logo

Article Review of Decision Support Systems

This is a marking criteria for a presentation assignment in a Critical Thinking course.

9 Pages2500 Words465 Views
   

Added on  2023-06-14

About This Document

This article review examines the effectiveness of Decision Support Systems (DSS) and the factors that influence their perceived effectiveness. The study uses a simulation method to measure the impact of DSS on company performance and user satisfaction. The findings show that DSS users who perceive the system as effective are more likely to experience improved company performance. However, investing significant time in developing a system does not necessarily guarantee improved performance. The article also highlights the importance of including subjective measures while examining DSS effectiveness.

Article Review of Decision Support Systems

This is a marking criteria for a presentation assignment in a Critical Thinking course.

   Added on 2023-06-14

ShareRelated Documents
Article Review 1
Article Review
By:
Foundation course:
Professor:
Institution:
Department:
Date:
Article Review of Decision Support Systems_1
Article Review 2
Article review of decision support systems
Organizations in general use Decision Support Systems (DSS) to give PC based help to
pioneers blamed for dealing with semi-sorted out and unstructured issues. Studies exhibit that
DSS is fruitful if the customers' arrangement objectives or execution wants of the system are
met. This is in light of the fact that the information needs of the customers (the pioneers) are
appropriately met by the DSS (Chou & Chang 2008) Furthermore, late data frameworks
consider utilize subjective measures, for example, client encounter, saw happiness and
convenience, to pressure the significance of psychological and full of feeling observations in
DSS. Most associations began with information handling frameworks that help exchange
preparing and develop administration data frameworks to help strategic and vital basic
leadership. In a previous couple of years, another kind of frameworks called a Decision Support
System (DSS) has picked up prevalence in the data framework field. The topic of estimating the
effectiveness of DSS has all the earmarks of being the fortune of the client i.e. perceived
effectiveness. (Ben-Zvi, 2010).
Basing my arguments on the article, a gap on literature review is well elaborated. Several
studies have been carried out by various scholars to determine the effectiveness of DSS in
different settings. For instance, Bharati & Chaudhury (2004), researched online choice
emotionally supportive networks. Crowston et al. (1999) inspected open and bias-free source
programming improvement settings. According to Reinig (2009), he considered community-
oriented advancements, for example, gather emotionally supportive networks and their effect on
execution. Those examinations primarily centered around the direct impacts of framework
outline and use on results and client execution. Less DSS considers have incorporated choice
process factors, such as saw helpfulness, fulfillment, satisfaction, and saw ease of utilization
Article Review of Decision Support Systems_2
Article Review 3
(Kamis & Stohr 2008). The generally modest figure of concentrates that put in place choice
process factors in studies for might be the aftereffect of the regularly utilized authoritative
setting for such investigations, where process factors such as states of mind may seem not so
much vital but rather blander and along these lines difficult to catch or measure. Likewise, when
DSS fill the main need of achieving a specific objective, scientists' consideration is typically
centered on that objective (and approaches to accomplish it) and less accentuation is set on DSS
process factors.( Kamis et al., 2008).
Additionally, experimental investigations that measure apparent effectiveness display
contradicting outcomes. A few analysts report the effective execution of DSS (Garrity et al.,
2008) According to Chan (2009), different researchers give no help to the preface that the
utilization of DSS enhances individual or collective choice-making adequacy. In an investigation
of undertaking multifaceted nature, Dulcic et al (2012), found that the DSS did not influence
subjects' execution. Courtney et al (2008), contended that a large number of the choices they
checked in their research facility DSS research were "ill-structured.
According to the article, a simulation method was used to conduct the research. On that
regard, DSS is felt through the simulation. The research is expanded by moving the
concentration to the frameworks, the clients, and the effect on execution. Classes of understudies
framed gatherings and took an interest in a reenactment work out. The gatherings, mimicking
organizations in an industry, created DSS that were later described also, examined. Moreover, a
few factors identified with DSS seen adequacy were assessed and contrasted with gathering
execution. According to Ben-Zvi (2012) a simulation case with 652 senior graduate understudies
who made DSS and expounded on the systems made. The article demonstrates that DSS clients
who see the framework as compelling connect to enhanced organization execution. However,
Article Review of Decision Support Systems_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Measuring the perceived effectiveness of decision support systems and their impact on performance
|13
|1190
|392

(solved) Research Methodology - Doc
|8
|1526
|518

Business Intelligence - Assignment PDF
|23
|3838
|167

Theory and Practice in Language Studies - PDF
|9
|1944
|70

Analysis of Security Breaches in RFID System
|32
|9176
|280

A Comparative Analysis of Offline and Online Evaluations
|13
|5636
|190