This document discusses the impact of change on an organization's strategy and operations, as well as the evaluation of internal and external factors affecting leadership and team behavior. It also explores measures to reduce the negative effects of change on organizational behavior.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Understanding and Leading Change
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 TASK 1............................................................................................................................................3 P1 Compare different organisational examples where there has been an impact of change on an organisation’s strategy and operations...............................................................................3 P2 Evaluation of internal and external factors that affect leadership, team and behaviour of individual................................................................................................................................5 P3 Measures thatcan be takento reduce negativeeffect of change on behaviour of organisation............................................................................................................................8 P4 Various barriers to change and how they impact leadership decision making.................9 P5 Leadership Approach to manage change in the organisation..........................................11 CONCLUSION.............................................................................................................................14 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................15
INTRODUCTION Every organisation and management team has to face lots of challenges to maintain productivity and profitability of company. There are micro and macro environmental component that affect decision and operations of company. Evaluation of these changes helps in establishing long and short term goal of an organisation. The change management is the approach by which company can identify need, how they influence and how to react towards environmental changes. The chosen organisation in this report is Tesco. This is one of the largest competitive company of UK that mainly deals in retail industry. It was established in 1991 by Jack Cohen. They has expanded their business market and operations across worldwide. This report discuss impactof change in organisation's strategy and operations. This also analysis internal and external factors that influence individual or team leadership. It also evaluate measures for negativeimpacton organisationbehaviour.Thisreportexplainbarriersandinfluencein leadership style. It applies various model of leadership to deliver effective organisation change. This will help in achieving mission and vision of a company. TASK 1 P1 Compare different organisational examples where there has been an impact of change on an organisation’s strategy and operations Change plays major role in growth and development of company. It influence efficiency and effectiveness of enterprise.In context of business change mainly refersto the process of change in order for the implantation of development change to accomplish overall aim of company. Most of the changes occurs in strategic, process, people, structural, planned as well as emergent changes.These changes affect overall operations and performance of employee as well as progress of company.This aids in achieving organisation goal at particular period of time. Various enterprise executed these changes for improving culture and environment of industry that automatically enhance profitability and productivity of company (Change management strategies for leaders, 2019). Organisational change help in achieving benefits of competitive advantages. It helps in identifying opportunity, where they are lacking and where theycan improve their performance. Through these changes company can improves their costumer base (Al-Ali2017). Here is the detail comparison of Tesco and Aldi's organisational change that influence its operations and strategy.
Emergent ChangeTescoAldi TechnologyThe major technology change of Tesco is online marketing. Theyattractpotential costumer by using their own mobile app. This is the major change of Tesco in terms of technologythatimprove delivery system of its product and services. Through online portalsandwebsites consumercanpurchase product from their home at their own convenience. This increasecostumerbaseof company. The major technology change isfacedbyAldiisonline marketing while promoting its productslikesocialmedia marketing. It is essentialto enhanceefficiencyinits operations(Howtobea successful manager, 2021). It also influence performance of company. They have to adopt thesechangesinorderto increasecostumerbase.By onlineorsocialmedia marketing they can deliver its product at affordable price in short time. StructuralThe structural change occur in hierarchy structure and job stricture.Thesechanges directly influence operations andstrategiesofbusiness. This also influence efficiency and effectiveness of company in the market. This structural changeisveryeffectiveas theyprovidesuitablesalary package to their employee as per their performance Structuralchangeinthis companyisrelatedwith commandofadministrative. Topmanagersprovides informationtomiddle managersandmiddle managers provide information to lower mangers. This will synchronise theirefforts and efficiency to attract potential consumer CultureCultural change of Tesco is effective as they value their There cultural change of this companyinvolves
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
employee and costumer. They support,recognisedand rewardtheiremployeethat putsgreatereffortsin understandingtheneedsof costumer.Itenhance employeeandcostumer relationswith company. developmentofindividual goal along with organisational goal to achieve objective of company.Theyfollowlean structure in order to improve mutualrespectwithin employee and costumer. This improveprofitabilityof industry. StrategicThestrategychangeoccurs whewtheyintroduceself services to satisfy consumer need and their experience. It aidsinmaintaining competitiveadvantage.This increase revenue of company. They focus on price strategy, by delivering limited selected productatlowprice.They providebrandedgoodsat affordableprice.This improveefficiencyintheir operations and generate more revenue. PeopleTesco delivers more value to their employee and staff who provide competitive benefit. In Aldi they keep on regular trainingsecessionsothat employeeis most important componentwhosatisfy demand of target audience. ProcessTheyadoptedjustintime processmethodologythat eliminateswastemetrical and degrade cost operation. Itincreaseprofitabilityof company. In Aldi company process of businessoperationinvolves lotsofcomplexitiessoin ordertoeliminate complexitiestheyfocuson simplifiedmethodof business process.
