).
The key focus of study for the current study is to explore the possible economic and social
effects that the Brexit would possibly have on the UK, the EU, and abroad, in the aftermath of
article 50. Article 50 dictates a plan for any country wishing to exist from the European Union. It
was created as part of the treaty of Lisbon, and involved an agreement that was signed by all EU
member states, and became a law in 2009. The adoption of this law has since evoked discussions
on the push, by a section of the UK legislature and the British people, to have the country exist
from the bloc.
Article 50 stipulates that any member state of the EU may decide to withdraw its membership
from the Union in accordance with its constitutional requirements. While, however, majority of
the people understand this provision, it remains unclear on what repercussions may be
experienced if the United Kingdom opts out of the European Union. The question that remains
unanswered is whether or not the Brexit would be of benefit to the UK. This present study
therefore strives to seek answers to this question by exploring the economic and social
implications that the Brexit would have on the UK, the EU and the EU member states.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design

8BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
This paper shall employ secondary research and therefore no data shall be collected from human
participants. A descriptive study design shall be employed in this paper, whereby descriptions on
the impacts of the Brexit based on existing literature and data form the government portal.
Participants
The secondary sources for this research shall be sources and information on the negotiations
between the UK and the EU on Britain’s exit from the bloc. Analyses and predictions of the
future of the UK if it exits from the European Union are solely based on secondary research.
Data Collection
Secondary data shall be obtained from websites and new channels as the UK is still negotiating
with the European Union. As the negotiations progress, information could change at any time
due to a possibility in changes in negotiation.
Data Analysis
This study is qualitative in nature and shall therefore employ the qualitative study design. The
research question that this study seeks to address is the impacts that a possible exist of Britain
from the European Union would have. Various literature is assessed in order to investigate or
answer this research question.
Reflexivity
The cause and effect relationships between Brexit and implications on the corporate sector
including land exchange has been focused. The cause effect relationship has been utilized
towards determining more insightful values of the findings that have been generated from the
study. The methods are used in order to understand the true causes to the events post the Brexit.

9BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
Reflexivity has been used to gather implications that are not possible to gather through the
normal research methods. It has been used as a catalyst for the research.
LITERATURE REVIEW
It has turned out to be clear now that Brexit will be deferred, yet the likelihood of a cluttered exit
isn't yet discounted. Theresa May has approached the EU for a further augmentation of the
arranging time frame to June 30. Individuals from Parliament have likewise casted a ballot by a
greater part to drive the administration to demand an expansion and maintain a strategic distance
from a no arrangement Brexit if May's arrangement can't win adequate sponsorship. This
expansion would need to be affirmed by the majority of the coalition's 27 part states. EU
pioneers will meet at a crisis Brexit summit on April 10, two days before Britain is relied upon to
leave.
May is having discourses with the pioneer of the Labor Party, Jeremy Corbyn, to choose what
the U.K. should look for in its future association with the EU. Since Corbyn favors remaining in
the EU's traditions association, the understanding is probably going to mean a "milder" Brexit
than the Conservatives might want. On the off chance that May and Corbyn concede to an
arrangement, it will be put to administrators for endorsement and taken to the European Council.
May has said the arrangement needs to include Parliament favoring the Withdrawal Agreement
she consulted with the EU since the alliance has would not renegotiate an arrangement.
On the off chance that Corbyn and May can't concur on an arrangement, at that point they will
put various alternatives to the House in a progression of votes so as to choose a strategy. May
implied in the past that she would require a general race to break the stop. A general decision is

10BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
seen by specialists as a sufficient purpose behind an augmentation to be conceded. The troubled
pioneer is likewise confronting serious strain to leave.
A second submission stays one of the Brexit choices, yet May has been unequivocally
contradicted to it previously. More than 5 million individuals have marked a "drop Brexit"
request on the Parliament site. Individuals from Parliament have casted a ballot twice on a few
options in contrast to May's arrangement, yet none of the alternatives had the capacity to get
larger part support.
On the off chance that Britain leaves the EU without the confirmation of an arrangement, there
will be no two-year change period. The U.K and the EU are intended to arrange another, long
haul exchange understanding amid the change time frame. Without an arrangement, WTO
guidelines will happen.
EU-UK relationships
The EU is an economic and political union between the member states currently consisting of:
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,
Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK
(Mykolaivna, 2015). The aim of the EU is to create a common market where goods, services,
people, and capital can move as freely as within a single country; and where competition is not
distorted (Alexeevna, 2012).
The UK is more dependent on the EU than vice versa given that about 13 per cent of UK GDP is
linked to exports to the EU, whereas only about 3 per cent of GDP among the other 27 Member
States is linked to exports to the UK. The EU is the destination of 44% of UK exports and 60%

11BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
of total UK trade is covered by EU membership and the preferential access it grants to 53
markets outside the EU (Poole, 2016). Following these statistics, it is therefore apparent that the
EU might not experience as much impact of the Brexit as much as the UK.
Internal market
The creation of a common market among member states has been a prime focus of the European
Union. The role that is played by Britain in this common market cannot be overlooked. The UK
had been a significant proponent and participant in the common market, especially in the service
industry (James, 2018). The country plays a major role to ensure the successful opening of the
European market. Another major role played by the UK in the internal market is that it
encourages integration by allowing for the freedom of movement of capital, services and goods
within and outside its borders.
A possible UK’s withdrawal from the European Union is expected to have an influence on the
future shape, scope and direction of the economic block. This is because the EU could lose one
of its very vital member and supporter for the completion of a single market. Like-minded
member states will also be losing a key ally. The website Business Sweden suggests that the
Sweden’s position in the European Union would likely be weakened by the possible exit of the
UK from the European Union. In particular, the EU shall be expected to experience a gap in the
field of services as the United Kingdoms has been a major provider of skills and services.
Possible effects of the Brexit
Impacts on economic growth of the UK and the EU
Economic performance of the European Union without the UK as a member state shall depend
upon whether or not the European Union shall embrace reforms to fill the gap left by the UK. It

12BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
shall also rely upon other trade agreements that shall be negotiated by the EU itself (Philippidis,
2016). It shall also depend on whether or not the UK shall still engage in trade with other
member states of the UK regardless of its non-membership in the Union. Another major
determinant on the future economic position of the EU is the future position of the UK on the
European Union single market.
As a result of the uncertainty of all of the above factors, growth projections among various
researchers and economists are expected to vary over time. It is expected that on worst scenarios,
the UK shall lose on average about 2% of its GDP by 2030 (MacDonald, 2016). However, on a
best scenario case, it is expected that on average the UK’s GDP shall grow by about 1.5 % by
2030. Consequentially, the European Union member states, on a worst scenario case shall be
expected to experience a joint loss of about 3% of their GDP that was being contributed by the
UK (Dougan, 2017).
The administration gauges that if there are grindings at the outskirt for exchange and a decrease
in relocation, at that point there will be a 3.9% decrease in GDP in 15 years' time in the present
costs, which generally converts into national yield being £100 billion lower every year. Less
outskirt contacts and more relocation would decrease that sway (Glees, 2017). However, in the
event that the UK wound up in a Canada-style exchange concurrence with the EU, at that point
that would diminish GDP by 6.7% and no arrangement at all would result in a 9.7% littler
economy. In any case, as far as money related solidness, these appraisals won't represent a stun.
At the point when BOE Governor Carney cautions about a 1970s-style stun, those two oil value
stuns were only that – shocks that raised costs that seriously influenced generation costs.
Paradoxically, even the no arrangement situation is genuinely well-trodden ground for the BOE
as well as budgetary establishments.

13BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
The single market
It is thought that the Brexit might have some effects on the single market. The UK could decide
to negotiate trade agreements with individual EU member states or it could decide to have trade
negotiations with the EU single market (Hartigan, 2018). Consequences shall be dependent upon
the trade models that the United Kingdoms would choose when negotiating trade with the single
market. Some models would require that the UK pays all access fees to the single market and
accept all the European Union regulations but will have no say on policy and managerial
formulation. Trade negotiations that would be absent of significant domestic reforms could be
considered the worst case scenario that could happen to the UK. The lack of domestic reforms
would lead to substantial economic costs.
However, a bilateral agreement would allow the UK’s access to the single market without
requiring the freedom of movement. The UK’s treasury feels that such an action would result to
about 6 % GDP decline by 2031. If the UK were to negotiate a unique trade agreement with the
EU that would benefit her, it is argued that it would take tentatively more than two ears. One
Brexit researcher argues that “the UK’s most suitable negotiation option would be the hardest
model to negotiate, and it may actually be easy to achieve a model along these lines by
renegotiating from inside the European Union.”
Concerning the single market, Theresa May made it categorically clear that the UK would not
seek to stay in the single market. However, some section of parliamentarians is opposed to such a
move. This section of legislators and the labor movement argue that the UK would lose lots of

14BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
benefits if it exits from the single market. These two groups strongly oppose May’s strategy and
recommend that the UK stays in the single market, regardless of whether or not it exits from the
European Union itself.
However, staying in the single market would mean that the UK will have to abide by the
European Court of Justice regulations and laws. This would mean allowing for unlimited EU
immigration into the UK, under the freedom of movement rules. This immigration could be
beneficial to the UK as it would gain from services offered by the immigrants. On the other
hand, the unlimited immigration of people from the EU member states into the UK would imply
a strain on the UK available resources.
Impact on financial services and insurance
The UK economy has ended up being continuously subject to the organization fragment, both as
the major engine of work creation and as a wellspring of charge demand. Some place in the
scope of 1997 and 2013, according to ONS data on last interest, the degree of organizations in
hard and fast UK exchanges climbed from 28% to 41%, with quick improvement in key
organization works out, for instance, fiscal and business organizations. These territories are by
and by as basic to the general UK convey effort as the genuine amassing regions of vehicles,
aeronautics, PCs and devices and pharmaceuticals. There is little vulnerability that the inflow of
work from the EU has usefully influenced the supply of work and that various open
organizations, explicitly, rely upon EU authorities. EU inhabitants of working age are inside and
out bound to be in work than their indigenous accomplices and make a positive responsibility to
the UK's open assets.

15BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
The financial and insurance sector utilizes about 4 per cent of the UK labor force. Financial
services represent a 9.6% share of all out UK exports of which 41% are bound for the EU. The
insurance sector accounts for about 4.4% share of all out UK exports of which 18% are bound
for the EU. The insurance business is all the more universally arranged so it is less in danger. In
any case, budgetary administrations are the most uncovered area and an arrangement will be
hardest to consult here. England would be compelled to pick between a "third nation" WTO-style
status or by one way or another remain an individual from the Single Market like Norway. The
EU is likewise at present in the process of fixing rules on third nation access to financial services
through the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive.
Another UK consideration is the "financial passport" whereby UK monetary firms, including
banks, insurance service providers, furthermore, resource directors for the most part have the
privilege to sell financial services and build up branches anyplace in the EU without different
nations having the capacity to force extraordinary or extra prerequisites. Outside the EU, UK
firms would never again appreciate that right. Any enthusiasm for changing exchange
administrations, in which Britain is particularly aggressive, would likewise lessen if the UK were
to leave from the European Union.
Effect on migration and citizenship
An estimated between 1.4 million to 1.8 million UK citizens live in the European Union member
states on permanent basis (Mindus, 2017). It is expected that these people would be greatly
affected by the proposed exist of the UK from the EU. It is expected that a high percentage of
these people shall be moving back to their country in order to benefit from government services,
if the exit occurs. The UK government service system shall therefore be expected to be burdened
by the returning citizens. Currently, UK citizens living in member states of the EU receive equal

16BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
government services as the citizens residing back in the UK (Wood, 2018). However, the Brexit
is expected to have an effect on the provision of services such as pension and healthcare cover to
citizens residing in the EU (Brändle, 2018).
The PM has said that free development - the arrangement that permits natives from part states to
live and work uninhibitedly around the EU - will finish in the UK after Brexit. Her
administration has not introduced any solid plans on how EU residents will apply for residency
or work in post-Brexit Britain, Quartz reports. Be that as it may, a released Home Office archive
in 2017 demonstrated that the Government was thinking about acquainting limitations with
prevent everything except the most very gifted EU laborers.
The UK is as of now home to around 3.6 million EU nationals, who represent somewhere in the
range of 4% and 30% of the workforce in each real division, as indicated by the CBI.
One of the main goals behind the push for the Brexit is to reduce migration from and into the UK
from the EU member states. Therefore, a case whereby the UK shall exit the European Union, it
is expected that there shall ensue a restriction on the freedom of movement between the EU and
the UK. This restriction shall apply to citizens of the EU and the UK and the goods that are
moved between the UK and the EU. This scenario shall therefore lead to substantial economic
costs and growth loss for the UK. However, limitation in movement will be both complicated
and expensive.
In its annual Economic and Fiscal Outlook report, the UK Office for Budget Responsibility (OB
R) found that net migration has a positive impact on the British economy. As indicated by its
estimation, the high relocation variation would build the UK's financial plan surplus by about

17BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
£4.5bn by 2019-20, while the low relocation variation would lessen it by the equivalent amount.
In different words the "high relocation situation" would add 0.8% to monetary development
while the "low relocation situation" would cut monetary yield furthermore, the span of the
economy by 0.8%. Migration is a vital factor in calculation of the UK's monetary and financial
standpoint, where there is a direct positive connection between migration streams and growth
predictions, in light of the fact that there is grown-up population growth, higher employments
rates, and expanded duty pay.
EU vagrants specifically have overall settled more in regulatory obligations than they have
gotten in advantages. EU vagrants that landed in the UK since 2000 have contributed more than
20 billion pounds to UK public finances somewhere in the range of 2001 and 2011, with EU
transients from the EU-15 contributing 64% more in taxes than they take out in benefits, and
transients from the 10 newest individual member States 12% more. Non EU migrants, for
comparison, have contributed around 5 billion pounds to the UK public finances in the same said
period. Likewise, there is not really any measurable proof to recommend that there is a negative
connection between migration and compensation, rather the opposite shows up to be valid.
The United Kingdom has never lifted border controls for the European Union citizens. In any
case, the freedom of movement (just as products, capitals and administrations) applies, which
implies that EU natives can enter the UK to (look for) work. In the event that the UK were to
leave the EU, also, depending on the understanding arranged with the EU, it might limit this type
of work relocation from the EU. Be that as it may, it is difficult to anticipate a situation where
the UK won't have to apply freedom of labor regulations and laws on the off chance that it needs
to keep up access to the EU's Single Market in a post-Brexit understanding. Moreover, it merits

18BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
remembering that, in regards to the aggregate movement streams into the UK between 2005 and
2015, more non-EU migrants entered the UK than EU migrants
Typically, market analysts will in general concur net movement accompanies a scope of financial
advantages, and the effect on wages and joblessness rates is fairly constrained, if not secondary.
Since transients will in general be college instructed, of working age, with higher or parallel
spending power, contrasted with locals, and in this manner are contributors to the economy.
Since a Britain’s exit from the European Union would hamper migration, the Brexit is expected
to result to loss of economic benefits accompanied by being a member of the European Union.
Though the local populace fears settlers from other countries take up occupation positions and
drag down wages, there exists another portion of a condition – immigrants make their very own
interest, work spots and organizations. Just as expanding the supply of labour, there will be an
expansion in the demand for labour – identifying with the expanded spending inside the
economy. Ceteris paribus, net relocation of people from other should prompt an expansion in
genuine GDP. With the UK’s exit from the European Union, migration between the UK and the
EU member states would be limited and economic benefits that would result of immigration
would be lost.
Effect on the real estate industry
Among the social and economic aspects that the Brexit would have an effect on is the real estate
industry. The real estate industry is expected to be hardly hit by effects that result from the
United Kingdom’s exist from the European Union (Dallago, 2016). The United Kingdom is
attached to a mortgage debt of about 11 billion sterling pounds. Of this amount, about 10 %

19BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
belongs to the European Union. The Brexit would therefore lead to adverse effects on Britain’s
real estate industry (Meleady, 2017).
A Brexit post-vote uncertainty is likely to ensue. This uncertainty is characterized by a long
period of price increases in housing which are unjustified and irrational. The uncertainty in the
real estate industry would lead to instability in other sectors and the economy at large (Jacobs,
2018). With a possibility of Britain’s exit from the European Union, it would be expected that
Britain loses the 10 % financing of her real estate industry that is being provided by the union. A
loss of this financing would result to an increase in house prices. These can pass shocks to the
economy of the United Kingdom.
However, the Brexit will not affect the UK’s legal jurisdictions. Therefore, laws and regulations
guiding the United Kingdom’s real estate industry won’t be affected by the Brexit. The specific
set of jurisdictions that govern the UK real estate prices have no intervention at the European
Union level and will therefore remain unaffected by the Brexit. Such domestic jurisdiction
include the legal formalities required for land ownership and registration. Such policies that
relate to land ownership and registration shall remain unscathed by the Brexit.
It is a fact that mass movement has an impact on housing. More than 33% of all new housing
interest in Britain is brought about by movement (Jacobs, 2018). What's more, there is proof
without the interest brought about by mass movement, house costs could be 10% lower over a
multi-year time frame threatening vibe to and objection to migration was one of the key
instruments in the referendum vote talk and the primary driver of Britons' vote to leave the EU.
An EU’s exit from the European Union would therefore reduce the strain on housing in the UK
as there would be limited immigration into the country by immigrants form the European Union
member states.

20BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
It is argued that the housing market in the United Kingdom relies upon exports from the
European Union, as over 70 % of primary development providers are from the EU. It can
likewise be effectively settled, that there has been an unwelcomed ascend in costs forced by the
political unsteadiness and conceivable changes in supply chains as the UK's exchange
accomplices are instantly wrapping up organizations with the UK and moving workplaces from
London to Continental Europe. A decline in the development of the real estate industry could
therefore be experienced following the UK’s exit from the European Union.
Infrastructure
David Lidington's (UK's Chancellor 2017-2018, talk made in harvest time 2017) explanation talk
joined a promise to enthusiasm for infrastructure, and that between 1.0%-1.2% of GDP will be
put into the proposition of the National Infrastructure Commission (0.8% at present). The £23
billion National Productivity Investment Fund (NPIF) program announced will be engaged at
four domains to improve proficiency: Housing, Transport, Digital Communications and Research
and Development. The £2.3bn new Housing Infrastructure Fund is a bit of the NPIF, and is
assigned to "give system centered at opening new private house working during the zones where
lodging need is generally conspicuous." Further foundation consumption joined a £1.1bn to
upgrade close-by lanes/open transport; and £1bn for cutting edge framework (Whitaker, 2018).
Likewise, with numerous circles of the United Kingdom's built environment, infrastructure
depends on European Union financing. In 2017, Environment Secretary Andrea Leadsom
declared that "the staying European financing from the Rural Development Program for England
(RDPE) Growth Program will be propelled on a national call. GM RDPE designation is
£415,000 (open call until the financing is assigned) supporting the travel industry infrastructure".

21BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
For the UK infrastructural framework, the Brexit vote may in the momentary mean a log jam in
speculation, due in part to the vulnerability and vacillations in GBP.
One of the reasons behind the push for Britain’s exit from the European Union is the control of
migration. Migration is argued to have adverse effects on infrastructure and open
administrations. It appears glaringly evident that migration ought to affect the accessibility and
cost of housing, the transport framework, the National Health Service or the quantity of school
places. In any case, previously, the administration impact appraisals didn't gauge the impacts of
more migration or figure out where its impacts would be felt the most.
There likewise exists a conviction that migrants drive the local populace out of the social
housing. It's a given, in any case, that not all immigrants are qualified for social housing. So as to
be qualified, transients must have, when all is said and done, settlement status or be a national of
the EEA (taken from the Housing Rights Information site for subtleties on the diverse lodging
privileges of vagrants). Administrative report on immigration expresses that 17% of UK-
conceived and 18% of foreign conceived people live in social housing. While there are
variations, these rates are fairly steady over time. Resultant of the Brexit, immigration into the
UK shall be reduced and locals shall be able to benefit from the social housing facilities.
Effects on the foreign investment market
Foreign direct investments (FDI) include adventures from outside a country to start up new
organizations, to stretch out existing establishments or to verify adjacent associations. The UK is
a vital recipient of FDI with a normal stock estimation of over £1 trillion, about a more
prominent bit of which is from various people from the European Union (EU), as demonstrated
by UK Trade and Investment. Simply the United States and China get more FDI than the UK.

22BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
FDI has a verifiably positive financial impact of the nations' economies as it bolsters generation,
which comprises nation's yield and wages. FDI involves direct advantages, since abroad firms
are seen to be more profitable and pay higher wages than the locally situated ones. Be that as it
may, FDI could likewise bring circuitous advantages as the new mechanical and administrative
ability in foreign firms can be embraced by local firms, regularly through multinationals'
production network. FDI can likewise lead to an increment in competitive pressure, which
powers directors to improve their execution (STANIG, 2018).
The following are some of the reasons why FDI may fall if the UK left the EU:
1. Regardless, being totally in the Single Market makes the UK an engaging fare goal for
multinationals as they don't bear possibly far reaching costs from obligation and non-charge
limits when conveying to the rest of the EU.
2. Second, multinationals have complex supply chains and various co-appointment costs between
their home office and close-by workplaces. These would end up being logically difficult to
regulate if the UK left the EU. For example, section parts would be obligated to different rules
and costs; and intra-firm staff trades would end up being logically troublesome with harder
migration controls.3. Third, vulnerability over the state of things to regarding trade agreements
between the UK and the EU would likewise possibly dampen FDI.
Various components figure out where firms are to be located and to invest. Greater and richer
markets will in general draw in more firms, and should be close to their customers. The UK has
strong rule of law, versatile work markets and an especially trained workforce, all of which make
it an appealing FDI zone paying little mind to whether it is in the EU. Nonetheless, since EU
investment decreases trade and adventure costs, it is presumably going to have an impact even in

23BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
the wake of controlling for these extraordinary elements (Daniel Dorling, 2019). It would
therefore be expected that in case the United Kingdom opts out of the European Union, the
foreign investment market would be hardly hit by the Brexit. A plausible and great export
platform would be lost if the UK exits from the European Union.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
This section provides the findings and conclusions of the stud. The present study relied on
secondary research by investigating what is present in newspapers, websites and news channels
on the possibility of the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union. We explored what has
been studied by other researchers and new information on the Brexit as it presents.
Findings
The study investigated the potential impacts of the Brexit (Potential exit of the UK from the EU).
The study found out that there are several economic and social impacts that will be experienced
in the event that Britain exits from the European Union. These potential impacts are both positive
and negative.
First, European Union-United Kingdom relationship is expected to be shaken. It has been
depicted that the UK is more dependent on the EU than vice versa. If the UK, exits from the
European Union, then the UK would experience economic loss in terms of a lower GDP,
resultant of lower economic prospects between the EU and the UK. This finding therefore points
out to the fact that the United Kingdom would likely be more hit by impacts of the Brexit then
the European Union would be hit. The EU would only lose the contribution of one country while
the UK would lose the mutual contribution of many countries.

24BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
The study also found that the UK is a major industry player in the EU, especially in the service
industry. A large gap is therefore expected to be felt by the European Union if the United
Kingdom opts out of the union. The UK has been a major supporter and proponent of the single
market, and her exit would result to the EU losing one of its very vital member and supporter for
the completion of a single market. Like-minded member states will also be losing a key ally.
Third, the study also demonstrated that if the UK exist from the EU, then both the UK and the
EU would be experiencing economic loses. The UK would be losing about 2 per cent of its GDP
that is as a result of the partnership with the EU. On the other hand, it is expected that the EU
would lose about 3 % of its GDP that is as a result of its partnership with the EU (MODIANO,
2017). However, economic performance of the European Union without the UK as a member
state shall depend upon whether or not the European Union shall embrace reforms to fill the gap
left by the UK. Likewise, post-Bretix reforms and trade negotiations would also dictate Britain’s
future trade shape and position if it exits form the European Union (Canessa, 2019).
Moreover, it has been found that the Brexit would also have an impact on financial services and
insurance. It is demonstrated that if the UK were to leave the EU, then it would be difficult for
her to sell financial and insurance services to the European Union. Of the financial and insurance
services offered in the EU, the UK accounts for more than 40 % of these services. The EU would
therefore fall deficit of such services while the UK will have limited her market access and sale
of this services, if she exits from the EU.
Further, the study has demonstrated that the Bretix would heavily impact on the foreign
investment market. Since the UK is a major export platform for the EU member states, the EU
will lose a key market, if the UK exits from the union. However, the locking out of foreign firms
following the UK’s exit from the EU would offer local firms an opportunity to expand their

25BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
operations in order to meet local and international product and service needs. Local firms are
therefore likely to benefit following the Brexit.
Analysis
Another sector that is going to be affected by the Bretix is the real estate industry. The EU has
been a key financer of the UK mortgage industry. Following the Brexit, the UK shall be expected
to lose about 10 per cent of its real estate financing that was being guaranteed by the EU.
Housing prices are also expected to shoot high due to limited power in financing the real estate
industry. However, the Brexit is thought to minimize freedom of immigration into the US.
Pressure on housing infrastructure and other social amenities shall therefore be expected to
reduce. The review of various literature has demonstrated that immigrants are more likely to be
offered social housing than the UK natives would. This scenario is therefore expected to be
mitigated if the UK exists from the EU.
Discussion
Migration and citizenship is another aspect that is going to be adversely affected following the
Bretix. One of the major reasons behind the formation of EU was to have freedom in movement
of people and goods across the borders of the union member states. The EU citizens freely move
across borders of member states and can settle anywhere among the EU member states. A great
number of Britons have therefore settled in the EU member states. These individuals are
expected to lose their EU passports and maybe citizenship if the UK exits from the EU.

26BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
However, the limitation of migration would limit pressure on resources that is being mounted by
natives and immigrants.

27BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
References
Alexeevna, K., 2012. European integration as a basis for converging political and legal systems of Ukraine
and the European Union. 13(4), p. 14.
Berman, R. A., 2016. Brexit, Immigration, and Populism. p. 15.
BIRRELL, D. G. A. M., 2017. Devolution: The Social, Political and Policy Implications of Brexit for Scotland,
Wales and Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Policy, p. 9.
Brändle, V. K. G. C., 2018. Marching for Europe? Enacting European citizenship as justice during Brexit.
Citizenship Studies, 22(8), p. 23.
Braniff, M. W., 2017. Deep impact: The fiction of a smooth Brexit for Northern Ireland. p. 9.
Canessa, A., 2019. Bordering on Britishness (National Identity in Gibraltar from the Spanish Civil War to
Brexit) || Governing Through the Border. p. 14.
Canessa, A., 2019. Bordering on Britishness (National Identity in Gibraltar from the Spanish Civil War to
Brexit) || Governing Through the Border: (Post)colonial Governmentality in Gibraltar. p. 18.
Dallago, B., 2016. The future of European integration and Brexit: Is Brexit only Brexit?. p. 7.
Dallago, B., 2016. The future of European integration and Brexit: Is Brexit only Brexit?. p. 9.
Daniel Dorling, S. T., 2019. Rule Britannia: Brexit and the End of Empire. p. 18.
Dougan, M., 2017. The Political Quarterl. p. 9.
Gietel-Basten, S., 2016. Why Brexit? The Toxic Mix of Immigration and Austerity. Population and
Development Review, 42(4), p. 13.
Glees, A., 2017. What Brexit means for British and Europe. p. 15.
Hartigan, J., 2018. Comparative Advantage in De-Globalisation: Brexit, America First and Africa’s
Continental Free Trade Area. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, p. 6.
Jacobs, F. B., 2018. The EU after Brexit || The Potential Institutional Impacts of Brexit. p. 2.
Jacobs, F. B., 2018. The EU after Brexit || The Potential Institutional Impacts of Brexit. p. 19.
Jacobs, F. B., 2018. The EU after Brexit || Will the EU Become Stronger or Weaker or Even Disintegrate
as a Result of Brexit?. p. 12.
James, S. Q. L., 2018. The Brexit Negotiations and Financial Services: A Two-Level Game Analysis. The
Political Quarterly, p. 6.
MacDonald, S., 2016. The impact of Brexit on the UK’s reputation, influence and soft power. p. 17.
Marsh, D., 2018. Brexit and the politics of truth. p. 13.
Meleady, R., 2017. Examining the role of positive and negative intergroup contact and anti-immigrant
prejudice in Brexit. British Journal of Social Psychology, p. 14.

28BREXIT: IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS
Mindus, P., 2017. European Citizenship after Brexit. p. 9.
MODIANO, M., 2017. English in a post-Brexit European Union. 11(2), p. 9.
Mykolaivna, M. M., 2015. Phenomenon of the European Union citizenship. European journal of law and
political sciences, Issue 2, p. 1.
Oliver, T., 2016. European and international views of Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy, p. 11.
Philippidis, G., 2016. The UK Brexit vote and its potential strategic impact. p. 12.
Poole, T., 2016. Looking beyond Brexit: union without Union. 4(1), p. 6.
STANIG, P., 2018. Global Competition and Brexit. p. 5.
TAYLOR-GOOBY, 2017. The impact of Brexit on UK welfare. p. 34.
Whitaker, R., 2018. All Brexiteers now? Brexit, the Conservatives and party change. p. 8.
Wood, P. B., 2018. Irish enough: changing narratives of citizenship and national identity in the context of
Brexit. Space and Polity, 11(2), p. Space and Polity.