This article discusses Curriculum Planning and Assessment in early childhood education and care. It explains the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) and its learning outcomes. The article also provides a practice context analysis and its relevance to children's development.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: CURRICULUM PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT1 Curriculum planning and assessment Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
CURRICULUM PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT2 Curriculum planning and assessment Part B Discussion and Reflection The Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) is considered the major constituent of National Quality Framework that is concerned with early childhood education and care. The primary focus of my professional educational plan was on quality outcomes for children. I based my plan on EYLF which takes into account children’s developmental needs, experiences and interests as well as their individual differences. It is clear that the EYLF outcomes are essential to enhance children’s learning. The outlined plan was aimed at improving children’s engagements with each other, their families and the community at large in order to develop a sense of well-being and belonging (Touhill, 2012). EYLF learning outcomes provide more insights on each child’s strengths and weaknesses (Rouse, 2012). Further, these informs the educator on major areas that they should focus on. Based on my adopted approach of teaching, I gained vital insights on the importance of learning based on play and how my approaches would be helpful in ensuring child development. This approach encourages me to focus on theoretical knowledge as it relates to the children’s developmental stages. Implementing the plan activities were essential in helping children to develop skills that are needed to move to the next stage. Though most plays were led by children, at times their activities and resources were determined by learning outcomes. In all the two approaches, I could act as a co-player and guided those children who had difficulty to ensure that all children were at the same level. Furthermore, I was able to acknowledge and provide feedback towards children’s achievements. Acknowledging instead of judging children for their results pays attention to the
CURRICULUM PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT3 process and the skills they used hence providing an effective way of evaluating children’s development (Coe, Aloisi, Higgins & Major, 2014). Based on my research, I can acknowledge that emphasizing on every child’s achievement and encouraging self-evaluation are vital to identify loopholes and provides opportunity for the children to take responsibility for their abilities. In addition, this improved my relationship with the children. Another aspect is that acknowledging a child’s achievement rather than praising them provides an avenue for the teacher to identify areas of a child’s interest as well as their learning needs. After every grade, a learner needs a new curriculum. An educator should take into account the children’s prior learning, strengths, and interests as well as learning outcomes to plan for children’s subsequent learning adequately. To give a proper guide to children’s learning, an educator needs to look at the strengths and weaknesses of a child regarding the five learning outcomes (Rouse, 2012). Children will be different in the level of their achievements of the five learning outcomes. Some children will have developed a strong sense of identity, but still lack a sense of wellbeing (Department of Education and Training, 2017). There are also children who will be confident enough to participate in the learning process but cannot communicate effectively. It is from these learning outcomes that an educator to would determine children’s prior learning interests and creates plans for a child’s future learning. Practice Context Analysis There are various EYLF learning outcomes that my professional educational setting is addressing. These are outlined as follows. OUTCOME 1: CHILDREN HAVE A STRONG SENSE OF IDENTITY The first learning outcome is to make sure that the children have a strong sense of identity. Every child is unique on their own, and they should not be made to feel the need to
CURRICULUM PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT4 change what they are (Ranson, 2012). Therefore, effective learning is supposed to make children feel secure and safe in their own identities. Indeed, the learning process should continually support children to be unique and stick to their different personalities. In addition to nurturing a strong sense of identity in children, EYLF learning is also supposed to cultivate their emerging independence, resilience, strong spirit, and inter- dependence (Fleer, 2013). If a child is encouraged to be unique and proud of it, they will learn to be self-independent and also learn to coexist. Indeed, such children would become confident, knowledgeable, proud of their self-identities, but also caring, empathetic and respectful towards each other. My professional educational setting provides a platform where children interact with each other, but none of them is obliged to change their unique characters. OUTCOME 2:CHILDREN ARE CONNECTED WITH AND CONTRIBUTE TO THEIR WORLD Another EYLF learning outcome that my professional educational setting would address is how children can be connected with their world and to contribute to it. By encouraging children to work in groups and communities, the learning setting would enable them to understand the reciprocal rights and their responsibilities to the society (Arthur, Beecher, Death, Dockett & Farmer, 2012). Another result of this teaching is that children would easily be comfortable and respectful of diversity. Indeed, children would become more aware of fairness and their social responsibility. OUTCOME 3: CHILDREN HAVE A STRONG SENSE OF WELLBEING Developing a strong sense of wellbeing is also another EYLF learning outcome that my professional educational setting is addressing (Miller, 2011). It would be hard for children to have a sense of belonging without first having a strong sense of wellbeing. Wellbeing
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
CURRICULUM PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT5 encompasses feelings of satisfaction and wellness, as well as good physical health. To develop a sense of wellbeing, children will be exposed to situations which would call for their social and emotional skills. Interactive programs would be used to help the children to cultivate social and emotional wellbeing (Briggs & Hansen, 2012). OUTCOME 4: CHILDREN ARE CONFIDENT AND INVOLVED LEARNERS Curiosity, cooperation, and confidence are also some other EYLF learning outcomes that my professional educational setting is addressing. A child learns much by being curious and asking questions. To be able to ask questions, a child needs to be confident. My professional educational setting would create an environment that would encourage children to ask questions. A good learner would display enthusiasm for learning, persistence, creativity, commitment, imaginativeness, and reflexivity (MacNaughton, 2009). As a result, a child would develop multiple skills and processes that would help them in solving problems, making inquiries, hypothesizing, experimentation, researching, and investigation. OUTCOME 5: CHILDREN ARE EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATORS Another important EYLF learning outcome that my professional educational setting is addressing is effective communication. The setting’s philosophy is to nurture children’s unique abilities. The teaching approach that we practice is congruent with the setting’s philosophy because it aims at arming the children with the five learning outcomes. Effective interactions among children either verbally or non-verbally would help them communicate and construct messages confidently.
CURRICULUM PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT6 References Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Death, E., Dockett, S., & Farmer, S. (2012).Programming & planning in early childhood settings (5th ed.).South Melbourne, VIC: Cengage Learning Australia. Briggs, M. & Hansen, A. (2012).Play-based learning in the primary school.London: Sage. Coe, R., Aloisi, C., Higgins, S., & Major, L. E. (2014).What makes great teaching?Review of the underpinning research.Durham University:UK. Department of Education and Training. (2017, June).High Impact Teaching Strategies. Retrieved from:http://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/support/ highimpactteachstrat.pdf Fleer, M. (2013).Play in the early years.Melbourne: Cambridge University Press. MacNaughton, G. (2009).Techniques for teaching young children: Choices in theory and practice (3rd ed.). French forest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia. Miller, M. (2011).Embedding Indigenous Perspectives in the Early Childhood Curriculum. Educating Young Children – Learning and teaching in the early childhood years, 17(2), 37 – 39. Retrieved from http://www.ecta.org.au/_dbase_upl/ECTA- MELINDA__MILLER_ARTICLE.pdf Park, Australia: Teaching Solutions Ranson, A. (2012, June 12).The Benefits of Playing with Play Dough. The Imagination Tree. Retrieved from https://theimaginationtree.com/benefits-ofplaying- Rouse, L. (2012).Family-Centred Practice: empowerment, self-efficacy, and challenges for practitioners in early childhood education and care.Contemporary issues in early childhood,13(1), 17-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.1.17
CURRICULUM PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT7 Touhill, L. (2012).NQS PLP e-newsletter, 37. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/nqsplp/wpcontent/uploads/2012/06/ NQS_PLP_ENewsletter_No37.pdf with-play-dough/