Evidence-Based Analysis: Comparing ACL Tests for Knee Assessment

This essay utilizes current literature to compare the quality of evidence between the Lachman's Special Test and the Anterior Drawer Test, both used for orthopedic assessment of the knee, specifically for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. It emphasizes the importance of evidence-based practice, where clinical decisions are informed by current, valid research and clinician expertise. The essay discusses the hierarchy of evidence and its role in minimizing errors and making reliable recommendations. It delves into the specifics of each test, including their sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, and evaluates the strength and weaknesses of the evidence base supporting their use. The analysis concludes that while both tests have value, the Lachman test generally provides better overall positive and negative probability ratios for diagnosing ACL tears. Desklib provides a platform for students to access similar essays and study resources.

Running head: NURSING 1
Nursing
Name
Professor
Course
Date

NURSING 2
Introduction
Evidence-based practise is the concept of clinicians using the best available current, valid
and relevant evidence when decision making for treatmentof an individual, these decisions
should be made by those receiving careinformed by the explicit knowledge of the clinician
providing care (Sackett, Rosenberg & Gray, 1996). Clinicianexpertise integrated with relevant
clinical research is important for evidenced-based practise, this allows for greater emphasis on
clinically relevant studies, clinical research and data-based studies to effectively apply evidence
in practise and determining a diagnosis etc. (Jette et al., 2003).Guyatt et al. (2000) highlights that
it is essential that clinicians have the ability to: ‘formulate clinically relevant questions’ this is
can be when the patient or the outcome of the treatment is focused upon. The next ability is
‘conduct an efficient literature search’ this is just going through research to find the best one with
evidence. Moving onto the next ability is ‘applying literature findings appropriately to patient
problems’ this involves performance evaluation, basing the research around the patient and
reflection upon the situation for further improvement. Furthermore, the next step is ‘apply the
rules of evidence, including hierarchy of evidence to determine validity of studies’. Hierarchy of
evidence is often used when it comes gathering literature as it supports decision making based on
strength of evidence, doing this will minimalize the possibility of errors as it is based on validity
of different methodologies which can further allow for recommendations to be made. The studies
on the hierarchy are ranked based on the quality of evidence and are categorised by the
methodology used, the results and sample taken etc. this is ranked usually by using a pyramid
system so research that provides minimal evidence would be placed at the base of the pyramid as
it permits heavy criticism to be made whereas as a good research with high validity and evidence
would sit at the apex of the pyramid (Constantino, Montano &Casazza, 2015).

NURSING 3
This is why we use evidence based practise in sports therapy as its methods are justified it leads
to more reliable results as its studies have been tried and tested with evidence supporting its use
further increasing its validity. The aim of this assignment is to utilise current literature to discuss
the quality of evidence when comparing two different special assessment tests used for
orthopaedic assessment. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a ligament located at the knee
joint and is one of the most injured ligament.
Back ground information of tests used for orthopaedic assessment of the knee
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a ligament located at the knee joint and is one of
the most injured ligaments. The physical diagnostic test is applied in this case for diagnosing the
ACL rapture. The clinical test relevancy of the results obtained depends on the priority of the
probability of the rapture presence. It is a different process for specialists and practitioners. The
Lachman’s Special Test and an Anterior Drawer Test are performed using the gold standards
knowledge. In the Lachman’s Special Test there is a lot of sensitivity on the specification of the
pivot shist. The important of the posterior mostly depends on the management undertaken by the
specialists. Some general specializations are taken into considerations when dealing with
Lachman’s Special Test and an Anterior Drawer Test. These include hospital-based orthopedic
care and secondary care center. The studies have shown that the prior probability of 50% and
above, the posterior diseases is probable to have negative test results which will never fall
approximately 10%. This is applicable even with the genitive results of the Lechman which is
one of the most important tests in exclusion. Based on the patient having a lower probability
below 10% of the rapture, the negative Lachman test provides the rapture very unlikely below
3%. In the positive pivot shift test increases the level of probability of the present rapture to
about 40% to 60%. The Lachman’s Special Test and an Anterior Drawer Test are so useful

