WHS General Risk Assessment for Cement Manufacturing Industry
Verified
Added on 2023/05/30
|16
|3570
|65
AI Summary
This report discusses the occupational health and safety concerns in the cement manufacturing industry, with a focus on risk assessment. It identifies key agencies, structures, and institutions that influence environmental health and suggests recommendations to resolve work safety risks identified.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Name of student: Registration number: Unit Title: Unit Code: Name of supervisor: Date due: WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 1|P a g e
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction Occupational health and safety has become a public health concern and priority especially in developed and industrialized countries. OHS is a primary concern in high risk industries especially the manufacturing and construction industries. Cement manufacturing industries is one of the high risk industries where OHS has to be given a lot of priority. Since cement is widely and regularly used, it has been determined that there are many health hazards of cement which includes lung function impairment, chronic obstructive lung diseases as well as stomach and colon problems (Ridley, 2015). The report uses work safety risk assessment template and uses the six steps in filling the template. The report identifies key agencies, structures and institutions which influences environmental health. The report summarizes the findings of the risk assessment and suggests recommendations to resolve work safety risks identified. GENERAL RISK ASSESSMENT Managing Workplace Health and Safety Risksprocedure Form WHS2 Workplace (School/Institute/Unit): Useful links: WHS Procedure: Managing Workplace Health and Safety Risks Approved Code of Practice: How to Manage Work Health and Safety Risks Local Assessment No: If applicable Assessment Date: Next Review Date:/ / Sign-off:(by a person with safety responsibility for the risk being assessed, for example: Head of Research Group, Workshop Supervisor, Academic WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 2|P a g e
//(3 years maximum)Supervisor, Project Leader, Head of School, Director of Institute, School/Institute Manager) Name:Position:Date:/ / What is being assessed?The assessment is on the risk factors on a job as a line manager at Sunstate Cement Limited in the port of Brisbane Australia. The Job involves spending most of my time at the factory supervising workers at the plant and even at the mines.There is a sizeable amount of risk in this occupation and hence the need to access the level of risk inthis area.Describe the item, job, process, work arrangement including the location or facili People involved in the assessment Assessor(s): Others consulted:Factory general manager, portfolio management office, project managers, plant manager, factory supervisors, elected safety and health representatives, work safety consultants and engineers. Risk assessmentRisk control plan* Ite m Hazard description/ how exposed (Refer Appendix 1) Risk control measure(s) in place (If existing controls need improvement or new controls introduced, record under the Risk Control Plan columns) Current risk level (H/M/L/ VL) with controls (Refer App.2) Extra controls needed to reduce risks to low or very low (The item should not be used or the process started until the remaining ‘residual risk’ Person responsibl e Date extra controls to be done Date extra controls completed WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 3|P a g e
is L or VL) 1Cement DustUse of enclosed conveyors Storage of crushed raw materials in closed areas Wearing of masks and other respiratory protection materials HighImprovement of storage facilities by sealing the places that are broken Continuous replacement of worn out gas masks in order to ensure the safety of all workers is assured (International Organization for Standardization,2017). Safety and health manager 28/11/201 8 29/11/201 8 2Slips, Trips and fallsSufficient lighting Tidy workplace Avoiding wet slippery surfaces MediumGood housekeeping Checking of ladders and other materials used for climbing Supervisor s 1/12/201815/12/201 8 3Lack of oxygen or presence of poisonous gas, fumes or vapourRestrictedentryinto confined areas Provisionofsufficient ventilation Provision of lighting High Testing of air to ensure that its safe and clean. Ensuring continuous routine assessments to ensure that all gas cylinders are in good condition to avoid accidental leakages (Healey & Walker, 2009). Plant manager 28/11/201 8 29/11/201 8 4ElectricAll electric installation are well insulated to avoid LowSafe electrical equipmentChief3/12/20184/1/2019 WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 4|P a g e
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
accidents Each panel in the cement plant is labeled All electricians are well trained and experienced should be purchased Regular maintenance of electrical equipment and systems electrician Fire/conveyor belt accidents Adequate training on safety while operating the conveyor belt Wearing of fire jackets when operating in areas with high risk of fire outbreak (British Standards Institution, 2008) Medium Ensuring the workplace is always tidy Avoid working beneath elevators or conveyor belts Use of heat detectors Installation of fire extinguishers Placingfire fighting procedures and evacuation procedures in strategic areas within the factory and in all sites (British Standards Institution, 2018) Supervisor s and and engineers 1/12/2018 19/12/201 8 Noise and vibrationPersonal noise protection gear HighUse of noise attenuation, absorption and installation technology Managem ent and WHS representat 2/12/201814/12/201 8 WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 5|P a g e
ives Safety guards of machineFollowing of operating guidelines for all machines Adequate training on handling of machines Low Proper maintenance of machines Use of appropriate guards HR manager 18/01/201 9 10/02/201 9 *may be left blank if the current risk level with existing controls in place (‘residual risk’) is low or very low. WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 6|P a g e
