logo

Critically evaluate the theories of true leaders being born and Lewin's 3 phase's model of change

7 Pages1580 Words96 Views
   

Added on  2023-06-08

About This Document

This article critically evaluates the theories of true leaders being born and Lewin's 3 phase's model of change. It discusses the trait theory and nature vs nurture argument for leadership and the positives and negatives of Lewin's model. It also highlights the problems and limitations that managers may face while implementing Lewin's model.

Critically evaluate the theories of true leaders being born and Lewin's 3 phase's model of change

   Added on 2023-06-08

ShareRelated Documents
Mock questions
Critically evaluate the theories of true leaders being born and Lewin's 3 phase's model of change_1
Contents
MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................1
Question Number A.....................................................................................................................1
Question Number B.....................................................................................................................3
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................5
Critically evaluate the theories of true leaders being born and Lewin's 3 phase's model of change_2
MAIN BODY
Question Number A
“True leaders are born” Critically evaluate this theory using the trait and nature and
nurture argument.
Answer number A: According to latest researches conducted in the field of leadership, it has
been found out that leadership can be attributed to 30% genetics and 70% being acquired
learning from one’s environment and experiences throughout life. This statement offers quite a
striking contrast with the statement that ‘true leaders are born’ as if that were the case, the result
would budge quite heavily in favour of genetics. Over the past few decades, the debate has raged
among experts that whether or not leaders are born with qualities that make them excel in their
respective fields or it is something that one learns over the course of their life (Sweeney, 2021).
There are many theories which have been used to better explain and take sides in this debate
even to this day and one of the most popular ones involves the trait theory of leadership. This
theory states that leaders are not born but are made with the help of various mental, physical and
social characteristics and this goes against the great man theory of leadership which states the
exact opposite. The theory lists many important traits which are required of leaders which one is
not born with such as empathy, futuristic vision and ambitious mind-set which goes against the
notion of leaders being born. There are many positives and negatives to this theory which are
listed herein and helps better understand the nature of leadership.
Positives
This theory helps understand the various social factors which shape up leadership such as
one’s quality of education, childhood and upbringing and skills such as teamwork and
empathy.
Trait theory has also helped advance the field of leadership as a separate branch of
management by highlight the tremendous amount of skills needed by modern day leaders
which they cannot possibly be born with (Stamopoulos and Barblett, 2020).
1
Critically evaluate the theories of true leaders being born and Lewin's 3 phase's model of change_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Critically evaluating the theory of 'True leaders are born' using trait and nature vs nurture argument
|6
|1269
|313

BHS105A - Cognitive Development in Children Report
|12
|2726
|60

Psychological Debate about Nature and Nurture
|10
|3468
|224

Leadership Theories Assignment (Doc)
|3
|728
|58

Leadership Approaches | Essay
|8
|1511
|27

Organizational Leadership: Reflective Essay on Leadership Philosophy and Application
|9
|2713
|72