Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Verified
Added on 2023/06/10
|13
|2918
|201
AI Summary
This report analyzes the legal and ethical issues faced by Amazon Company while delivering the employee compensation plans to employees. The GMB union announced that it is taking legal action on behalf of members working for three delivery firms used by Amazon, arguing that the companies wrongly classed them as self-employed.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
RUNNING HEAD: Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility1 Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................................1 Ethical issue in business and decision making.............................................................................................1 Ethical theory..............................................................................................................................................2 Ethical decision making framework.............................................................................................................2 Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................4 References...................................................................................................................................................5 Amazon delivery firms face legal action over workers' rights............................................7 Amazon accused of treating UK warehouse staff like robots................................................8
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility2 Introduction With the ramified economics changes and complex business structure, each and every organization needs to follow proper ethical and legal compliance program which may increase the overall outcomes and efficiency of the business at large.The ethical and legal business practice are undertaken by the organization which assists in strengthen the posting impact on the stakeholders of the organization. The company uses different culture and values to define ethics for the organization. Ethical issue when the act taken by the employees breach the moral and ethical concern in the present busienss environment (Amazon, 2018). The CSR activities are the method which assists organization to run the business sustainably in the society with a view to increase the overall satisfaction of the clients.In this report, new article from the Australian financial review have been selected for the analysis of the ethical issues. This article reveals the legal and ethical issues faced by Amazon Company while delivering the employee compensation plans to employees.Amazon Company is international company indulged in online selling of electronic commerce and cloud computing company based in Seattle. This company has faced the ethical and legal issues in determining whether asking legal action on behalf of members working for three delivery firms used byAmazonhave been wrongly classed as self-employed work program.This program was related to providing the employment benefitplan to employees and the legal policy frameworks prepared by the Amazon for the employees who deliver its goods to the clients around the globe (Crane, and Matten, 2016). Ethical issue in business and decision making It is analyzed that each and every organization needs to take initiative in such a way which will ultimately increase the overall outcomes and efficiency of the busienss at large. Company should stagnate to its value and commitment with respect to strengthen the customer’s satisfaction (Den Hond, de Bakker, and Neergaard, 2016). This essay reflects the unethical act of the Amazon implemented in the society which may directly and indirectly affect the employees at large. In this ethical issue, GMB union announced
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility3 that it is taking legal action on behalf of the employees so that they could get the benefits. It is analyzed that latest in a string of gig economy legal disputes have shown thechallengingwhatunionssayisbogusself-employmentamong couriers and other drivers. It is noted that the Wesfarmers Company has been claimed that all the drivers who were working as contract basis should be treated as employees of the Amazon Company. It is analyzed that all the employees who are indulged in the working of the Amazon are not free to take their independent decisions and they directly and indirectly affected by the orders given by amazon (Sabag, and Schmitt, 2016). Ethical theory There are several ethical theories which could be undertaken by theAmazonCompanysuchascorporatesocialresponsibilities program, triple bottom line and long term sustainable program which needs to be assessed by company before undertaking decisions. It is required from the Amazon Company needs to take decisions in the best interest of the employee which could add value for the better value creation in business.The ethical theory needs to be assessed by the Amazon Company to evaluate the potential of giving employee benefitstoemployeesforthebettermentoftheorganization.the ethicalconsiderationemphasis’suponfactthattheGMBunion announcedonMondaythatitistakinglegalactiononbehalfof members working for three delivery firms used byAmazon, arguing that the companies wrongly classed them as self-employed. In the given case, it is analyzed that so many drivers of the Amazon were facing issue related to less amount of payment and loss of their own busienss which may directly and indirectly impact their working.