Freedom of Information

This document explores the rights and privileges of individuals to access government records under the Freedom of Information Act. It discusses the process of requesting access, the types of documents that can be accessed, and the factors considered in granting or denying access. The document also highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in proper administration.

Running Head: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Freedom of information
Student’s Name
University Name
Author’s Note

2
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Exhortation to Paddy implies that every individual have the chance to claim, under the Data act
to ask for accessing the reports kept with the companies of the government offices which in this
case is the college where Paddy have been placed. On the off chance that anybody might request
for the records that include actual and/or business data about him in context to the instance
witnessed in the case of Drake vs. The Immigration as well as The Ethnic Affairs Ministry1. On
top of that, it is necessary to idealize that respective security as well as the impact on individual
businesses to regard in a choice when the archive arrives.
Any individual can ask for accessibility under the demonstration of FOI to the records that are
kept with the college which can be considered as an administrative agency with the
complimentary exception of the security that the knowledge based organizations are liable to get.
On the off chance, that the reports are incorporated within a section of data that have been
restrictively exempted from the demonstration, at the specific point where any equivalent cannot
be discharged2. The primary point for any individual to find access are not complimentary to
choice preferences regarding whether to analyze any document for the purpose of the paddy
records, which might potentially reveal any examinable substance as well as choice embraced.
This stands on the basis that they are committed in accordance to the law school and the
institution which leads to a persuasive commence of his exhibition at that specific point
squeezing issuance on him.
Every individual is privileged by means of the Act of Freedom for Information, 1982 to demand
for access to the documents that have been kept with the government offices as well as the
official records preserved with the clergymen3. On that instance, when any one requests for
documents which conceal data about personal business, you are bestowed with singular rights
since you are enthusiastic regarding the outcomes of the solicitatory activity. The assurances of
security as well as the impact up on your business are the fundamental contemplations in the way
of deciding for the discharging of the archives or against.
An individual can rightfully demand for accessing the records preserved under the
legislature, based on the provisions of the FOI Act, to get a view of the documents collected
1 Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60.
2 Smith Joel,‘Ethos: Official Publication of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory’. (2018)Contract law in
Australia [Book Review]60.
3 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act).

3
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
from the general public as well as their business networks. All organizations under the Australian
Government (exempting few of the offices, for evidence the security as well as the knowledge
offices), as well as the priests incorporating the parliamentary secretaries, are liable to get the
advantages of the FOI Act. As per researchers, access shall be granted to the demanders if not
the report that is demanded, is incorporated under the category of materials which are absolved
by the provisions of the Act of FOI4. The purposes of any individual for asking for access might
not be pertinent to choices regarding discharge of any report.
The archives include papers, maps, sound recordings, photos, movies, plans and so on.
Some of the classified information which has been gathered by the administration would not be
uncovered as held by the FOI Act since the enactment of the act associates a mystery with the
documents. These mysterious files incorporate data which have been accumulated by the tax
department, tyke support, licenses law or the quality innovation.
A report can be held back if the revelation of the concerned paper would be exchange
mysteries or any sort of data that can be associated with monetary profit whose validation as well
as esteem might be decease by the revelation of the concerned document. Any concerned office
as well as priest might contact you regarding your perspectives about the imposition of the
exception on that respective information in any report that can be associated with your respective
business5.
Other than the above mentioned documents, there are additional materials which absolved by the
Act of FOI. The process of deciding whether to reveal any report that have been restrictively
absolved, have two phases. In the first place, the information can be “restrictively excluded”
from being revealed, in case if:
 Retains information regarding businesses as well as discharge
 Would be influencing you in an absurd manner or have an antagonistic impact up on your
business.
 Could partially reveal the future supply of the data with the Commonwealth
4 Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 17-CV-422 (PKC) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2018).
5 Bannister Jirk, Olijnyk Arleen, McDonald Sier,‘Government accountability: Australian administrative law’. (2018)
Cambridge University Press 2.

