Factors Affecting Construction Quality

This document discusses the factors that affect the quality of construction projects and presents findings from a study conducted in the Melbourne and Canberra region of Australia. It explores the use of primary and secondary data collection methods and discusses the importance of data analysis. The document also highlights the main factors impacting construction quality and provides recommendations for improvement.

FACTOR AFFECTING
CONSTRUCTION QUALITY

Table of Contents
Chapter 4:....................................................................................................................................................2
Chapter 5...................................................................................................................................................12
References.................................................................................................................................................16
1

Chapter 4:
Data Collection
The data collection helps to gather the necessary information for the research study to get on to a
conclusion of the business decisions. There are essentially two types of data that are needed by a
research study. They include the primary and the secondary data. The primary data is in the form
of quantitative analysis which is freshly collected from the respondents as teachers and board
members of education institutions of India. They are surveyed with a questionnaire to obtain the
primary data and the sources of secondary information include the published information like
journals, websites, books, magazines, organizational records etc. Thus the study considers both
the quantitative information through the primary data and the qualitative information from the
secondary sources of information. Data Collection Method is additionally another imperative
piece of any examination that involves qualitative and quantitative methods. With the utilization
of secondary data collection process, the qualitative data is gotten from the picked respondents.
Then again, online review approach is likewise used to achieve the quantitative feedback. With
the assistance of the questionnaire, created according to the goals, the data is acquired.
Notwithstanding, the expressions of the previous line are challenged Anderson and Shattuck
(2012)saying that inadequate achievement of the resources may demonstrate to a great degree
risky for the researcher to assess reality. Accordingly, the research would not present balanced
facts and details, as it may contain changed one-sided and enthusiastic data.
Investigation of rejuvenation of brand building in higher administration training is subject
includes multidimensional viewpoints and the researcher has huge number decision accessible
for gathering study particular data obviously. The researcher needs to ponder different assets
accessible on this subject and more elevated amount of precision is required for this exploration.
To develop belief system of hypothetical structure/model of brand creation for higher
administration training foundation is conceptualized and extremely popular on premise of both
kind of information accumulation. Information accumulation could be either logical or essential
of authentic and auxiliary in nature. While examining brand building procedure in higher
administration training, bunches of assets and enormous data sources are required. Here the
2

researcher said few resources of optional information accumulation which the researcher has
used to infer results for study.
Primary data collection method: primary data is shaped wrapped up measurable looking over
or audit process which consolidates the veritable response of the respondents. The primary
information accumulation procedure is additionally called as the quick asset or direct resource.
Primary information is gathered from the quantifiable investigating process which joins an
overview, respondents, and diagrams(Bergold and Thomas, 2012). The specialist asked the
examination request to the respondents, and in reflection, the respondents offered answers to the
exploration question as primary information. Furthermore, the primary information and
secondary information are rule two territories of the information gathering strategy. The primary
information is gathered from the respondents amidst the gathering in the field consider. The
primary information accumulation procedure intertwines some principal parts, for example, field
review, meeting, respondents and quantifiable examining gear.
Study-related to the rejuvenation of brand building in higher administration instruction is the
establishment's partner-driven study. This is a study where framework on foundation, its area,
computerized base, library offices, resources and managerial work force, arrangement, opens
connection exercises, typical traits of establishment all influences view of different partners
connected with organization supposition of different partners' observation in regards to most
importantly parameters offers establishment to detail or some assistance with modifying its
image building methodologies(Crowther and Lancaster, 2012). Higher administration training
being administration industry is elusive in nature, and much heterogeneity in the assessment of
different partners wins in the business sector.
This is an exceptionally complex study where the researcher needs to gather sentiment from
individuals who are connected with this industry and having tremendous work involved in higher
administration instruction market. Along these lines the researcher will gather information from
essential, dignitary, HOD's of administration organizations and the researcher additionally need
to consider the master feeling of entrepreneurs eminent instructive advisors and senior
educationalist. This is a sort of study where individual encounters of partners are pivotal. In this
way, going by numerous administration establishments separated from gathering information
3

