Financial Performance Analysis: Tesco, Sainsbury's, and Morrison's

Verified

Added on  2023/04/05

|19
|3460
|357
Report
AI Summary
This report presents a comprehensive financial analysis of Tesco, Sainsbury's, and Morrison's Plc, examining their financial health and performance. The analysis covers profitability, management effectiveness, efficiency, and liquidity ratios, providing a comparative assessment of the three major UK supermarket chains. The report delves into key financial metrics such as gross margin, operating profit, net profit, return on assets, return on equity, inventory turnover, asset turnover, and receivable turnover. It also includes an evaluation of non-financial ratios like revenue and operating income per employee. Furthermore, the report includes a memo to the managing director of Morrison's Plc, offering recommendations for improving financial performance. Finally, it outlines the limitations of financial ratio analysis and discusses investment appraisal techniques. This report, contributed by a student, offers valuable insights into the financial aspects of the retail sector and the application of financial analysis tools.
Document Page
Accounting and Finance for Managers
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
SECTION A.....................................................................................................................................3
a. Analyzing financial health and performance of Tesco, Sainsbury and Morrison’s Plc...........3
b. Writing a memo to managing director regarding the performance of firm along with the
recommendations.......................................................................................................................10
c. Outlining the limitations of financial ratios...........................................................................11
SECTION B...................................................................................................................................12
a. Using net present value technique to assess whether three year contract is profitable or not
...................................................................................................................................................12
b. Explaining approach of taxation in appraisal........................................................................14
c. Discussing the techniques that can be used for the evaluation of project..............................14
d. Stating the other factors that need to consider while taking final decision...........................15
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................15
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................17
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
Accounting and finance management are vital for the organizational growth and success.
In the business organization, manager places high level emphasis on maintaining accounting
records and information which in turn helps preparing suitable statements. Hence, by making
analysis of financial statements through the means of ratio analysis both internal and external
stakeholders can take suitable decision. This report is based on three major retail or supermarket
stores such as Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Morrison Plc. All these retail stores are listed on the
recognized stock exchange of UK and known for delivering high quality products. The present
report will light on the extent to which financial condition of company is sound over others. It
will develop understanding regarding the investment appraisal techniques and its significance in
the decision making aspect.
SECTION A
a. Analyzing financial health and performance of Tesco, Sainsbury and Morrison’s Plc
Profitability analysis
Gross margin ratio: It has been assessed from ratio analysis that GP margin of Tesco
decreased over the years and accounts for 6.31% respectively. Besides this, from 2010 to
2014 GP ratio. Due to sale revenue and high direct expenses Morrison fluctuated. In
2014, gross profit ratio of Morrison’s Plc was 6.07%. In comparison to this, Sainsbury’s
GP margin was 5.79% in 2014. Due to the existence of more competition business units
failed to generate more sales and profit. Hence, by considering such aspects, it can be
stated that GP margin of all such business units were not good.
Document Page
Operating profit ratio: Outcome of ratio analysis shows that declining trend took place in
the operating margin of Tesco Plc. In 2012, operating margin was account for 6.54%,
whereas in 2014 such ratio implies for 4.14%. From 2010 to 2013 operating profit margin
of Morrison’s was lied between the ranges of 5.24% to 5.89%. On the contrary to this,
such ratio was negative .54% which entails that business unit sales has been failed to
manage general administration expenses. In comparison to Tesco and Morrison’s Plc,
operating ratio of Sainsbury’s Plc accounts for 4.21%. Hence, by considering such trend
or performance level it can be stated that operating margin of Tesco and Sainsbury’s Plc
was good.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Net profit ratio: Graph clearly shoes that net margin of Tesco Plc increased from 4.09%
to 4.94% from 2010 to 2012. Hence, after such period, net profitability aspect of firm
after the fulfillment of obligations was 2.42% and 3.01% in the year of 2013 and 2014.
On the other side, NP margin of Morrison Plc moved from positive to negative trends. In
2014, NP ratio of Morrison Plc was -1.35% which in turn presents that profitability of
company was worst. On the other side, net profit margin of Sainsbury’s Plc was within
the range of 2 to 3%. Sainsbury’s net profit was 2.99% at the end of 15 March 2014.
