Leadership Development in Garvey Group

This report discusses leadership development in Garvey Group, a family-owned hotel and retail business in South Ireland. It covers the difference between leadership and management development, leadership theories, and how HR professionals can work towards effective leadership development. The report emphasizes the importance of leadership skills and how they can be acquired through different programs.

Leadership Development 0
Title: Leadership Development
Assignment Name:
Student Name:
Professor:
Date:

Leadership Development 1
Executive Summary
The accomplishment of a task within the Garvey Group is done through leader. When moving up
in a ladder, the individual must have requisite skills to become the leader. The present report
summarizes leadership as opposed to management development make to successful performance
in the Garvey Group. The report highlights how leadership skills can be acquired with different
leadership programs. An overview of how can theory related to leadership inform leadership
development in the Group has been given. The HR professionals provide the clear pathway to
achieve the organizational goals and responsibilities. An explanation has been provided on how
can and should HR professionals work with others within the Group to ensure effective
leadership development. This is followed by a conclusion.

Leadership Development 2
Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................3
1. Leadership as Opposed to Management Development............................................................3
2. Leadership Development in the Group....................................................................................6
3. How Should HR professionals work within the Group to achieve Effective Leadership
Development?..................................................................................................................................9
Conclusion.....................................................................................................................................13
References......................................................................................................................................14

Leadership Development 3
Introduction
Garvey Group is being run as a family-owned hotel and retail business. The company has 13
hotels and stores across the South Ireland of the country. The company largely believes in the
learning and development of its employees. Learning and development refer to various skills and
abilities which can help the employees to perform efficiently in their jobs. The Garvey group
focuses on mentoring and coaching the employees and guide their employees. Moreover, the
success of any leadership and development is greatly influenced by the quality of programs that
are being run by the Garvey Group. This also requires acceptance from the superiors.
1. Leadership as Opposed to Management Development
The Garvey group has more than 1000 employees working with them. The superiors and
management need to analyze the leadership and management development process which can
ensure success in the long run. Foremost, the question is how leadership strongly opposes the
management development process (Howland, 2012). The management development implies the
execution and administering of different operational tasks. This also involves planning,
implementation and controlling. The management needs to understand when working in a matrix
or project-based organization, managers and employees need to have advanced leadership skills
for promoting the hierarchy of individuals to achieve a certain designation or title (Bush, 2010).
Leadership is considered a primary part of management. Employees may be predisposed to one
or other but cannot function well without the effective use of skills and abilities. The
competencies, concepts, and dynamics are different at each executive level. The Garvey Group

Leadership Development 4
comprises high performing executives, but dependent on functional compatibility (Gunter,
2010).
The Leadership concept urges adaptation, innovation or changing the response to changing
circumstances. The group needs to focus on the discipline factor as a part of leadership
management (Marcketti, Arendt and Shelley, 2011). The context within which leadership and
management development takes place is both dynamic and complex. The concepts of leadership
and management and their application in an organizational, social, environmental and
multicultural context can be explained as follows-
Organizational-This can be understood as the leadership and management development with
relevance to the functional integration of executives working in the organization. This will help
in building strong ties among the executives. This is driven by powerful organizational factors.
This includes salary and competitive forces which are helpful in creating the brand more
successful. The organizational context is also targeted towards customer preferences and
achieving the goals within a stipulated time period. The Garvey group needs to focus on cost
advantages and globalization (Stewart, 2012). The Garvey groups need to make an investment in
material sourcing and advertising for achieving the large market potential. The manual work can
be reduced to an extent and fostering new skills such as customer service. This will enable
managers to work across different boundaries. This also implies increased use of team working.
Leadership and management development focus on gaining manager commitment and loyalty.
The managers must be in a position to take decisive action (Bush, 2014).
Social-When any change takes place in the social organizational structure like delayering or
downsizing. This can affect the managers to a great extent. The group needs to respond to these
changes and ensure customer expectations can be met rapidly. This also implies quality and labor

