Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Options for Internal Walls
VerifiedAdded on 2023/01/19
|13
|1907
|62
AI Summary
This document discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different options for internal walls, including block work, framed structures, timber walls, brick walls, and rammed earth walls. It provides insights into their characteristics, such as moisture resistance, durability, energy efficiency, and aesthetic appeal. The document also covers the construction sequence for building internal walls and the elements used in constructing the front wall. Additionally, it explores the advantages and disadvantages of various types of roof structures, including gable roofs, hip roofs, mansard roofs, gambrel roofs, and flat roofs.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
By Name
Course
Instructor
Institution
Location
Date
By Name
Course
Instructor
Institution
Location
Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Question 1: Advantages and disadvantages of the various options for the internal walls
Advantages of block work
Ideal in areas that are moist
Can withstand high storms and winds
Energy saving and eco-friendly
Disadvantages
High cost of construction
Inaccessibility of mechanical or electrical installations in case of fault
Advantages of framed structures
Quick to construct
Ease of constructions
Come in economical designs
Disadvantages
Restricted lifespan
Advantages of timber walls
Timber structures tend to be attractive
Offers excellent circulation
Disadvantages
Susceptible to abiotic factors
Shrinks and swells
Advantages of block work
Ideal in areas that are moist
Can withstand high storms and winds
Energy saving and eco-friendly
Disadvantages
High cost of construction
Inaccessibility of mechanical or electrical installations in case of fault
Advantages of framed structures
Quick to construct
Ease of constructions
Come in economical designs
Disadvantages
Restricted lifespan
Advantages of timber walls
Timber structures tend to be attractive
Offers excellent circulation
Disadvantages
Susceptible to abiotic factors
Shrinks and swells
Advantages of brick walls
Ease of formation of openings
Ease of handling since pieces are of lightweight
Easily available
Disadvantages
Low aesthetic appeals
Not durable in comparison with stone
Water absorbing resulting in dampness and distortion over time
Rammed earth walls
Advantages
Excellent soundproofing (Andreescu et al. 2016)
Energy efficient
Relatively fireproof
Disadvantages
Need protection from heavy rains
Does not provide good insulation
Ease of formation of openings
Ease of handling since pieces are of lightweight
Easily available
Disadvantages
Low aesthetic appeals
Not durable in comparison with stone
Water absorbing resulting in dampness and distortion over time
Rammed earth walls
Advantages
Excellent soundproofing (Andreescu et al. 2016)
Energy efficient
Relatively fireproof
Disadvantages
Need protection from heavy rains
Does not provide good insulation
Question 2: Section through the external wall including a junction with the ground floor
slab, first floor slab and ceiling
Question 3: Advantages and disadvantages of timber stud wall construction
Advantages
Sustainability: Timber is one of the renewable materials used in construction. An increase in the
use of timber as a construction material has the potential of enhancing the growth and
development of forests to ensure more supply of the material (Preti et al. 2018). This is
slab, first floor slab and ceiling
Question 3: Advantages and disadvantages of timber stud wall construction
Advantages
Sustainability: Timber is one of the renewable materials used in construction. An increase in the
use of timber as a construction material has the potential of enhancing the growth and
development of forests to ensure more supply of the material (Preti et al. 2018). This is
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
comparable to other materials including concrete and bricks that depend on the extraction of
finite raw materials. Besides, construction of timber needs less carbon dioxide in processing as
well as production as compared to steel
Speed of construction: Erection of timber frame on the site is quite faster in comparison it block
and brick construction allowing interior trades including electrical wiring and plastering to start
soon enough in the building program since the interior will be subjected to weather for a short
time.
Quality: Offsite fabrication of timber may enable higher quality to be attained in comparison
with less controlled conditions on a site of construction. It is common for the fabricated timber
suppliers to as well undertake the on-site erection allowing in the controlled factor conditions to
be adhered to throughput (Preti et al. 2018).
Thermal performance: Timber structure is able to attain a better thermal performance in
comparison with masonry structure owing to the thinner construction. The low thermal mass of
timber enables spaces enclosed by timber frames to undergo heating more quickly in comparison
with masonry construction even though they as well tend to cool at a higher rate.
Strength and robustness: Timber structures remain both robust and strong provided the design
and construction is adequate. Cost effectiveness may be attained through careful design of the
elements of timber to make use of the optimal quantity of material for the needed strength
(Vinod 2019)
Disadvantages
Acoustics: Timber structures are not able to attain the same sound insulation levels as concrete
or masonry since they are not dense. Construction of two separate walls may be used in the
finite raw materials. Besides, construction of timber needs less carbon dioxide in processing as
well as production as compared to steel
Speed of construction: Erection of timber frame on the site is quite faster in comparison it block
and brick construction allowing interior trades including electrical wiring and plastering to start
soon enough in the building program since the interior will be subjected to weather for a short
time.
