logo

Assignment on Introduction To Business Law

   

Added on  2019-10-31

4 Pages424 Words142 Views
Running head: INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW1Introduction to Business LawName:Institutional Affiliation:
Assignment on Introduction To Business Law_1
INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS LAW 2The alleged Statutory ProvisionsThe statutory provisions that ACCC alleged TPG’s contravened were sections 53(e), 52, 53Cand 53(g) of the TPA. It was alleged also that it contravened sections 18, 29(2)(i) and 29(1) of the schedule 2 under the CCA (Australian Commercial Law). Section 18 talks about misleading or deceptive conduct. For example:s18(1) states that a person must not in business engage in conduct that is misleading or islikely to mislead or deceive (Australiancontractlaw.com, 2010). Section 29(1) says that a person must not, in a trade or in relation to the supplying or possible supplying goods and services or in relation to promotion by any means of supply or use goods and services: a.Make a false representation that goods are of certain quality, standard, value, composition, grade, or style have had a specific previous use; orb.Make a misleading representation that services are of a specific quality, standard, grade or value; or c.Make a misleading or false presentation that goods are new.What ACCC saidWhat the ACCC said about the advertisement that contravened the provisions were:That the advertisements were misguiding and deceiving because the difference between the noticeable ADSL2+service offered by TPG’s at favorable price and the less noticeable terms meeting the requirements of the offer (Corones, 2014).
Assignment on Introduction To Business Law_2

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
The Australian Business Law
|9
|1734
|28

High Court of Australia - Act 1974
|7
|1619
|96

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission | Assignment
|10
|2061
|47

Misleading and Deceptive Advertisements: ACCC v TPG Case Study
|13
|2611
|341

Assignment Business Law
|4
|387
|40

ACCC v Optus: Misleading Advertisements and Contract Law
|12
|3211
|1