Implementing Operational Principles in an Organization

This document discusses the implementation of operational principles in an organization, focusing on the case of Cranswick, a food products company. It explores the principles of operations management and their application in improving productivity and efficiency. The document also discusses the plan for continuous improvement and the principles of operational management.

Operations and
Project Management

Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................3
P1. Implementing the operational principles in an organization.................................................3
TASK 2............................................................................................................................................5
P2. The plan for continuous improvement along with the principles of operational management
......................................................................................................................................................5
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................8
P3. Application of project life cycle with the supporting documentation for completing the
project...........................................................................................................................................8
TASK 4..........................................................................................................................................12
P4. Review and critique of the effectiveness of PLC applications............................................12
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................14
REFERENCRES............................................................................................................................15

INTRODUCTION
Operations management is the way toward overseeing individuals and framework in an
association who are liable for the creation of products and enterprises. It handles different vital
issues, for example, stock, quality, control and so on so as to expand the result. Venture
management is a business situation which alludes to the acts of arranging, executing, observing
and shutting of the work to achieve a particular objective. This report is separated into two
sections initial one depends on Cranswick and another is on Portakabin. Cranswick bargains in
food items and provider of it and Portakabin bargains in secluded structure and presently
dispatched its new item named "Yorkon Building System". This report incorporates audit and
scrutinize of the operational management standards and the use of ceaseless improvement. Then
again, second part depends on the undertaking life cycle and the investigate of the venture to
decide the adequacy.
TASK 1
P1. Implementing the operational principles in an organization
Organization Overview
Cranswick was consolidated in 1974 in UK and arrangements in the wide scope of food
items and the top notch provider of new food items. It is arranged in Hull, UK and was
established by Jim Bloom and Mike Field. In 1993 organization assorted itself into pet items
with the procurement of George Buckton and in 2009 sold its pet business.
Operations versus Operations Management
Operations remember those exercises for which crude materials are changed over into completed
items so as to expand creation and acquire more benefit. Though Operations Management is that
region which ensure that the assets which are utilized in the operational exercises are used in a
proper way which expands the result or improve efficiency. Activity the board is capacity of
arranging and dealing with the result, creation, workforce and accessible assets so as to change
over them into conclusive item (Feng and Shanthikumar, 2018).
Operations Management Principles
Difference: This standard speaks to that the organization needs to lessen its expense or not
which is relies upon the handling and assembling. By gracefully chain, cost decrease can be
attempted to guarantee the viability of the item and associations builds their assortment of items.
Cranswick actualize this guideline in their flexibly affix so as to increase upper hand or to get
achievement in the market.
Association: According to this standard, gainfulness and productivity is expanded so as to
appropriately compose the association. To deal with its gracefully chain, Cranswick includes

development of crude materials and furthermore deals with the progression of merchandise and
enterprises which is very hard to deal with while operational exercises with same effectiveness.
Consequently, usage of this is some way or another hard for an association.
Change: This rule is important to guarantee the adjustment in an association or ensure the
modification in any operational exercises which is critical to keep up consistency so as to get by
in the habitually evolving condition. What's more, it will help in on time conveyance of items to
clients. Regarding Cranswick, they utilizes different devices and strategies in their conveyance
system so as to expand the general expense.
Essential: according to this guideline, the achievement factor of the organization relies upon
keeping up the order and adhering to the different principles and guidelines of the organization.
What's more, devices and methods additionally assume a significant part in the achievement of
tan association. With regards to Cranswick, organization deals with its gracefully chain by
utilizing condition factor so as to ensure the wellbeing and supportability of atmosphere
(Sabbaghtorkan, Batta, and He, 2020).
Investigation of standards so as to meet the authoritative necessity
Activity the executives is significant so as to work and run association effectively. It is
fundamental for the Cranswick to dissect and execute these standards so as to meet the necessity
of the organization. Firm need to apply these standards so as to improve the adequacy for the
accomplishment of new item advancement. The examination of these standards so as to meet the
necessity are as per the following:
•This is the main necessity for Cranswick so as to lessen cost in their operations. Organization is
penetrating the law of sanitation which influences the nature of the creation. For this
organization can organization can apply standard of difference to upgrade their contributions in
items and administrations. This guideline recommends the firm to diminish the operational
expense and aides in expanding the assortment of items. Be that as it may, it doesn't meet the
necessity of organization.
•Another prerequisite is the consistency in the operations as the quality is influenced when the
organization is differentiates their items so as to gain more market zone. This effect the
gracefully chain of the organization and effect the usage of these standards (Holweg and et al.,
2018). This expresses that each operational movement has its need which can cause obstacles in
the achievement of the rule of association.
•Third prerequisite is that organization should ensure about the utilization of strategies and
procedures in its creation which can deal with the flexibly chain. In this organization embraces
change standard as it recommends novel thoughts or techniques in the achievement of
hierarchical targets.