Leadership Development 5
supply and reward work must be in order to achieve productivity. The reason behind the changes
in the social structure is due to changes in information technology. One of the greater
consequences is distinctions that exist between employee and management. The employees can
get more empowered. The employees must be encouraged to share the information within the
group (Boyatzis, 2014).
Environmental-The impact of leadership style and project environment has been examined
by the Garvey Group. There are different environment findings that will provide insight into
organizational conditions, business processes, and management leadership styles. These can be
conducive to high performance and technology-based environments. There are a huge number of
performance factors that have been associated with the human side. There are organizational
conditions that will satisfy professional as well as personal needs and this can have a strong
impetus over-commitment, risk management, cooperation and drives team performance. The
leadership styles have a strong emphasis on the management of project teams and conditions that
are favorable for assessment of performance in different groups.
The organizational culture must be conducive to knowledge use, sharing and development.
There must be provision for management intervention and appropriate knowledge management
strategy must be applied. This applies to build knowledge of employees. Garvey Group focuses
on management training and development must be designed in a way that can foster learning
through skills and experimentation. The employees are required to be managed in different ways.
Managers must be provided with a high level of autonomy and ensure that there are enough
opportunities for self-learning and development (Gabriel, 2015).
Multicultural-The leadership diversity in the Garvey group is one of the major issues. It has
been recognized gender inequality is an existing problem. Women are under-represented in

Leadership Development 6
different senior positions. The discrimination is one of the common problems in these types of
organizations. The managerial roles are male dominant. This has a strong over different
particular groups which include minority groups and women. Individuals who belong to these
groups have less mentoring, networking and leadership development opportunities.
Leadership development is an activity that can increase the skills and traits of an individual and
assumes leadership responsibilities and roles. This example includes executive education,
workshops, and seminars, executive education at management level and internships. There is
number of learning opportunities that are focused on developing knowledge skills, abilities, and
self-awareness. All the individuals are not born with the ability to lead others and these skills can
be developed with time. The leadership traits cannot be changed as this is a set of practices
which is learned through experience and effort. Organizations need to provide formal training to
their employees. Traditional styles require doing manual work in a particular area using feedback
and coursework. The traditional style of leadership is lecture and classroom training and this
provides the employee with the ability to question the leader. This is how the information can get
transferred to a training environment.
2. Leadership Development in the Group
Leadership Theories are focused on abilities, preferences, and traits. A transactional theory
refers to leading towards transactions between followers and leaders. These transactions within
the group will lead to positive outcomes (Junker and van Dick, 2014). Success or failure is
dependent on the skills of a leader and motivates followers through rewards and punishment. At
an initial level, rewards have been accomplished through paying the subordinate with job. This
goes far with leaders as subordinates may or may not be able to achieve the targets. The theory

Leadership Development 7
sets up the system as leaders exchange rewards and punishment which is based on the
performance of subordinate. The theory will be more effective when there is a clear expectation
of procedures and policies. This must coexist with learning and development and training
essential for performing the tasks. The subordinates or employees must know what they need and
what is expected and have a clear understanding of what can be the consequences of non-
performances (Mango, 2018).
The transactional leadership theory is also known as the Leader-Member Exchange Theory.
This has been developed in 1970s. This is one of the ways of further explaining the dynamics
which exist between seniors and employees. The theory recognizes effective leaders and this
must maintain the authoritative position. The leader-member exchange theory suggests the
association is must between leaders and subordinates. This association will develop over time
and transforms the subordinates into trustworthy supporters (Allio, 2012). The Garvey Group
needs to offer favors to employees in the shape of recognition, raises, promotions, etc. Rewards
are consistently effective if, leader is continuously motivated and encourages its employees. This
is how organizational goals can be streamlined with those of individual goals. For instance-the
individual who is planning to move to the management will be more responsive to leadership
opportunities. This is not an uncommon practice for the associations developed through these
procedures and carries forward and moves with the new opportunities. The leader will be
required to keep the associations preserved and look for opportunities and bring trustworthy
employees too. This implies promotions for the subordinates in the group (Mahajan, 2011).
There are certain instances where the follower challenges the authoritative nature of the
leader. This happens when goals and responsibilities are not appropriately defined. The leader-

