Management Accounting: XYZ Ltd. Costing Approaches Comparison

This assignment delves into the realm of management accounting, focusing on the financial analysis of XYZ Ltd., a chair manufacturing company. It meticulously examines the advantages and disadvantages of budgeting control techniques and constructs income statements for a three-year period using both marginal and absorption costing approaches. The assignment calculates net profit under each costing method, providing detailed interpretations of the financial results. The analysis includes calculations for sales, marginal cost of sales, gross profit, and net profit after considering various overheads and tax. The document presents a comprehensive overview of XYZ Ltd.'s financial performance, comparing the outcomes of marginal and absorption costing to offer insights into the company's profitability and cost management strategies. This assignment is a valuable resource for students studying management accounting, providing practical application of key concepts.

Management accounting

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
TASK...............................................................................................................................................1
P3. Advantages and disadvantages of budgeting control techniques.....................................1
P4. income statement for 3 years using marginal and absorption cost approach...................3
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................10
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................11

INTRODUCTION
Management accounting is the process of assessing the business activities of the internal
management so that better decision making can be done. Management and accounting reports are
prepared so that company could analyse its profits and can compare it with past year's data.
Present study is based on XYZ ltd., a chair manufacturing company and will explain the
advantage and disadvantage of budgeting control tools. Furthermore, it will calculate net profit
by using marginal and absorption costing approach for 3 years’ business of XYZ ltd.
TASK
P3. income statement for 3 years using marginal and absorption cost approach
USING MARGINAL COST APPROACH-
Income statement for the year ended 1
( using marginal approach)
ITEMS
NO. OF
UNITS
PER
UNIT
AMT.(in
pounds)
TOTAL AMT.
(in pounds)
sales 36000 70 2520000
Marginal cost of sales (MCOS)
Stock at beginning(opening stock)
add: variable production cost:-
direct material(DMC) 40000 12 480000
direct labour(DLC) 40000 16 640000
variable expenses(VC) 40000 20 800000
Total variable cost A 40000 48 1920000
less:closing stock at the end of the year B
(opening stock units+units produced-
units sold) 4000 48 192000
Marginal cost of sales(MCOS) A-B 1728000
Fixed indirect production cost 64000
Gross profit: (sales- marginal cost of
sales- Fixed production cost) 728000
1

selling and distribution overheads(S&D) 10000
admin overheads(Admin O/H) 15000 25000
profit before interest and tax(PBIT) 703000
Interest expenses 1000 1000
profit before tax(PBIT-interest) 702000
Tax @ 19% 133380
net profit 568620
Interpretation- From the above table it is interpreted that the no. of units sold in the first
year are 36000 @ pound 70 per unit so the total amount got is pound 2520000. After the sales
calculation, marginal cost of sales is calculated by deducting closing stock from total variable
cost where total variable cost is defined as A and closing stock is defined as B. Thus marginal
cost of sales after subtracting is pound 1728000 then for calculating gross profit, marginal cost
and fixed production cost is deducted from sales so the amount got pound 728000. Thereafter, all
the indirect overheads are reduced that are selling and distribution and administration overhead
from gross profit for getting profit before interest and tax and amount of PBIT is pound 703000
then the interest expenses are deducted and profit before tax of pound 702000 is evaluated and
lastly after deducting tax rate from PBT, net profit is aroused of pound 568620 (Raka, 2017).
Income statement for the year ended 2
(using marginal approach)
ITEMS
NO.
OF
UNITS
PER
UNIT
AMT.(in
pounds)
TOTAL AMT.
(in pounds)
sales 40000 70 2800000
Marginal cost of sales (MCOS)
2

Stock at beginning(opening stock) 4000 48 192000
add: variable production cost
direct material(DMC) 48000 12 576000
direct labour(DLC) 48000 16 768000
variable expenses(VC) 48000 20 960000
Total variable cost A 48000 48 2496000
less: closing stock at the end of the year B
12000 48 576000 1920000
(opening stock units+units produced-units sold)
Marginal cost of sales A-B 880000
3

Fixed indirect production cost 64000
Gross profit: (sales- marginal cost of sales-Fixed
production cost) 816000
selling and distribution overheads(S&D) 10500
admin overheads(Admin O/H) 15000 25500
profit before interest and tax(PBIT) 790500
interest expenses 1250 1250
profit before tax(PBIT-interest) 789250
Tax @ 19% 149957.5
net profit 639292.5
4