P2 Evaluation of internal and external factors that affect leadership, team and behaviour of individual. The change driver facilitate change of shape in respect of internal or external pressure within organisation. The changes combines of strategy, plan, goods, servives, design and opaertions. Internal drivers or factors refers to things, situation or events which happen within enterprise. These forces can be manage and controlled by industry itself. Where as external drivers happen outside the enterprise. These drivers can not be controlled by enterprise (Bolden, Gulati and Edwards, 2019).It affect the overallperformance and operationsofcompany.Boththeforcesinfluenceleadership,teamandindividual behaviour in the industry.The internal factors can be identify and controlled by SWOT Analysis where as external forces can identify and controlled by PESTLE Analysis. The internal drivers of change also combines of staff, company culture, process, employee expectations, change in climate situation etc that affect the performance as well as progress of company. Example when staff or company culture change then it automatically affect perspectiveof employeeperformance.Each staff has differentbackground and has different style of understanding any of operations. SWOT Analysis-It combines of strength, weakness, opportunity and threat of company. Through this model company can drive conclusion where it is in the position of strengthen or weakness. It also aids organisation in identifying its opportunity or threat areas. This can improve behaviour or performance of individualemployee or team members (How to be a successful manager, 2021). It also helps in decision making or developing strategies of company. Strength-Tesco holds biggest market share of UK, mainly dealing in retail segment. They maintain dominator position in the market. In terms of financial ground, annual report is in profitable situation. Even in pandemic time through online, they generate maximum revenue from its competitors. They increase their delivery capacity through online rather than in store purchase. The reason behind these strength is their effective management and employees that adapt all the changes as per environment. Weakness-Company faces leadership change which was not an easy task for them to manage online sale. They fail to carry off their quality control and disappoint their costumer. They have to face shortage of goods due to its inefficient leadership style and
operations.Theyfailto manageinventoryastheiremployeeprovideexpirydate products. Opportunity-The major opportunity grab by them is online presence. To prevent from covid 19, people does not move out of their house. At that pandemic time they deliver online products to their potential costumer for their convenience. Unemployment rate is increasing day by day. Super market is one of the place that provide employment to needy candidate (Bresciani, Ferraris and Del Giudice, 2018). Tesco hire skilled and qualifiedcandidatefor their business and operations. The management team utilise AI and machine learning in their operations to improves profitability and productivity of company. Threat-The increase in competitionlevel is the biggest threat of Tesco. Their competitors join partnership and explore bigger market share collectively to compete. Economic recession affect the purchasing power of buyers that automatically affect the performance of company. The relation of UK-EU influence operation activities of company (Clifton, 2017). They have to follow new rules and legislation in their process like additional tariff, custom checks etc. The strength of company are specific where as their weakness are common in this industry.ThereforeTescocantakecompetitivebenefitandimproveitsleadershipand management practices. To overcome from their challenges they started online grocery store to attract more costumer. PESTLEAnalysis-Itcombinesofpolitical,economical,social,technological, environmental, legislative factors.All of these are external factor that influence performance of individual or team from outside the organisation. It is essential to analyse this model to modify or upgrade the performance of industry. Political Factors-The political factor greatly influence productivity of their team because it operates globally or worldwide. This consist of tax rate, course of legislation and stability condition of company in which they operates their business activity. The relation of political parties with companyinfluence the performance of company (Endrejat, Baumgarten and Kauffeld, 2017).Good relation with political parties generate positive impact towards Tesco performance. This will aids in effective flow of operations in the enterprise.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Economical Factors-These factors play crucial role in the productivity of company as these factors directly influence operation cost, demand and price of product. Company is very attentive towards changes in taxation policy orother policy related with finance. Due to decrease in income level of costumer, they mainly focus on promotional activities of their products rather than branded product (Organisational change management, 2021). This strategy provides positive growth towards company because they will target low to premium costumer. Social Factors-The various changes in social trend handle by this company. They offer varieties of non food items. The goods or services that are demand by their potential costumer are based on their believe and perception of society condition. Society are moving towards trend of organic goods or services (Escrig-Tena,and2018). To adapt these changes they are trying to develop the process of organic food or services as per the demand of costumer. Company gets affected lot by these social factors but they try hard to improve their services by providing organic product. Technological Factor-The up-gradation in technology brings benefits to enterprise. Company invested huge amount of money in efficient energy project that aids in achieving long term goal of management team along with goal