Understanding and leading change

Understanding and
leading change

Contents
Contents...........................................................................................................................................2
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................1
P1 Compare different organisational examples where there has been an impact of change on
an organisation’s strategy and operations....................................................................................1
TASK 2............................................................................................................................................4
P2 Evaluate the ways in which internal and external drivers of change affect leadership, team
and individual behaviours within an organisation.......................................................................4
P3 Evaluate measures that can be taken to minimise negative impacts of change on
organisational behaviour..............................................................................................................6
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................7
P4 Explain different barriers for change and determine how they influence leadership
decision- making in a given organisational context....................................................................7
TASK 4............................................................................................................................................8
P5 Apply different leadership approaches to dealing with change in a range of organisational
contexts........................................................................................................................................8
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................10
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................11

INTRODUCTION
Administrative design is characterized as differences in the role of an institution's
workspace. Organizational transformation occurs if an institution is adversely influenced by both
internally and externally influences (Chin, 2018). It is among the most fundamental ways to
motivate businesses to enhance their competitiveness. Major societies may efficiently
accommodate developments in a well-defined approach by possessing an adaptive tendency
toward their rules, goals, working environment, and functional model. Two tasks are presented in
this article. The very first concept conversations took place at House of Fraser and Marks and
Spencer, whereas engagement 2 took place at Nokia. In this study, initial talks have taken place
about the effects of migration on every firm's strategies and processes, as well as the various
enablers. As well as this, the paper discusses how internally and externally market drivers effect
overall team actions, as well as governance within House of Frazer and M & S. This initiative
also incorporates steps to mitigate the adverse impacts of synthetic. This study also covers the
use of the Burke-Litwen Paradigm, the continual improvement approach, and structuralism.
Finally, the company receives a suggestion.
TASK 1
P1 Compare different organisational examples where there has been an impact of change on an
organisation’s strategy and operations
A performance management is defined as a system that establishes distinct measurements in
which the group's actions occur in order to achieve the issuer's mission and vision in a well-
defined approach. Oversight, obligations, tasks, and tasks are among the tasks. This covers the
dissemination of knowledge as well.
As per the stated example, the picked companies are House of Fraser and Marks and
Spencer. House of Frazer is a European store that specializes in the retailing industry. The group
was launched in 1849 and has its headquarters in Britain, United Kingdom. Sparked, dress
materials, souvenirs, makeup, sports, and other items are available from the brand. Whereas
Marks and Spencer is an English corporation that provides retailing services. The business was
launched in 1884 and is headquartered in London, United Kingdom. A foundational contrast
between Marks and Spencer and House of Fraser is outlined in the following table:
Basis Marks and Spencer House of Fraser

Technological Change To make drastic changes
within purchasing process, this
business is using a point-of-
sale (POS) technology. In ad-
dition, companies use personal
computers to keep abreast of
the current product develop-
ment available. Furthermore,
this group offers users the op-
tion of online purchases in or-
der to make their buying expe-
rience more convenient
(Conrad and Aðalsteinsdóttir,
2017).
In order to provide its goods to
the most up-to-date layout in a
timely manner, the firm oper-
ates modern technology. Re-
duce flaws for the unit with the
goal of increasing effective
corporate efficiency. Further-
more, in order to ensure long-
term viability in today's
crowded marketplace, entities
must significantly improve
their infrastructure in accor-
dance with the changing situa-
tion. Furthermore, it's been dis-
covered that a company's total
financial analysis can suffer if
it does not have an internet
business.
Technology Adopted Marks and Spencer imple-
mented smart phone image
recognition software as a mar-
keting platform in its 959 UK
location. Furthermore, the
business makes use of “posi-
tion intellectual ability” soft-
ware to readily measure foot-
falls throughout its shops.
Associations require several
kinds of technology to achieve
optimal firm productivity. Or-
ganizations deploy many
pieces of applications, such as
productivity information sys-
tem, in compliance with exist-
ing technical innovations.
Structural Change The team hired consolidation It's been determined the ex-