Interpretation- In the second year table the sales given for the no. of units was pound
40000 @ 70 per unit so the total amount of sales realised is pound 2800000 then by subtracting
the closing stock that is B from the total variable cost that is A, marginal cost of sales is
ascertained of pound 1728000. After evaluation of MCOS, gross profit is calculated by reducing
fixed production cost and MCOS from sales that is equal to pound 1008000 then for evaluating
profit before interest and tax all the indirect cost that is overheads are deducted from gross profit
and the PBIT realised is of pound 982500 then interest expenses are subtracted and profit before
tax resulted as pound 981250 (Chi and Ho, 2017). Thus, profit before tax less tax rate the net
profit of pound 639292.5 was resulted.
Income statement for the year ended 3
(using marginal cost approach)
ITEMS
NO.
OF
UNITS
PER
UNIT
AMT.(in
pounds)
AMT.(in
pounds)
sales 60000 70 4200000
Marginal cost of sales (MCOS)
Stock at beginning(opening stock) 12000 48 576000
add: variable production cost
direct material(DMC) 51000 12 612000
direct labour(DLC) 51000 16 816000
5

variable expenses(VC) 51000 20 1020000
Total variable cost A 51000 48 3024000
less: closing stock at the end of the year B
3000 48 144000 2880000
(opening stock units+units produced-units
sold)
Marginal cost of sales A-B 1320000
Fixed indirect production cost 64000
Gross profit: (sales- marginal cost of sales-
Fixed production cost) 1256000
6

selling and distribution overheads(S&D) 11000
admin overheads(Admin O/H) 15000 26000
profit before interest and tax(PBIT) 1230000
interest expenses 1500 1500
profit before tax(PBIT-interest) 1228500
Tax @ 19% 233415
net profit 995085
Interpretation- In the above table the sales given as pound 60000 @ 70 per unit and by
multiplying per unit with the no. of units’ total amount of sales realised as pound 4200000. after
calculating sales, marginal cost of sales is evaluated by reducing closing stock from total variable
cost which is equal to pound 3024000 then fixed indirect production cost and MCOS was
subtracted from the sales so that gross profit was ascertained of pound £1256000. Gross profit
less all the overheads, profit before interest and tax is realised of pound £1228500 and by
reducing the interest expenses from PBIT, Profit before tax is resulted of pound £1228500. Thus
PBT less tax rate @ 19% net profit was evaluated of pound £995085.
USING ABSORPTION COST APPROACH-
7

Income statement for the year ended 1
(using absorption cost approach)
ITEMS no. of units Per unit amount total amount
sales 36000 70 2520000
less: COGS 40000 49.6 1984000
gross profit 536000
operating expenses:-
selling expenses 10000
admin expenses 15000
interest expenses 1000 26000
net operating income 510000
working note-
direct material 40000 12 480000
direct labour 40000 16 640000
variable overhead 40000 20 800000
fixed overhead 64000 64000
total production cost 1984000
unit produce 40000 40000
production cost per unit 49.6
Interpretation- From the above table by using absorption costing approach the number
of units of sales was given of pound 36000 @ 70 per unit so the amount by multiplication is
resulted of pound 2520000 and by deducting cost of goods sold of pound 1984000 from the
sales, gross profit was realised of pound 536000. For evaluation of net operating income or net
profit all the operating expenses that are selling, administration and interest are subtracted from
the gross profit which was equal to pound 26000. Thus, the net profit was resulted of pound
510000.
Income statement for the year ended 2
8

(using absorption cost approach)
Items no. of units Per unit amount total amount
sales 40000 70 2800000
less: COGS 48000 49.33 2367840
gross profit 432160
operating expenses:-
selling expenses 10500
admin expenses 15000
interest expenses 1250 26750
net operating income 405410
working note-
direct material 48000 12 576000
direct labour 48000 16 768000
variable overhead 48000 20 960000
fixed overhead 64000 64000
total production cost 2368000
unit produce 48000 48000
production cost per unit 49.3333333333
Interpretation- for the second year the table shows the no. of units of sales of pound
40000 @ 70 so the total amount realised was pound 2800000 less cost of goods sold, the gross
profit of pound 432160 was ascertained and by deducting all the operating expenses of pound
26750, the net operating income realised of pound 405410 (Danaiata, Negovan and Hurbean,
2016).
Income statement for the year ended 3
(using absorption costing approach)
Items no. of units Per unit amount total amount
9

sales 60000 70 4200000
less: COGS 51000 49.25 2511750
gross profit 1688250
operating expenses:-
selling expenses 11000
admin expenses 15000
interest expenses 1500 27500
net operating income 1660750
working note- 51000
direct material 51000 12 612000
direct labour 51000 16 816000
variable overhead 64000 20 1020000
fixed overhead 64000
total production cost 51000 2512000
unit produce 51000
production cost per unit 49.2549019608
Interpretation- from the above table in the third year the number of units of sales was
given of pound 60000 @ 70 and by multiplying the no. of units with per unit total amount of
sales realised of pound 4200000 less cost of goods sold, the gross profit resulted of pound
1688250 and by subtracting all the operating expenses of pound 27500, the net operating income
evaluated of pound 1660750.
Difference between marginal and absorption costing-
Marginal costing absorption costing
It considers fixed cost as period cost and
variable cost as product cost.
In this both fixed and variable cost are
considered as product cost.
Changes in the closing and opening stock does Changes in the closing and opening stock
10