(PDF) Systems development methodologies
7 Pages2053 Words44 Views
Added on 2021-04-21
(PDF) Systems development methodologies
Added on 2021-04-21
ShareRelated Documents
[TYPE THE COMPANY NAME]DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY[Type the document subtitle]Student NumberWord Count: 1000
DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGYITC506 Assessment Item 1- Marking SheetTotal Obtained Marks/100 & /15CriteriaStandardsMarksawardedAnalysis of the ethical dilemma using the Doing Ethics Technique(DET) (Value: 70%)HD: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, identifies all the ethical issues, evaluates all the options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and justifies why this option is the best using supporting arguments based on the literature.DI: Answers all DET questions, lists all the facts, identifies all the non-ethical issues, lists all the stakeholders, lists all the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and explains why this option is the best.CR: Answers all DET questions, lists most of the facts, identifies most of the non-ethical issues, lists most of the stakeholders, lists most of the ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these and makes an attempt to explain why this option is thebest.PS: Answers some of the DET questions, lists a few facts, identifies a few non-ethical issues, lists a few stakeholders, lists a few ethical issues and options that seek to resolve them and selects the best option from these but without explaining why this option is the best.FL: Answers a few DET questions but fails to list important facts, fails to identify relevant non-ethical issues, fails to list important stakeholders, fails to identify the ethical issues and evaluates the options that seek to resolve them and does not select the best option or does not explain whythe option selected is the best.Writing & structure(Value 20%)HD: Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.DI: Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.Grammar & spelling accurate.CR: Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas.Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type. Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.PS: The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort.FL: Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas.Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner.Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised.Grammar & spelling contains many errors.Referencing(Value 10%)HD: Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, andconforms exactly to APA style conventions.DI: Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.High quality references.CR:Good referencing, including reference list and citations. Good quality references.Your Name
DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGYPS:Referencing is comprehensive, mostly accurate according to APA styleconventions, and demonstrates academic integrity. Some minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, etc) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or demonstration of academic integrity.FL: Sub-standard (or no) referencing. Poor quality (or no) references.Total MarksQ1. What's going on?As the project manager Greg enter the office room, he notices that the junior developer peter is speaking to the client over the phone. The junior developer peter receives a call from the client that is the Willis project, and takes it as the project manager was not presentin the point. The client says that he needs some changes in the willy’s project, like some of the changes in the software and also gives ideas about changing the interface of the software. The junior developer that is peter promises to make the required changes in the software without missing the given deadline of the project. The manager gets bit worried about it, as the peter has promised to make changes without asking any of the superior. Theethical dilemma in this situation is whether the junior developer should or should not receive the phone calls from the clients and promise to make changes without the approval of the seniors("Scenario 2: Development Methodology", 2018).Q2. What are the facts?The junior developer takes a phone call from the client, which is originally meant for the project manager.The client wants changes in the Willis system.The junior developer promises the client to make the required changes in the given interval of time without failure.The project manager gets worried about the situation because of the fact that the junior developers taking all from the client. Q3. What are the issues?The issue of the scenario is that a junior developer takes a call from the client which was originally meant for the project manager (Ghillyer, 2012). The issue of the project manager regarding this is that the developer took the call without permission and promised the clientfor changes in the project without consulting him.Your Name
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Assignment on The Untested Systemlg...
|8
|2064
|46
ITC506 - Doing Ethics Techniques - Assignmentlg...
|6
|2373
|30
Development Methodology Assignment Samplelg...
|7
|2087
|45
Information Technology Ethics Assignment | DETlg...
|6
|2059
|84
(PDF) Ethics and Information Technologieslg...
|8
|2135
|26
(Solved) Doing Ethics Technique: Assignmentlg...
|9
|2019
|217