4
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
 Influences the personal security and bears possibility of nonsensical exposure of the
personal information about you.
Based on the fact that the report meets the test for contingent exclusion, the leader would then
perceive the fact whether it will be opposing the aspect of open enthusiasm to offer accessibility
to it. The chief would be considering various factors for as well as against giving access to the
data6.
Revelation of the data might impact the favorable position of a business negatively, in the
stringent commercial context. In this case, the college would be a factor in opposition to the
discharge. This is a potential factor that needs to be weighed against the arguments that supports
the provision of opportunity for access. For evidence, there can well be a sharp open enthusiasm
for deciphering governmental guidelines regarding the businesses as well a different
organizations as well as colleges.
In case if the chief perceives that you or your association might sensibly want to develop an
archive, that is:
 Relieved on the ground of the competitive advantages or the monetary importance
attached with the data, or
 Exempted on condition of the account of providing protection to you or the business
interests of your entity.
The selected entity or the college should not be choosing to discharge any document before there
have been any sensible chance for submission. In this case, the college which can be considered
as the leader might provide the information or hint to the data based on the perception of the
news that exists regarding you or any information regarding your business that can be understood
openly. You and your association can be identified with the data topic, and in that case, you are
invited for submission.
Every individual have the privilege under the act of Freedom to Information, to demand
access to the archives that have been protected by the offices of the Australian government as
well as the official records that have been provided by the priests. Based on the possibility that
6 Lindsay Bikry,‘Public participation in water resources management in Australia: procedure and possibilities.
Reforming Water Law and Governance’ (2018)From Stagnation to Innovation in Australia, 171-91.

5
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
someone might request for materials which incorporates data about you as well as your business,
you are entitled to have singular rights, since there is enthusiasm in you regarding the outcome of
solicitation.
The personal security as well as the impact up on your business can be considered as the
basic contemplations for selecting whether to or not discharge the records7.
Any individual can request for granting of access to reports that have been preserved by
the administration, as per the provisions of the Act of FOI, including the records that have been
received from general society as well as the concerned business network. All the governmental
organizations exempting some of the offices, for evidence the security as well as knowledge
offices, as well as the clergymen are accountable to the FOI act. Access would be provided
generally, other than if any documentation falls under the categorization of the reports that have
been restrictively exempted under the provisions of the act. The explanation provided by any
individual against accessing the reports are not coherent with choice about whether the report
would be disclosed or not. The set of archives incorporate documents, photos, some sound
recordings, movies as well as others like maps or plans. Some of the information accumulated by
the administrative department would not be disclosed as per the provisions of the FOI act. This is
because; the enactment of the act holds that the data should be preserved as a mystery8. This
range of the data incorporates information that has been gathered under the tax assessments, kid
support, and enactment of licenses as well as kid support. Any archive can be exempted from
being absolved in case if the discharge of such data reveals some insider information that could
have been accountable for financial profit and the esteem of such data can be reduced as an
outcome of its revelation. Any organization or its respective pastor might approach you for your
perception regarding the exclusion and its applicability towards the data in any record which
associated you with the business you have been holding. Other than that there are few other
kinds of archives that have the provision for being “restrictively absolved” under the FOI Act.
The process of determining whether to disclose any archive that has been restrictively excluded
7 Gilchrist D. ‘Westminster system, parliamentary sovereignty and responsible government: Executive
accountability in New Zealand and Australia’. (2018)InPublic Sector Accounting, Accountability and Governance
55-66.
8 Gilchrist Dareen‘Westminster system, parliamentary sovereignty and responsible government: Executive
accountability in New Zealand and Australia’. (2018)InPublic Sector Accounting, Accountability and Governance
55-66.

6
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
incorporates two phases. In the initial phase, the archive will be “restrictively absolved” from
being disclosed, on the ground if:
1. Containing information about the business as well as the discharge
2. Would be absurdly influencing you or your business antagonistically, or
3. Could partially diminish the future supply of the data of the commonwealth
Influences the security as well as discharge would be including any nonsensical exposure to
the individual data regarding you. On the proximity that the report have been fulfilling the
test for contingent exclusion, the leader should then be thinking about the factors in open
opposition to the enthusiasm to offer access to the data9. The chief will be regarding the
factors that go in favor or against giving the access. For evidence, the disclosure of the data
can potentially hurt leveraging the business at the commercial center. This can be considered
as a factor for discharge which has to be weighed against the variables that have been
favoring discharge. For evidence, there can be a concrete open enthusiasm for finding out the
governmental regulations of the business a well as different organizations.
Any leader might frame this viewpoint based on any of the applicable data incorporative
of whether the information about you or the concerned business network is implied or you as
well as your business entity are accepted as related to be related to the topic of data.
It is sensibly considerable to welcome you for presenting the report with the objective
that the operator might address the company with the entity that has been tallying. In any
case, the natural routine regarding to the offices or the courts is not to reveal the identity of
the individual candidates or the protective grounds, other than in case if there is the assent of
the individual10. Based on the provision that the choice have been inspected later by the
Commissioner of Information or the Tribunal of Administrative Appeals, it will rely up on
the Tribunals Commissioner to opine if the personalities of the gatherings are unveiled or
not. Genuinely so. Based on the proximity that you have been counseled by the chief before
opining on to declining your request, you would be explained if the person who have been
looking for inner audit as well as the concerned office is to give get to. However, then you
9 Greenpeace, Inc. v. Department of Homeland Security, Civil Action No. 17-479 (TJK) (D.C. May 1, 2018).
10 Henninger Miyawa,‘Reforms to counter a culture of secrecy: Open government in Australia’. (2018)Government
Information Quarterly, 398-407.