•In expansion to this, wellbeing is the significant prerequisite of each organization from any
vulnerability and for this organization can embrace rule of major. Security measures are taken by
organization for their representatives with respect to ensure themselves. This necessity is
fulfilled at significant level by this guideline.
Various ways to deal with operations the executives
Taylor's logical administration hypothesis: It is a logical hypothesis which depicts and breaks
down the progression of work and keeps up the financial effectiveness and profitability. Its
significant standards are as per the following:
Logical, not the dependable guideline: It said that this methodology is important so as to take
administrative choices.
Congruity, not friction: It speaks to the solidarity of activity and on the opposite side strife
expresses the different methodologies.
Participation, not independence: It speaks to the working way of individuals wherein they
accomplish the objectives and targets however for this people need to forfeit their own objectives
(Choi, Guo, and Luo, 2020).
High creation: It speaks to that creation needs to expand increasingly more so as to build the
profitability. They never think about limitation in their expectations.
Adaptable specialization: Here, organization can utilize different machines and innovation with
various reasons. They gain themselves in performing multiple tasks and creative strategies to
alter in the as often as possible evolving condition. It very well may be utilized by Cranswick to
make their types of gear working for multi reason.
TASK 2
P2. The plan for continuous improvement along with the principles of operational management
Nonstop or continuous improvement alludes to that technique which helps in dissecting
the different chances and creation so as to take out waste. Constant improvement plan is a
nonstop cycle which helps the business in improving the quality and norms of items and
administrations. These upgrades should be possible when wastage is decrease and nature of the
items gets improved. CIPs will assist the Cranswick with increasing upper hand and furthermore
helps in delivering more items as per the need and necessity of clients.
Lean Principles
It is an arranged way by which wastage can be diminished so as to give something important to
clients. This guideline is general in nature as it applies in each organization and in each office so
as to limit the waste and cost of creation. This rule put accentuation in creating more items with

less assets. This guideline is valuable in deciding the cycle of operational exercises so as to build
the viability of technique. The different standards are remembered for it which helps in
improving the tasks:
Characterizing Value: It alludes to the expense of offered items and administrations which is
paid by the clients. It is significant for the organization to decide the necessities and prerequisites
of the clients which is useful for them so as to create something important and convey items as
per clients (Spring and et al., 2017). For this, Cranswick can decide the different needs and
prerequisites of the clients by directing statistical surveying since this exploration help the
organization about what is anticipating from them.
Planning the worth stream: This rule map all the associated activities and capacities which are
important to change over the crude materials into completed products so as to ideal usage of the
accessible assets. Cranswick need to think about their clients while creating or making any food
item since it decides the estimation of tasks. Cranswick center around observing and working of
the methodology which help with lessening the waste.
Make stream: This guideline speaks to the moves which are made to ensure the smooth running
of the creation with no obstacle. This accelerate the creation strategy and for this, Cranswick put
forth attempts to decrease those things which can influence their food items and flexibly chain
while conveying items.
Building up pull: This guideline expresses that organization ought not create something if there
is no interest of that item. It put accentuation in offering those items which coordinates the
prerequisites and requirements of the clients. Cranswick center around improving its flexibly
chain the board which can improve its food creation and nature of food instead of presenting new
item in the commercial center.
Seek after flawlessness: Cranswick can dispose of its wastage by following the above standards
in a proper manner as indicated by the necessity. Yet, from the all examined standards, seek after
flawlessness is significant in lean standards as it is consider as the consistent cycle by which
improvement should be possible easily without influencing the way of life of association.
Cranswick can utilize this by dispatching itself with new cycle and working which won't
influence the creation of food.
Continuous improvement plan for Cranswick
Basis Existing Methodology Proposed Methodology
Cost Cranswick is presently
utilizing fluctuation standards
in its operational exercises.
Cranswick should zero in on
taking out the wastage of
items. This point can be satisfy