Appendix 1 - What hazards might be present? WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 7|P a g e The purpose of this page is to provide prompts on the types of hazards which might be associated with the item, job process or work arrangement you are assessing. In some cases you will need to fill out specialist risk assessment forms in addition to or in place of form WHS2, eg: Plant (WHS41) Hazardous Chemicals (WHS12) Fieldwork (Procedure). Hazardsare things, situations or arrangements that could potentially cause harm to people, property or the environment. When considering what hazards might be present think about: The physical work environment (eg lighting, ergonomics, safe access) Equipment, materials and substances used (eg desktop computers, chemicals) Work tasks and how they are managed (eg fieldwork, working in isolation, volunteers) Work design and management (eg workload, fatigue).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Hazards: Potential to cause harm to people, property or the environment. General Work Environment Health and SecurityPlant and equipment Restricted access or egress FoodVehicles Confined spacesPoisoning or contamination Mobile and fixed plant Air-conditioning (thermal comfort) Communicable diseasesPowered equipment Air qualityIntoxicationNon-powered equipment LightingDehydrationElevated Work Platforms Noise (discomfort)Violence or assaultPressure vessel Outdoors (sun exposure)Working alone or in isolation Laser (Class 2 or above) Uneven walking surfacesWorking in remote areasTraffic control Working at heightBites / StingsElectrical Ergonomic/manual handling ChemicalVibration Workstation set upHazardous chemicalsMoving parts Poor postureExplosivesAcoustic / Noise Lifting / CarryingEngineered nanomaterialsTemperature / Weather effects Pushing / PullingGas cylindersHeat Reaching/overstretchingRadiationCold Repetitive movementIonising radiationRain / Flood BendingUltraviolet (UV) radiationWind Eye strainRadiofrequency/ microwave In or on water Work design and management Infrared radiationPressure (Diving / Altitude) FatigueBiologicalLightning WorkloadMicrobiologicalSmoke Mental stressAnimal tissue / FluidsOTHER WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 8|P a g e
Organisational changeHuman tissue / Fluids Work violence or bullying Allergenic Inexperienced or new personnel Other Biological Volunteer or work experience safety Children or U18 students . Appendix 2 -Risk Assessment Matrix RISK SEVERITY/CONSEQUENCE LIKELIHOODCRITICAL (may cause severe injury or fatality - more than MAJOR (injury resulting in at least one day lost time) MINOR (medical treatment injury - back to work) NEGLIGIB LE (first aid treatment - no lost time) WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 9|P a g e
two weeks lost time) VERY LIKELY (exposure happens frequently) HighHighMediumMedium LIKELY (exposure but not frequently) HighMediumMediumLow UNLIKELY (exposure could happen but only rarely) MediumMediumLowVery low VERY UNLIKELY (Exposure can happen but probably never will) MediumLowVery lowVery low Bas ed on SafeWork SA risk assessment matrix April 2015 RISK PRIORITY TABLE Risk priorityDefinitions of priorityTime frame High Situation critical, stop work immediately or consider cessation of work process. Must be fixed today, consider short term and/or long term actions. Now MediumIs very important, must be fixed urgently, consider short term and/or long term actions.1 – 3 weeks LowIs still important but can be dealt with through scheduled maintenance or similar type programming. However, if solution is quick and easy then 1 - 3 Months WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 10|P a g e
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
fix it today. Very lowReview and/or manage by routine processesNot applicable Note: Once the WHS2 form has been completed you may delete the Appendices from the document if you wish. There are various institutions, policies and laws that govern work health and safety in the cement manufacturing industry. One of the institutions the institutions that govern health and safety in the workplace include; Safe Work Australia, the department of labour, and the worker's unions (Rayburn, 2010). In Australia, different states have diverse policies and laws that govern work health and safety in specific states. The work health and safety guidelines must be in line with the national and international OHS requirements. The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations (DEWR) is another institution governs safety at the workplace. This institution designs policies that regulate workplace safety and health for the Commonwealth WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 11|P a g e
government. The Australian Safety and Compensation Council maintains sets of national OHS standards. It also helps in the consolidation of national policies and state policies regarding health and safety. Some of the vulnerable groups in the cement factory include people working at in the quarry, supervisors, engineers as well as people working in the packaging section. The risk that is prevalent for each group are discussed, and a recommendation on minimizing each risk factor is also discussed. The dust has been identified as one of the major health hazards for people working in the cement industry. Most of the process followed in the manufacture of cement involves the production of dust particles which could pose a health hazard for people working both in the factory and in the quarries. One of the cement manufacturing processes that produce a lot of dust is the quarrying process. This process involves the use of explosives which generates a lot of dust with elements that are not healthy for human beings. The transportation of the raw materials, as well as the grinding process, also involves the expulsion of a lot of dust. It is therefore very crucial for Sunstate Cement Limited to put measures and policies in place to ensure the safety and health of all employees. Dust emanating from the production of cement has been identified to cause many respiratory diseases that are very harmful to the human (Dentch, 2018). One of the ways that can be used in minimizing the risk of dust hazard is the use of dust mask and safety glasses. This will help to minimize the risk of suffering an infection of the eyes as well as respiratory diseases. Use of automated WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 12|P a g e