of employee. They execute self service system for convenience of potential costumer that also decrease cost of labour. Impact of technological factors comes in favour of company as they develop there own website and provide products to their costumer at their own convenience. This technological advancement help company in increasing their potential costumer base. Environmental Factor-Company is very concern about environmental factors, they are strictly committed to decrease their carbon waste. Through enhancing social conscience , they always try to decrease waste in their stores. They ensure safety and security of their employee. Thismotivates employee and push their efforts in company betterment.Due topandemiccompanyfaceslotsofhealthissuesintheirworkforce.Thisaffect production and distribution process of company. Toovercome this issue they practice and follow all safety guidelines as per regulation of government. Legislative Factors-The legislation and policy of government influence performance of industry in larger context. They have to practice all the legislation as per the government law (Gentle and Clifton 2017). If they fail to implement changes as per law then they
have to be pay some penalties. Example- FOOD RETAILING COMMISSION imposed practice that modifyprice and demand of suppliers payment. As per the changes organisation decreases cost of the product that leads to the increase in their purchase. So company must keep on evaluating and identifyingthese internal and external drivers that influence performance of organisation and directly or indirectly affect the behaviour of individual employee or management team. This will aids in rising efficiency and effectiveness of entity. The internal and external drivers affect the performance or company in context of leadership, team, and behaviour of Tesco. The leadership style gets affects by these internal drivers along with team behaviour in order to achieve futuristic vision of the company. P3 Measures that can be taken to reduce negative effect of change on behaviour of organisation. The biggest challengesor negative change faced by the Tesco is implementation of transformational change in a successful manner. If organisational change is implemented poorly then it will definitely affect the behaviour of employee or management team. The positive change in Tesco aids in improving brand name and successfully gains competitive benefit. Positive change is to provide value to their employee by training, education, promotion. Satisfied employeedeliversproductiveservicestoconsumer.Thiscaninfluencequalityofwork, productivity, mental health and satisfaction of job (Hallinger, 2018). However there are various measures to reduce negative impact of change in the behaviour of team members and employees of Tesco. By applying this company minimised its negative effect. Leadership-Change management is not an easy task, sometimes it leads to confusion in management operations. Company outsource the change management from expert consultant, so it is hard for them to understand employee or company culture. It is better to strengthen manager's ability and skills of leadership rather than outsourcing expert consultant. Managers have better understanding of employee capabilities and they can be accountable for their process. They can clearly define roles and responsibility of individual and provide guidance in achieving organisation goal. It will reduce negative impact of change on enterprise. Advantage–Thiswillprovideappropriateguidanceforsuccessfulimplementationof organisational change Disadvantage – lack of confidence will leads towards inappropriate flow of direction towards organisational change.
Set realistic time-Company want changes to implement as fast as possible, but in reality it does not happen because work in reality have to go through from lots of process. Company must prepare a road map as per resource and existing work capability of employee. So that realistic goal set aids in enhancing performance of team members or employee. It motivates employee to be more committed towards company betterment and eliminates negative influence of change management. Advantages- This will help Tesco in achieving long term goal on time due to realistic predetermine time. Disadvantage- There is no such as harm effect of this component that affect organisational and leadership change. Communicationstrategy-Bydevelopingstrongcommunicationchannelwithin employee and management will leads to proper flow of change management or information within organisation (Kalendra and Cook, 2017). This system enhance operations of organisation and productivity of company. This build strong relationship within enterprise and provide proper direction to the company. This help in improving negative impact of change in industry. Employeeparticipation-Companymustfacilitateemployeeforparticipatein organisationactivity.Employeegetfrustratedwithcompanyduetolackofemployee engagement.Thereforecompanymustensure involvementof eachemployeeinbusiness decision or change management so that employee get familiar with changing process. Effective Training-Proper training among employee and management team reduce negative impact of change on organisation behaviour. Through training employee will get proper guidance and direction towards the change in organisation. If employee get influence by change management they will not perform in appropriate manner and get frustrated. But training will enhance skills and knowledge of employee. Tesco adopted Kaizen model for continues development as well as for proactive effective change of plan. as per this model some ongoing changes implemented for improvement of business process. This model facilitates cooperation and commitment in order to top- down changes so that company will achieve transformation. Apart from this Tesco uses Bruke litwen model for successful implementation of effective as well as efficient change. This model ensures changes that occurs in workplace and provide direction for continues flow of actions at several
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