Thus, overall evaluation presents that Tesco generated suitable margin by making
effectual control on expense level.
Management effectiveness
Return on assets: ROA of Tesco was 6.46%, 3.03% and 3.81% from 2012 to 2014. As
compared to Tesco, Morrison’s ROA reduced significantly from 7.04% to -2.24%. It
presents that Morrison failed to generate more funds or returns through assets. In against
to other rival firms returns generated by Sainsbury’s Plc was within 4 to 6%. Such trend
or competitor analysis shows that Sainsbury’s Plc performance of was good in the year of
2014 over others.
Document Page
Return on equity: ROE of Tesco was 18.40% in 2012 which in turn indicates that
company had made effective use of equity to some extent. In contrast to this, return on
equity measure of the company was 12.22% which shows that performance level
decreased significantly. Morrison’s ROE was negative such as -4.80% which shows that
strategic framework of company was not highly sound. Ratio analysis results show that
ROE of Sainsbury’s Plc increased from 10.42% to 12.09% 2014. Thus, Tesco and
Sainsbury Plc had made their best efforts for generating higher revenue through the
means of shareholders fund.
Document Page
Efficiency ratio analysis
Inventory turnover ratio: Financial statement analysis presents that inventory turnover
ratio declined from 19.38 to 16.27 times. On the other side, such ratio of Morrison’s Plc
also shows declining trend in the performance level. Stock turnover ratio of Morrison’s
was 26.79, 25.24 & 23.54 respectively. On the contrary to this, such ratio of concerned
business organization accounts for 21.96 & 20.34 times. In addition to this, Sainsbury’s
turnover ratio also shows decreasing trend from 27.15 times to 22.65. The above
mentioned trend shows that all these three companies are facing difficulties in relation to
generate more money through sales due to the rise in competition and changes in the
needs, wants as well as expectation level of customers (Collier, 2015). In comparison,
Sainsbury’s stock turnover ratio was good as compared to others.
Asset turnover ratio: By applying the tools of ratio analysis, it has been assessed that
asset turnover ratio was 1.30 times in both 2011 & 2012. On the other side, assets
turnover ratio of Morrison’s Plc declined from 1.81 to 1.66 times. Along with this,
declining trend or in the Sainsbury’s Plc performance level pattern was seen. Hence, by
considering the outcome of ratio it can be stated that all such supermarkets failed to
generate enough sales by making use of assets. In comparison to all the firms, Tesco Plc
had generated more sales from both fixed and current assets.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Receivable turnover ratio: Outcome of ratio analysis entails that Tesco generated money
from debtors within the less time frame in 2014 as compared to the past years. Whereas,
receivable turnover ratio of Morrison’s Plc was 87.31 in 2014. In contrast to this, debtor’s
turnover ratio of Sainsbury’s Plc significantly declined from 129.22 to 25.04 days. Out of
all the supermarkets Tesco received money from debtors within the less time frame.
However, working capital aspects of Sainsbury’s and Morrison’s Plc was fluctuated
negatively due to inappropriate credit policy.
Liquidity ratios
Document Page
Current ratio: Graphical presentation shows that current ratio of Tesco Plc was declined
from .71 to 0.61 times at the end of 2014. Hence, during the period of 5 years company’s
capability in relation to fulfilling obligations decreased significantly. On the other side, in
2010 current ratio of Morrison’s Plc was .51, whereas it reached on .50 times in 2014.
During the same time period, current ratio of Sainsbury’s Plc also decreased from .66
to .64 times. Hence, in 2014, all these companies were failed to maintain enough current
assets. Thus, it can be stated that liquidity position of all three supermarket was not good
because ideal ratio implies for 2:1 (Francis and et.al., 2015). However, as compared to
other firms liquidation position of Sainsbury Plc was good.
Quick ratio: From ratio analysis, it has been assessed that quick ratio of Tesco,
Morrison’s and Sainsbury’s Plc was fluctuated from the period of 2010 to 2014. In 2014,
quick ratio of Tesco, Morrison and Sainsbury accounts for .42, .16 and .48 times
respectively. In this year, quick ratio of Tesco and Sainsbury’s Plc was near to the ideal
ratio such as .5:1. By considering this, it can be stated that both the organizations
maintained enough current assets other than inventory and prepaid expenses that can
easily be converted into cash (Nielsen, Mitchell and Nørreklit, 2015). However, quick
ratio performance of Sainsbury shows that it was not highly capable in relation to
meeting immediate payments.
