THE WORKPLACE LEADERSHIP

Running Head: WL 0
WORKPLACE LEADERSHIP
[Document subtitle]
DECEMBER 16, 2019
[Company name]
[Company address]

WL 1
Leadership
Leadership is the approach that individuals use to inspire others to attain an aim and lead the
organization in a manner that will allow it to be fruitful and attain its purposes. This procedure
is made probable by the leaders who apply their headship skills and information. Each leader
must be in a place to apply authentic headship to be skilled in influencing worker’s positive
mental capital. Once the frontrunners practice the authentic headship, they improve trust to
triumph in the association where the workers trust their frontrunners in their production
(Antonakis and Day, 2017). Also, it supports the workers to give their conceptual contributions
that can be valuable in the attainment of organizations' purposes. The authentic frontrunner is
not born nonetheless they are made only if an individual has the wish and readiness to become
an actual leader. A front-runner with confident psychological capital grows slowly through a
non-ending procedure that includes training, self-study, instruction, and knowledge.
The potentials of authentic frontrunners are; they need to be trustworthy, inspired and
confident. Similarly, they should have effective communication skills and creativity among
others. These characteristics are significant to the leader, society in addition to the workers. For
the front-runner they allow them to comprehend others and being capable to implement
choices and alteration that might be essential for attaining objectives of an organization. For
the association, it supports it to accept the freshest technologies and skilled workforces who help
the society to achieve its impartial on time. they allow the association to compete efficiently
with their contestants (Grint, Jones, Holt and Storey, 2016). In this particular literature report,
the relationships between authentic leadership, LMX, and PsyCap of employees will be
discussed. It will also include building PsyCap and why do the emotion can impact the
performance of employees.
Authentic headship is an order of leader’s habit that emphases and inspires positive
mental abilities as well as a favourable moral environment to improve better self-awareness,

WL 2
stable processing of info, internalized moral feature and lucid transparency of leaders at work
with employees. As per (Leroy, et al., 2015), an authentic headship is a positive approach to
structural headship that can support the leaders to experience the current encounters.
Authentic headship is introduced by self-awareness of leaders, clearness of behaviour in
addition to openness. Utmost of authentic frontrunners shares the data essential in decision
making, reveals their reasons, standards and sentiment and receive other person input. These
characters are valuable as they support the workers to efficiently assess the capability and
moral behaviours of their authentic frontrunners. Also, according to Hirst et al., (2016) there
is a straight link between the authentic headship and inventive. This is since authentic
frontrunners may inspire employee’s inventiveness through other mechanisms aside from
PsyCap. For example, it might promote the excellence of leader-employee discussion that
supports to raise worker's trust and sense of independence to subsidize their alternative ideas.
LMX is the substitute for Leader-Member Exchange that is denoted as the
relationship-based method to headship that is constructed on a two-mode connection;
between front-runner and workers and Vice versa. Similarly, it can be supposed to be the
procedure of transporting the effects of authentic headship on employee's performance
because of two motives (Martin et al., 2016). To start with headship is debatably an
interpersonal process; an association amongst leaders and employees arises at different levels
throughout the process. Psychological capital is an person’s positive emotional position that
is presented by having self-efficacy (sureness) that supports an individual to leave and place
in the compulsory effort to flourish in a stimulating task. An additional feature is making an
optimistic involvement that will aid to prosper now and in the forthcoming. Similarly,
preserving towards purposes and when essential readdressing paths to purposes with an
expectation to flourish and finally when confronted by encounters and hardship it tolerates
and bounces back and outside reaching success (Liao et al., 2017).

