logo

The Australian Business Law

9 Pages1734 Words28 Views
   

Added on  2020-03-23

The Australian Business Law

   Added on 2020-03-23

ShareRelated Documents
Running head: BUSINESS LAWBusiness LawName of the StudentName of the UniversityAuthor Note
The Australian Business Law_1
1BUSINESS LAWTable of ContentsQuestion 1........................................................................................................................................2Question 2........................................................................................................................................2Question 3........................................................................................................................................3Question 4........................................................................................................................................4Question 5........................................................................................................................................5Question 6........................................................................................................................................5Question 7........................................................................................................................................6Reference list...................................................................................................................................7
The Australian Business Law_2
2BUSINESS LAWQuestion 1The TPG Internet Pty Ltd is a company that engaged in providing telephone and internetconnections to the consumers under the name ADSL2+. The ACCC had initiatd legalproceedings against the company on the grounds of encouraging misleading and deceptiveadvertisements (Thampapillai et al. 2015). The Company was alleged that the advertisementswere misleading and deceptive in nature. This is evident from the facts:There was a difference between the prominent headline that was offering TPG’sADSL2+ service and the less prominent terms that qualify the offer made by thecompany;The advertisements violated section 53C (1) (c) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) bynot specifying the single price of the package of services in a more prominent way and asa single figure;The advertisement violated section 53 of the TPA by making false or misleadingrepresentation in terms of the price of the services or the products. It made a misleadingor false representation regarding the exclusion, existence or effect of any guarantee, right,warranty, condition or remedy. Question 2The TPG Internet Pty Ltd has been alleged to have contravened sections 52 and 53C (1)(c) of the Trade and Practices Act. According to section 52 of the TPA, a corporation must notexhibit any conduct that amounts to misleading or deceptive conduct or the company must not beengaged in any misleading or deceptive act while carrying out its business activities. According
The Australian Business Law_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Assignment Business Law
|4
|387
|40

Assignment on Introduction To Business Law
|4
|424
|142

High Court of Australia - Act 1974
|7
|1619
|96

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission vs TPG Internet Pty Ltd- Law Assignment
|6
|1499
|328

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission | Assignment
|10
|2061
|47

ACCC v TPG Case Analysis: Misleading Ads and Legal Rulings
|7
|1556
|353