from different partners is essential. The researcher has connected the distinctive apparatuses of
essential information gathering.
Expert Opinion
Observation Method
Survey Method
1. Expert Opinion
This is the investigation of a standout amongst most imperative zone of training where loads of
new specializations are coming, innovation and advancements are going on, and this makes this
field exceptionally mind-boggling and intriguing. To comprehend structure, sort of value
measures overall, real ramifications of value standards endorsed by administrative bodies,
aptitude improvement tasks arranged and its outcome situated adequacy, instrument to cross over
any barrier between industry necessities and scholastic instructional method/course educational
modules/showing procedure, the researcher need to gather sentiments of existing students, ex-
students of administration projects, individuals working in corporate parts, individuals working
in government segments, resources of administration system, executives/dignitaries of
establishments, business visionaries, enrollment specialists, senior-level administration,
individuals working in administrative assemblages of administration foundations(Easterby-Smith
et al., 2012). By gathering suppositions of every one of these individuals, the researcher can
identify different issues related with scholarly process and establishments which are making the
block in surrounding positive brand discernment about administration organizations.
2. Observation Method
When the researcher discusses recognition, distinct individuals have their particular discernment,
and abnormal state of heterogeneity exists. An arrangement of discernment relies on upon
different viewpoints like; individual needs, training foundation, family or society he/she is
raised, singular conviction and qualities, judgment level, ability to think on multidimensional or
all-encompassing angles and numerous such different variables which are not in control of the
person. In this way, an abnormal state of subjective predisposition occurs and to determine solid
4

conclusion is troublesome. In this circumstance "Witnessing something first hand is the only way
to accept something difficult to believe" marvel one needs to take after, and individual
experience to comprehend different complex issues and parameters included in brand
observation around administration foundation. The researcher needs to experience and feel
different perceptional variables. Consequently, the researcher has chosen to visit carious
administration organizations or colleges to assess crevice between guarantees given partners by
institutional brands and genuine offices and administrations conveyed(Green et al., 2012).
Perception strategy offers us to lead essentially some assistance with auditing of administration
organizations. The researcher can cook around twenty administration establishments and
colleges to feel offices, foundation, scholastic quality standards, scholarly variables, aptitude
improvement angles, society, position and preparing offices, promoting and other
correspondence exercises and other administration viewpoints alongside co-appointment
between different divisions and organizations, entomb relationship among staff individuals and
behavioral part of administration supplier with partners.
3. Survey Method
This is the most imperative component of examination for study. Here brand observation
assessment of different partners is a prime target to comprehend recognition. A sentiment of
specialists in the scholastic field connected with administration instruction and industry
specialists are gathered. The researcher has likewise experienced different offices,
administrations, showcasing correspondence exercises did by administration foundations by and
by(Rozenfeld et al., 2010). The researcher has likewise gathered data about elements and
parameters influencing brand discernment from different optional sources. Considering the
greater part of the above data, proposals and assessments the researcher has identified different
variables and parameters/perspectives which are pivotal for building brand recognition about
administration organization. The researcher has composed organized poll and connected review
system to gather sentiment and comprehend view of partners concerning administration
institutional brand.
Secondary data collection method: secondary resource are past research paper, magazines,
books, articles, journals, and the web. Secondary information can be collected from books,
diaries, articles, records and the webGrove et al., 2012). The scientist will assemble secondary
5

data to lead this exploration venture by gathering secondary information. So as the scientist
needs to amass either primary or secondary information through different assets for the lead a
practical research venture. The secondary information accumulation system is another
tremendous piece of the information gathering technique which is amassed from different assets,
for example, books, diaries, articles, paper, records and the web. With the assistance of
secondary information gathering process, the analyst can arrange profitable subjective research.
Justification
The researcher will be using an analyzing method and phenomenology type of qualitative
research approach. Also, the researcher will apply qualitative research method to analyze the
data. First of all, the researcher will accumulate all the relevant data and then will analyze it in
the later part of this paper.
Using the secondary design approach, the study of various reports of construction projects was
conducted for projects based in the Melbourne and Canberra region of Australia due to high
number of population and construction developments in the area. The targeted projects were
reports from building and civil contractors and consultants (architects, quantity surveyors as well
as project and construction managers) that are registered with the Construction Industry Council
(CIC) and Ministry of Public Works and Transport and publish their reports and findings for the
public. Registration with the bodies was on-going at the time of this study but the population
included the already registered members. The study was limited to the formal sector because
there is no database on the registered companies within the CIC for the informal sector. Since
this research is qualitative in nature, the study adopted verified reports from with credible
evidences which were based on findings of this organizations who deal with this quality issues
on the grassroots level.
Analysis of the Gaps in Quality factor
The factors impacting the execution quality of construction extends inside the Swaziland
construction industry are demonstrated in table 1. The main considerations are the utilization of
incompetent exchange subcontractors and poor on location supervision. Other essential factors
are deficient construction work abilities and absence of acceptance; duty by the managing group
and lack of common sense and booking of works(Kolb, 2012). Different factors with mean
6

