Organizational Culture and Leadership at Charles

This assignment delves into the organizational culture of Charles, highlighting the influence of behavioral perception within the company. It examines how different leadership styles contribute to this culture and its impact on employees. Furthermore, the report analyzes Charles' strategic objectives within the UK marketplace.

Management and
Organizations

TABLE OF CONTENT
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................1
A. Three different organisational structures................................................................................1
TASK 2............................................................................................................................................3
A. Modern/ Contemporary management.....................................................................................3
B. Four management functions and leadership styles.................................................................3
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................4
A. Most appropriate organisational culture.................................................................................4
B. Definition of perception to fit into the culture of the organisation.........................................5
TASK 4............................................................................................................................................5
A. Strategic Objectives of Charles Organisation........................................................................5
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7

INTRODUCTION
Management is a fundamental part of all sort of organisations where its affiliated
members represent to be the most accountable bodies for carrying out their business functions on
due period of time. It is mainly in context to acclaim a timely accomplishment of organisational
goals and objectives from the appointed set of workers in the establishment. Wherein, the present
report is hereby based upon a similar acquisition of administration and enterprise where they
held a close relationship among one another. Though, organisational structure and culture are
two other prudent part of a workplace that largely contributes in configuring the business
activities (Canina, Palacios and Devece, 2012). It is basically to make a precise declaration of the
organizational targets to its accompanied staff members to subsequently attain it in on time.
Below report is hereby based upon a bestowed case script of Charles as an entrepreneur who is
willing to set up a project management company in UK. The current report has consequently
measured the prevalent state of UK marketplace as a mean of supporting an active existence of
Charles venture in UK's project management industry. Additionally, the administrative bodies
are together composed of distinct set of leaders with their varied styles of managing the team
members that has been discoursed in the recent report.
TASK 1
A. Three different organisational structures
There exists assorted organisational structures that plays an assistive role in establishing
the business in a competent way. This is mainly with reference to define the set clauses of the
enterprise that will further reflect the cultural base of the workplace. This section is to propose
some considerable forms of organisational structure to Charles for setting up his project
management business (Drafke and Murtaugh, 2009). In context to which, below defined are the
three assistive compositions that can be adopted by him, as mentioned below-
 Functional organisational structure- It is one of the most common structures of the
organisation where the enterprises are segregated as per their distinct functional arenas.
These areas are in context to some specialised groups of IT, marketing and finance, etc.
These functional areas will hereby play a paramount role in timely completion of the
projects.
1

◦ A vital advantage of such organisational structure is its greater constituent of
flexibility with proficient supervisor in each of its department (Greenberg, 2013). As
a result to which, they can hereby refer to provide expertise services to the clients and
users with timely completion of their respective assignations.
◦ However, there exist a leading drawback of such organisational composition where
there occurs a significant lack of focus on completing the projects on time. It is
basically to fulfil the basic needs that often leads to such delinquent state of work.
 Project based organisational structure- It is yet another profound alternative that refers
to a hierarchical structure of the workplace. It is with a prominent role of project based
groups that for timely carrying out the assigned tasks.
◦ A foremost benefit of such structure is its project oriented work that leads to timely
completion of undertaken operations with a focussed approach of the team mates.
This will certainly advantage Charles where the project management team will
strictly refer to the limited deadlines of their undertaken chores and accordingly
complete the given assignments (Robbins and Judge, 2014).
◦ Though, there exists a conceptual drawback of this structural composition that is the
referred to be the isolation of projects with separate teams to handle a single task. It
will thence lead to duplicated exertions and failure of extensible economies.
 Matrix organisational structure- It is referred to be a hybrid form of organisational
structures that is further composed of various matrix systems. With reference to which, it
is also outlined as a combination of the preceding alternatives of functional and project
based structures that assigns a relative power to both their superior parties.
◦ A prime advantage of this format is its parallel features like that of the functional
composition that leads to multiple usage of resources that can relatively resolve the
issue of redundant staff members (Wagner and Hollenbeck, 2014).
◦ It is together associated with some critical measures of internal complexity with a
disadvantage of affording expensive maintenance of internal conflicts.
Hence, on configuring the above stated organisational structures, it can be stated that the
project based organisational structure is the most suitable option for Charles business
cooperation.
2