WL 3
A Megeirhi et al. (2018), there is a straight and optimistic relationship amongst
authentic headship and the PsyCap. This is because as the authentic headship rises, PsyCap
also upsurges. This was similarly obvious by their investigation showed by the New Zealand
nationwide study. They are associated as the workforces who are controlled by authentic
frontrunners develop advanced PsyCap that helps them to be extra creative in their output.
Authentic headship endorses PsyCap in employees as the leaders partake self-awareness and
are translucent, skillful by interior ethical values and are similarly skilled in examining
accurately all-important data. Admire and trust is important as workers experience augmented
emotional protection and they sense free to subsidize their alternative ideas and present
conflicting ideas deprived of fear. In return, the frontrunners feel less endangered as the
employee’s thoughts might have optimistic impacts to the association. Therefore,
establishments must apply authentic headship as it will endorse the employee's mental status
hence cultivating overall workers' performance (Olaniyan and Hystad, 2016).
According to the results of a research directed by Dharmasiri Kirige et al. (2019),
LMX superiority is directly connected to workforces PsyCap Optimism, Pliability, Hope and
complete but there are no investigations that have exposed direct association between LMX
and effectiveness though utmost of PsyCap features is interlinked with each other. Likewise,
the study designated that the contextual performance of the corporate is directly connected to
worker’s age and occupancy; the old workers have functioned for a long time in the
association and with the frontrunners henceforth being capable to cooperate with front-runner
deprived of fear. This feature is significant in most scenarios as it upsurges the association
production. the excellence of LMX and PsyCap leftovers constant; when one decreases the
other one decreases and verse vise. Finally, PsyCap subsidizes meaningfully to LMX
association also, LMX subsidizes to PsyCap. Subsequently, this investigation displays that

WL 4
there is a straight association between LMX and mental capital as the features of XML
effects psychological capital or PsyCap and verse visa (Liao et al., 2017).
PsyCap in specialists like nursing has a confident association within the field of
gratification. The most valuable feature of psychological capital for specialist’s satisfaction
comprises optimism and expectation as they donate to the growth of encouraging
psychological capital. In the field of nursing due to their roles, facilities they offer, attention,
uniqueness of the occupation and job worth, psychological capital turns out to be useful in the
attainments (Paek et al., 2015). Psychological capital is similarly valuable to managerial
workers as it affects the worker’s behaviors in the direction of the quality of their production,
job requirement and working setting. In this respect, the managerial employees who have
optimistic psychological capital can solve the encounters that might come their way.
Similarly, it subsidizes improving worker’s performance that repeatedly impacts the
organization's output.
Emotional labor has progressively changed to turn out to be a topic of attention and is
quickly harmonizing the area of executive behavior. The connection amongst mental effects
and expressive labor has been exposed by numerous investigations such as Chen, S.L., 2015
different researchers indicated that psychological Capital functions as a mediator between
emotional labor and the job satisfaction and connections inversely the three expressive labor
approaches; internal state, outside behaviour, and inner process shows. These approaches
propose that when employees portray increased Psychological Capital, formerly the
psychological health will buffer the varied outcomes of performing the surface acting
(Schuckert et al., 2018). The current negative association amongst job satisfaction and
superficial acting and exhaustion will be feebler once the PsyCap is at the top. Conflicting,
since employees experience optimistic feelings when they perform profound acting and
usually felt reactions, their degree of knowledgeable strain is probable to decrease and

