Analyzing Ethical Principles and Objectivity in Research Studies

This essay delves into the critical role of ethics in research, emphasizing well-founded standards of right and wrong, obligations, fairness, and societal benefits. It highlights key ethical principles such as avoiding harm to participants, obtaining informed consent, ensuring privacy, and maintaining confidentiality. The essay contrasts paid and unpaid research, noting that while paid research compensates participants and potentially accelerates data collection, unpaid research may face challenges in participation rates. It also addresses the complex issue of objectivity in journalism and research, acknowledging the potential for personal biases to influence judgment and decision-making. A personal ethical dilemma is presented to illustrate the challenges individuals face in upholding ethical standards. The essay concludes by underscoring the importance of ethical considerations in maintaining research integrity, quality, and adherence to human rights, legal compliances, and social and moral values. Desklib provides access to this and other solved assignments for students.

Running Head: RESEARCH 0
Research

RESEARCH 1
Ethics are based on well-founded standards of right or wrong in terms of behaviour,
obligations, fairness, benefits to society and specific virtues. Ethics also refers to the study
and development of one's ethical standards. (Gillan and Pickerill, 2012). The roots of ethics
are spread widely and in the field of researches, it has played a crucial role in considering
various significant procedures.
Ethical considerations form a major element in research and it makes researchers adhere the
prominent ways to conduct researches. It includes reporting reliable knowledge, truth and
prevention of faults (Qu and Dumay, 2011). There are several principles related to ethical
considerations such as –
 Research participants should not be subjected to harm in anyways.
 Prior to study, full consent needs to be obtained from the participants.
 Privacy of research participants needs to be secured.
 Appropriate level of confidentiality in terms of research data.
Ethical considerations enable academics and scholars to deal cooperative approach towards
their study with provision of their mentors, peers, and other contributors to the study. There is
also requirement of various values alike fairness, accountability and mutual respect among all
users involved in a study. Other importance of ethical considerations include-
 Promoting original, authentic and true knowledge by avoiding errors.
 To encourage values of co-operative work.
 Public accountability.
 It also helps in maintaining integrity and quality including human rights, legal
compliances, social and moral values, etc.
Now, it is to be identified the difference between paid research and unpaid research viewed.
Payments are offered to compensate research participants for the fair value of their time, and
their acceptance to accept research-related burdens including their contribution to research. It
is also termed as an incentive to overcome various barriers. On the other hand, it allows more
gathering of participation and reflects as a sign of respect. Unpaid researches are possibly
competitive and exercise reduced speed in the procedure of completion, however, paid
researches can be called for rapid publication (Bianchi and Milkie, 2010). There is a
difference between both sort of researches as paid researches greatly reduce the potential for
undue inducement, gives value standardization across studies and adheres to the principle of
justice with paying similar individuals similar amounts. The difference is also due to various

RESEARCH 2
sorts of researches as in some researches, scholars need to conduct research from a particular
group, institution or individual where achievement of appropriate information will only be
possible when they pay certain amount to these groups. Sometimes, these institutions will
also provide true data when they receive a specific amount as an arrear.
One of the major tenants of journalism is to be objective and this includes not allowing of
personal biases to impact on your judgment and decisions. Now, the question arises that
people will truly be objective and set aside their personal beliefs while sharing of necessary
information crucial in fulfilment of respective research. There are multiple perspectives to
this issue as for someone it will be “yes” and for some, it will be “No”. For instance, as an
individual one can easily confront with the issue of objectivity. Which sides of the story
should I choose to share? How will my decisions impact readers perception, and so on. The
same situation can look by different people differently and also various opinions can be
formed. On the other perspectives, Cohn, (2008) argues that the real question to the
objectivity is partial perspectives. They also suggest that one should perceive things from
below and have situated knowledge where the object and subject are split. Therefore, it
cannot be clearly said whether people will be objective or not while conduction certain
research.
In my life, I also faced an ethical issue. When I was doing voluntarily for an event in my
university and need to collect some amount for a particular activity, someone accidentally
overpaid fees for the activity. Initially, I pocketed the difference and was on the way to return
the money to that person. I always believe that “honesty is the best policy”. Moreover, I
always give money to homeless individuals in the street, however, part of me wants to walk
on by and keep my money’. This can also be called to be an ethical dilemma.
Hence, these all are some of necessary ethical considerations in researches where various
elements need to be identified and their respective impact.

RESEARCH 3
References
Bianchi, S.M. and Milkie, M.A. (2010) Work and family research in the first decade of the
21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), pp.705-725.
Cohn, J.P. (2008) Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research?. AIBS Bulletin, 58(3),
pp.192-197.
Gillan, K. and Pickerill, J. (2012) The difficult and hopeful ethics of research on, and with,
social movements. Social Movement Studies, 11(2), pp.133-143.
Qu, S.Q. and Dumay, J. (2011) The qualitative research interview. Qualitative research in
accounting & management, 8(3), pp.238-264.