Document Page
Non-financial ratios
Revenue/Employee: In the accounting year 2014, employee revenue of Tesco,
Morrison’s and Sainsbury’s Plc was £124513, £337953 & £484798 respectively. By
making evaluation of performance, it has been identified that workforce of Sainsbury’s
Plc is highly efficient and made significant contribution in the revenue level.
Operating Income/Employee: Below mentioned graph presents that operating income
generated by Morrison’s employees are highly lower as compared to Tesco &
Sainsbury’s Plc. Thus, Morrison is required to frame competent HR policies and
strategies to enhance employee performance (Ferrell and Fraedrich, 2015).
b. Writing a memo to managing director regarding the performance of firm along with the
recommendations
To,
Managing Director of Morrison’s Plc
Date: 21st March, 2017
Subject: Financial performance results
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
From financial statement analysis, it has been assessed that profitability aspect of the company was worst in the
year of 2014. During such period, both operating and net profit margin of firm was negative which in turn closely
influence the future monetary aspects of firm. Further, it has been identified that liquidity position of the company
was not sound. Moreover, as compared to ideal ratio business unit was maintained only 25% of current assets. This
in turn entails that company was not highly capable during the period of 2014 to meet its current liabilities. Along
with this, company was also failed to incorporate high return from assets such as, debtors, inventory etc. Thus, it is
suggested to the firm to follow below mentioned aspects which will help it in enhancing financial performance:
Business organization should focus on advertisement campaign and sale promotion activities. Hence, by providing
suitable information to the large number of customer regarding the quality and price of product sales revenue and
thereby profitability can be maximized. Along with this, for making control over cost level Morrison Plc should
undertake budgeting technique.
In addition to this, Morrison should lay more emphasis on maintaining current assets such as cash etc by reducing
the level of expenses. It can be done by the firm through the means of continuous monitoring. By this, firm can
maintain high liquidity and thereby would become able to meet obligations on time.
Further, by encouraging personnel to give their best efforts Morrison’s Plc can make optimum utilization of assets
and thereby would become able to generate high profit margin.
Hence, by following all such measure's Morrison Plc can make significant improvement in the profitability and
liquidity aspects. All these aspects will help company in gaining competitive edge over others.
Recommendation: by applying these financial ratios the organization can increase their
performance level and also it help them to take major decisions or major steps for making profits
in long run. The company can improve its worst performance by applying these ratios analysis.
Through these ratios the organization can change its strategies and pricing policies to meet the
need of the people in long run.
Sincerely
Financial analysts
c. Outlining the limitations of financial ratios
Limitations
Document Page
Different rules and regulations: Accounting policies which are undertaken by different
organizations highly differ. Moreover, some organization considers UK GAAP, whereas
other considers IAS and IFRS for both recording and reporting (Reckers and Samuelson,
2016). Different rules and regulation in the financial ratio has major deal with the
organization because if any small mistake is happen than the organization have to bear
huge amount of loss.
Inflation: Rate of inflation changes over the years or time frame which in turn closely
influences the financial health and performance (Anderson and et.al., 2015). Hence, rate
of inflation highly varied from one year to another. In this, it is not possible to evaluate
company’s performance over the years. Company’s balance sheet have been badly
distorted due to inflation. company must interpret with judgment so that it is not
necessary that the judgment is good.
Historical evaluation: Financial statement analysis presents information regarding the
past performance. However, it does not reflect trend in relation to future performance and
aspects (Bebbington, Unerman and O'Dwyer, 2014). Due to this evaluation organization
does not takes its major decisions. Hence, by considering this it can be stated ratio
analysis tool does not help in making suitable decision regarding investment.
SECTION B
a. Using net present value technique to assess whether three year contract is profitable or not
To
John Green
Financial director, Sound Equipments Ltd
Date: 21st March, 2017
Subject: Investment appraisal analysis
Introduction: This report present the evaluation of the financial and non financial ratio to the organization for
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 19
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]