WL 5
achieved psychological features are projected to rise. Because of this factor, workforces with
a raised degree of PsyCap be furnished with additional resources to challenge their
responsibilities (Gyu Park et al., 2017).
The Generational cohort is the idiom used to denote to persons who were born nearly
at a similar time and possess the involvement of similar historic actions that have influences
on their behaviors and views. Every cohort is predisposed inversely and by dissimilar aspects
like friends, societal actions, media, parents and financial position that grows mutual value
but distinguishing them from other compeers that produced at dissimilar times. According to
investigators, there are 4 different groups specifically: baby boomer, the veterans, associate
of cohort Y and X. They specify that each of these cohorts displays distinct conduct at work
as they have dissimilar PsyCap (Sweet, Swayze and Busse, 2019).
Kwok, Cheng and Wong (2015), reported that psychological capital and ethnic
personality have a critical optimistic association and collectivist introduction is fresh to the
writing and updates the positioning of psychological capital exclusive the mixed variety
writing. This conclusion commends that pensiveness regarding and progression of positive
psychological limits of individuals might add to imposing capacity to advance the benefits of
an opposing workforce. Furthermore, the researchers have added to the PsyCap writing in
displaying that psychological capital is recognized with connection, growth, and work
assortment dispositions in people.
Handling the emotions is dynamic in the workplace and an important component of
accomplishment for every investor of a company. Particularly, emotions handling havoc have
the possible to harm or undesirably influence persons who work straight with the workers for
example leaders (Chughtai, Byrne and Flood, 2015). Consequently, a front-runner who fails
to accomplish their feelings well can source severe havoc on a company, severely affecting

WL 6
the employees retaining, morale, and eventually the result. Every form of emotions detained
by frontrunners either adverse or positive will influence all people who are working under
them and affect the complete success of the company. It is sensible for frontrunners to
distinguish when sharing their feelings with their apprentices (Mo and Shi, 2017).
It has been established that managers are principally the most significant factor in
carrying out an employee’s best performance. Consequently, managers’ feelings have a
straight consequence on the workers. Notably, workers saw a firm link between a good
presentation and good supervision than the association themselves did. directors’ emotions
transported virally to the whole group. Feeling spread from the director to the workers as of
the statistic that administrators are agreed on a featuring role and therefore have improved
human communication (Cho et al., 2-016). If directors have positive feelings in the
workplace, workforces will gain promising results in counting job enrichment, advanced
quality societal context and accomplishments. Conversely, manger' undesirable emotions for
example anger antagonism and sadness affect workers in the means that it improves the
expectedness of workplace aberration and spoils the organization’s image from the
customer's perspective (Mulki et al., 2015).
Feelings are said to be totally human mental phenomena. A worker is meaningfully
obstructed by their actions in their workplace. A worker’s overall character and feelings have
a significant amount of influence on their job performance, spirits of team, revenue, headship
and decision-making abilities (Bin, 2015). According to current research, worker’s feelings
have a direct effect on their decision making, relational relationship in addition to ingenuity.
Constructed on these facts, if the worker's level of ingenuity is damagingly affected as an
outcome of bad feelings, the level of efficiency goes down similarly to the profit (Jung and
Yoon, 2015).

WL 7
In conclusion, headship begins and ends up with authenticity. Genuineness is the
performance of being oneself. This can also be said that it is being in a way one was shaped.
Authentic frontrunners are mostly categorized by their quest to assist others through their
headship. Authentic frontrunners are sincerely focused on sanctioning the persons they result
in the assurance that they understand their full ability and receive money and respect for
doing something. Besides, they are fine guided by abilities of their sentiment, by sympathy,
and passion as they are abilities of the mind. Reminisce that the authentic frontrunners are
learn being authentic from birth nonetheless they advance this quality to turn out to be an
outstanding front-runner. The virtuous thing of these frontrunners is that they favor emerging
themselves as they recognize that it just takes time for a person to turn out to be an
outstanding front-runner who owns most of the necessary abilities of a front-runner. PsyCap
has a link with authentic front-runner as in mental capital the front-runner is categorized by
an increased level of hopefulness, self-efficacy, resiliency, and expectation. Representing
these two features, mental capital, and the authentic front-runner is important for not solitary
the frontrunner themselves nonetheless the entire company as well.