level within organisation. This Bruke litwen model help them in improving efficiency and effectiveness in the process of change. P4 Various barriers to change and how they impact leadership decision making. Barriers always generate gap in existing practice and this will automatically influence leadershipdecisionmakingwithinenterprise.Herearevariousbarrierstochangethat management or leadership face inproduction and productivity as well as implementing any change within Tesco. Lack of employee involvement-Sometimes employee set themselves into their comfort zone, they started fear of change. Employee do not want to participate in the process of change. They are not comfortable to adjust towards the new change or development in entity. Leaders should make some efforts to introduce change in employee (Koontz,Weihrich and Cannice, 2020). Managers or leaders should ask view point of employee, this leads towards understanding of employee perception. It makes employee to push them towards organisational change. Only loyal employee try to resist the change. Industry must provide all the information or resources to drive workers towards change so that they will try to come out of there comfort zone. Lack of effective communication-Sometimes leaders and management team thought after announcing change, employee will adjust according to the change or new development. But in reality it is not thatmuch easy task for them. This will impact overall decision making of company. It is not an appropriate way of introducing change. Worker do not only necessity to know about change they also need to know about affect and how they will adapt those changes in their operations or process (Kouzes and Posner,2019). So there is a need of effective communication system betweenemployee and leaders that provide appropriate information which help in decision making. Poor culture shift planning-Poor management and leadership has no proper idea of that how change influence employee and their decision making. Poor planning team fail appropriate decision in respect of employee perception. The overlook of employee work, capability, reason , perception act as barrier to change. That is why leaders or management should be attentive towards critical thinking in decision making, it is essential to understand employee sentiments to overcome from this barrier. It is the only method to avoid barrier, planning team have to understand that company must pay attention towards employee feeling and sentiments.
Lack of current state-It is not easy for organisation to implement change management. Before implementation of change management company should know about its current state. The deficiency of current state idea act as barrier of change management. If management or leadership introduce changes without assessment of current situation then change will turn into failure implementation (Langford, Dougall,and Parkes, 2017). Sometime industry do not analyse existing situation and introduce change in the hope. To overcome from this barrier leaders or managers should go through program and analyse how effective change will impact in decision making of long or short term goal. Organisation complexity-Some times company started to create complex process in planning of decision making, this will make complex for organisation in introducing change. This will leads to complexities in system, process, product and in decision making. It act as a barrierforindustry andinfluenceorganisationbehaviour.Employeefounddifficultiesin understanding change due to complexities. It is essential for enterprise to introduce skilful methodology to handle complexities in organisation decision making. Industry can remove this barrier by hiring qualified and skilful employee. However it is good for the company to introduce some less complexities to organisation. Complex change must be introduced within organisation as per the capabilities and skills of employee. Managing multiple teams-Managing multiple team at same time is one of the difficult task for company. Managers must implement changes according to the particular team members capabilities (Lee, 2020). Each team has their own set of limitations and skill. It is not necessary thatmultiple teams have same capability toadjust change ornew development. Managing different team is a bigger challenge for company. Poor cross functional team work-Company has various inter department and they perform different set of operations. The lack of cross functional teamwork leads towards barriers in introducing change at each level of cross functional department. Leaders need to motivate and push efforts of each functional department to remove this barrier. Lack of senior management framework-Most of the time management itself get threatened by change. They try to avoid implementation of change to rescue their position. This blocked the flow of proper instructions. This leads towards confusion creation in an organisation. Assuming easy implementation-Senior leaders or managers some times underestimate the impact of change within enterprise. They do not prepare any layout for resource optimization
and there implications. This degrade corporate culture of the company. To assuming in advance without evaluating impact of change create problems in operations and productivity. It develop hindrance in decision making for log term objective. Working environment-The work culture or environment affect the mindset of team members or employee. Poor culture demotivate and decrease the morale of employee that automatically influence their productivity (Madsen and Scribner, 2017). This create barrier in formulation of strategy by leaders. Apart from this Tesco recognise barrier change through model of Lewin’s force field analysis. As per this model it diversified changing factor within particular situation. It will help company as an effective tool in order to identify corporate and personal environment change. This is one of the best model that address changing factor of Tesco very effectively that enhance overall working environment of employee. By understanding and