Essendon & Buckley Street Level Crossing Removal Project Charter
Verified
Added on 2023/06/15
|15
|1900
|259
AI Summary
This project charter outlines the purpose, objectives, scope, duration, budget, stakeholder list, and approval requirements for the Essendon & Buckley Street level crossing removal project. The project aims to improve safety, reduce congestion, and transform the local precinct by removing the level crossing at Buckley Street.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: PROJECT CHARTER Project: Essendon & Buckley Street level crossing removal Name of the Student Name of the University Author’s Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2 PROJECT CHARTER Project charter 1. Project purpose and justification The paper mainly focuses on Essendon & Buckley Street level crossing removal. It is identified that Buckley Street is one of the key arterials in Melbourne’s inner North West that generally connects Avondale and Keilor Heights in the west. The boom gates of Buckley Street are down for about78 minutesduring the morning,which generallycreatesfrustration, congestion as well as potential danger to the vehicles.In order to resolve the issues as well as challenges, the Victorian government wants to remove the level crossing at Buckley Street. It is found that removal of level crossing at Buckley Street generally helps in improving safety, reducing congestion as well as helps in providing appropriate opportunity for transforming the local precint. The initiation of the level crossing removal construction generally signals the end of the boom gates by the end of the year 2018. 2. High-level requirements The high-level requirements of the project mainly include: Ability to enter the information of the project Ability to track the project Reporting projects as defined by level crossing removal authority 3. Project objectives The objectives of the project include: To remove the level crossing at Buckley Street, Essendon To reduce traffic congestion at the boom gates To improve traffic flow as well as travel time by minimizing disruption
3 PROJECT CHARTER 4. Scope The scope of the project is mainly categorized into in-scope as well as out-scope In-scope:In-scope of the project includes: Removal of level crossing by building a road underpass Removal of the boom gates in order to reduce traffic congestion To complete the entire project within estimated time and budget Out-scope:Out-scope of the project mainly include: No detail information about the upgrade of the existing underpass are provided Type of changes that will occur in traffic after the removal of level crossing is not provided 5. Duration Task NameDurationStartFinish Essendon & Buckley Street level crossing removal 985 daysThu 2/11/16Wed 11/20/19 Initiation phase of the project73 daysThu 2/11/16Mon 5/23/16 Identifying objectives of the project 15 daysThu 2/11/16Wed 3/2/16 Undertaking feasibility study20 daysThu 3/3/16Wed 3/30/16 Estabilishing project charter16 daysThu 3/31/16Thu 4/21/16 Appointing team members of the project 22 daysFri 4/22/16Mon 5/23/16
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
7 PROJECT CHARTER manager Solution announced20 days Construction technician, Contractor, Equipment cost[1] $7,081,600.00 Community information sessions 25 days Construction manager, Contractor $102,000.00 Trader consultation26 days Construction manager, Contractor $106,080.00 Assessment of design options 26 days Construction manager, Contractor, Sub- contractor $156,000.00 Lowering Buckley street under rail line 29 days Architect, Construction manager, Construction technician, Sub- contractor $229,680.00 Milestone 2: Completion of planning phase 0 days$0.00 Procurement phase254 days$34,070,960.00 Community input on design elements 32 daysCost for removing level crossing[1], Supervisor, Architect, Construction technician, Equipment $16,194,560.00
8 PROJECT CHARTER cost[1] North west alliance project partner announced 39 days Supervisor, Architect, Construction manager, Contractor, Procurement manager $396,240.00 Construction partner announced 44 days Supervisor, Architect, Construction technician, Contractor, Procurement manager $447,040.00 Community consultation47 days Cost for removing level crossing[1],Architect, Construction technician, Contractor $9,285,760.00 Refinement of design including community inputs 50 days Architect, Construction technician, Contractor, Financial manager, Procurement manager $492,000.00 Finalizing design42 days Supervisor, Architect, Equipment cost[1],Procurement manager $7,255,360.00
9 PROJECT CHARTER Milestone 3 : Completion of procurement phase 0 days$0.00 Construction phase436 days$72,236,480.00 On-going community consultation 32 days Supervisor, Architect, Contractor, Procurement manager, Sub-contractor $322,560.00 Construction commences34 days Cost for removing level crossing[1], Project manager, Architect, Construction technician, Procurement manager $9,282,880.00 Preparatory work commenced 43 days Cost for removing level crossing[1], Supervisor, Architect, Construction technician, Contractor, Equipment cost[1],Sub- contractor $16,433,440.00 Finalized design released to the community 45 days Supervisor, Architect, Construction manager, Construction technician, Procurement manager $453,600.00 Contract awarded for Buckley street level crossing 52 daysCost for removing level crossing[1], Project $9,536,640.00
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10 PROJECT CHARTER removal project manager, Architect, Construction technician, Contractor, Sub- contractor Early works commence57 days Cost for removing level crossing[1],Architect, Construction manager, Construction technician, Equipment cost[1] $16,342,000.00 Major works commence48 days Cost for removing level crossing[1], Project manager, Supervisor, Architect, Construction manager, Construction technician, Sub- contractor $9,591,360.00 Boom gates removed60 days Cost for removing level crossing[1], Project manager, Architect, Construction manager, Construction technician, Contractor $9,624,000.00 Finalizing landscapes65 daysArchitect ,Construction$650,000.00
11 PROJECT CHARTER manager, Construction technician Contractor, Sub-contractor Milestone 4: Completion of Construction phase 0 days$0.00 Closure phase74 days$337,440.00 Post-project review20 days Project manager, Project planner $91,200.00 Stakeholder-sign off30 days Project manager, Project planner $136,800.00 Documentation24 days Project manager, Project planner $109,440.00 Milestone 4: Completion of project closure phase 0 days$0.00 7. Stakeholder list Theinternal stakeholdersof the project: Project manager Project planner Financial manager Construction engineer Architect
12 PROJECT CHARTER Construction technician Procurement manager Theexternal stakeholdersof the project Contractor Sub-contractor Supplier Creditor 8. Project approval requirements In order to approve the level crossing removal, it is very much important for the level crossing removal authority to seek removal approval from the ministry of planning. In addition to tis it is advised to occupiers as well as owners who will be affected by the project must be provided an opportunity to get feedback.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
13 PROJECT CHARTER Bibliography Heldman, K. (2018).PMP: project management professional exam study guide. John Wiley & Sons. Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), 291-298. Joslin, R., & Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts.International Journal of Project Management,33(6), 1377-1392. Kerzner, H. (2017).Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance. John Wiley & Sons. Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success.International journal of project management,32(2), 202-217. Snyder, C. S. (2014). A guide to the project management body of knowledge: PMBOK (®) guide.Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA. Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), 278-290
14 PROJECT CHARTER Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance.International Journal of Project Management,32(8), 1382-1394.