System Thinking and Innovation in Complex System of Healthcare Sectors
Verified
Added on  2023/06/11
|6
|1401
|175
AI Summary
This annotated bibliography explores the implementation of system thinking and innovation in complex healthcare systems. It discusses the challenges and strategies for implementing innovative approaches in healthcare management, including customer-focused approaches, patient-led innovation, and innovative leadership strategies.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY System Thinking and Innovation in Complex System of Healthcare Sectors Name of the Student Name of the University Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Thakur, R., Hsu, S.H. and Fontenot, G., 2012. Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends.Journal of Business Research,65(4), pp.562-569. In this research paper, the authors tried to find out the system and methodology used within healthcare system by investigating their innovative thinking in complexity management. The research reflects the key public health areas of concern with innovative implementation of ‘advanced technological interventions along with the implementation of IT’and the social determinants of health. The research has implemented the secondary research methodology where secondary data collected from articles and research journals on 15 healthcare units and 21C-level healthcare execution have been analysed with qualitative content analysis.The types of complexity management and practical models have been identified through this research that are usually implemented in public healthcare system. This analysis suggested thatsoftwarebasedsystemmodellingtechniquesaremostusefulinimplicationsfor practitioners and policy makers and the future trends. The major limitation of this paper is it is focused on only previous researched data and numerical findings that can be considered as outdated. Moreover, this research paper is very useful for understanding the implementation of system thinking in current healthcare system and operational complexity. These findings will help to extend the range of utilisation of innovative thinking and implementation in a complex system of healthcare management. Atun, R., 2012. Health systems, systems thinking and innovation.Health policy and planning,27(suppl_4), pp.iv4-iv8. In this report, the author has tried to find out the cause of unachieved desired outcomes that lead to unexpected or unintended consequences in several well-intentioned policies and
2ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY managerial decisions that are aimed to improving healthcare systems. This paper briefly discussed the dynamic complexity in healthcare system that needs innovative system thinking and implementation rather than traditional execution of system theories in management. The paper also reflected the factors that hindered the adaptation and diffusion innovation in healthcare.The research has followed the secondary research method while examining various relevant articles and previous research topics with quantitative content analysis and numerical expression. This report has found a ‘cause and effect mapping’in healthcare system that initiates the interconnection within problem findings, innovation and adaptation systemfromabroadcontextofhealthcaremanagementsystem.Lackofinnovative intervention of system model and complexity handling has been found as the core cause of these anomalies. The major limitation of this paper is it is focused on only previous researched data and numerical findings instead of real time data collection from existing healthcare environment. Dey, P.K., Hariharan, S. and Ho, W., 2009. Innovation in healthcare services: a customer-focused approach.International Journal of Innovationand Learning,6(4), pp.387-405. In this paper the authors examines the trends of implementing various tools and techniques of quality management system in existing healthcare while there can be some alternative way or frame work of the implementation of consumer focused innovative approach. The research examines the innovative techniques and skill requirement for implementing thecustomer focus approachwhile comparing the classical approach and advanced dynamic approach in practical environment. The paper have found that the implementation of advanced ‘Quality Function Deployment or QFD’and logical framework with dynamic and recurrent approach will be required more in intensive care unit of the healthcare system. The paper also stated
3ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY that there are several initiatives taken by the government and private health organisation worldwide to implement and demonstrate the alternative innovative way of managing the complexhealthsystem.Thereportfocusedonthequalitativeanalysisofrecent implementation trends while framing those with explanatory design. The most weak point of this report is it has been developed under the light of logical explanation of innovative quality management issues and analytical techniques for prioritising the improvementtheory while comparing various case studies and practical situations without interfering with any primary or secondary numerical data or statistical analysis.However, to understand theinnovative framework usingQuality Function Deployment(QFD) and a logical frameworkdesign and implementation in complex healthcare system this paper would be very helpful. Rethmeier, K.A., 2010. Innovation for healthcare reform: Creating opportunities to explore, expand and excel.Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare,3(2), pp.150-162. In this research report the author, examine the existing political policy, global economic downturn and frequent changing healthcare practices of executing system thinking in a complexhealthcareenvironmentwhileanalysingtheresultantsocialandcultural consequence on internal as well as external environment of healthcare sector. The research contributed to the Knowledge of complex management handling and discussed its four regulatory models including effective ‘leadership, network, knowledge and communication’ while finding their social and cultural influences. Though this research various challenges of developing measurementof criticalbusiness issues with innovativeimplementationof leadership model have been identified that has considerable amount of impact within organisational culture and performance level. The major boundary of this paper is it analysed the existing and potential implementations complexity management and innovation from the
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY externalperspectivewhileinterpretingthecombinationaloutcomesduetoinnovative leadership. Most of the health systems do not concerned about this innovative leadership approach at all. This paper can helps the learner to understand the impact and challenges from externalfactorsincomplexitymanagementofhealthcarealongwiththeappropriate techniques of developing innovative leadership strategies. McNichol,E.,2012.Patient-ledinnovationinhealthcare:Thevalueofthe ‘user’perspective.International Journal of Healthcare Management,5(4), pp.216-222. Thispaperaimedtoexaminethechallengesofimplementinginnovativecomplexity management approach in Middle Income Countries (MICs) to strengthen the existing flaws and loopholes in healthcare sector. The paper mainly explored the barriers that are hindering the effective execution in Complexity management while prioritising the users perception and the possible strategies to implement ‘patient-led innovation’. After analysing the collected data from the realistic case studies and organisational records the lack of prioritising the user- led healthcare and design thinking approach have been found as the key barriersof implementing the complexity handling model healthcare management system. Apart from that lack of expertise, responsible stakeholders and fragmented controlled system are found as the key obstacles. The main limitation of this research is it emphasise only the perceptions of higher regulatory factors that can have huge competence gap with the ground level implementation of the patient-led innovative technique. Moreover, from this research the operational hindrance in implementation ofDesign thinking and user led innovative approach can be understood from the individual profitability and regulatory viewpoints.
5ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY References: Atun, R., 2012. Health systems, systems thinking and innovation.Health policy and planning,27(suppl_4), pp.iv4-iv8. Dey, P.K., Hariharan, S. and Ho, W., 2009. Innovation in healthcare services: a customer-focused approach.International Journal of Innovationand Learning,6(4), pp.387-405. McNichol,E.,2012.Patient-ledinnovationinhealthcare:Thevalueofthe ‘user’perspective.International Journal of Healthcare Management,5(4), pp.216-222. Rethmeier, K.A., 2010. Innovation for healthcare reform: Creating opportunities to explore, expand and excel.Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare,3(2), pp.150-162. Thakur, R., Hsu, S.H. and Fontenot, G., 2012. Innovation in healthcare: Issues and future trends.Journal of Business Research,65(4), pp.562-569.