NURSING 4
especially in the case where there is a low priority of the probability. In this case, the negative
Lachman test holds the referral-based type of probability. The positive pivot shift test, in this
case, selects the patients with immediate referral. Besides, the Lachman’s Special Test done to
the patients having high clinical probability leads to the anterior cruciate rapture. The probability
of this happening is less than 90%. This means that the probability of this to happen is
unwarranted. This strategy can give an arthroscopic intervention of the test. There is a statement
that has not yet proven true on two types’ tests. The negative Lachman’s Special Test leads into
the rapture which is unlikely to the patient having the lower prior probability. Besides, the
Anterior Drawer Test is important in selecting the patients for the determination of the
diagnostics procedure to be used in the operation. This can be as well applied when determining
the therapy with high prior probability. This will involve discussion of the three diagnostic tests
applied in the cruciate ligament tears. In the process of the physical process of examining the
knee, there is a very high probability that the negative Lachman test would have indicated no
possibility of the anterior cruciate ligament tear (Makhmalbaf, Moradi, Ganji & Omidi-Kashani,
2013). Besides, the positive pivot shift test would have a probability of indicating that there is an
anterior cruciate ligament tear.
This evidence based paper with assumption on predictive based values that have a high
influence on incidences that are found within the patients. The effectiveness of the Lachman test
depends on the rapture of the anterior cruciate Ligament (Scholten et al., 2003). This indicates
that the anterior drawer test is supposed to be inconclusive to draw strong conclusions. Besides,
the effectiveness of the pivot shift test determines the anterior cruciate ligament rapture simply
because in most patients the performance has conditions. In this case, the sensitivity, as well as
the specification values, can be more important than the predictive values. The level of

NURSING 5
sensitivity of the values in the test gives a representation of the total number of patients who
have the condition of the positive test results. The measure of positive results indicates that there
is truth in the clinical tests. The sensitivity of the test gives a representation of the number of the
total groups of the patients who have positive test results. This is the measure of the truly
positive results which indicates that sensitivity percentage. The better chances found in the
positive tests confirm that there is a presence of the condition. In the application of these criteria,
the results which are collected indicate that the Lachman test is better in general in the
assessment of the anterior cruciate ligament (Edwards et al., 2004). Utilizing an interpretation
scale, no doubt the Lachman test gives the best by and large positive and negative probability
proportions, though the turn move test exclusively has a high positive probability proportion and
the anterior drawer test is fair in the two types of the tests (Petrisor, Keating & Schemitsch,
2006). From the clinical perspective, this analysis ensured patients with factual proof that the
Lachman test is a substantial test for diagnosing ACL tear (Ostrowski, 2006). On the other hand,
the anterior drawer might be an unnecessary extra test. The patient ought to think about whether
a clinical test is useful in building up a determination and may even interfere with the analysis.
Many scholars of future survey studies should take a gander at consolidating a few clinical tests
and even exhaustive research to help improve the legitimacy of the physical assessment. It has
been proposed that probability proportions can help give a superior comprehension of the impact
of a test result on clinical basics. Positive and negative probability proportions give a reflection
of the move in probabilities once the consequences of the clinical tests are acquired. A positive
probability proportion gives a variety of the range of the chances of supporting a condition being
available given a positive test result. Moreover, with a positive test result, a high positive
probability proportion demonstrates a more close connection between a positive test and the

NURSING 6
condition being found in the test. A negative probability proportion can determine the condition.
A little negative probability proportion reflects the probability likelihood of the non-appearance
of a condition given a negative test result. Some scholars and researchers audit announced
probability proportions, they can without much of a stretch be determined. For the anterior
drawer test pooled information, the positive probability proportion is 5.17 and the negative
probability proportion is 0.43. These statistics were carried as per the research was done by the
clinical specialists. In respect to the Lachman test, pooled information, show the positive
probability proportion is to be 9.56 and the negative probability proportion is 0.15. In the case of
the pivot shift test, utilizing the middle estimations of the detailed range, the positive probability
proportion is 16.5 and the negative probability proportion is 0.68. A negative proportion gives a
range of the chances of supporting a condition being missing given a negative test result. Such
investigations may uncover that the after-effects of the anterior drawer and Lachman tests, joined
with emotional history things, are as powerful in diagnosing ACL breaks as is attractive
reverberation imaging (Prins, 2006). This reason is viable, in view of revealed affectability and
explicitness esteems for attractive reverberation imaging in ACL-inadequate knees of 95.5% and
100%, respectively.
How strong and quality is the papers in respect to the evidence base
The strength and quality of this paper are in the determination of the variables which
represent different levels of the results obtain in the tests carried out. Specialists esteem inquires
about discoveries, however, the dominant part has issues getting to and understanding the
writing, which is seen as defective and inadequate. This recommends a need to improve
preparing at both undergrads also, postgraduate level; improve the nature of productions in
proficient diaries, and commission treatment applicable preliminaries, methodical audits, and

