A variety of information sources

qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb
nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc
vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklz
xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf
ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas
dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiop
asdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui
opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty
uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe
rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq
wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn
mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv
bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx
cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjkl
zxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgh
jklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf
HRM

Variety of information sources may be helpful in effective performance management:
advantages and disadvantages of each
It is true that different people are involved in providing the information regarding
performance management. For providing the knowledge regarding employee’s performance,
different people are involved such as subordinates, supervisors, customers, peers and self.
Managers are found to be the most frequent and important source of performance
management. it is assumed that supervisor have enough knowledge regarding the requirement
of job. Due to this, they have enough opportunity for observing their employees. However,
problems might occur by using supervisor as information source as supervisor might not have
enough opportunity to observe the employees performance during their duty. Several
supervisors are also biased to some of the employees. Due to this, using supervisor as sole
information source might lead to less than accuracy measures (Medhi and Jain, 2018).
The main advantage of collecting information from such sources are ability to evaluate the
performance, effective able to compare the performance dimension as well as decision can
also be made toward research. At the same time, several disadvantages are seen such as
evaluation might be based. For example: if any subordinate have conflicts with any person,
he or she will not give positive feedback at all. At the same time, it might be possible that
supervisor is not able to directly observe the performance of their employees (Kokina,
Pachamanova and Corbett, 2017). Therefore, any performance management done by such
supervisor will be inappropriate or might be biased Peers are also found to be information
source in performance management. When information is collected from peers, it leads to the
team work. At the same time, peers might bias based on friendship. For example: If “A” is
the peer who have to give marks to B and C. B is good friend on A and C is not at all in
communication with C. In such a situation, a feedback will be based on the friendship
biasness. It might also be possible that subordinates do not check the day to day tasks so they
would not be able to talk about their behaviour. Peers are other information source who rates
the other members of the team since they are the one who work closely with them on daily
basis. They will also witness the performance, as employees know that manager is watching.
However, there might be some interpersonal problems if any team member tends to rate other
negatively which in turn can reduce the cohesiveness of group. With the peer evaluation, it is
therefore effective way to use the evaluation of subordinates for the purpose of development.
In order to assure that subordinate do not fear for their retribution, it is essential to use the