estimation of more than 3.00 are Lack of correspondence; venture administrator's numbness and
absence of learning; shortage of assets; poor material and plan the executives; delays in basic
leadership, issue of number of undertakings nearby (remaining burden); structure changes;
compliance with details; association of End-User customer; and affirmation with customer's
financing. The least critical factor is harsh climate conditions, which is identified with power
majeure(Doloi, 2012).
Because of different factors impacting quality execution of construction ventures, distinctive
methods for improving the quality were inspected and featured in table 2. The most imperative
execution quality improvement factors are worried about the utilization of legitimate and
present-day construction gear just as allotment of satisfactory undertaking span(Sageer et al.,
2012). Utilization of appropriate construction techniques to suit explicit undertaking; legitimate
organized site the executives and supervision; conformance with construction illustrations and
determination; clear data and correspondence channel; appropriate coordination between the
construction group; arrangement of experienced temporary workers; sufficient arranging and
sorting out; having total and reasonable structures at the opportune time are likewise critical.
Different factors for improving execution quality are an arrangement of an exceedingly
experienced specialized group, utilization of fitting construction technique, legitimate material
acquirement, visit advance gathering and convenient supply of materials(Kuada, 2012). The least
vital factors for quality execution improvement are the recompense of material value acceleration
in the unique, delicate report; guaranteeing modern innovation use; decline in the number of
variety orders and appropriate venture attainability think about. Even though less essential, it
could be seen that every one of the factors has a mean score of above 3.50, this infers they are for
the most part averagely critical.
Data Presentation
After careful analysis of various reports related to different aspects of construction like
earthwork, casting, foundation etc the factors which were found to directly impact the quality of
construction sites of Melbourne and Canberra are collected in Table 1:
7

Once the factors identified were analyzed and their causes was determined various improvement
factors were identified which could be implemented on not only the construction sites in
Australia but all over the world who are facing similar issues in their sites. The improvement
factors have been shortlisted in Table 2 below:
8

Discussion of findings
The central point impacting quality execution of activities are identified with the utilization of
untalented sub-temporary workers, poor site supervision, construction work abilities, lack of
common sense and planning, the absence of correspondence, and the shortage of assets. In
perspective on this, MacDonald (2012) saw that decreased subcontractor obligation help with
improving quality among construction ventures. The issue of poor on location observing and
criticism just as lack of foresight and planning are a central point in task quality execution. It
very well may be inferred that most ventures endure as a result of the absence of correspondence
and wrong channels to convey, plan and screen, while an examination by Maxwell
(2012)uncovered that low quality and shortage/poor accessibility of assets significantly influence
quality execution to a huge degree.
The examination uncovered different methods for improving the quality execution of
construction ventures. In concurrence with the investigation, Miller et al. (2012)noticed that high
experience and capabilities of faculty associated with a construction venture would help the
9