Quick changes in the creation
of food influences the flexibly
chain the board and its
conveyance of the items and it
expands the expense of
assembling.
by receiving lean standards
which helps in lessening its
expense and wastage or ideal
usage of accessible assets.
Quality Cranswick faces different
issues in its food items, for
example, creation issues,
sanitation issues and so on
which influence the nature of
food items and furthermore
influence the client base.
Organization can utilize
guideline of association so as
to arrange and deal with their
creation.
It is proposed to Cranswick
that they can utilize six sigma
to dispense with the
deformities which can improve
the nature of food creation.
They can improve their
creation and flexibly chain by
checking the strategy and take
restorative activities (Wei, and
Zhang, 2018).
Delivery Cranswick is creating new
items which brings about
postponing the conveyance of
crude items to the last creation.
For this, Cranswick can
receive change rule which
helps in presenting the
adjustment in its creation and
conveyance framework.
Just in time approach is
recommended to Cranswick so
as to ensure that organization
can move from one item to
other item when the interest of
clients emerges for the new
item.
Safety The principle reason for
Cranswick is to deliver
increasingly more item in the
market so as to get serious
Cranswick should zero in on
their creation endeavors and
take measures for wellbeing
reason which can guarantee the

edge. For this, organization is
at present utilizing rule of
basic which limit the workers
so as to dispense with wastage
and initiates them to follow
different standards and
guidelines which is trailed by
organization.
restorative utilization of
accessible assets and
furthermore put accentuation
on the wellbeing and security
of the food items.
Recommendations
•Cranswick is confronting quality issues in its assembling and creation. For this, it is
prescribed to Cranswick to receive six sigma strategies so as to improve the technique and
framework which will help in eliminating the different impediments.
•Cranswick makes incessant creation which builds the expense of organization and by
this the records of organization gets influence. For this, organization can embrace lean standards
so as to wipe out the wastage of assets and builds the nature of creation.
TASK 3
P3. Application of project life cycle with the supporting documentation for completing the
project
Overview of case:
London Olympics and Paralympic Bit’s achievement and success tends to create use
opportunities and growth which is required at the great level of infrastructure regeneration and
construction in order to find better venues to organise and offer the stage for the big Global
event. Considering the Vision and Mission of Olympic games that changed into the reality in
front of New Public organisation is establish and known as Olympic delivery authorities. This
company is prominently publicly funded and developed in 2006 with the objective of offering
the best platforms when use and infrastructure for the Global event and games.
Project Life Cycle:
The project life cycle model is undertaken as the plan or blueprint that has four significant stages
in which the whole project is classified and also being followed by the project manager regarding
the successful completion of all the task and prominent responsibilities for accomplishing
significant goals(Gemünden and et. al., 2018). Moreover, the project lifecycle leads to enable
leaders and management towards the gain for depth vision regarding the requirements and

objective of project for the better execution and higher level of productivity. Furthermore, the
whole cycle is surrounded with four steps that enable with significant performance monitoring
and controlling them till the project is completed successfully. The project life cycle is applied to
Olympic delivery authorities with the objective of offering best infrastructure venues for the
Olympics and Paralympic Games.
Figure 1: What is Project Life Cycle and its Main Characteristics, 2020
(Source: What is Project Life Cycle and its Main Characteristics, 2020)
 Initiation stage:It is undertaken as the first stage in which objectives are set and purpose
of project is examined regarding the problems are also determine with effective solutions and
implementation. In terms of doing that proper business case is developed considering the
significant information which is mentioned and collected prominently (Greene and Stellman,
2018). At this stage Olympic delivery authorities can opt democratic leadership that leads to
promote prominent involvement of employees towards the decision-making process that result in
better and innovative ideas and procedure. Moreover, the project mission vision and objectives
are established at this stage.
 Planning stage:it is the second stage in which plants are developed and constructed on
the grounds of identify the objectives and also address the examined problems by offering their
prominent solutions. For this manager is responsible in order to divide the project into small task
and make plans respectively for achieving them in various levels and intervals (Hu and et. al.,
2018). In regard of this lean principle is significant that can be obtained by Olympic delivery
authorities and their leaders opt automatic leadership style in terms of keeping the number of
confusion and must be standing at the lower level and eliminating them in order to increase the
moral of people.

