Case Study Assessment 4

This case study assessment 4 covers topics such as internal audits, continuous improvement, project governance, premature closure of a project, organizational documents, and project management office support.

Case Study Assessment 4

Table of Contents
1. Knowledge Questions
1.1 Explain how internal audits can support effective continuous improvement............................3
1.2 Explain how continuous improvement relates to.......................................................................4
1.3 Summarise the ‘Phase or stage-based’ approach to project governance...................................5
1.4 Identify 2 factors that might result in a premature closure of a project.....................................6
1.5 Identify and describe 2 appropriate organizational documents for recording strategies and
goals for integration processes.........................................................................................................6
1.6 Describe the ways in which an organization’s Project Management Office (PMO) can
support a project manager in relation to project integration............................................................6
2. TASKS
TASK 1 Project Management Plan..................................................................................................7
2.1.1 Project Charter and Project Management Plan...................................................................7
TASK 4 Finalization and Lesson learned report...........................................................................10
2.4.1 Develop lessons learned report.........................................................................................10
References......................................................................................................................................12

1. Knowledge Questions
1.1 Explain how internal audits can support effective continuous
improvement
The definition of an internal audit is self-regulation action, confirmation of objectives and advice
which aims to instill respect and improve the activity of the association. Internal audit is required
regarding most of the ISO management system standards. The association should conduct
internal reviews of organized competitions. This is to provide data on changing the QMS based
on the organization's requirements for its QMS (Processes and Procedures).
Internal audit, when done correctly, is probably the most important tool in a stock of quality
frame machines. This is the essential method of monitoring an organization's quality
management (QMS) framework. Indeed, the input of internal evaluation is crucial for the
development of the QMS. Through review, the company can differentiate frame incompatibility,
make a healing move, and ultimately support sustainable development. Unfortunately, an
inadequately designed internal audit framework can lead to increased costs, disrespectful inputs,
several long periods of wasted resources and possible interruptions to the QMS, which are
inevitable.
The value of an internal audit approach is that it feeds into a basic view of your organization and
how it works. More importantly, this is self-examination. Despite being internal, the key point is
that an individual / supervisor / employee cannot review their area of work and then consider an
audit of the consistency and performance of an action. . The review cycle varies according to
configuration and increases inconsistency due to inability to allow for identified rounds and
needs. The action strategies to treat and protect these non-compliances include a measure of
sustainable development. Associations are seen to have a strong internal audit capacity and a
more competent circle and are usually examined in a more sustainable manner. Internal Audit
should report validly to the Board or Executive Group to ensure that progress exercises are
appropriately prioritized. The benefits of the Internal Audit degree are that it allows an
association to achieve its objectives by providing a bespoke and trained approach to address,
audit and capacity building risk, management, control and administrative measures.

1.2 Explain how continuous improvement relates to
a) Knowledge management
Knowledge retrieval is a decisive part of the performance of a knowledge management system.
To improve retrieval accuracy, a robust display evaluation system is essential. In those days,
there is certainly no standard evaluation system for evaluating information retrieval, as the
established evaluation is still innovative, entering specific parts of the hunting situation.
Laboratory assessment is not appropriate for assessing the extent of information retrieval,
because information is dynamic, changing and evolving. Furthermore, concurrency analysis is
also an important feature for the presentation of information retrieval frameworks. To improve
the presentation of information retrieval, this paper proposes an evaluation component using the
Six Sigma method to help designers control the information retrieval phase.
b) Quality management
The continuous improvement part is one of the most important standards in any quality
management system and represents a key objective for all development within the company.
While there are numerous important standards for quality management, this time around we will
be at the forefront of continuous improvement. Perhaps the most common thought associated
with quality is that it means that you are not satisfied with the norm. By constantly finding ways
to improve, both the organization and the producers benefit. Employees are more happily
involved with their work and contribute to the development of the organization.
c) Performance management
Performance management and continuous performance improvement specifically are maybe the
most essential prerequisites for accomplishing worldwide intensity and continued development at
a business and undertaking level and at an industry, provincial or nation level. Persistent (and
ceaseless) improvement (CIP) is about the continuous exercises that empower cycles, items and
administrations to be created and conveyed all the more productively, at lower costs and with
improved quality. These enhancements can be of a gradual or advancement nature.