undertaking gatherings to actualize their task objectives expertly prompting better execution of
quality, time, cost, profitability and security of the venture. All the more in this way, Alzahrani
and Emsley (2013) noticed that profitability in the construction business isn't just affected by
work, yet additionally by execution of hardware, materials, construction techniques, experienced
contractual workers and site the board, this is in concurrence with the discoveries of this
examination.
The accompanying removed factors were the most grounded indicators displaying circumstances
and logical results association with increasing number of ward factors by and large quality
perspective.
• The manager ought to have the capacity to do the test without specialists.
• Whenever the meter and instrument are irritated, it ought to be recalibrated.
• Each and each thing must be affirmed by the quality administrator.
• The following removed factors were the most grounded indicators displaying circumstances
and logical results association with progressive number of ward factors in standard code
speaking to perspective.
• The site needs to report Customer grievances in month to month quality report.
• The venture pursues a composed hierarchical approach to actualize quality affirmation.
Supervisors assume a vital job in Total Quality Management. Starting and executing all out-
quality administration programs require an extraordinary measure of arranging and research.
Chiefs need to get prepared in different TQM rehearses before executing the equivalent. The job
of an administrator is to go about as a facilitator in the working environment. It is the obligation
of the director to help representatives in actualizing TQM(Aziz, 2013). A chief must allot assets
for complete quality administration, assign time for different preparing programs and
acknowledge representatives who think of different improvement thoughts, deal with obligation
without professionals and procedures which would enable the association to convey prevalent
quality. A chief is dependably a solid wellspring of motivation for different representatives.
10

Supervisor needs to rehearse all out-quality administration before anticipating that others should
have faith in the equivalent(Wang et al., 2010).
Adjustment is the way toward finding a connection between two amounts that are obscure
(Berndtsson, 2010).The quantifiable amounts may contrast in two gadgets which are
proportionate. The gadget with the known or doled out accuracy is known as the standard. The
second gadget is the unit under test, test instrument, or any of a few different names for the
gadget being adjusted. Recalibration of instrument ought to be intermittently done to address the
issues, to improve attractiveness or fulfil the quality necessities.
The quality director will advocate, backing or lead quality improvement activities. The
individual in question is in charge of guaranteeing that all chiefs, process proprietors and bosses
create and keep up their piece of the quality administration framework. The quality supervisor
screens and exhorts on how the framework is performing, which may regularly incorporate the
distribution of insights concerning organization execution against set measures(Doloi et al.,
2012). A key job of the quality supervisor is that of guaranteeing that client prerequisites and
desires have been precisely distinguished and that the association is meeting or surpassing client
desires. The quality administrator will be in charge of the endorsement of every single thing
associated with construction ventures(Ismail et al., 2014).
Overseeing client grumblings adequately could have progressively possibility of living up to
their desires too. Which rapidly transform client objections into consumer loyalty rather
particularly when you see protests as a chance to improve what you do and how you do it. The
client grievances the board framework is a fundamental however basic prerequisite for
Construction ventures. The advantages of client protest the executives are:
 Achieve operational proficiency to distinguish patterns and reasons for objections
 Resolve more grievances by embracing a more client-centred methodology
 Engage staff with new client administration preparing openings
 Integrate with ISO 9001 to improve by and large productivity
 Monitor and ceaselessly improve your objections taking care of the procedure.
11

The quality strategy is the system for deciding and checking on quality goals. The strategy is
completed as a feature of normal yearly administration surveys. The accompanying long haul
goals will accomplish a quality approach to execute quality affirmation:
 better arranging,
 consistent adherence to need undertakings,
 improving documentation,
 ensuring efficient checking and coordinating procedures, results and errands,
 Increasing representative and customer fulfilment.
The factors recorded beneath show to be noteworthy and to be observed with less need. These
factors to be treated as critical factors by the quality group in construction ventures. The critical
factors under general quality angle are:
 Technician must know about the guideline of the machine and example.
 The adjusted instrument ought to be kept cautiously against stun.
 The noteworthy factors under standard code speaking to angle are:
 The plan for the item quality checks ought to be accessible and checks ought to be done
according to plan.
 The site group should utilize deliberate strategies/instruments with information to
examine quality issues.
 The QMS introduction must be given to all new staff and labourers.
 The reviews must be led according to the arrangement (proof).
Investigating aptitudes are imperative to upkeep professional. Before powerful fixes to be done,
the essential rule of machine or instrument ought to be comprehended. The professionals jobs are
Operation Monitoring - Watching checks, dials, or different pointers to ensure a machine is
working appropriately, fixing machines or frameworks utilizing the required apparatuses,
Performing routine support on gear and deciding when and what sort of upkeep is required,
Controlling tasks of hardware or frameworks dependent on their individual guideline of machine
and directing tests and reviews of machines, administrations, or procedures to assess quality or
execution (Guo et al., 2016).
12