 Implementation stage:In this stage effective plans and ideas are executed considering the
practical scenario at the time of facing all and identified with new emerged challenges. The
leaders and management of Olympic delivery authorities suggest to use total quality management
methodology which is considered as the most effective method in order to keep track of the
available and utilised resources within an organisation (Kerzner, 2019). Total quality
management also make sure good quality and optimum utilisation of resources in terms of
mitigating risk at the significant level to enhance the quality of products and services which is
offered by company. For this democratic and supportive leadership style is best suited as their
employees need support of management in terms of keeping the moral high and work in effective
way. For the more company also need innovative and creative plans in terms of working for
better implementation of task which are assigned to employees.
 Closure stage:In this stage in the cycle restart with making continuous changes and
improvement and also tends to perform the regular tasks with significant perfection. This is the
phase in which controlling and monitoring actions are undertaken with significant actions that
are performed in order to meet the quality standards that are not suitable delivered (Huemann
and et. al., 2018). Along with this most of the organisations and operation houses neglect this
stage but also decide their future in terms of purchase transactions and sales. In this stakeholders
and management of Olympic delivery authorities include the government public media and many
more who stay in close contact and also review the success of project by searching and finding
any drawback to resolve them to get effective perfection.
Project Documentation:
Business case
Company Overview ODA is developed by parliament in 2006 after earning its
name and Olympics and Paralympic in 2012. Organization
is prominently funded by the government and public
bodies.
Vision and Mission The Vision and Mission of ODA is to transform the
Olympic bid into Real world by offering prominent
bridges, stadium, bet roads and many more.
Objectives The objective of company tends to include the
deconstruction of400-hectare site and the construction of
around 20 kilometre of roads around 30 bridges 13
kilometres of tunnels and useful infrastructure. It is also
required to be undergone construction for the 14 Sporting
venues the broadcast centre media Centre for the

commercial use after the games. Along with this the
construction of athlete’s villages for the creation of 18
actor of gardens public open space parklands and huge
transport improvement regarding the infrastructure and
stations.
Strategies At the time of developing all this ODA make significant
plans and Strategies for the better execution and also opt
those plants on the grounds of market research.
Project Plan
Cost The estimated cost which company made for making
available their product is 8.1 billion through the various
resources and majorly from their public.
Quality The quality of services and offerings should be based in
terms of matching and aligning with the vision and Mission
of the pre examined research.
Communication The most prominent communication channel which can be
used by company is both verbal and nonverbal and for this
company make the significant use of Technology for
storing and sorting data.
Scope The significant scope of this project is quite wide as they
offer personalized structure for B2B customers. They are
also present the same new technologies and workforce in
terms of recruitment to organise market research and
develop significant products.
Work Breakdown Structure:
Gantt Chart:

TASK 4
P4. Review and critique of the effectiveness of PLC applications
Project life cycle is undertaken as the productive and significant tool that provide effective
direction towards the particular goals and direction of Management people and many more in
terms of following the making of project towards success and accomplishment of objectives and
goals (Park and Huh, 2018). For reviewing the efficiency of project life cycle in terms of
Olympic delivering authorities waterfall model is used that has four prominent components
which are as follows