TASK 2
A. Modern/ Contemporary management
It is basically in context to define the optimum measures of design management with a
substantial outlook of developing a preserved environment of the business. It is hereby
associated with the set organisational structure and culture of the enterprise with an intended
approach of timely attainment of their strategic goals and missions (Robbins, 2009). It is
however done via some encompassing tools of design management by establishing prompt and
impelling systems of working. Such modern and contemporary sense of management is also
aimed at sanctioning invented services to the clients to satisfy their modern-day preferences that
hereby necessitate Charles to adopt some progressive means for operating the business.
B. Four management functions and leadership styles
There exists four basic functions of management that includes planning, organising,
leading and controlling. In context to which, Charles with an entrepreneurial position is hereby
required to think in a conceptually planned manner for timely achievement of their framed goals
and objectives. Below explicated are these four common managerial functions- Planning- It is a foremost step in which, Charles will hereby refer to adjudicate the
futuristic goals of the business by planning some strategic ways for acquiring those
ascertained objectives. This will also include to forecast the factual needs of the
business with a clear identification of its associated challenging situations in terms of
acknowledging their economic status as well. Organising- It is on another hand refers to organise the requisite resources for attaining
the targets (Canina, Palacios and Devece, 2012). This will require Charles to together
bring their manpower, fiscal and other physical resources. Leading- It is with a principle role of the upper administrative bodies where they are
hereby required to take some continual steps for motivating their employees. This also
involves to make a prior supervision of the hired set of employees with an effective set
of communication.
 Controlling- It is an eventual step in which the hired set of leaders and managers are
hereby required to observantly measure the achieved goals and objectives (DuBrin,
3

2013). This is basically in order to identify any divergence in meeting the standardised
set of performance.
Beside this, there exists different leadership styles with two common techniques of
autocratic and democratic leadership. In which, the autocratic style of leadership is to treat the
workers in rigorous manner that often tends to demotivate the workers at times when they are not
involved in the decision making procedure (Arnold and et.al., 2015). However, the democratic
forms of leadership is also known as participative style of making organisational decisions in
which, the employees are together involved in the decision making procedures. This tends to
motivate the workers at a greater level where they largely contribute in submitting productive
work performances. With an analogous context of which, Charles is hereby suggested adopting
the format of participatory leadership style that will also support his establishment to work as per
the changed managerial concepts.
TASK 3
A. Most appropriate organisational culture
The culture is another substantial part of the organisations that depicts their behavioural
concepts and its other affiliated measures. It is a collective set of values, beliefs and principles of
the individuals that together reflects their shared concerns as well (Clarke, 2013). These thoughts
hereby plays a very influential role that in turn governs the carried mindset of individuals. In
context to which, there exists two common types of organisational cultures known as role culture
and clan culture. Below elaboration is in context to specify the broader concept of these
organisational cultures, defined as- Role culture- It is close to the functional structure of the organisations where all the
appointed set of individuals are hereby required to operate as per their definite set of
roles. In context to which, Charles workforce will hereby operate as per their respective
deputations.
 Clan culture- It is a vital form of corporate culture that strongly emphasis the team
members to internally collaborate one another at the workplace (DuBrin, 2013). Team
work is a major consent of this form in which people generously supports each other.
Charles on adopting this sort of organisational culture is hereby required to familiarize
with his group members.
4