Quality: Offsite fabrication of timber may enable higher quality to be attained in comparison
with less controlled conditions on a site of construction. It is common for the fabricated timber
suppliers to as well undertake the on-site erection allowing in the controlled factor conditions to
be adhered to throughput (Preti et al. 2018).
Thermal performance: Timber structure is able to attain a better thermal performance in
comparison with masonry structure owing to the thinner construction. The low thermal mass of
timber enables spaces enclosed by timber frames to undergo heating more quickly in comparison
with masonry construction even though they as well tend to cool at a higher rate.
Strength and robustness: Timber structures remain both robust and strong provided the design
and construction is adequate. Cost effectiveness may be attained through careful design of the
elements of timber to make use of the optimal quantity of material for the needed strength
(Vinod 2019)
Disadvantages
Acoustics: Timber structures are not able to attain the same sound insulation levels as concrete
or masonry since they are not dense. Construction of two separate walls may be used in the
improvement of performance that leaves a structural break between them. Part of the break my
be filled using a sound absorbent material for example mineral wool
Condensation: Condensation may take place on the surfaces or may be interstitial condensation
taking place between the various layers of the building fabric ideally as a result of diffusion of
air from the warm interior to cool exterior of building and attaining the dew point within the
building envelope. Timber structures are not good as far as reduction in the problems associated
with condensation is concerned and may require the inclusion of a vapor barrier between the
insulation and the lining of inner wall to bar vapor from sipping through (Sim, Viriyavudh, and
Woo 2017)
Rot and infestation: Timber structures are prone to rot over time in case of poor maintenance
even though the frame is often generally properly protected. Adequate construction and proper
maintenance in needed to ensure timber is in the most suitable conditions for infestation not
arising
Fire risk: Timber structures are highly prone to the risk of fire in comparison with steel
structures as well as masonry construction (Vinod 2019).
Cost: Predesigned timber frame may be more costly in comparison with the other materials used
for construction.
Question 4: Overview of the elements to be used to construct the front wall
Ceiling joist: Horizontal members holding the ceiling members together provided the
required strength.
Common stud: These are vertical members for transferring loads to the bottom plates
noggin: Defines a horizontal member running between various studs
be filled using a sound absorbent material for example mineral wool
Condensation: Condensation may take place on the surfaces or may be interstitial condensation
taking place between the various layers of the building fabric ideally as a result of diffusion of
air from the warm interior to cool exterior of building and attaining the dew point within the
building envelope. Timber structures are not good as far as reduction in the problems associated
with condensation is concerned and may require the inclusion of a vapor barrier between the
insulation and the lining of inner wall to bar vapor from sipping through (Sim, Viriyavudh, and
Woo 2017)
Rot and infestation: Timber structures are prone to rot over time in case of poor maintenance
even though the frame is often generally properly protected. Adequate construction and proper
maintenance in needed to ensure timber is in the most suitable conditions for infestation not
arising
Fire risk: Timber structures are highly prone to the risk of fire in comparison with steel
structures as well as masonry construction (Vinod 2019).
Cost: Predesigned timber frame may be more costly in comparison with the other materials used
for construction.
Question 4: Overview of the elements to be used to construct the front wall
Ceiling joist: Horizontal members holding the ceiling members together provided the
required strength.
Common stud: These are vertical members for transferring loads to the bottom plates
noggin: Defines a horizontal member running between various studs
jack stud: A horizontal members linking the top late and lintel
head trimmer: Also known as the lintel used for holding the doorway frame
jamb stud: Placed immediately close to the opening
sill trimmer: Serves for positioning the window frame
Brace: A reinforcement bar for the vertical members
Question 5: Construction sequence from start of clearing to completion of the front wall
1. Clearance of the site: The site is cleared of any materials including leaves, stones,
branches and any other dirt
2. Installation of stud wall bottom plate: This is done as per the drawing designs with the
measurements taken precisely
3. Installation of stud wall top plate: Various joinery materials including nails would be
used in the joinery work to ensure adequate strength (Jozef, Svajlenk and Kozlovska
2018)
4. Installation of the vertical studs between the plates: The installation should be done with
regard to the recommended room height that would ensure maximum comfort
5. Noggins installation between the studs
6. Creation of the frame of the doorway: The framework is done as per the standard
measures of doors or otherwise as per the design requirements. The timber used for the
frame should be adequately strong.