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility4 One of the drivers had to stay for his job till the mid night as he was asked to meet the target and if he fails to do so then he will be penalized for the same (Saeidi, et al., 2015). Ethical decision making framework The ethical decision frameworks of the Amazon should be based on the collected information and the undertaken framework which are given as below.This ethical decision makes the process use of the moral philosophies and ethical and consideration which needs to be taken into consideration. Identification of the ethical issue- In this process, Amazon needs to analysis all the ethical issues that are related to the breachment of the ethical rules and guidelines. It is analyzed that Amazon needs to give all the employees related benefits to the employees who could add value to their economic development (Amartya, 2017). Gathering of information: After identifying the case, Amazon needs to collect the required data which could assist in developing a good strategic plan to solve the issues and problem faced by the employees and Amazon. This will be used to develop mutually agreed understanding between employees and employers (Amazon. 2018). Analysis of data:After collection of the data, Amazon needs to analysis the gathered data with the assistance of the regulators and banking authorities.However, it requires high amount of compliance program which needs to be assessed on the basis of existing rules and regulations. Consideration of Alternative:This process requires official consideration of the negative and positive impact of the ethical issues which have been faced by Amazon Company. It will require Amazon to evaluate the employees work program and compliance structure which needs to be made for the effective resolving of the queries.There are several alternatives which could be undertaken by the Amazon such as undertaking particular action plan, setting new objectives and goals and undertaking the proper work program for the better satisfaction of employees. Make a decision: Afterward undertaken decisions will be undertaken which will assist in taking the business decisions such as considering drivers as regular employees, determining the benefits
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility5 plans which will be given to them and assessing the issues and problem areas which will add value to the better satisfaction of employees at large (Trevino, and Nelson, 2016). The decision to undertake employees as normal employee and rendering the employee benefit program require proper analysis program and implemented actions. In this case, justice theory will be used to assessed on the basis of the decision making process. As per the justice theory, company will have to treat all these employees as regular employees and they should be given all the employees benefits (Vaughn, 2015). All the decisions taken by the Amazon should be taken in the best interest of the organization so that it could add value to the society. Company needs to give back more to its society what it has been taking for running its busienss effectively (Biller-Andorno, and Capron, 2016). Implementation of decision: After analyzing all the details and case study program, it is analyzed that company needs to assess whether the internal and external factors will have the negative and positive indicators on the busienss. The mangers needs to analysis that drivers are putting efforts in the best interest of the organization and it is responsibilities of the company to give the best employee benefits to them for their best interest. It will also establishment nexus between the organization development and their employee development (Martinov-Bennie, and Mladenovic, 2015). Conclusion After evaluating all the cases related to legal and ethical issues, it could be inferred that all the employees who are indulged in discharging the assigned work should be treated as employees of the Amazon. Thus, in the limelight of the given case study, these employees should be given all the employee benefits plans which are given to other regular employees. It is explained that Company like Amazon cannot easily take the decision to give zero benefits to their contract based employees and absorb all the benefits from them what they actually take from employees. Now in the end, it could be inferred that reason of occurring of this event and the way in which company had taken the decision have legal and ethical issues. These issues are required to be solved to overcome the problems in long run.It is assessed that different ethical
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility6 theory and implemented action plan will assists in implementing the work program and delivering the best possible benefits to employees at large.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility7 References Amartya, S., 2017. What do we want from a theory of justice?. InTheories of Justice(pp. 27- 50). Routledge. Amazon ., 2018.,Amazon delivery firms face legal action over workers' rights,GMB union is demanding gig economy drivers get sick pay and national minimum wage[online]. Available from <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jun/04/amazon-delivery-firms-face-legal- action-over-workers-rights>., Accessed on 25 May 2018. Biller-Andorno, N. and Capron, A.M., 2016.Ethical issues in governing biobanks: global perspectives. Routledge. Crane,A.andMatten,D.,2016.Businessethics:Managingcorporatecitizenshipand sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford University Press. Den Hond, F., de Bakker, F.G. and Neergaard, P., 2016. Introduction to managing corporate social responsibility in action: Talking, doing and measuring. InManaging Corporate Social Responsibility in Action(pp. 15-26). Routledge. Martinov-Bennie, N. and Mladenovic, R., 2015. Investigation of the impact of an ethical framework and an integrated ethics education on accounting students’ ethical sensitivity and judgment.Journal of Business Ethics,127(1), pp.189-203. Sabag, Ḳ. and Schmitt, M. eds., 2016.Handbook of social justice theory and research(pp. 10- 14). New York, NY: Springer. Saeidi, S.P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S.P. and Saaeidi, S.A., 2015. How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction.Journal of Business Research,68(2), pp.341- 350. Trevino, L.K. and Nelson, K.A., 2016.Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right. John Wiley & Sons.