WL 8
References
A Megeirhi, H., Kilic, H., Avci, T., Afsar, B. and Abubakar, A.M., 2018. Does team
psychological capital moderate the relationship between authentic leadership and negative
outcomes: An investigation in the hospitality industry. Economic research-Ekonomska
istraživanja, 31(1), pp.927-945.
Antonakis, J. and Day, D.V. eds., 2017. The nature of leadership. Sage publications.
Bin, A.S., 2015. The relationship between job satisfaction, job performance and employee
engagement: An explorative study. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 4(1),
pp.1-8.
Chen, S.L., 2015. The relationship of leader psychological capital and follower psychological
capital, job engagement and job performance: a multilevel mediating perspective. The
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(18), pp.2349-2365.
Cho, M., Bonn, M.A., Han, S.J. and Lee, K.H., 2016. Workplace incivility and its effect upon
restaurant frontline service employee emotions and service performance. International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(12), pp.2888-2912.
Chughtai, A., Byrne, M. and Flood, B., 2015. Linking ethical leadership to employee well-
being: The role of trust in supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), pp.653-663.
Dharmasiri Kirige, I.E., Nielsen, I., Newman, A. and North-Samardzic, A., 2019, July.
Impact of Psychological Capital on the Relationship between LMX and Adaptive
Performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2019, No. 1, p. 16964).
Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
Grint, K., Jones, O.S., Holt, C., and Storey, J., 2016. What is leadership? The Routledge
companion to leadership, p.3.

WL 9
Gyu Park, J., Sik Kim, J., Yoon, S.W. and Joo, B.K., 2017. The effects of empowering
leadership on psychological well-being and job engagement: the mediating role of
psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), pp.350-367.
Hirst, G., Walumbwa, F., Aryee, S., Butarbutar, I. and Chen, C.J.H., 2016. A multi-level
investigation of authentic leadership as an antecedent of helping behavior. Journal of
Business Ethics, 139(3), pp.485-499.
Jung, H.S. and Yoon, H.H., 2015. The impact of employees’ positive psychological capital
on job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors in the hotel. International Journal
of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), pp.1135-1156.
Kwok, S.Y., Cheng, L. and Wong, D.F., 2015. Family emotional support, positive
psychological capital, and job satisfaction among Chinese white-collar workers. Journal of
Happiness Studies, 16(3), pp.561-582.
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W.L. and Sels, L., 2015. Authentic leadership, authentic
followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level study. Journal
of Management, 41(6), pp.1677-1697.
Liao, S.S., Hu, D.C., Chung, Y.C. and Chen, L.W., 2017. LMX and employee satisfaction:
mediating effect of psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development
Journal, 38(3), pp.433-449.
Liao, S.S., Hu, D.C., Chung, Y.C. and Chen, L.W., 2017. LMX and employee satisfaction:
mediating effect of psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development
Journal, 38(3), pp.433-449.

WL 10
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A. and Epitropaki, O., 2016. Leader-member
exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta‐analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1),
pp.67-121.
Mo, S. and Shi, J., 2017. Linking ethical leadership to employee burnout, workplace
deviance, and performance: Testing the mediating roles of trust in leader and surface acting.
Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), pp.293-303.
Mulki, J.P., Jaramillo, F., Goad, E.A. and Pesquera, M.R., 2015. Regulation of emotions,
interpersonal conflict, and job performance for salespeople. Journal of Business
Research, 68(3), pp.623-630.
Olaniyan, O.S., and Hystad, S.W., 2016. Employees' psychological capital, job satisfaction,
insecurity, and intentions to quit The direct and indirect effects of authentic leadership.
Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 32(3), pp.163-171.
Paek, S., Schuckert, M., Kim, T.T. and Lee, G., 2015. Why is hospitality employees’
psychological capital important? The effects of psychological capital on work engagement
and employee morale. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 50, pp.9-26.
Schuckert, M., Kim, T.T., Paek, S. and Lee, G., 2018. Motivate to innovate: How authentic
and transformational leaders influence employees’ psychological capital and service
innovation behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(2),
pp.776-796.
Sweet, J., Swayze, S. and Busse, K., 2019. The Relationships between Psychological Capital
and GPA: A Study of One Freshmen Cohort. Journal of Higher Education Theory and
Practice, 19(2), pp.129-146.