(solved) Financial Reporting : Assignment

Financial Reporting 1
FINANCIAL REPORTING
By Name
Course Title
Instructor’s name
Name of Institution
Name of Department

Financial Reporting 2
Woodside Petroleum Limited financial reporting in accordance with the requirements
of Australian accounting standards (AASBs)
Executive Summary
This particular report seeks to assess and comment on diverse information regarding leases
provided in the annual reports of Woodside Petroleum Limited for FY2016 with the
requirements of the relevant Australian Accounting Standards (AASBs). Woodside
Petroleum Limited is considered to be an Australian petroleum production and exploration
firm headquartered in Perth, Western Australia. The company was incorporated in 1954, and
it is also considered as the largest operator of gas and oil production in Australia.
The new IFRS 16 – Leases requirements basically eliminates nearly all off-balance
accounting for leases and also redefine many commonly utilized financial metrics such as
EBITDA and the gearing ratio (Woodside Petroleum Limited annual reports, 2016: note 117).
Under AASB 16, the new IFRS 16 also conveys most leases on the balance sheet for lessees in
a single requirement, abolishing the difference that exists between finance and operating
leases. Under this particular requirements, the lessee will be required to recognize liabilities
and assets for contracts and agreements with terms of more than twelve months and is also
realized on the balance sheet (Ahmed, Neel, and Wang, 2013).
According to Australian Accounting Standards (AASBs), this new standard will increase
comparability and also affect agreements, borrowing costs, credit ratings and stakeholders
perceptions towards the company. AASB 16 offers a single lease accounting model and
necessitates a lessee to recognize liabilities and assets for all the lease agreements for a period
of more than twelve months except the underlying property at a lower value (AASB 101.26).
According to Woodside Petroleum Limited annual reports, the lessee is basically required to
recognize a right of use of property that outlines its ultimate right to use the asset and a leased
liability that represents a liability on the lessor. The lessee is also required to make payments

Financial Reporting 3
for the leased property as the new IFRS 16 sets out the principles for presentation,
measurements, recognition, and exposure of leases.
According to AASB 16, the leaser will be needed to state a capital lease as a liability and as an
asset at the amount equivalent to the present value at the start of the lease period (Cairns,
Massoudi, Taplin, and Tarca, 2011). In this particular case, Woodside Petroleum Limited will
be needed to realize any lease agreement like capital lease as a liability and as an asset at the
cost equivalent to the present value at the start of the lease period (Annual report note 13).
Under AASB 110 Presentation of Financial Statements and AASB Conceptual Framework,
the accounting requirement for lessees will be needed to recognize all the leases on the
statement of financial position except the short-term leases and also leases that have low costs
(Wong, and Joshi, 2015). If Woodside Petroleum Limited leases any asset for a lessor, then it
will be required to recognize the leased assets on its balance sheet except for the short-term
assets that contain low costs (AASB 101.26). The assets will be recorded on the balance sheet
as an asset, and the lessor company will record the same transaction as a liability on its
balance sheet.
Difference between lease operating and finance lease
A finance agreement is considered to be an arrangement in which the rewards and risks are
shifted to the leaseholder with the transfer of the property while operating lease is deemed to
be a lease agreement in which rewards and risks are basically not shifted to the leaseholder
with the transfer of the property (Riccardi, 2016). A finance lease is a saleable agreement in
which the lessor permits the lessee to utilize the property for the maximum measure of is
cost-effective life against rental payment that is referred to as finance lease. In a finance
lease, the property ownership is basically transferred to the lessee when the lease period
expires (AASB 98.90).