automatic machines as well as using enclosed conveyors will help to reduce dust hazard in both the packaging process as well as grinding. To minimize the risk of slips and falls, Sunstate Cement Limited should put in place measures to ensure that there is sufficient lighting in the factory (Hasle&Zwetsloot, 2011). This will ensure that both visitors and workers at the factory have good visibility and hence they can avoid tripling on items that are on their way. Proper housekeeping will also be crucial since it will ensure that everything is in order and there are no wet or slippery surfaces that may cause accidents. The hazard of lack of oxygen or the presence of poisonous gases is high for employees working in the cement factory. There are many machines running in the factory as which produce poisonous gases (International Organization for Standardization, 2018). Employees and visitors in this section might, therefore, be exposed to the hazard if sufficient measures are taken to ensure that there is enough oxygen in this area(Stuart& Sweet, 2013). One of the ways of reducing this hazard is ensuring proper ventilation and testing of air to ensure that there are no accidental leakages that may risk the health of workers. Sunstate Cement Ltd can minimize the hazard of accidents or injuries related to electrical faults by making sure that all the staff in the company are well trained. The hazard can be minimized by ensuring safe electrical equipment and machines are purchased as well as making sure that electronic equipment and machinery are replaced regularly (Manuele, 2011). Labelling of every panel in the factory will also aid in minimizing accidents and injuries related to electronic equipment. WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 13|P a g e
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
The hazard of fire and conveyor belt accidents can be minimized at the Sunstate Cement Factory by making sure that all employees are familiar with the safety procedures when operating the conveyor belt. One of the requirement is that non-one should walk or operate below the conveyor belt. All employees also need to be trained on evacuation and safety measures in case of a fire breakout. Noise and vibration hazard in the factory can be minimized by ensuring all workers and visitors to the factory and quarries have protective gear to minimize the effects of loud sounds which could cause ear damage. Technology should also be utilized to minimize the hazard of noise pollution. Conclusion There are various policies and laws that govern occupational health and safety in different countries across the globe.Australia, each state formulates its work health and safety policies which govern the health and safety of employees working in each particular state. Some of the institutions involved in WHS management include; Federal government, state government, International labour organizations, local workers unions, Workers representatives in WHS committees as well as the management of the organization. The report carries out a risk assessment of the Sunstate Cement factory and classifies different hazards depending on their risk levels. The report also analyzes the risk assessment and identifies vulnerable groups and provides recommendations on improving health and safety at Sunstate Cement Ltd. WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 14|P a g e
Reference list British Standards Institution. (2018). Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use.London: British Standards Institution. British Standards Institution. (2008). Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements. London: British Standards Institution. Healey, B. J., & Walker, K. T. (2009).Introduction to occupational health in public health practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. International Organization for Standardization,. (2017). Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO. International Organization for Standardization. (2018). Occupational health and safety management systems: Requirements with guidance for use = Systèmes de management de la santé et de la sécurité au travail: exigences et Lignes directrices pour leurutilisation. Geneva: ISO. WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 15|P a g e
Dentch, M. P. (2018). The ISO 45001:2018 implementation handbook: Guidance on building an occupational health and safety management system.London: Oxford University Press Hasle, P., &Zwetsloot, G. (2011). Editorial: Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems: Issues and challenges. Safety Science, 49(7), 961-963. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.02.013 Manuele, F. A. (2011). Advanced Safety Management Focusing on Z10 and Serious Injury Prevention. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Myers, M. L., & American Public Health Association,.(2015). Occupational safety and health policy. New York: Springer-Verlag. Rayburn, S. R. (2010). The foundations of laboratory safety: A guide for the biomedical laboratory. New York: Springer-Verlag. Ridley, J. R. (2015). Safety at Work. Cambridge: Elsevier Science. Stuart, R., & Sweet, E. (2013).A systems approach to an institutional laboratory ventilation management plan.Journal Of Chemical Health And Safety, 20(4), 31- 37. doi: 10.1016/j.jchas.2013.03.491 WHSGeneral Risk Assessment WHS2, V2.1, 1 November 2016 – Safety & Wellbeing Team Hardcopies of this document are considered uncontrolled. Please refer to the Safety & Wellbeing website for the latest version. 16|P a g e