handling hindrance or barrier Tesco can easily introduce change in the industry. At last employee or management team get comfortable towards new change in company. It helps management or leaders in decision making and policy formations. This will aids in reducing cost of operations and generate revenue of company. It successfully identify capabilitiesofemployeeandleadershipskillstowardschangeornewdevelopment.P5 Leadership Approach to manage change in the organisation. Leaders play essential part towards change in organisation. They act as role model for team members or employee of company. They encourage employee towards organisational change. Each leader of Tesco should practice 3 C's of change leadership to established link between process change and employee change. These changes aid in dealing impressive change in leadership. This combines of communicate, collaborate, commit. Communicate-Inefficient leaders mainly focus on what comes in behind of change. But effective leaders focus on reason of what and why behind the change. Leaders must know the aim of change and connect the change with values of organisation(Pearce, Wood and Wassenaar, 2018). This leads towards benefits generated strong relation and effectiveness for change. Collaborate-It is difficult to put collectively all employee and implement change. Efficient leader always try to push the limit and motivate employee to break out their
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
comfort zone. They always try to deny unhealthy work culture. They involve their employee in decision making to commit them towards change in the organisation. If employee deny to participate in decision making then change will turn around a failure change. Commit-Effective and efficient leaders commit towards change in company. They believe and support the change management. Change is hard for leaders to implement but manage and push their and employee limit towards change in industry. They always try to come forwards from their comfort zone(rasanna and Haavisto, 2018). They contribute more time or efforts as change focus on wide or large picture. Inefficient or ineffective leaders do not adapt any change or challenges and spread negativity in the working environment. Tesco mainly focus on situational leadership theory in order to raise motivation. As per this approach Tesco adopt several leadership theories as per situation as well as development stage of their particular team. This approach its effective as it satisfy team need along with balance of overall objective of company. It consist of directing, coaching, supporting and delegating in order to encourage employee motivation. In context of Tesco situational leadership is much effective as in each stage of its business life cycle leads towards overall growth of company in handling balance of its long term goal. The efforts of leaders leads towards successful implementation of change management. This provide several change at various level of enterprise. So it is essential for leaders of Tesco to introduce these strategies or approaches to raise the chance of successful change management. Establish Vision-A clear vision of effective change is required by leadership. Vision must be easy to understand for employee. So that they easily adjust with the change in organisation. Vision must be communicate several times through several medium of exchange. It provide clear understanding of vision among employee. This generate clear idea of company goal and employee contributes their efforts in achieving goal. In meeting, leaders must discuss change management. They need to interact with the employee on individual basis for clear vision of change. Leverage the change-Successful manager must plan a layout to analyse before, during and after change in organisation. Conduct a survey to examineemployee readiness for change. Established employee goal in respect of change management. During change, examine employee
actions with respect of change. Leaders can emphasize and encourage employee towards change in meeting. After the change, examine degree of actions that their implication turn around successful or not. Skill development-Employee should generate communication, time, stress management skills. These skills helps employee in managing change management(Schwarzmüller. , 2018). It is essential to provide appropriate training to employees and leaders before introducing change in organisation. This help in developing actual learning and real outcomes. Support employee-By supporting your employee leaders can eliminate fear, anger, anxietytowardsorganisationalchange.Generatinglearningopportunitiesatworkplace encourage employee to develop new skills. This facilitate risk free workplace to motivate employee and provide better understanding. Leaders should make sympathetic approach towards employee emotions and sentiments. This will improve perception of employee in constructive way. Effective communication-Some times employee need to see or hear message more times to maintain sustainable environment change. So for successful change management employee should provide several way to communicate with each other. Leaders should discuss challenges with team members during meeting. They should develop casual interaction and express their experience with employee to reduce fear or anxiety in them. Managers or leaders must build effective two way communication channel in organisation. This will strengthen change management in company. Successful change in organisation needactive engagement of managers or leaders to introduce these leadership approach. However implementation of these approaches may differ from one person to another. This depend on the basis of company, function or leadership style and their commitment towards organisation change. The commitment or efforts of leaders or employee will introduce successful implementation of change. In respect ofchain management leaders can practice transformational leadership style as this most effective style of leadership. Transformational leadership style -It combines of idealized influence, inspiration, intellectual activity and individualism. This style facilitate and satisfy organisational need or individual need in order to build oriented relation within organisation. It build confidence among employee and team members. Implementation of this style aids in achieving individual goal along with company goal(Uhl-Bienand Arena, 2018). It builds trust and create sense of team