Leadership Development 8
member exchange theory reveals three stages of association development between superiors and
subordinates.
Role Taking-This is the first stage that covers the evaluation period. This is the stage which
is to be completed by a new employee. During this stage, the leader will be assessing the
subordinate motivation and determiner the talent of the subordinate. This needs to be utilized in
the best possible ways (Subrahmanyam, 2018).
Role Making-The subordinates will start contributing to the group. This is done by
performing the roles and responsibilities as assigned by the superior. The leader-member
exchange theory states that subordinates are divided into two groups. In group and Out Group-
the employees which are placed in the in-group are known for the loyalty, skills, and traits. This
in-group will be receiving more attention and also receives rewards such as training
opportunities, growth and development, and work. When compared with the in-group, the out-
group has lost the trust of superiors. This is visible in the form of unmotivated and incompetent
traits. These employees will be receiving less attention and opportunities from the superiors (Zhu
et al., 2015).
Role Routinization-In this stage, the association between superior and subordinate is normal.
In-group subordinates are able to maintain their status and continuously rewarded for continuous
support and loyalty. Out-group subordinates are dissatisfied with status and search for
opportunities and plan to leave the organization.
There are different methodologies of looking at leadership practices. These are known as trait
theories and focus on characteristics and personality. Experts have a native belief that leadership
behavior is based on intrinsic qualities. It is possible that the employee may or may not have the
desired qualities. The leadership theories have covered an extensive range of approaches and

Leadership Development 9
principles. However, there are different leadership styles that fit with different places and
circumstances and encourage leadership behavior in people (Bullough and de Luque, 2014).
The selection of leadership approaches makes the most sense in the organization. The
management needs to have the working knowledge of leadership approaches and these can be
applied to an ideology which is relevant to the circumstance.
Trait Approach-According to the trait theory, leaders will be displaying emotional maturity
and honesty and have a strong drive towards cognitive ability. Experts have recognized how
great leaders did not have these traits but were effective leaders. The contingency leadership
theory is there is no single leadership style that can fit with all the circumstances (Pinnington,
2011).
Situational Approach-The situational approach focuses on the fact that leaders must be
promoted to react in a way that is determined through a situation and the given task. This is true,
whether the employee is working alone or supported through other members.
The Garvey group management and administration department have knowledge about leadership
theories and approaches. This helps them in hiring the appropriate people and makes the best
teams. This enables them to complete the task over a given period of time. Project managers
must be encouraged to utilize leadership approaches and improve performance levels. There are
leadership theories that provide a list of personal characteristics and how people can make their
jobs done.

Leadership Development 10
3. How Should HR professionals work within the Group to achieve
Effective Leadership Development?
Human Resource Management has been seen as the crucial and critical component of every
organization. In particular, it is necessary to analyze ho efficient people management can ensure
better organizational performance. Besides, the people component, the HRM function is related
to leadership development (Cook, 2013). The HRM practices of different successful companies
have been outdoing peers with relevance to economic profitability and following the practices of
leadership development. The companies must be able to retain their place in society. Leadership
development programs are adopted by companies. These are simple programs that are based on
the value of generating value for the different resources like manpower and after-sales services.
The organizational culture must be defined so as to inspire leaders. The performance
management must be streamlined with the Garvey Group's roles and responsibilities. This
includes leadership objectives, business strategies, and skill development activities. The
individual promotions are based on performance and these are linked with the attainment of
business objectives (Nilson, Fels and Gopaul, 2016).
The leadership development has been embedded in manpower planning and this is long term.
The companies are required to divide the manpower and governed for high objectives and
responsibilities. Further, the recruitment and selection of new employees in the organization are
based on long term assessment of demand and supply of manpower. This ensures the hiring of
the young generation, who have potentials and requisite skills to achieve success (Kovach,
2018).
The Human resource management function in Garvey group works in a collaborative mode.
This implies people management function is not solely remaining with potential leaders. It is

