This assignment on corporation law.  directors have been provided the responsibility of managing the company and taking decisions related to it

Corporation Law - Assignment Sample

coporate law

This case analysis presents the breach of duties by Charles Whitehouse, the director of Carlton Hotel, under section 181(1) of the Corporations Act, 2001 (Cth) by issuing shares to his sons for avoiding the control of the company going into the hands of his ex-wife. The case also introduced the 'but for' test and its relevance in determining the dominant cause of impermissible purpose. The case has been referred to in various other cases due to its significance.

Klamath Community College

Whitehouse v Carlton Hotel Proprietary Limited Case Analysis

DIRECTORS DUTIES DIRECTORS rule DUTIES 1 Directors Duties of the Student Name of the University Author note Introduction 2 Case Facts 2 Duties breach by the directors 3 Decision of the court 3 Conclusion 5 References 7 Introduction One of the most popular restraints which is imposed on the directors of the company in relation to discharging their duties is the duty to act in good faith and proper purpose of the company (Knepper et al. In this case it had been ruled by the court that a

Duties breach by the directors of a university

This report discusses the breach of director's duties in the case of Whitehouse v Carlton Hotel Proprietary Limited based on the Corporations Act. It provides a brief background of the case, the duties breached, the reasons for the breach, and the court's decision. The report also highlights the relevance and impact of this decision.

Whitehouse v Carlton Hotel Proprietary Limited: Breach of Director's Duties

This article analyzes the breach of director duties in the case of Whitehouse v. Carlton Hotel Proprietary Limited, discussing the background of the case, the provisions of Corporations Act, and the court's decision. The article highlights the significance of this case in the present day.

Corporation Law - Assignment Sample