Question 6: Advantages and disadvantages of the various types of roof structures to roof
the house
head trimmer: Also known as the lintel used for holding the doorway frame
jamb stud: Placed immediately close to the opening
sill trimmer: Serves for positioning the window frame
Brace: A reinforcement bar for the vertical members
Question 5: Construction sequence from start of clearing to completion of the front wall
1. Clearance of the site: The site is cleared of any materials including leaves, stones,
branches and any other dirt
2. Installation of stud wall bottom plate: This is done as per the drawing designs with the
measurements taken precisely
3. Installation of stud wall top plate: Various joinery materials including nails would be
used in the joinery work to ensure adequate strength (Jozef, Svajlenk and Kozlovska
2018)
4. Installation of the vertical studs between the plates: The installation should be done with
regard to the recommended room height that would ensure maximum comfort
5. Noggins installation between the studs
6. Creation of the frame of the doorway: The framework is done as per the standard
measures of doors or otherwise as per the design requirements. The timber used for the
frame should be adequately strong.
Question 6: Advantages and disadvantages of the various types of roof structures to roof
the house
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Gable roofs: also called pitched or peaked roof. Asphalt shingles, clay or concrete tiles, cedar,
metal and shakes are the common roofing materials
Advantages
Easily shed water as well as snow
Offer more space for vaulted ceilings
Allow more ventilation
Simple to design hence easy to build
Cheaper than more sophisticated designs
Cons
A challenge in high wind and hurricane regions
Roof may collapse in case of inadequately constructed frames
High winds may results in peeling away of materials (Kim, Hyun-Su, and Joo-Won 2017)
Hip Roof: The roof has slopes on four sides that are equal in length and meet at top to form a
ridge. Shingles, metals or tiles are recommended materials
Advantages
More stable those gable roofs
More durable and sturdy
Ideal in snowy and high wind regions
May provide extra living space with extra dormer
Disadvantages
More expensive to construct that gable roof
metal and shakes are the common roofing materials
Advantages
Easily shed water as well as snow
Offer more space for vaulted ceilings
Allow more ventilation
Simple to design hence easy to build
Cheaper than more sophisticated designs
Cons
A challenge in high wind and hurricane regions
Roof may collapse in case of inadequately constructed frames
High winds may results in peeling away of materials (Kim, Hyun-Su, and Joo-Won 2017)
Hip Roof: The roof has slopes on four sides that are equal in length and meet at top to form a
ridge. Shingles, metals or tiles are recommended materials
Advantages
More stable those gable roofs
More durable and sturdy
Ideal in snowy and high wind regions
May provide extra living space with extra dormer
Disadvantages
More expensive to construct that gable roof
Complex to design and need more construction materials
Additional seams may render it easily water leaking (Sanna, Fausto, and Fausto 2018)
Mansard roofs: Had four sides with a double slope on every side meeting to form low
pitched roof. Materials used include wood or slate shingles, metals including copper or
zinc
Advantages
May aid in creation of a great deal of additional living space
Ideal for occupants who want flexibility
Disadvantages
The low pitched part is not good for regions that receive heavy downpours
More costly to construct as a result of establishments and details they are associated with
Gambrel Roof: More of mansard since it has two various slopes with the only difference being
Gambrel has two sides whle mansard have four. Wooden, slate or asphalt shingles are
recommended for use as materials (Finch, Gerard Guy 2019)
Advantages
Offer additional living space for attic, loft or garret
Simple to design and frame out
Disadvantages
Not ideal for heavy wind regions as well as snowy regions
Additional seams may render it easily water leaking (Sanna, Fausto, and Fausto 2018)
Mansard roofs: Had four sides with a double slope on every side meeting to form low
pitched roof. Materials used include wood or slate shingles, metals including copper or
zinc
Advantages
May aid in creation of a great deal of additional living space
Ideal for occupants who want flexibility
Disadvantages
The low pitched part is not good for regions that receive heavy downpours
More costly to construct as a result of establishments and details they are associated with
Gambrel Roof: More of mansard since it has two various slopes with the only difference being
Gambrel has two sides whle mansard have four. Wooden, slate or asphalt shingles are
recommended for use as materials (Finch, Gerard Guy 2019)
Advantages
