Descriptive Statistics Mean Std Assignment
14 Pages1937 Words95 Views
Added on 2021-01-04
Descriptive Statistics Mean Std Assignment
Added on 2021-01-04
ShareRelated Documents
1Dissertation Chapter -Results
2A total of 80 patients with chronic low back pain CLBP were screened for eligibility. 28patients did not meet the study criteria and were excluded. 42 participants took part in the study. 10 ofthem did not complete the treatment session, therefore, a total of 42 participants completed the studytreatments. 20 of them were allocated in the experimental group while 22 were from the control group(Figure 1)..Total number of recruited participants = 80Total number of recruited participants = 8028 subjects excluded because they did not meet the study criteria28 subjects excluded because they did not meet the study criteria42 subjects enrolled based study criteria42 subjects enrolled based study criteria10 subjects did not complete the study10 subjects did not complete the study42 subjects completed the study42 subjects completed the studyExperimental group: 20 subjectsExperimental group: 20 subjectsControl group: 22 subjectsControl group: 22 subjectsFigure 1: Flow chart describing the patient recruitment process.
3SPSS solution to calculate p-value: For this purpose, two of the crucial group such as experimental and control group are takeninto account. The subjects will be consisting of male and female single or married patients that to visitking Fahad specialist hospital. Solution: Null Hypothesis: H0: μ1 = μ2H0: There is no any significance difference confidentiality among experimental and control group. Alternative hypothesis: H1: μ1 ≠ μ2H1: There is a significant difference between confidentiality among experimental and control group.Level of significance: α=0.05Decision rules: In order to calculate p-value, it is essential to analyse the value which is less than the level ofsignificant researcher can reject the null hypothesis, otherwise accept hypothesis. Test statistic: One-Sample StatisticsNMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error MeanStudy groups421.52.505.078Patient Gender421.55.504.078Patient Age4241.989.4621.460Patient Weight4285.54018.70992.8870Body Mass Index4231.53576.28288.96947Marital Status421.90.370.057Employment Status421.21.415.064Baseline Reading Data entry4226.01.201827 07:48:28.4744 05:11:36.086The value of the test statistic of the group (male and female) is 0.566, whereas body massindex is 0.844, Marital status is 0.938, employment status of the groups is 0.601, Baseline reading dataentry is recorded outcome as 0.737.P-value: There is a significance difference in the age group between male and female that arebelongs to experimental and control group. The value is 0.579. The effect of PEMF on intensity of LBP: This particular research is based on pulsedelectromagnetic field (PEMF) that make impacts on the various condition of low back pain (LBP) wasanalyses properly because of lacking in the studies in this particular areas. The main objective is to
4determine the overall effects of pulsed electromagnetic areas therapy with 50Hz frequency withminimum intensity of 20 Gauss as associate to certain conservative non-invasive valuation ofmodalities in patients with chronic non-specific LBP. The study was conducted among 2017 from thementioned group with the sample size of total 52 respondents with non-specific low back painassociated with experimental and control group. Intervention: The overall experimental group tend to received therapy and shamelectromagnetic areas. Both the group retained 12 sessions of 4 weeks’ duration. In order to measurethe valuable outcome was intensity of pain while the external results tend to measure were disabilityand lumbar range of motion. It has been analyses that there is no as such impacts occurred during theoverall research. Results analysis: The 42 participants with non-specific low back pain taken from (controlgroup = 22 and experimental group= 20) were more randomized. The impacts are mentioned below: Descriptive StatisticsMeanStd. DeviationNPatient Gender1.55.50442Patient Age41.989.46242Study groups1.52.50542Baseline Reading Data entry26.01.201827 07:48:28.47442CorrelationsPatient GenderPatient AgeStudy groupsBaselineReading DataentryPatient GenderPearson Correlation1.167.091.090Sig. (2-tailed).292.566.573N42424242Patient AgePearson Correlation.1671.018-.007Sig. (2-tailed).292.910.967N42424242Study groupsPearson Correlation.091.0181-.053Sig. (2-tailed).566.910.737N42424242Baseline Reading Data entryPearson Correlation.090-.007-.0531Sig. (2-tailed).573.967.737N42424242Model SummaryModelRR SquareAdjusted RSquareStd. Error of theEstimate
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Electronic Education and Diabetes Assignment PDFlg...
|5
|912
|228
Designing a Nutrition Experimentlg...
|4
|1166
|445
Lived experiences of recalled mentally disordered offenders with dual diagnosislg...
|9
|2287
|101