Estimation and estimation related activities have been assessed to represent somewhere in the
range of 3% and 6% of the GDP of modern nations. The monetary accomplishment of most
assembling ventures is fundamentally subject to how well items are made and alignment assumes
a key job in this. Alignment is one of the cost things, yet at the same time, each estimating
instrument utilized for a significant reason should be adjusted at customary interims to guarantee
it is performing inside its predetermined points of confinement. The dangers and expenses of
mistaken estimations are as a rule a lot higher than the expense of alignment.
Chapter 5
Conclusion
Venture execution isn't only the worry of customers, contractual workers and specialists yet
different partners including end-clients. It is in this way important to give sufficient
consideration to different factors that have been affecting the quality execution of construction
ventures for better and improved profitability (Ismail et al., 2014). The central point impacting
the quality of construction ventures is the utilization of untalented, untrained and unpracticed
exchange subcontractors, sub-providers, experts and workforce with practically zero abilities and
learning. There is additionally an issue of poor site appearance because of the absence of duty by
groups, and people bore with the duties of observing and guaranteeing that construction ventures
are conveyed to required and affirmed standard. The absence of correspondence among
undertaking partners, particularly among configuration group and from the group to the customer
or lender of task because of numbness and absence of information may result to lack of common
sense and planning of construction assets (Gündüz et al., 2012). These incorporate materials,
plant, work, time, and so forth inaccessibility or absence of quality of the assets ordinarily results
in poor task execution.
In perspective on these difficulties and issues territories identifying with undertaking quality
execution, different execution improvement estimates should be embraced to diminish or take
out the difficulties (El et al., 2017). Because of changing nature of the construction business, the
venture is getting to be perplexing, and this requires the appropriation of present-day innovations
and gears for better execution. All the more in this way, experienced and talented contractual
workers and specialists ought to be locked in and there ought to be satisfactory supervision and
site the executives to guarantee consistence to affirmed standard (Thomas and Sudhakumar,
13

2013). Quality affirmation projects ought to likewise be presented and actualized in construction
organizations, and such should shape the reason for reviewing and enlistment of the
organizations by Construction Industry Council.
Albeit top administration will not have to supervise the day by day activities of the quality
administration framework, they are required to build up the quality strategy and the quality
destinations, lead the executive's audits, guarantee accessibility of assets, and impart the
significance of meeting client necessities and any material administrative orders. Top
administration must be included amid the advancement, just as the usage, audit and investigation,
of the quality administration framework for upkeep and constant improvement. All dimensions
of the board ought to guarantee that all administrations gave and related exercises are arranged,
executed, controlled and checked(Lindhard and Larsen, 2016). All dimensions of the board must
be in charge of distinguishing and encouraging the correspondence of issues and make a move to
determine them. Construction ventures should unmistakably characterize each job of quality
administration and staff for powerful inner correspondences, controlling both one another and
the work to be completed.
Findings
The hidden basic factors which are in charge of the usage of quality administration in
construction ventures have been distinguished. The distinguished basic factors are to be given
much need for continuous checking (Issa, 2012). The factors with less criticalness esteem ought
not to be dismissed but rather should be given due significance. The recognized basic factors
uncovered that quality preparing is increasingly vital for the representative.
The primary target was to assess the viability of quality administration framework in
construction ventures. The investigation reasons that job of quality administration framework
appears to have a positive impact in construction ventures. The second target was to assess the
basic factors that influence the quality administration framework on quality improvement and
execution in construction ventures.
The third goal of the examination was to propose a usage structure for quality administration
framework in construction ventures(Eriksson, and Westerberg, 2011). The investigation proposes
a usage structure. The fourth target of the examination was to propose relapse condition for the
14