 Requirement : It is the first element that represent the requirement and need of
significant resources considering the raw materials human resources finance and many more.
These resources are identified and important for initiating the project and tends to effective for
the conclusion by offering its significant purpose. Lean principle is the prominent tool that is
helpful for this stage for eliminating waste and improving productivity (Taherdoost, 2018). It
tends to enable the reduction of waste and bringing significant improvement for the quality of
offerings.
 Design: In this step structure of project is developed by considering the whole purpose
and objectives in the mind. At this stage Olympic delivery authorities of Total Quality
Management methodology that eliminate errors and enhance quality and also eliminate waste
because of effective completion of small task instead of duplication of work (Rendon and Snider,
2019). Along with this ODA can also useful in principle in order to eliminate loss and identify
the issues that influence the production quality.
 Development: It is the third stage that leads to evaluate the tools and represent the
completion work and operations within the stipulated period of time which is involved in the
project. In this it is required for effective execution of all the task and duties are identified and
examined (Yiu and et. al., 2018). In terms of organisation delivering authority they can use total
quality management instead of that company can also opt Six Sigma methodology in terms of
minimal time which is consumed for the execution of plants which is prescribed for the resources
and significantly divide the time and cost in terms of saving them.
 Maintenance: It is undertaken is the last step of waterfall model that leads to enable the
fixing of significant issues and also grows it for processing the project in terms of accomplishing
the competitive advantage considering the respective project. In terms of developing and
maintaining the invariably performance on the grounds of project manager they are responsible
to take significant decisions (Eyers and Naim, 2019). Hence at the state strategic leadership is
best considering the situations and their requirements. Along with this Olympic delivering
authorities and their leaders make effective use of separate leadership style including supportive
democratic and autocratic in terms of dealing with their employees and keeping their moral high
regarding their performance for the best possible manner.

CONCLUSION
By the above conversation it is reasoned that tasks and undertaking the executives is the
technique which deals with the different exercises and furthermore helps in presenting the item
in new market. Also, it is summed up that nonstop improvement plan and lean standards helps in
upgrading these plans. Additionally, it is resolved that the different administration styles
actualize in the various procedures and in which best one is selected the execution of venture.
Besides, examination of PLC is led which guarantee that execution is done in a legitimate
manner. Besides, different procedures are likewise apply for the little scope and enormous scope
ventures.

REFERENCRES
Books and Journals
Choi, T. M., Guo, S. and Luo, S., 2020. When blockchain meets social-media: Will the result
benefit social media analytics for supply chain operations management?.Transportation
Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 135. p.101860.
Eyers, D. and Naim, M., 2019. Project management for effective operations management.
In Contemporary Operations and Logistics (pp. 11-27). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Feng, Q. and Shanthikumar, J. G., 2018. How research in production and operations management
may evolve in the era of big data. Production and Operations Management. 27(9).
pp.1670-1684.
Gemünden, H. G., and et. al., 2018. The project-oriented organization and its contribution to
innovation. International Journal of Project Management. 36(1). pp.147-160.
Greene, J. and Stellman, A., 2018. Head First PMP: A Learner's Companion to Passing the
Project Management Professional Exam. O'Reilly Media.
Holweg, M., and et al., 2018. Process theory: The principles of operations management. Oxford
University Press.
Hu, Z. Z., and et. al., 2018. BIM-based integrated delivery technologies for intelligent MEP
management in the operation and maintenance phase. Advances in Engineering Software.
115. pp.1-16.
Huemann, M., and et. al., 2018, September. Human resource management in the project-oriented
organization. Project Management Institute.
Kerzner, H., 2019. Using the project management maturity model: strategic planning for project
management. John Wiley & Sons.
Park, S. and Huh, J. H., 2018. Effect of cooperation on manufacturing it project development and
test bed for successful industry 4.0 project: Safety management for security. Processes.
6(7). p.88.
Rendon, R. G. and Snider, K. F., 2019. Management of defense acquisition projects. American
Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc..
Sabbaghtorkan, M., Batta, R. and He, Q., 2020. Prepositioning of assets and supplies in disaster
operations management: Review and research gap identification.European Journal of
Operational Research. 284(1). pp.1-19.
Spring, M., and et al., 2017. Creating the competitive edge: A new relationship between
operations management and industrial policy. Journal of Operations Management. 49.
pp.6-19.

Taherdoost, H., 2018. How to lead to sustainable and successful IT project management?
Propose 5Ps guideline.
Wei, M. M. and Zhang, F., 2018. Recent research developments of strategic consumer behavior
in operations management. Computers & Operations Research. 93. pp.166-176.
Yiu, N. S., and et. al., 2018. Implementation of safety management systems in Hong Kong
construction industry–A safety practitioner's perspective. Journal of safety research. 64.
pp.1-9.