Nutrition Assessment Report: Body Composition Evaluation Analysis

Verified

Added on  2022/08/09

|5
|352
|17
Report
AI Summary
This report provides a comprehensive review of the article "The Evaluation of Body Composition: A Useful Tool for Clinical Practice." The assessment highlights the critical role of body composition analysis in addressing undernutrition, obesity, and chronic illnesses. It emphasizes the limitations of traditional methods like BMI in detecting fat-free mass (FFM) loss, especially in sarcopenic obesity. The report discusses how advanced techniques, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and computerized tomography, can accurately quantify FFM loss. Furthermore, it underscores the significance of body composition evaluation in tailoring nutritional support, optimizing disease-specific therapies, and reducing the risk of drug toxicity. The assessment concludes by advocating for the integration of body composition assessment into routine clinical practice to improve patient outcomes and enhance the credibility of nutrition in global medical management.
Document Page
Running head: NUTRITION ASSESSMENT
NUTRITION ASSESSMENT
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
NUTRITION ASSESSMENT 2
Table of Contents
Article 1: The Evaluation of Body Composition: A Useful Tool for Clinical Practice.............3
References..................................................................................................................................5
Document Page
NUTRITION ASSESSMENT 3
Article 1: The Evaluation of Body Composition: A Useful Tool for Clinical Practice
It is identified that undernutrition is inadequately addressed in and out of patients. It is
possible for worsening at the time of the next decades. The increased occurrences for obesity
and chronic illnesses related to fat-free mass losses. It would outcome in increase prevalence
related to sarcopenic obesity. It is addressed that patients who have sarcopenic obesity, body
mass index and weight loss can create lack accuracy for addressing the FFM losses. From this
article, it is found that FFM loss is associated with gaining mortality, worse clinical results as
well as, impaired quality related to life.
Under sarcopenic obesity as well as, chronic diseases, body composition assessment with
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance assessment and computerized
tomography can qualify the losses related to FFM. It also identifies the nutritional assistance,
disease-specific therapy along with, declines the uncertainty of drug toxicity. It is evaluated
that body composition evaluation can be combined into the routine clinical strategy for initial
evaluation as well as, sequential development about the nutritional position1.
It is identified that body composition can be combined into a clinical strategy for primary
evaluation, sequential continuation about a nutritional position as well as, identifying the
nutritional together with disease-specific therapies. It is addressed that body composition
assessment can contribute to developing the role as well as, credibility about nutrition in
global medical management and declining unfavorable effects on malnutrition on clinical
results and quality of life. Consequently, it aids to increase the overall medico-economic
advantage2.
1 Thibault, R. and Pichard, C. The Evaluation of Body Composition: A Useful Tool for
Clinical Practice. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012; 60: 6–16, DOI: 10.1159/000334879.
2 Thibault, R. and Pichard, C. The Evaluation of Body Composition: A Useful Tool for
Clinical Practice. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012; 60: 6–16, DOI: 10.1159/000334879.
Document Page
NUTRITION ASSESSMENT 4
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
NUTRITION ASSESSMENT 5
References
Thibault, R. and Pichard, C. The Evaluation of Body Composition: A Useful Tool for
Clinical Practice. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012; 60: 6–16, DOI: 10.1159/000334879.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 5
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]