Offer additional living space for attic, loft or garret
Simple to design and frame out
Disadvantages
Not ideal for heavy wind regions as well as snowy regions
Flat roof: Have absolutely no pitch even though have a slight pitch to enable drainage and water
runoff. Metal sheets, rubber membrane, PVC, gravel TPO and roll roofing are recommended
materials (Li et al. 2019)
Pros
Addition living space on the roof
Conducive design for installation of PV solar panels for greeter energy efficiency
Easier to construct in comparison with pitched roofs
Cons
High susceptibility to water leakages due to low pitch
May be more expensive in the long run as a result of maintenance as well as ongoing
repair and costs of replacements
Question 7: Section showing how the roof structure sits on the external walls
Question 8
Detail where the external walls are pushed to the eaves line
runoff. Metal sheets, rubber membrane, PVC, gravel TPO and roll roofing are recommended
materials (Li et al. 2019)
Pros
Addition living space on the roof
Conducive design for installation of PV solar panels for greeter energy efficiency
Easier to construct in comparison with pitched roofs
Cons
High susceptibility to water leakages due to low pitch
May be more expensive in the long run as a result of maintenance as well as ongoing
repair and costs of replacements
Question 7: Section showing how the roof structure sits on the external walls
Question 8
Detail where the external walls are pushed to the eaves line
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Bulkhead ceiling formed
References
Andreescu, Ioan, Alexandra Keller, and Marius Mosoarca. "Complex assessment of roof
structures." Procedia engineering 161 (2016): 1204-1210
Finch, Gerard, and Guy Marriage. "Non-orthogonal Light Timber Frame Design: Using Digital
Manufacturing Technologies to Facilitate Circular Economy Architecture." In Digital Wood
Design, pp. 1087-1115. Springer, Cham, 2019
Jozef, Svajlenka, and Kozlovska Maria. "Perception of economic, social and environmental
aspects of modern methods of construction." IJAME (2018)
Kim, Hyun-Su, and Joo-Won Kang. "Vibration control of smart TMD for retractable-roof spatial
structure considering closed and open roof condition." International Journal of Steel
Structures 17, no. 4 (2017): 1537-1548
Andreescu, Ioan, Alexandra Keller, and Marius Mosoarca. "Complex assessment of roof
structures." Procedia engineering 161 (2016): 1204-1210
Finch, Gerard, and Guy Marriage. "Non-orthogonal Light Timber Frame Design: Using Digital
Manufacturing Technologies to Facilitate Circular Economy Architecture." In Digital Wood
Design, pp. 1087-1115. Springer, Cham, 2019
Jozef, Svajlenka, and Kozlovska Maria. "Perception of economic, social and environmental
aspects of modern methods of construction." IJAME (2018)
Kim, Hyun-Su, and Joo-Won Kang. "Vibration control of smart TMD for retractable-roof spatial
structure considering closed and open roof condition." International Journal of Steel
Structures 17, no. 4 (2017): 1537-1548
Li, Jiehong, Behzad Rismanchi, and Tuan Ngo. "Feasibility study to estimate the environmental
benefits of utilising timber to construct high-rise buildings in Australia." Building and
Environment 147 (2019): 108-120
Preti, Marco, Malek Neffati, and Valentino Bolis. "Earthen masonry infill walls: Use of wooden
boards as sliding joints for seismic resistance." Construction and Building Materials 184 (2018):
100-110
Sanna, Fausto, and Fausto Sanna. "Timber modern methods of construction: a comparative
study." PhD diss., Edinburgh Napier University, 2018
Sim, Viriyavudh, and Woo Young Jung. "Wind Fragility for Honeycomb Roof Cladding Panels
Using Screw Pull-Out Capacity." World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural
Engineering 11, no. 10 (2017): 1368-1371
Vinod, B. R. "3rd_IA _CASE STUDY MATERIAL_ABM_ Comparison of Different Roof
Types in Housing Projects in Turkey: Cost Analysis." (2019)
benefits of utilising timber to construct high-rise buildings in Australia." Building and
Environment 147 (2019): 108-120
Preti, Marco, Malek Neffati, and Valentino Bolis. "Earthen masonry infill walls: Use of wooden
boards as sliding joints for seismic resistance." Construction and Building Materials 184 (2018):
100-110
Sanna, Fausto, and Fausto Sanna. "Timber modern methods of construction: a comparative
study." PhD diss., Edinburgh Napier University, 2018
Sim, Viriyavudh, and Woo Young Jung. "Wind Fragility for Honeycomb Roof Cladding Panels
Using Screw Pull-Out Capacity." World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology,
International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural
Engineering 11, no. 10 (2017): 1368-1371
Vinod, B. R. "3rd_IA _CASE STUDY MATERIAL_ABM_ Comparison of Different Roof
Types in Housing Projects in Turkey: Cost Analysis." (2019)
1 out of 13
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.