Critical Literature Analysis on Technology Integration in Education

Running head: CRITICAL LITERATURE ANALYSIS
CRITICAL LITERATURE ANALYSIS
Name of Student:
Name of University:
Author note:

CRITICAL LITERATURE ANALYSIS1
Table of Contents
Analysis of Paper 1................................................................................................................2
Question 1..........................................................................................................................2
Question 2..........................................................................................................................2
Question 3..........................................................................................................................3
Analysis of Paper 2................................................................................................................3
Question 1..........................................................................................................................3
Question 2..........................................................................................................................4
Question 3..........................................................................................................................5
Analysis of Paper 3................................................................................................................5
Question 1..........................................................................................................................5
Question 2..........................................................................................................................6
Question 3..........................................................................................................................6
Analysis of Paper 4................................................................................................................7
Question 1..........................................................................................................................7
Question 2..........................................................................................................................7
Question 3..........................................................................................................................8
Reference:..............................................................................................................................9

CRITICAL LITERATURE ANALYSIS2
Analysis of Paper 1
Howard, SK, Thompson K, Yang, J & Ma, J 2017, 'Working the system: Development of
a system model of technology integration to inform learning task design', British Journal of
Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 326–341.
Question 1
Author have discussed on the innovation of the technology which is developed on teaching
of the teachers and the learning of the students. Various type of available digital technology
are used by the teachers and the students to serve the purpose. The author clarifies that
teaching and learning both are the part of dynamic practice and social practice. To address the
context of the paper the authors have addressed all the complexities that are related to
learning and related to teaching (Howard et al. 2017). In this case the author have used the
teacher model and the EDM to understand the relations between all the digital technologies
used by the student. To describe the particular context of the paper the author have integrated
ICT in this paper. The author have described the context by giving a clear structure of the
teacher model and the way the students experience the ICT. The context is also described by
giving a clear structure where all the key factors are described along with the digital
technology that is used in learning. Like this all the explanations are explained with various
type of graphical structure which helps to understand the context very easily.
Question 2
The author have used various type of methods which helped the readers to get convinced
along with the structure presented by the author. The discussion provided by the author is
dependent on various type of data (Howard et al. 2017). The author have made all the
discussion which are based on various data that are collected. As the author have described
the teacher’s practice model depending on the structure of the model, depending upon the

CRITICAL LITERATURE ANALYSIS3
aggregated graph, the R1 loop diagram. This type of data are collected by the author to
describe the paper. The collection of the used in the paper is done depending upon the
method of data mining. Data mining technique is used on the teacher’s model which helped
the author to collect certain number of important data. As the data are collected the data are
analysed in a structured way. The analysis is done in three stages including the factor
generation, creation of the various fuzzy sets and also by mining all the association rules
(Howard et al. 2017). As the paper concludes with various raising of questions rather that
providing answers of these questions, so the author do not keep enough space where form the
conclusion drawn can be challenged.
Question 3
In the paper the author draws a clear Neohumanism paradigm to legitimise the knowledge.
In the discussion of the report the report uses a question belief system by using
emancipation technique. The meanings generated over here are based on perceptions of
individuals. Various questions are made on all the boundaries of the report (Howard et al.
2017). Various ideologies are made on communications. Thus by all these concepts it can be
understood that the paper is dependent on Neohumanism.
Analysis of Paper 2
Almas A G, and Krumsvik R 2008, 'Teaching in Technology-Rich Classrooms: Is There a
Gap between Teachers’ Intentions and ICT Practices?'Research in Comparative and
International Education, vol. 3 no 2, pp. 103–121.
Question 1
In the report the author have made a report which is based on teaching along with
technology. Here the author have found all the gaps that is created in between the intentions
of the teachers and the practice of ICT. The author have clearly described the context which