d) Sustainability
Continuous improvement efforts in lean are centered around the end of non-esteem added waste
to deliver precisely what the client needs, when they need it, in the amount they indicate - and to
utilize the base measure of time, material, space and work to achieve this at the most reduced
conceivable expense. Manageability is tied in with limiting the utilization of regular assets like
materials, vitality and even replenishable biomass assets like trees, while diminishing strong
waste and dangerous materials from our creation measures and limiting our carbon impression.
These asset contributions to our assembling tasks have an expense, so diminishing their
utilization is a cost-decrease exertion that improves gainfulness. Notwithstanding diminishing
cost, the pledge to manageability can be persuasive for your workers, a large number of whom
are worried about our planet's future and the way of life we will abandon for people in the future.
1.3 Summarise the ‘Phase or stage-based’ approach to project
governance
A phased approach to practice allows time in the basic stages to collect direct data on the
exploitation of social attributes, workforce and subtleties. At that stage, as a result of this data, it
is possible to design the officers' framework for action and create a turnaround agreement that
will increase the opportunities for improvement. Subsequent levels of performance rely on
providing enterprise-wide tools that enable a company to gain awareness to extend planning,
resource and cost data across the entire set of responsibilities. This data can be used to bolster
business dynamism as there are requirements identified by limited funds, limited financial plans,
and need for action. Surprisingly, company-wide dynamics must be based on solid action-level
data; at least the choices that can be made may not be correct. A phased approach allows time to
ensure that the sound design for each individual task is done before moving on to large
enterprise-grade data. Also, tier tools can speak of a generous budget burden. A gradual
approach can determine the position of interest in these instruments with the most suitable
purpose.

1.4 Identify 2 factors that might result in a premature closure of a
project
1. Projects do not achieve all their deliverables or opportunity to do so.
2. Project has already consumed the budget and client is not ready to increase his budget or
runoff with funds.
1.5 Identify and describe 2 appropriate organizational documents for
recording strategies and goals for integration processes
1. Project charter
2. Project communication plan
1.6 Describe the ways in which an organization’s Project Management
Office (PMO) can support a project manager in relation to project
integration
Some of the ways through which an organization’s PMO can support a project manager are:
 Gathering data about project progress and producing reports
 Developing standards and processes
 Encouraging (or enforcing where necessary) the use of those standards and processes
 Managing resources for projects
 Delivering training and mentoring project team members
 Managing dependencies across multiple projects
 Tracking and managing project benefits
 Reporting on financial information such as return on investment.

2. TASKS
TASK 1 Project Management Plan
2.1.1 Project Charter and Project Management Plan
Project Charter for Software management
Project Details
Project
Description
The project will include the following activities:
 Review management
 Review research manuscript requested by researchers
 Professional and qualified reviewer provide feedback on manuscript
with review report and get payment
 Data Sharing
 Researcher can share and sell data
 Idea/Problem discussion
 Researcher can share their idea/problem through public and private
discussion rooms on different topics
 Profile management
 Maintain and update profile information of professional reviewers.
Project Purpose Writing a successful research paper is a tough job. The ability of success to
have organized newspapers far more important than being recognized by the
best magazines in the world. Powerful analysis of audit documents plays an
important role in the dissemination of test documents. The exam paper exam
requires a considerable amount of adjustment and requires complete
knowledge of the branch of study. Similarly, there are situations where
analysts need to share ideas and other reflections about their work. In some
studies, the information is difficult to find or difficult to pick up. In addition,
the administration of online paper surveys is fully accessible in Bangladesh,
where scientists can profit from these offices by using neighborhood rate
options. This work intends to address each of these requirements and
continue to an electronic level, i.e. combined research effort and level of
information sharing, a wide range of expert review documents review
administrations to help scientists achieve their achievement.
Project Goals &
Outcomes
The results of this project are:
 A web based platform where an analyst is unable to evaluate their
paper drafts from the associated subject matter experts.
 A clear strategy for how to enter a survey request, select an analyst
and a share option.
 A data sharing platform where an analyst can share / sell research-
related information Level where experts / scientists can create public