Leadership Development 11
essential to identify the potential leaders who are working within the company and the
performance must be interlinked with empowerment. This model also enables the potential
leader to move up the chain. The senior management and HRM function have the ability to
identify leaders. Human resource management function plays a crucial role in the employee
lifecycle. The leaders in the Garvey Group must have the right skills and traits that can
effectively meet the challenges of 21st century. This group starts grooming of its executives right
from the middle management (Gun and Aslan, 2018).
Leadership is assumed as a mix of natural abilities, skills and traits and organizational
nurturing. This helps in the determination of success or failure. An HRM function helps the
senior management to develop leaders. One of the common problems that are related to
leadership is-there is numerous terms and definitions and numerous perspectives. Moreover,
every individual working in an organization has its own definition and which is, generally
implicit. HR professionals have been trying to give this term an explicit definition of what
leadership implies within the context of the organization. Leadership and development take the
form of behavioral indicators that are required to set clear objectives and work as a common
language for superiors and subordinates. Leadership has been effectively distributed across the
whole group and not the responsibility of only executives (Garn and Copeland, 2014).
One of the common problems which are associated with leadership is-the promotion of
people without the required support and development and they are unable to fulfill the
responsibilities as leaders. In order to address this issue, HR professionals must understand the
present capability levels that are present within the Garvey Group. The company needs to create
the different leadership programs which help in building the skills of people who act as leaders
and potential leads.

Leadership Development 12
The HRM should function within an organization to bring sustained changes in leadership
development and capability programs. This is a long term approach that helps in the
development of employees identify as leaders. This also includes mentoring, coaching and
support over the given period of time and is effective when compared with short training
processes.
Learning and development are some of the functions which are used through HR
professionals to support the leadership within the organization. Processes like recruitment,
appraisal, and promotion are different forms of embedding positive leadership. Promotional
systems are made to ensure that people who have capability can be put into positions that involve
leading other people. There are instances where the manpower is technically excellent but cannot
be good leaders. The organization needs to identify that manpower and provide them with
technical promotion. This implies recognizing the quality of people working within the
organization (Saxena and Choubey, 2018).
Performance management and appraisal will support the administration department of the
Garvey Group and what has been expected out of it. This implies organizational leaders and
leadership capability must be working within the context of the organization. The group needs to
focus on the development of different procedures and policies like organizational development,
job design, employee engagement and this must emphasize the good people leader development.
In order to achieve efficient leadership and development within the organization, it is crucial to
have processes and systems at all levels of enterprise and specifically from the top. This can be
done through-articulation of business case, agenda influence and leadership championing and
showing how leadership can be dealt with dynamic and complex operating organizations.

Leadership Development 13
The leaders may be required to challenge at top management level and role model
leadership, values, and authenticity. HR professionals need to allow the leadership to be
understood as a process. This approach will benefit leaders as well as employees and
organizations (Innocenti, Pilati and Peluso, 2010).
The HR needs to ensure whether the organization has appropriate people who are
performing well in different leadership roles at all the departmental levels. HR needs to focus on
different areas such as internal assessment, success recognition, performance definition, and
leadership capacity. HR must dispel that soft skill to subordinates. It has been observed sift skills
are difficult to master. This is how performance can be maximized. There are different observers
which have been assigned different roles by the HR personnel. This can vary from data
administrator, strategic partner, and compliance enforcer. HR is considered to be one of the
significant roles which ensure organization has effective supply of leadership and management
development. HR ensures that assets, systems must serve the purposes effectively.
Conclusion
The difference between leadership and management development has been highlighted.
Leadership development works as a facilitator Management training is required to get into the
role of facilitator. The imparting of new information to employees is effectively done.
Leadership development focuses on how to create an environment where employees can
articulate the development needs. How the different leadership approaches must be used for
closing the gaps. Leadership developments rely on managerial responsibility. The leader must be
successful in carrying out the management session and must operate successfully within the
group. Management must rely on the commercial aspect of group performance.