NURSING 7
meta-investigations (Hurley, 2000). A generous number of respondents detailed institutional
boundaries, including poor assets and protection from change by restorative staff. The four
treatments discussed in this paper are most certainly not similar in their perspectives about the
issues related to inquiry about or the significance of examine. There is much possibility of
having a deliberate connection between the two types of tests discussed. The contrasts may
reflect preparing, the nature of the treatment, passage criteria to the calling and different
elements (Steves & Hootman, 2004). Further investigations of these issues will be conveyed out
to incorporate both quantitative and subjective investigations. In spite of the absence of
unwavering quality testing, the survey seemed to perform well and its affectability to contrasts
between the treatments proposes that it could be utilized in longitudinal examinations to outline
in frames of mind after some time. It could likewise be utilized as a result measure to evaluate
the advantages of intercessions intended to energize proof-based practice and investigate
orientated EBP (Melnyk et al., 2004). It appears to be likely that it could, with some minor
changes to the wording, be adjusted to lead comparable research in the numerous other callings
in the EBP.
How weak is the papers in respect to the evidence base
Some of the weakness about the paper is that EBP analysis has not outlined on the most
proficient method to patient preparing. Choices on the most proficient method to think about
competitors are not founded exclusively on the accessible proof and tests carried. For instance,
individual experience, judgment, and patient inclinations have not been considered. Any
clinician who feels confined to act just as the proof directs is feeling the loss of the idea of EBP
(Levin & Chang, 2014). Moreover, one boundary to actualizing EBPin clinical patient preparing
practice is the absence of result adequacy contemplates by and by accessible in the field of

NURSING 8
medication. Clinicians endeavoring to rehearse EBPmay get discouraged with the procedure
when they can not locate any valuable data to respond to their clinical inquiries. Now and again,
data is accessible, yet the proof might be uncertain or repudiating. But the most important thing
with this paper, the measure of data accessible to patient prescription clinicians keeps on
developing. In any case, more research thinks about should be directed to survey the results of
clinical strategies essential to athletic preparing if the act of EBPis to be fruitful.
Potential Barriers
Some of the barriers based on the all the papers I have chosen in this analysis includes
time unavailability, lack of the proper methodologies to use in this analysis, ineffective skills to
be applied in the analysis of the papers, the relevancy of the materials used to draw the
information and time limitation factors (Scurlock-Evans, Upton & Upton, 2014). Individuals in
junior evaluations will, in general, proceed onward rapidly, or be in multi-inhabitance
convenience, which may clarify an enormous extent of polls returned 'not known at this present
location or not recorded in the nursing recorded data index (Metcalfe et al., 2001). An elective
strategy for testing would have been to keep in touch with every nursing health care trust
requesting the names and addresses of each specialist are utilized (Manspeaker & Van Lunen,
2011).
Recommentation
Experience recommended that analysis from all levels of dicsussion should examine
issues that would be hard to identify. The one who will be using this paper may deliberate
nonrandomized tests of the patient this is one of the barriers because the true values will not be
acquired in this case. The recognition situated nature of the information should likewise be