and private chat rooms on a variety of topics
 Create and maintain site content with the latest search pattern on an
advanced basis
Project Scope The project will include the SRS, design, testing, and delivery of web based
platform survey management centers to help scientists achieve usage results.
The business body oversees all staffing, equipment and programming
facilities. All work will be free from each day and all ongoing activity and
the necessary tests will be carried out in the IIT research facility. All
business donations will be managed by the campaign leader up to and recall
the amounts donated for this report. Additional funding requires business
support license. This action will end when the final report is submitted within
several weeks of trying the electronic internship and the final test, most
importantly, all documents are ready and submitted presentation to the
course teacher.
Project
Deliverables
The main deliverable of this project will be:
 A web based platform that is usable, compliant with requirements, and
more manageable.
 All project related documents:
- Project Initiation
- Domain Analysis
- Business Case
- Project Plan
- BRD/SRS
- Design
- Risk Management
- Configuration Management
- Release Document
- Change Management
- Quality Assurance (Test Plan)
- Project Summery
Benefits  Researchers will have the opportunity to effectively study their draft
papers during this online phase. This will greatly reduce the time and
effort required.
 Paper reviewers are experts in related fields. Scientists can obtain quality
paper analyzes from them. This will take the opportunity to identify their
card with the diaries.
 Researchers can obtain basic information related to the test from this
level. They can use it in their analyzes to build the accuracy of their
results.
 Researchers can also take advantage of the revenue by selling high-
quality information.
 Researchers can discuss questions related to the experiments with site
experts and provide an effective answer to their problems.
 The paper reviewers will find a paper on benefits related to the card by
reviewing a research paper.
 The paper reviewers will have an idea of a study provided by analysts

that will improve the familiar image.
 The developers will build this job with the money. After that, they have
to increase the income from this business.
 The developers will increase direct involvement in creating a mechanical
operation with all necessary documentation and a solid business setup.
Stakeholders  Researchers
 Paper reviewers
 Developers
Constraints/Risks  There is little optional information available for this company’s essential
market review. Due to the critical time constraint, the necessary field of
information is also beyond the reach of this job.
 There are few opportunities to complete a campaign and the time for the
campaign can be changed at any time due to external circumstances.
 There are a few human resources that will pay attention to this activity.
Failure to have a colleague present will prevent the campaign from being
completed as there are no strengthening facilities. Engineers may have
certain limitations (level, coding language).
Assumptions This project is based on the following assumptions:
 Each developer and project team will have unique skills and knowledge
of the new innovations required by the business.
 All project team members will be accessible for the duration of the post.
Aids are available for purchasing equipment / programming for an online
framework.
 The owner and facilitator offer basic help to complete a fertile activity.
 Project has executive-level support and backing.
 Client will test the website.
 Project team effectively identifies how to create expectations within an
expansion, financial plan, and action plan.
Summary Budget Project Component Component Cost
 Project staffing
 Logistic
 Utility
 Miscellaneous
 Laptop
 Desktop
 Premises
Total Anticipated costs
$ 63, 000
$ 11, 500
$ 7, 000
$ 2, 000
$280, 000
$120, 000
$240, 000
$723, 000
Project Timeline Milestone/Deliverables Target Date
Project start 03/10/2020
Project plan review and completion 10/10/2020
Project Initiation 15/10/2020
Planning complete 30/10/2020
Execution Complete 11/11/2020
Monitoring & Control complete 17/11/2020
Project completion 19/11/2020