7
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
will have the opportunity to look for the IC survey prior to discharging of the record. In case
if the FOI personnel have been looking for an IC survey of the opinion for declination, you
will be informed as well as reserved a privilege for being a component to the auditory
procedures.
In the end, it can be summed up that Paddy can get a grip to the data magistrate regarding
the activities of the company as per the demonstration provided by the FOI since this is an
alternative method from seeking the audits of the selected office which you have been
concurring or differing inside end11. The enactment establishing the accumulation of
regulatory laws in the country is important for the characterization of the connection between
the residents as well as their administration. It not only sets out the standards that have been
supervising the proper exercising of the legislature of its primary leadership controls, still
additionally incorporates the opportunity for the people to challenge the actions of these
forces.
Straightforwardness as well as responsibility might be considered as the basics of proper
administration. These are the regulations having extraordinary significance or the managerial
law and they actually lay down the rationale for FOI enactment12. It is evident that the FOI
Act along with the regulation of the government, the senior Public service dimensions as well
as others will prompt for the improvement of a revelation of a worthier level from the end of
the government. The entry of the data cannot be denied to it since it belongs between
significant opportunity objectives of the data as well as the Westminster Privacy Convention.
Like the Standing Committee of the Senate of 1979, I trust the assertion that the 2 are
contrary as well as exaggerated.
The freedom of the FOI Act which has not been much unaltered since the time of its
commencement, has now been put to scrutiny for negligence towards satisfying the purposes
that had been initially communicated13. Sir Anthony Mason depicted it as ‘generous
disillusionment’ in the year 2007. Others have been less kinder, considering it to be 'routine
… in threat of terminal decrease' while something like an individual from fourth domain has
11 Wilczynski v. Berryhill, No. 17CV50095 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 16, 2018).
12 Bedford Naflier‘The Winner Takes It All: Legal Costs as a Mechanism of Control in Public Law’ (2018) Bond Law
Review119.
13 Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act).

8
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ventured to an extreme level in order to depict it as a ‘wiped out joke’ that have been
highlighted exclusively by the deferrals, checks as well as assumption against the discharging
document14. The open authorities which particularly delay as well as block any data
application or who purposefully provide gross or deceitful data might be rebuffed under the
provisions of the RTI laws. The RTI laws hold the punishments as critical as they take on a
significant role in alternating the way of mysteries in life that should be perceived as normal.
Other than the risk of authorization, the civil servants have minimal impetus of agreeing with
the new clauses of the act.
14 Pearson Guldian‘Enforcement and Effectiveness of Consumer Law in Australia. InEnforcement and Effectiveness
of Consumer Law’ (2018)Springer, Cham2.

9
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
Bibliography
Bannister Jirk, Olijnyk Arleen, McDonald Sier,‘Government accountability: Australian
administrative law’. (2018) Cambridge University Press.
Bedford Naflier‘The Winner Takes It All: Legal Costs as a Mechanism of Control in Public
Law’ (2018) Bond Law Review.
Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 2 ALD 60.
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act).
Greenpeace, Inc. v. Department of Homeland Security, Civil Action No. 17-479 (TJK) (D.C.
May 1, 2018).
Pearson Guldian‘Enforcement and Effectiveness of Consumer Law in Australia.
InEnforcement and Effectiveness of Consumer Law’ (2018)Springer, Cham2.
Wilczynski v. Berryhill, No. 17CV50095 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 16, 2018).
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 17-CV-422 (PKC) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2018).