Leadership Development 14
References
Allio, R. (2012). Leaders and leadership – many theories, but what advice is reliable?. Strategy
& Leadership, 41(1), pp.4-14.
Boyatzis, R. (2014). Possible Contributions to Leadership and Management Development From
NeurosciencePossible Contributions to Leadership and Management Development From
Neuroscience. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(2), pp.300-303.
Bullough, A. and de Luque, M. (2014). Women’s participation in entrepreneurial and political
leadership: The importance of culturally endorsed implicit leadership theories. Leadership,
11(1), pp.36-56.
Bush, T. (2010). Accelerating Leadership Development. Educational Management
Administration & Leadership, 38(2), pp.147-148.
Bush, T. (2014). Educational leadership and leadership development in Africa. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 42(6), pp.787-791.
Cook, S. (2013). Your Leadership Banner Personalizes Leadership Theories. Women in Higher
Education, 22(11), pp.23-23.
Gabriel, K. (2015). Organizational Development, Organizational Culture and Organizational
Change. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Garn, G. and Copeland, G. (2014). School Board Elections: Theories Meet Reality. Journal of
School Leadership, 24(1), pp.4-31.

Leadership Development 15
Gun, İ. and Aslan, Ö. (2018). Leadership Theories and Leadership in Healthcare
Facilities. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi.
Gunter, H. (2010). Book Review: Full Range Leadership Development. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 38(3), pp.396-397.
Howland, G. (2012). Book Review: Leadership and Management Development. Educational
Management Administration & Leadership, 40(3), pp.410-411.
Junker, N. and van Dick, R. (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic
review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. The Leadership
Quarterly, 25(6), pp.1154-1173.
Innocenti, L., Pilati, M. and Peluso, A. (2010). Trust as moderator in the relationship between
HRM practices and employee attitudes. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(3), pp.303-
317.
Kovach, M. (2018). An Examination of Leadership Theories in Business and Sport Achievement
Contexts. Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 11(2).
Mahajan, S. (2011). Study on Leadership Styles and Theories. Indian Journal of Applied
Research, 4(3), pp.281-282.
Mango, E. (2018). Rethinking Leadership Theories. Open Journal of Leadership, 07(01), pp.57-
88.
Marcketti, S., Arendt, S. and Shelley, M. (2011). Leadership in action: student leadership
development in an event management course. Leadership & Organization Development Journal,
32(2), pp.170-189.
Nilson, M., Fels, L. and Gopaul, B. (2016). Performing Leadership: Use of Performative Inquiry
in Teaching Organizational Theories. Journal of Leadership Education, 15(3), pp.170-186.

Leadership Development 16
Pinnington, A. (2011). Leadership development: Applying the same leadership theories and
development practices to different contexts?. Leadership, 7(3), pp.335-365.
Saxena, A. and Choubey, R. (2018). Study of HRM Practices on Teachers Performance. Journal
of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education, 15(3), pp.104-107.
Stewart, T. (2012). Classroom teacher leadership: service-learning for teacher sense of efficacy
and servant leadership development. School Leadership & Management, 32(3), pp.233-259.
Subrahmanyam, P. (2018). Corporate Leadership: A Review of Conventional Theories of
Leadership. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, Volume-
2(Issue-3), pp.1360-1368.
Zhu, W., Zheng, X., Riggio, R. and Zhang, X. (2015). A Critical Review of Theories and
Measures of Ethics-Related Leadership. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2015(146),
pp.81-96.