Essay on Qualitative Vis-à-Vis Quantitative Research Methods

This essay provides a comprehensive comparison and contrast of qualitative and quantitative research methods, commonly used in various disciplines such as business, marketing, psychology, and sociology. It highlights that quantitative research relies on statistical or logical observations, while qualitative research depends on verbal narratives. The essay details the intrinsic differences in data capture and representation, noting that qualitative research uses interviews, observations, and group discussions, while quantitative research emphasizes measurable quantities and statistical analysis. It further discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method, including the suitability of qualitative research for smaller areas and the efficiency of quantitative research for analyzing large populations. The essay also addresses the ethical considerations and similarities between the two methods, emphasizing the importance of limiting variables and allowing participants to make their own choices. It concludes that a proper research design should implement both methods to comprehensively cover the topic of study. Desklib provides a wealth of resources, including past papers and solved assignments, to aid students in their academic endeavors.

RUNNING HEAD: RESEARCH METHODS 1
Quantitative Vis-à-vis Qualitative Research Methods
Name
Student

RESEARCH METHODS 2
Quantitative Vis-à-vis Qualitative Research Methods
Research is common tool that is applied by many to brush-up and increase the stock
of knowledge about someone and something. In the discipline of business, marketing,
psychology, sociology, science and economics, technology, qualitative research or
quantitative research are the two standard ways that are employed while conducting research.
Many incorrectly think that the two terms can be applied interchangeably as they do not
recognize the differences between the two research methods. However, while quantitative
research mainly relies on statistical or logical observations, qualitative research is dependent
on verbal narrative such as written or spoken data to draw conclusions. Thus, this paper
contains a complete comparison and contrast of the two research methods.
The intrinsic difference in the use of these two reach techniques is largely accredited
to the different methods in which data is captured and represented in each of the methods.
Qualitative research method is defined by Schindler and Cooper (2018), as research methods
that are applied to open up an individual’s opinions and thoughts besides helping to expound
on a particular problem (Quinlan, Babin, Carr, Griffin, & Zikmund, 2015). Some of its
common examples are the use of interviews, observations, and group discussions.
Contrariwise, quantitative method put emphasis on computation of the variables, measurable
quantities and the application of mathematical and statistical analysis. Nevertheless,
researchers normally applies the two methods of conducting research are in reporting the
results of their studies.
Qualitative and quantitative research methods differ in several ways. Qualitative
research heavily relies on the application of explanations during the survey (Bordens &
Abbott, 2014). In such instances, the investigator has a responsibility to solicit for an
understanding the opinions of the respondents relative to the topic of study. Unlike qualitative

RESEARCH METHODS 3
research, data is quantified in the forms of numerical data in quantitative research quantifies.
According to Bordens and Abbott (2014), this data is used to quantify the attitude, thoughts
and opinion, of the respondents.
The qualitative research method is heavily deemed unsuitable for obtaining data over
an extensive area. As stated by In Lochmiller (2018), this form of research needs a huge
investment in terms of resources and time for the investigator to get into contact with the
targeted subjects. As a result, this particular method of conducting research is well suited for
research in fairly in cases or smaller areas where a small data is wanted otherwise it might be
very costly to fund the study (O'Gorman & MacIntosh, 2015). Conversely, quantitative
research method is considered suitable for analysing large populations as they take a shorter
time and thus may not inconvenience the respondents in any way possible. Actually, some of
the its methods data collection like questionnaires can also be issued to many respondents at
the same time and thus permitting the researcher to use less time and to obtain the required
data.
The methods used in analysis and presentation of the obtained data are easier to be
interpreted by audience. For instance, through the use pie charts, bar charts and line graphs to
represent the statistical data, one can easily reference and understand what the data portrays
(Remler & Van, 2015). Conversely, the application of qualitative methods does not make it
easier for researchers to represent results and thus one has to read through very long
explanations to comprehend what is portrayed by the data. It may, thus, be tough for a reader
to get the information that is summarized under the result as not all people love reading
through the long texts (Miller, 2018). Understanding the explanations also necessitates one to
be attentive and hence this kind of information may not be appropriately presented to a time-
sensitive audience.