Financial Reporting 4
The finance lease is also considered as a non-cancellable agreement in nature that can only be
cancelled if the lessor permits the happening of any contingent event that may affect the
asset. Consequently, operating lease is a commercial agreement where the lessor permits the
lessee to utilize the property for a period lesser than the profitable life of the property against
the rental payments which is referred to as an operating lease (Wong, and Joshi, 2015). An
operating lease is basically more like a rental contract because usually rental payments are
paid for the use of the property and often charged a rental expense in the income statement in
the books of the lessee.
According to Woodside Petroleum Limited annual reports, the company leased floating
production, helicopters, storage and off-take vessels, supply vessels, land, cranes, computers
and office premises as operating lease so as to utilize the assets in their operations. In this
case, the company will be required to record the assets as expenses in the income statement
on a straight-line basis over the lease period (Grenier, Pomeroy, & Stern, 2015). Lease
rewards attained are realized in the profit and loss account as part of the total lease expenses.
On the other hand, the lessor will record this transaction as an asset on its balance sheet.
Woodside Petroleum Limited also leases long-term bank loans from financial institutions
under capital lease. In this case, Woodside Petroleum Limited will record the lease as
liabilities in its balance sheet and the bank will record the transaction as an asset on its
balance sheet (Annual reports, 2016: note 34).
In lessee’s perspective, the potential implication of the adoption of the new AASB 16 on
assets is that the lessee firm will be needed to realize the leased asset as an asset on its
balance sheet (Albu, and Albu, 2012). Under AASB 110 Presentation of Financial
Statements, the right to use the asset will be measured by the lessee at the amount of the lease
liability and the ultimate direct costs involved and reported as an asset on the statement of
financial position. For example, leasing a helicopter or office premise will increase the

Financial Reporting 5
company assets a thus will be treated as an asset in the balance sheet. Another implication on
debts and liabilities is that the lessee firm will definitely increase its overall liabilities in its
balance sheet since the leased property will be recognized as a liability in the financial
statements (Annual report note 41).
Under AASB Conceptual Framework, the lease obligation will be measured through the
present cost of the lease value discounting by the interest rate implied in the lease agreement.
For example, utilization of long-term loans by the company will decrease the firm profit
because of the interest paid to the bank. Under lessee’s perspective, leverage ratio will
increase because it is usually measured as net debt/value of the firm. A higher leverage ratio
will result in a higher value of the company (Chalmers, Clinch, and Godfrey, 2011).
Accounting based on debt contract will be affected by the new AASB 16 because growth in
the accounting based debt agreements will increase the firm value (AASB 101.26).
According to AASB 16, the value of the company will increase with the net debt while the
value of equity remains constant (Wong, and Joshi, 2015). The potential implications of
adopting new AASB 16 lease on profit and expenses is that the firm will experience an
increase in obligations because of the finance leases such as long-term loans. Increase in
company obligations negatively affects the revenue as most of the attained profits will be
used to repay some of its due obligations.

Financial Reporting 6
Bibliography
Ahmed, A.S., Neel, M. and Wang, D., 2013. Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve
accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4),
pp.1344-1372.
Albu, N. and Albu, C.N., 2012. International Financial Reporting Standards in an emerging
economy: lessons from Romania. Australian Accounting Review, 22(4), pp.341-352.
Cairns, D., Massoudi, D., Taplin, R. and Tarca, A., 2011. IFRS fair value measurement and
accounting policy choice in the United Kingdom and Australia. The British Accounting
Review, 43(1), pp.1-21.
Chalmers, K., Clinch, G. and Godfrey, J.M., 2011. Changes in value relevance of accounting
information upon IFRS adoption: Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of
Management, 36(2), pp.151-173.
Grenier, J. H., Pomeroy, B., & Stern, M. T. 2015. The effects of accounting standard
precision, auditor task expertise, and judgment frameworks on audit firm litigation
exposure. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 336-357.
Riccardi, L., 2016. Accounting Standards for Business Enterprises No. 3—Investment Real
Estates. In China Accounting Standards (pp. 25-29). Springer Singapore.
Wong, K. and Joshi, M., 2015. The impact of lease capitalisation on financial statements and
key ratios: Evidence from Australia. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance
Journal, 9(3), p.27.
Woodside Petroleum Limited annual reports, 2016. Retrieved from
http://www.woodside.com.au/Investors-Media/announcements/Documents/
01.03.2017%20Annual%20Report%202016.pdf