building which share clear set of vision. It is most preferable leadership style as compare to other leadership style in case of change management. This approach inspire employee to develop creative changewhich help in the growth of company. Itfacilitate employee to work in more constructive way and provide innovative solution to business problems. Tesco adopted Kotter’s 8 step change model in order to communicate change as well as leadership style within organisation. This model combines of 8 step in respect of change such as raising in urgency, create guidance for team, create vision of company, communicate strategy of company, empower work of actions, encourage short term objective of company, face the challenges or conflicts do not let up, stick towards changing management. The Lewin’s change model is also apply by Tesco for greater organisation as effective change as it easy to understand by employee and management of Tesco. Through this motivation chain circulateempowerworkcultureandenvironmentsothatcompanycaneasilyexecute organisational change in company. CONCLUSION The change management of organisation facilitate in reducing negative impact of various type of change in company. It combines of both internal or external factors that influence management, leadership and individual or team members of company. It is essential from top to bottom level for reallocating roles and responsibilities of employee. Organisational change influence the behaviour of employee. Company need to take effective measure to eliminate negative impact on organisational behaviour on regular basis. This will help in improving productivity of industry. It is essential for enterprise to introduce successful change in company. Organisation have to handle various barrier that influence leadership decision. Leaders must ensure employee or team members top to participate in decision making of company. The company should adopted transformational leadership style in their practice to deal with change in organisation. Leaders must encourage employee in productive way towards change.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
REFERENCES Books and Journals Al-Ali, A.A. and et.al., 2017. Change management through leadership: the mediating role of organizational culture. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. Bolden, R., Gulati, A. and Edwards, G., 2019. Mobilizing change in public services: insights from a systems leadership development intervention. International Journal of Public Administration. Bresciani, S., Ferraris, A. and Del Giudice, M., 2018. The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 136. pp.331-338. Clifton, J., 2017. Leaders as ventriloquists. Leader identity and influencing the communicative construction of the organisation. Leadership. 13(3). pp.301-319. Endrejat, P.C., Baumgarten, F. and Kauffeld, S., 2017. When theory meets practice: Combining Lewin’s ideas about change with motivational interviewing to increase energy-saving behaviours within organizations. Journal of Change Management. 17(2). pp.101-120. Escrig-Tena, A.B. and et.al.., 2018. The impact of hard and soft quality management and proactive behaviour in determining innovation performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 200. pp.1-14. Gentle, P. and Clifton, L., 2017. How does leadership development help universities become learning organisations?. The Learning Organization. Hallinger, P., 2018. Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational management administration & leadership. 46(1). pp.5-24. Kalendra, D.R. and Cook, A., 2017. Implementing organisational change using action research in two Australian organisations. ALAR: Action Learning and Action Research Journal. 23(2). pp.71-102. Koontz, H., Weihrich, H. and Cannice, M.V., 2020. Essentials of Management-An International, Innovation and Leadership Perspective|. McGraw-Hill Education. Kouzes, T.K. and Posner, B.Z., 2019. Influence of managers’ mindset on leadership behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Langford, P.H., Dougall, C.B. and Parkes, L.P., 2017. Measuring leader behaviour: evidence for a “big five” model of leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. Lee, J., 2020. Managing Culture Change in a Technology Set-up Using CATM. In Accelerating Organisation Culture Change. Emerald Publishing Limited. Madsen, S.R. and Scribner, R.T., 2017. A perspective on gender in management: The need for strategic cross-cultural scholarship on women in management and leadership. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. Pearce, C.L., Wood, B.G. and Wassenaar, C.L., 2018. The future of leadership in public universities: is shared leadership the answer?. Public Administration Review. 78(4). pp.640-644. Prasanna,S.R.andHaavisto,I.,2018.Collaborationinhumanitariansupplychains:an organisational culture framework. International Journal of Production Research. 56(17). pp.5611-5625. Schwarzmüller, T. and et.al., 2018. How does the digital transformation affect organizations? Key themes of change in work design and leadership. mrev management revue. 29(2). pp.114-138.
Uhl-Bien, M. and Arena, M., 2018. Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly. 29(1). pp.89-104. Online Changemanagementstrategiesforleaders,2019.[Online].Available through:<https://www.eaglesflight.com/blog/5-change-management-strategies-for- leaders-and-managers> Howtobeasuccessfulmanager,2021.[Online].Available through:<https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/successful-change- leader/> Organisationalchangemanagement,2021.[Online].Available through:<https://www.michiganstateuniversityonline.com/resources/leadership/ organizational-change-management/>