RESEARCH METHODS 4
Contrary to qualitative data, the quantitative data makes it easier for researchers to
make an exact generalization of the data during the survey. According to Remler and Van
(2015), the data that is normally applied in quantitative surveys is usually obtained from a
larger sample of the population and therefore may not depict the general physiognomies of
the entire population. In contrast, the small sample of data that is obtained in qualitative
research might not precisely describe the trend in the entire population as only a small
fraction the respondents under study are interviewed, and thus the deductions may not be
accurate.
The application of statistical and mathematical data to represent the analysed data in
quantitative research method sometimes look very sophisticated (Gutmann, 2014). Moreover,
it is burdensome to some people particularly those who do not have mathematical skills, and
thus they may not be able to fully understand the results. As a result, this type of research
method is not well suited to all people. Contrasting the quantitative research method, the
qualitative research uses very basic models in the representation of their outcome. One is
only needed to be well-versed with the reading capabilities and the comprehension of the
language that has been used to develop the research the document. The particular method of
research is thus well-suited for all individuals.
Irrespective of the many inherent differences between the quantitative and qualitative
research methods, the two methods also exhibit several similarities in various facets of their
uses. According to Gutmann (2014), the two research methods usually limit the particular
variable being explore. This implies that a separate method will only remain limited to the
particular aspects of study that it is measuring; this is to guarantee that the study does not
diverge to other issues that may make its findings to be irrelevant to the subjects that were
being explored by the research. To ensure that the research is constrained to the variable, the

RESEARCH METHODS 5
investigator must make sure that he sufficiently plans for the undertakings to be steered in the
research.
The two research approaches can be applied to examine the same phenomenon
(Quinlan et al., 2015). As it was earlier explained, some of the aspects that determine the
appropriate technique to be employed during the survey is heavily dependent on the
experience and ability of the researcher to employ either method of research (Stokes, 2011).
Thus, the partiality of the researcher to any specific research method usually play a crucial
role in determining the kind of research method that they will adopt. Nonetheless, any of the
approaches can be utilized to measure the whole phenomenon.
Ethical consideration is paramount in each of the research method. In both
quantitative and qualitative research methods, the researcher usually allow the participants to
decide whether to participate in the study or not. According to Schindler and Cooper (2018),
respondents usually make own choices while at the same time, the researcher endeavours to
keep all their responses strictly confident This concept of research ethics is also supported by
Bordens and Abbott (2014) who explains data should be kept and used for the sole purpose
of the study.
From the above discussion on the two research methods, it evident that the two methods of
research are broadly differentiated based on the skills that are required to adopt any of them
and their mode of use. The quantitative research technique is more appropriate for application
with a large data size whereas the qualitative research technique can be used in a small data
size. Unlike the qualitative research method, quantitative research method can also be applied
to generalize the results of the research in an extensive area. Regardless of the differences in
the two research methods, they also have a range of similarities that were comprehensively

RESEARCH METHODS 6
covered above. As such, a proper research should implement both methods of research in the
same research to comprehensively cover the topic of the study.

RESEARCH METHODS 7
References
Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2014). Research design and methods: A process
approach(9th ed.).
Gutmann, J. (2014). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and
researchers (2nd edn). International Journal of Market Research, 56(3), 407.
doi:10.2501/ijmr-2014
In Lochmiller, C. R. (2018). Complementary research methods for educational leadership
and policy studies (3rd ed.).
Miller, K. (2018). Practice research enabler: Enabling research in a social work practice
context. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 5(2), 147-332.
doi:10.1177/1473325017751038
O'Gorman, K. D., & MacIntosh, R. (2015). Mapping Research Methods. Research Methods
for Business and Management, 5(3), 13-34. doi:10.23912/978-1-910158-51-7-2772
Quinlan, C., Babin, B., Carr, J., Griffin, M., & Zikmund, W. G. (2015). Business research
methods (8th ed.).
Remler, D. K., & Van, R. G. (2015). Research methods in practice: Strategies for
description and causation (3rd ed.). Los Angeles [etc.: Sage.
Schindler, P. S., & Cooper, D. R. (2018). Business research methods (5th ed.).
Stokes, P. (2011). Key Concepts in Business and Management Research Methods. Key
Concepts in Business and Management Research Methods, 5(6), 1-134.
doi:10.1007/978-0-230-34600-0_1

RESEARCH METHODS 8