logo

Caffeine Free Coca-Cola

   

Added on  2022-09-16

7 Pages2108 Words19 Views
Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................ 1
Objective of the experiment....................................................................................... 2
Material and method.................................................................................................. 2
Material used in the experiment.............................................................................2
Participants............................................................................................................. 2
Sensory procedure.................................................................................................. 3
Data analysis.............................................................................................................. 3
Results pie chart.................................................................................................. 4
Conclusion............................................................................................................... 6
Assumptions of the study........................................................................................ 6
List of reference......................................................................................................... 7
Introduction
Coke, mostly known as Coca-Cola is a soft beverage processed by the Coca-Cola Company. Its
production began over a century ago towards the end of 19th century. According to Donnelly, B.
2009, the drink is known all over the world due to the company’s comprehensive advertising.
The carbonated soft drink is now being produced in different flavors having different amounts of
sugar levels included in the processing. The products are Caffeine free Coca-Cola, zero sugar
Coca-Cola, Coca-Cola cherry, Coca-Cola Vanilla and the most common diet coke Coca-Cola,
thanks to the availability of different alternative sweeteners and food additives that are used in
production of flavors.
Due to the increasing levels of obesity, diabetes and diet related diseases, the health ministries
are concerned about the role of sugar intake. Kweon M 2009 defined alternative sugars as food
additives that can be used to replace sugar since they have a lower food energy level compared to
sugar. Alternative sugars are proposed to be used in production of food in processing firms in a
bid to reduce sugar intake. The presence of sugar in processed foods is not only used for
sweetening purposes but also to preserve, palate, modify food texture, adding flavor and color
adding. According to Ibrahim O.O 2016, the common sugar alternative include erythritol which
is used in the processing of chewing gum, candies, and beverages, mammitol mostly used in
production of chewing gum and dusting power, isomalt commonly used in processing of dusting
power and lactitol which is used in processing of jams, candies and desserts. According to Gupta
P 2013 alternative sugars usage can significantly reduce dental carries.
1

According to Carpenter R.P 2012, sensory evaluation is a scientific analysis that is aimed at
testing sensory activities such as smell and taste using scientific methods. Sensory evaluation is
majorly designed to evaluate people’s different taste, smell, sound and visual, these kinds of
tasting preference is most important to food processing companies since they will use the results
to know what people prefer most compared to similar product and to know what to change and to
produce which type in abundance. The experiment in this lab report uses sensory analysis to
establish statistical relationship between three types of Coke soft drink using triangular test.
Triangle test is a discriminant test which uses scientific methods to gauge difference in food
products produced. It is important in every product development since it is easy, time-saving and
cost-efficient for a large company product testing since it only requires a different product and
the original products provided to experiment participants for testing. The results are usually
importing in product preference setting and mode of production.
Objective of the experiment
The experiment had two major objectives:
The first objective was to demonstrate an analysis of the ancient triangular test using
binomial model
The second and also main objective of the conducting this experiment was to determine if
the Coca-Cola provided samples was different with respect to the flavor test.
Material and method
Material used in the experiment
Three Coca-Cola samples were provided having two of the same flavor and one of a
different flavor based on the original first Coca-Cola soda samples provided.
A cell phone was used to open the provided link used in Coca-Cola samples coded
derivation.
Crackers and water was used to clean palate between the Coca-Cola soda sample testing
3 digit Codes were used to represent different Coca-Cola soda samples.
A pen and a note book were also used in the experiment to keep and record the found
data results.
Participants
A total of 51 participants participated in the experiment. All of the participants were given codes
to be used as their names in the experiment ranging from 1004 to 1065. Each participant was
given three different Coca-Cola soda samples and was required to test and recorded found results
with identity numbers of 1 and 2 representing Coca-Cola original and Coca-Cola no sugars
2

respectively. Later when the testing of flavor is done each of the participants is then given the
identity of the Coca-Cola samples provided to be compared with the found results. Only 27 of
the 51 participants were able to correctly identify the identity of the Coca-Cola soda samples.
Sensory procedure
When collecting data from research participant it is always important to collect data ethically.
Ethics was maintained in the data collection by making sure that all participants were willing to
take part in the experiment and they were provided information concerning the research. The
data used in this experiment was collected ethically using the following procedure:
Each of the 51 participants was provided with three different Coca-Cola soda flavors
samples having two samples of the same flavor and one sample of a different flavor. The
pattern of the Coca-Cola flavors samples was randomly changed.
Each of the participants was required to test the Coca-Cola soda sample from left to right
and record the result using number 1 and 2 representing Coca-Cola original and Coca-
Cola no sugars respectively.
The participants are allowed to break their palates using water and crackers before testing
the next soda sample.
The participants are allowed to retest as they please but they must record their predicted
soda identity. In a case where the participant was unable to distinguish the flavors they
were supposed to guess the identity. Choice making was compulsory.
The participants are to record the results and to identify out the different Coca-Cola soda
sample among the three samples provided.
After completing the testing procedure the participants are provided with the identity of
the Coca-Cola soda samples provided.
The participants are thanked for their participant in the experiment.
Data analysis
The data results found from the experiment was analyzed using Excel and the following results
were obtained. From the experiment done 27 of the 51 (52.9%) participants included in the study
were able to find correct identity of the Coca-Cola soda samples provided. 24 (47.1%) of the
experiment participants were unable to correctly identify the different Coca-Cola soda sample
through testing.
Results table
3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Strategic Management for Coca-Cola's Diet Coke
|10
|2819
|359

Poster
|1
|379
|73

Marketing Mix Strategies of Coca Cola and PepsiCo
|10
|1670
|189

Coke No Sugar Marketing: Value Proposition, Positioning, and Marketing Mix
|12
|3191
|489

Business Environmental - Coca –Cola Assignment
|11
|2141
|81

Mental Wealth 1: Academic and Digital Proficiency
|11
|714
|83