Political Party Systems: Elections, Governance, and Policy Analysis

This essay examines the role of political party systems in elections, governance, and policy-making, focusing on the impact of majoritarian systems. The analysis considers the influence of political parties on policy choices, the importance of fair elections, and the characteristics of different electoral systems, such as the Single-Member Plurality (SMP) system and the impact of open-list and closed-list occupations. The essay references examples from various countries, including Mongolia, and highlights the significance of political parties in mediating between the government and the public, facilitating stable mechanisms for representing public preferences, and making government more accessible. The essay also explores the effects of party systems on government stability, fiscal responsibility, and legislative outcomes. The essay also discusses the two-partism and its impact on the political landscape.

Essay Paraphrasing

The political party spirited possibility which is usually determined by the relevant and absolute
majoritarian orientations and systems of politics. For this government have controls on the large
domain of arrangements like Sweden, New Zealand, Britain and Greece (Schmidt 1996, p. 174).
Superimposed political party prefer those plan of action and practices that are narrowly
compatible with several policies such as policy chase scope, business establishment seeking as
well as preferences of social body (Schmidt 1996, p. 156).
The hypothesis of 'Political party-do-matter' for contribution of real choices as well as voters for
selecting best person who is able to implement exactly what they desire. This possibilities of
outcomes traced from the Stylised framework of political procedures in a majoritarian political
orientation as well as systems (Schmidt 1996, p. 156).
Scholarly involvement in the systems helps in motivating by specific desire to better realization
of inherent nature of political party system of rules. By awareness about these features it can
significantly impacts on the adequate functioning of the systems of political parties. The research
report describe that the characteristics of political party system of rules or regulations effect the
stability of politics as well as government, fiscal irresponsibility and legislative assembly results
as well as several governance outputs (Pelizzo & Nwokora 2016, p. 1018).
For democratic politics the political parties considers as a significant element which serves as a
intermediaries between the government as well as public, facilitates the stable company
mechanisms through which the preferences and interests of public can be communicated to
policy makers. Also, it will impacts upon the decisions on policies which are formulated for the
public. Political parties can assist to make government understandable as well as make
participation meaningful (Ippolito & Walker 1980, p.1 ).

Without bias elections are considered fair and free which known as a “only game in town” but
rules are frequently changes in Mongolia. After analysing the past system Mongolia
accomplished on integrated majoritarian system of rules before 2012 elections (Washington post,
2016).
Chang and Golden (2007) shows that open-list occupation is less in countries as compared to
closed-list. This democracy works top-quality below two-separatism that are gives by voters with
one party and offer one alternative government from opposition party. Two-partism normally
associated with SMP electoral system (Quinn 2016, p. 122).