TASK 4 Finalization and Lesson learned report
2.4.1 Develop lessons learned report
Summary: The given report is based on learning lessons after completion of project charter and
management based on software management.
Report:
The success of a project depends on the skills and characteristics of the people in question. In
this way, an enthusiastic and talented person who moves towards a common goal must have an
action. Along with administrative skills, an action manager should know the characteristics and
shortcomings of his staff, so that gifts can be addressed and shortcomings minimized to help the
business.
A champion team and a team of champions are indeed different. The former would suggest
effective action while the latter would honor a competition of conscience, each pursuing an
individual goal. It's nice to know who the leaders are. These people usually may not be
immediately visible, but they will make important decisions, so building a strong line of
communication with these people will be rewarding in the long run. On the off chance that you
don't have the knowledge and experience to decide on a choice, at that stage you should proceed
this way, without expecting the best leaders to have your cuddles at every step. Lingering doesn't
work. As a result of evaluating the relevant data, choices need to be made. Wrong choices can be
saved whenever they are found early; however, the correct options cannot be delayed.
In this way, Carpe Diem, (hold on to the day), as the famous saying goes. Right now things are
going wrong, as they always are; the reasons will not work. Identify a selective strategy or
therapeutic recommendations. By making allegations solely on the grounds of dissent and
aggression, seeking consent unites the organization. Support the dynamic in your approach.
Responsiveness is not enough. Be open to change. In some cases, you may find that what you
knew may not be right at this particular time, under these particular conditions. Know what
facilities are available. Those under sovereignty as well as those under the notice of various
agencies.

From time to time, others may be happy to help. Overall, the court bank 's view is sharply stated
as "do something for me and I will return a reasoning of favor also evident in the business
world." Desk work and documentation are fundamental to advertisements. , when you decide,
placing too much reliance on information that can lead to changes in a very short period of time
brings almost no profit, to especially in an unstable situation.
Conclusion
Repetitive mistakes are the best avoided. Project lessons learned should be documented so that
future team leaders can make use of the learning experience of others in order to avoid the same
pitfalls themselves.

References
Demirkesen, S. and Ozorhon, B., 2017. Impact of integration management on construction
project management performance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8),
pp.1639-1654.
Bjorvatn, T. and Wald, A., 2018. Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as
drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project
Management, 36(6), pp.876-888.
Silvius, G., 2017. Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 166, pp.1479-1493.
Padalkar, M. and Gopinath, S., 2016. Six decades of project management research: Thematic
trends and future opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7),
pp.1305-1321.
Tereso, A., Ribeiro, P., Fernandes, G., Loureiro, I. and Ferreira, M., 2019. Project management
practices in private organizations. Project Management Journal, 50(1), pp.6-22.
Mavi, R.K. and Standing, C., 2018. Critical success factors of sustainable project management in
construction: A fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP approach. Journal of cleaner production, 194,
pp.751-765.
Bond-Barnard, T.J., Fletcher, L. and Steyn, H., 2018. Linking trust and collaboration in project
teams to project management success. International Journal of Managing Projects in
Business.
Niazi, M., Mahmood, S., Alshayeb, M., Qureshi, A.M., Faisal, K. and Cerpa, N., 2016. Toward
successful project management in global software development. International Journal of
Project Management, 34(8), pp.1553-1567.
Henriksen, A. and Pedersen, S.A.R., 2017. A qualitative case study on agile practices and project
success in agile software projects. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 5(1).
Niazi, M., Mahmood, S., Alshayeb, M., Riaz, M.R., Faisal, K., Cerpa, N., Khan, S.U. and
Richardson, I., 2016. Challenges of project management in global software development:
A client-vendor analysis. Information and Software Technology, 80, pp.1-19.
Bondarenko, S., Lagodienko, V., Sedikova, I. and Kalaman, O., 2018. Application of project
analysis software in project management in the pre-investment phase. Journal of
Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(13), pp.676-684.