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility8 Vaughn, L., 2015.Doing ethics: Moral reasoning and contemporary issues. WW Norton & Company.
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility9 Appendices Amazon delivery firms face legal action over workers' rights GMB union is demanding gig economy drivers get sick pay and national minimum wage The GMB says delivery drivers are treated like employees and should get the same benefits. Photograph: Tony Margiocchi/Barcroft Images Drivers delivering goods forAmazonare to fight for better employment rights, including sick pay, holiday pay and the national minimum wage. The GMB union announced on Monday that it is taking legal action on behalf of members working for three delivery firms used byAmazon, arguing that the companies wrongly classed them as self-employed.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility10 A statement from the union, which represents professional drivers, said: “The drivers were required to attend scheduled shifts that were controlled by Amazon, meaning they did not have the flexibility that is integral to being self-employed. In this situation, the couriers were treated like employees in terms of their working hours and the GMB union contends they should be treated as employees in terms of their rights too.” Advertisement The case is the latest in a string of gig economy legal disputes challenging what unions say is bogus self-employment among couriers and other drivers. The GMB wona landmark judgmentagainst Uber in 2016 and others, including Deliveroo, Addison Lee and CityLink, are all involved in ongoing legal action. The case is being handled by solicitors Leigh Day. Partner Nigel Mackay, a specialist in employment and discrimination law, said seven drivers – including two who had been dismissed – were involved in the claim at this stage and he expected that number would grow. One of the drivers described his experience of leaving the house at 6am, not returning until 11pm at night and as a “thank you” for his hard work, had £1 per undelivered parcel deducted from his wages. On more than one occasion he was told by the company that he would not be paid if he did not complete a route and had sometimes driven when “half asleep at the wheel” in order to ensure he got paid. Two of the members are also claiming that they were dismissed because of whistleblowing, claiming their roles were terminated because they raised concerns about working practice. These included that the number of parcels allocated to drivers resulted in excessive hours and/or driving unsafely to meet targets, and that drivers were expected to wait a significant time to load their vans, extending their working hours. Amazon accused of treating UK warehouse staff like robots Read more
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility11 GMB’s general secretary, Tim Roache, said: “The day to day reality for many of our members who deliver packages for Amazon is unrealistic targets, slogging their guts out only to have deductions made from their pay when those targets aren’t met and being told they’re self-employed without the freedom that affords.” “Companies like Amazon and their delivery companies can’t have it both ways – they can’t decide they want all of the benefits of having an employee, but refuse to give those employees the pay and rights they’re entitled to.” “Guaranteed hours, holiday pay, sick pay, pension contributions are not privileges companies can dish out when they fancy. They are the legal right of all UK workers, and that’s what we’re asking the courts to rule on.” An Amazon spokesman said delivery providers are contractually obligated to ensure drivers they engage receive the National Living Wage and are expected to pay a minimum of £12 per hour, follow all applicable laws and driving regulations and drive safely. “Allegations to the contrary do not represent the great work done by around 100 small businesses generating thousands of work opportunities for delivery drivers across the UK,” he said. He added: “Amazon is proud to offer a wide variety of work opportunities across Britain – full-time or part-time employment, or be your own boss. Last year we created 5,000 new permanent jobs on top of thousands of opportunities for people to work independently with the choice and flexibility of being their own boss – either through Amazon Logistics, Amazon Flex, or Amazon Marketplace.” In April, the delivery company Hermes, which delivers packages for retailers such as Next, Asos, John Lewis, Topshop and River Island, began a legal battle with eight of its own drivers. It is under pressure to settle after rival delivery firm DPD offered all its drivers sick pay and holiday pay as part of wholesale reforms to its gig working model sparked by the death of a driver it charged for attending a medical appointment to treat his diabetes and who later collapsed and died. In 2016 the ride-hailing firmUberwas told its drivers should be classed as workers with minimum-wage rights. Uber, which says its drivers are self-employed, lost its appeal against the decision last year but said it would appeal again. The case could end up in the supreme court this year.
Comparative Business Ethics and Social Responsibility12