distinguished most grounded indicator among the free factors which have circumstances and
logical results relationship onward factors. The investigation proposes relapse condition for the
forecast parameters. The Last target of the investigation was to propose a reasonable suggestion
for compelling quality administration and quality framework. The examination proposes an
appropriate suggestion for a viable quality administration framework.
The basic factors distinguished in this examination by leading poll overview are not
comprehensive. Factors all in all influencing the usage of quality administration in construction
ventures are to be distinguished by leading contextual analyses in different construction to
extend in all states around India. Likewise, a correlation could be made between the outcomes
got all through the conditions of the nation.
Recommendation
The basic factors which are probably going to influence the usage of absolute quality
administration in construction ventures have been recognized. They are gathered under three
classifications dependent on their hugeness as profoundly basic, huge and less noteworthy. The
profoundly basic factors are to be given top need in continuous observing. The noteworthy
factors are likewise to be tended to with equivalent significance. The less huge factor ought not
to be disregarded but rather given due significance (Hussain et al., 2018). With every one of
these perspectives legitimately tended to at the fitting phase of the task, the venture can be
effectively finished inside the stipulated time. The basic factors distinguished uncover that the
quality supervisory crew individuals have a critical task to carry out. The site builds also called
architects additionally have an equivalent task to carry out. The framework can convey to the
construction ventures and furthermore absence of ability and aptitude to execute the QMS. In
that capacity, coming up next are proposals to cure the circumstance:
i. Instigate a Quality Working Environment: Promoting a complete change to the
construction business towards a quality-workplace isn't a simple errand. The
significance of giving the quality working society in the construction business is
anyway irrefutable as it will unwittingly change the mindset of the construction
network towards a quality working society(Wang and Yuan, 2011). Along these lines,
steps ought to be taken to start the change. Responsibility from all dimensions of the
15

board uniquely from the top dimension is fundamental to appear the idea. In this
manner, the legislature should assume its job to advance and teach the general
population particularly the construction group through standard crusades, classes and
courses so to persuade all members in construction to execute the QMS in their
organizations and tasks.
ii. Enforce Companies to Implement QMS: By authorizing a guideline to construction
organizations and counselling firms to execute the QMS, the construction group will
have no way out as opposed to rehearsing the quality framework in their undertakings
and like this the QMS will turn out to be a piece of their life. For the individuals who
slight the prerequisite, they are not permitted to take an interest in any delicate or
embrace any counselling administrations(Langford et al., 2014).
iii. Frequent Training and Seminars: It is apparent that preparation can usefully make a
fast change to the view of the QMS and quick improvement of the aptitude to execute
the QMS. Along these lines, the designers in the general population and private parts
should assume their job to elevate preparing to the undertaking administrators, the
experts and the contractual workers(Jarkas and Bitar, 2011).
iv. Increase Audit Frequency: To guarantee the smooth keep running of the usage of the
QMS, evaluating must be done every now and again. Irregularity in reviewing will
prompt lost power over execution and the quality of the work, bringing about the
inability to achieve the work in time and to the detail.
v. Incentives: Incentives, either money related or generally by employment certifications
and types of gratefulness ought to be given to the construction group for effectively
playing out the work in understanding to the QMS necessities(De Silva et al., 2012).
This will urge them to consistently actualize the QMS. All advantages that the
organization picked up amid the usage of the QMS ought to be pitched to dissipate
the dread and misjudging of different organizations on the execution of the QMS.
16

References
Alzahrani, J.I. and Emsley, M.W., 2013. The impact of contractors' attributes on construction
project success: A post-construction evaluation. International Journal of Project
Management, 31(2), pp.313-322.
Anderson, T. and Shattuck, J., 2012. Design-based research: A decade of progress in education
research?. Educational Researcher, 41(1), pp.16-25.
Aziz, R.F., 2013. Ranking of delay factors in construction projects after the Egyptian revolution.
Alexandria Engineering Journal, 52(3), pp.387-406.
Bergold, J. and Thomas, S., 2012. Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in
motion. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, pp.191-222.
Berndtsson, J.C., 2010. Green roof performance towards management of runoff water quantity
and quality: A review. Ecological engineering, 36(4), pp.351-360.
Crowther, D. and Lancaster, G., 2012. Research methods. Routledge.
De Silva, N., Ranasinghe, M. and De Silva, C.R., 2012. Risk factors affecting building
maintenance under tropical conditions. Journal of Financial Management of Property and
Construction, 17(3), pp.235-252.
Doloi, H., 2012. Cost overruns and failure in project management: Understanding the roles of
key stakeholders in construction projects. Journal of construction engineering and
management, 139(3), pp.267-279.
Doloi, H., Sawhney, A., Iyer, K.C. and Rentala, S., 2012. Analysing factors affecting delays in
Indian construction projects. International journal of project management, 30(4), pp.479-489.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Jackson, P.R., 2012. Management research. Sage.
El, M.S.B.A.A., El Nawawy, O.A.M. and Abdel-Alim, A.M., 2017. Identification and
assessment of risk factors affecting construction projects. HBRC journal, 13(2), pp.202-216.
17