Therefore, on depicting the above two organisational cultures, it has been ascertained that
clan culture will evident an aided tool in Charles project based organisational structure that will
be also incorporated by a democratic style of leadership.
B. Definition of perception to fit into the culture of the organisation
Perception has a greater contribution in organisational behaviour where the sensory
impressions of the individuals are being identified in it. This is mainly done by an active
association of communication among the individuals where the carried perception of the
workforce are often impacted by varied influential means. These are the personal traits of the
percipients like their attitudes, motives, level of interests, past- experiences and expectations, etc.
It thence plays a greater role in the adopted culture of the organisation where it significantly
assists the official bodies to acknowledge the behavioural trend of their personnels (Mullins and
Christy, 2013). It in turn helps in motivating them in a substantial way by which they can timely
accomplish their framed organisational goals and objectives in a standardised format of work. It
is mainly in regard to state about a supportive outlook of an induced perception in the
organisational culture that will help the managers to make error free performances. It is by
clearly detecting the factual standpoint of their teammates where the leaders can accurately
address their coherent needs and demands.
TASK 4
A. Strategic Objectives of Charles Organisation
It is basically in context to define the strategic objectives of Charles while referring to
establish a project management business in UK market. However, there exists such varied
influential means that largely affects the organisational decisions and are therefore required to be
referred by Charles before setting up the establishment. This will comply by the five generic
strategies of Charles, as described below- Setting up goals- It is the foremost strategic objective of a project management company
where there planned projects are hereby required to outline the realistic goals of their
planned project (Vandeveer and Menefee, 2010). It is basically to articulate the necessity
of the projects by together configuring its vital outcomes. Fulfilment of goals- It is a subsequent measure after defining the targeted goals of their
project and in convexity to which, Charles will hereby refer to proceed with a substantial
5

creation of a flow chart to detail their organized plans. It is a step wise approach as a
mean of communicating it to the employees and other affiliated set of audience. Keeping supervision- This is basically to supervise the applied measures of work in the
above strategic arenas with a prior role of the upper administrative bodies to appoint tight
people to attempt right projects that matches their attributes. Budgeted alliance- It is yet another momentous strategy in which, the top level
management of Charles with a foremost contribution of their fiscal department to manage
as per their configured budget (Riley, 2012).
 Meeting deadlines- It is a foremost strategic consent of Charles where they are hereby
required to timely serve their clients and users on due amount of time with no delays in
work submission.
CONCLUSION
The above has defined an impeccable relationship of the organisations with its
management. It is with another vital role of the employees whose up-keeping is a primary
obligation of the appointed set of employers. The above report has thus speculated four well
defined sections with a foremost unit that has highlighted varied type of organisational structures
with their absolute benefits and drawbacks. It is basically to recommend Charles to adopt one of
those proposed set of organisational structure with another part that has identified the advanced
means of management. Leadership styles was another substantial referral of this subdivision that
has tended to suggest a vital adoption of an effectual mode to Charles. Another portion of this
report has formulated a momentous contribution of organisational culture with a greater role of
behavioural perception in it. It is basically to identify the induced role of perception in
organisational culture that directly impacts upon the individuals. Beside this, the eventual
division of this report has hereby demonstrated about the strategic objectives of Charles
organisation in accordance to their chosen marketplace of UK.
6

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Arnold, K. A. and et.al., 2015. Leadership styles, emotion regulation, and burnout. Journal of
occupational health psychology. 20(4). pp.481.
Canina, L., Palacios, D. and Devece, C., 2012. Management theories linking individual and
organizational level analysis in entrepreneurship research.International Entrepreneurship
and Management Journal. 8(3). pp.271-284.
Clarke, S., 2013. Safety leadership: A meta‐analytic review of transformational and transactional
leadership styles as antecedents of safety behaviours. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology. 86(1). pp.22-49.
Drafke., M. and Murtaugh., J., 2009. The Human Side of Organizations 10th ed., prentice Hall
DuBrin, A. J., 2013. Fundamentals of organizational behavior: An applied perspective. Elsevier.
Greenberg, J., 2013. Organizational behavior: The state of the science. Routledge.
Hall
Mullins L., J. and Christy., G., 2013. Management & Organisational Behaviour 10th ed., prentice
prentice Hall
Robbins., S., P. and Judge., T., A., 2014. Essentials of Organizational Behaviour 12th ed.,
Vandeveer, R. and Menefee, M., 2010. Human Behavior in Organizations 4th ed., Prentice Hall
Wagner, J. A. and Hollenbeck, J. R., 2014. Organizational behavior: Securing competitive
advantage. Routledge.
Online
Riley, J., 2012. Theories of motivation. [Online]. Available through:
<http://tutor2u.net/business/gcse/people_motivation_theories.htm>. [Accessed on 19th
November 2016].
Robbins, S.P., 2009. Essentials of Organisational Behaviour. 9th ed. Prentice hall. Guzman, O.,
2013. Organizational Leadership Theories. [Online] Available at:
7

<http://smallbusiness.chron.com/organizational-leadership-theories-284.html> [Accessed
on 19th November 2016].
8