NURSING 9
confinement since we accepted that all members who involved in the research of this paper were
honest in their reactions. The reactions to this request should be variable in content, yet they are
important in helping us comprehend EBP through teachers' eyes as we progress toward idea
execution. Different instructors should audit their program content, survey pertinent barriers, and
structure an arrangement for beating these barriers for the improvement of their understudies and
the calling.
Conclusion
Based on the topic of discussion, the importance of EBP brings an idea to set up our
clinicians for the present and future medicinal services condition and the imagined culture of
EBP. It is important for curricular adjustments that adequately coordinate EBP ideas that can
start with the adjustment of the current learning structure. The important of the EBP concerning
the topic is that it enables us survey program substance and competency. It helps in evaluating
the possible barriers, and configuration plans for solving the identified barriers. The present
analysis is tomorrow's clinicians’ ideas in understanding important aspects. Guaranteeing that
present instructors have what it takes to consolidate EBP ideas into the study. A perfect
instrument for finding out about EBP is through a full-staff approach. Instructors should show a
promise to the proof-based procedure as something other than utilizing research yet rather as
consolidating research with thought for patients' values. This mentality can be accomplished
through workforce improvement opportunities. Institutions may choose to send staff off-grounds
for expertise advancement sessions, or they may welcome outside specialists to grounds for
preparing sessions. From this paper, teachers can make a topical way to deal with the educational
plan, introducing EBP as a repeating theme all through the program. Additionally, improvement
openings must be made accessible in suitable formats to urge instructors to extend subject

NURSING 10
matters in which they are deficient. Potential configurations for such materials incorporate
Internet-put together instructional exercises and more productions concerning confirm related
subjects. At first, these methods of guidance should concentrate on essential ideas of EBP,
including the development of a clinical inquiry and quest for applicable literature.
References
Edwards, I., Jones, M., Carr, J., Braunack-Mayer, A., & Jensen, G. M. (2004). Clinical
reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Physical therapy, 84(4), 312-330.
Hurley, M. (2000). Linking research with practice: the missing link–
collaboration. Physiotherapy, 86(7), 339-341.
Levin, R. F., & Chang, A. (2014). Tactics for Teaching Evidenced‐Based Practice:
Determining the Level of Evidence of a Study. Worldviews on Evidence
‐Based
Nursing, 11(1), 75-78.
Makhmalbaf, H., Moradi, A., Ganji, S., & Omidi-Kashani, F. (2013). Accuracy of Lachman
and anterior drawer tests for anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Archives of Bone and
Joint Surgery, 1(2), 94.
Manspeaker, S., & Van Lunen, B. (2011). Overcoming barriers to implementation of
evidence-based practice concepts in athletic training education: perceptions of select
educators.
Melnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Fischbeck Feinstein, N., Li, H., Small, L., Wilcox, L.,
& Kraus, R. (2004). Nurses' perceived knowledge, beliefs, skills, and needs regarding

NURSING 11
evidence‐based practice: Implications for accelerating the paradigm shift. Worldviews
on Evidence
‐Based Nursing, 1(3), 185-193.
Metcalfe, C., Lewin, R., Wisher, S., Perry, S., Bannigan, K., & Moffett, J. K. (2001). Barriers
to implementing the evidence base in four NHS therapies: dietitians, occupational
therapists, physiotherapists, speech and language therapists. Physiotherapy, 87(8),
433-441.
Ostrowski, J. A. (2006). Accuracy of 3 diagnostic tests for anterior cruciate ligament
tears. Journal of athletic training, 41(1), 120.
Petrisor, B. A., Keating, J., & Schemitsch, E. (2006). Grading the evidence: levels of
evidence and grades of recommendation. Injury, 37(4), 321-327.
Prins, M. (2006). The Lachman test is the most sensitive and the pivot shift the most specific
test for the diagnosis of ACL rupture. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 52(1), 66.
Scholten, R. J., Opstelten, W., Van Der Plas, C. G., Bijl, D., Devillé, W. L., & Bouter, L. M.
(2003). Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior
cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis.
Scurlock-Evans, L., Upton, P., & Upton, D. (2014). Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy:
a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions. Physiotherapy, 100(3), 208-
219.
Steves, R., & Hootman, J. M. (2004). Evidence-based medicine: what is it and how does it
apply to athletic training?. Journal of athletic training, 39(1), 83.

NURSING 12