Eriksson, P.E. and Westerberg, M., 2011. Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on
construction project performance: A conceptual framework. International journal of project
management, 29(2), pp.197-208.
Green, J.L., Camilli, G. and Elmore, P.B. eds., 2012. Handbook of complementary methods in
education research. Routledge.
Grove, S.K., Burns, N. and Gray, J., 2012. The practice of nursing research: Appraisal,
synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Gündüz, M., Nielsen, Y. and Özdemir, M., 2012. Quantification of delay factors using the
relative importance index method for construction projects in Turkey. Journal of management in
engineering, 29(2), pp.133-139.
Guo, Y., Liu, F., Lu, Y., Mao, Z., Lu, H., Wu, Y., Chu, Y., Yu, L., Liu, Y., Ren, M. and Li, N.,
2016. Factors affecting parent’s perception on air quality—From the individual to the
community level. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13(5),
p.493.
Hussain, S., Fangwei, Z., Siddiqi, A., Ali, Z. and Shabbir, M., 2018. Structural equation model
for evaluating factors affecting quality of social infrastructure projects. Sustainability, 10(5),
p.1415.
Ismail, I., Memon, A.H. and Rahman, I.A., 2014. Expert opinion on risk level for factors
affecting time and cost overrun along the project lifecycle in Malaysian Construction
Projects. International Journal of Construction Technology and Management, 1(2), pp.10-15.
Ismail, I., Memon, A.H. and Rahman, I.A., 2014. Expert opinion on risk level for factors
affecting time and cost overrun along the project lifecycle in Malaysian Construction
Projects. International Journal of Construction Technology and Management, 1(2), pp.10-15.
Issa, U.H., 2012. Developing an assessment model for factors affecting the quality in the
construction industry. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 6(3), p.364.
18

Jarkas, A.M. and Bitar, C.G., 2011. Factors affecting construction labor productivity in
Kuwait. Journal of construction engineering and management, 138(7), pp.811-820.
Kolb, S.M., 2012. Grounded theory and the constant comparative method: Valid research
strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy
Studies, 3(1), p.83.
Kuada, J., 2012. Research methodology: A project guide for university students.
Samfundslitteratur.
Langford, D., Fellows, R.F., Hancock, M.R. and Gale, A.W., 2014. Human resources
management in construction. Routledge.
Lindhard, S. and Larsen, J.K., 2016. Identifying the key process factors affecting project
performance. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23(5), pp.657-673.
MacDonald, C., 2012. Understanding participatory action research: A qualitative research
methodology option. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 13(2), pp.34-50.
Maxwell, J.A., 2012. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Sage
publications.
Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M. and Jessop, J. eds., 2012. Ethics in qualitative research.
Sage.
Rozenfeld, O., Sacks, R., Rosenfeld, Y. and Baum, H., 2010. Construction job safety
analysis. Safety science, 48(4), pp.491-498.
Sageer, A., Rafat, S. and Agarwal, P., 2012. Identification of variables affecting employee
satisfaction and their impact on the organization. IOSR Journal of business and
management, 5(1), pp.32-39.
Thomas, A.V. and Sudhakumar, J., 2013. Critical analysis of the key factors affecting
construction labour productivity–An Indian Perspective. International Journal of Construction
Management, 13(4), pp.103-125.
19

Wang, J. and Yuan, H., 2011. Factors affecting contractors’ risk attitudes in construction
projects: Case study from China. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), pp.209-
219.
Wang, J., Yuan, H., Kang, X. and Lu, W., 2010. Critical success factors for on-site sorting of
construction waste: a China study. Resources, conservation and recycling, 54(11), pp.931-936.
20