This essay aims to draw a theoretical concept to connect organizations performances and HRM routine. Furthermore, the article discusses the empirical evidence and how it links the HRM and output.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: HR AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE1 HR and Organizational performance Student’s Name Institution Affiliation
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE2 HR and Organizational performance According toDhanabhakyam and Kokilambal (2014),indicates that managing a company’s human resources is one of the numerous means to progress and survive.Eniola and Ektebang (2014)claim that unlike the other assets, human resources assist a company in gaining a competitive edge as it is unique and hardness copy. It has been alleged that the HR supports the organization performances as the HR practices assist to back the workers’ motivations, which then inspires the personnel’s to do even better resulting to the company’s productivity.Contrary to the above opinion, firms are diversifying the venture on novel technologies rather than relying fully on the HRM routines. As the support of HR actions to the company’s output is not measurable, researchers find it hard to have conclusive proofs linking the HRM and the organization’s productivity. This essay aims to draw a theoretical concept to connect organizations performances and HRM routine. Furthermore, the article discusses the empirical evidence and how it links the HRM and output. HR-Performance Link Boxall and Purcell (2015) argue that human resource management involves handling humanresourceswithconfidence,whichinfluencestheproductivityofanorganization. Additionally, Osman, Ho, and Galang (2011) allege that HRM practices are deliberated as a positive contribution to the Organizational performance.There a numerous study establishing the link of the organization’s performance with human resource practices. Even though AMO theoryisabestandwell-usedframework,severalapproachesexistsuchasRBVand contingency theory which links the organization’s performances and HRM routines. Business approaches of the company are the most critical aspects that the HRM system requires to reflect(Hassan, 2016); the latter mentions that all the HR-connected jobs need to
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE3 supplement the firm’s business plan.Klychova, Zakirova, Zakirov, and Valieva (2015) argues that thecontingency theory is all about shaping the HRM structure to house the background to realize the best outcomes for the company.It denotes that the company’s output is contingents on both internal and external states of the HR structure of the specific company. Resource-based view theory also connects the organization's performance and HRM. Competitive edge can be achieved by using rare and precious assets that rivals cannot imitate. According to this theory, a company’s workforce becomes a reliable resource, and the HR purposes would exploit human resource powers by assisting the workers to grow their behavior, which is an advantage of the company. Marin-Garcia & Tomas (2016) alleges that the company would surpass the rivals if it has rare, precious, distinctive and indispensable assets. The core of RBV theory shows that HR action takes a crucial part in creating a pool of human resources which are rare, precious, distinctive and indispensable (Katou, and Budhwar, 2010). AMO theory is another concept linking HRM and Organizational performance. The theory proposes that productivity can be impacted by the effectiveness of the actions of the HRM in influencing the worker’s motivations, capabilities, and choices to partake. According toEniola and Ektebang (2014),the AMO theory proposes that the performance take part in decision- making actions. The concepts advocate that HR actions must initiate the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSA), inspire to arouse KSA of the workers and finally, offer prospects for the expert development in the organizations. The initials aspects of the AMO model focus on well-read knowledge, which assists individuals from performing specific jobs (Kim,Pathak & Werner, 2015). HR professionals take caution of the skill of workers by enticing, hiring and choosing the applicants with needed talents after which they train and teach the staff and lastly assess and evaluate the worker’s output.
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE4 According toKim,Pathak & Werner (2015)“motivation”is the willingness and keenness of individuals to engage in specific occupations. Here, the intrinsic stimulus is triggered by elements such as desire, gratification, readiness, and happiness to learns and perform.Marin & Tomas (2016) proposes thatextrinsic“motivation”is generated by tangible or physical aspects such as recognition, promotion, and job security. The authors describe that HR offers a chance to its workers by having them engage in the decision making routine. The researchers go ahead to state that the AMO theory can be evaluated by considering at the monitory results such as market shares, returns; functional outcomes such as productivity, customer fulfillment, and organization performances, and lastly the HR results like the employee turnover, job satisfaction, and absenteeism. The study also argues that by using the AMO framework, it assists individuals to open the“black box”in having a clear image of the connections between the organization performances and HRM. The HR professional can use the concept in the field of enticing, enlisting and picking; and to drill, grow and hold the personnel primarily for the vast and medium organization. This would also assist the organization progress the human resources to enjoy a competitive edge and improved returns. However, small companies may not be capable of using the AMO concept due to lack of monetary resources. Due to many mediating elements, exertions to ascertain the connection between the performances and human resources structure of the firm stay uncertain. Validating the link in one study is impossible. This part of the paper will highlight some proof of the positive impact of performance andHRpractices.Broadstudieshavebeendonetoestablishtheconnectionbetween performance and HR.Sánchez, Marín & Morales (2015)shows that the high-performance work structure results in considerable improvement of performances of the market and financial area
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE5 and also advanced productivity and minimized employer turnover.The proof shows that the market worth of a worker upsurge approximately $19,000 with a rise of the standard deviation of HPWS. With the similar deviation of HPWS, there is a growth of $ 4,000 in cash flow and a surge of little more than $27,000 in transactions (Sánchez, Marín & Morales, 2015) Researching the link between patient deaths and HR practice in 52 health care facilities in England, an active HR structure lead to augmented health care provisions.The research has shown that the health care outcomes improved by having an effective routine of sharing information, which allows a worker to be part of the decision making.Sánchez, Marín & Morales, 2015). Active HR practices assisted the facilities to lower their worker's absenteeism and turnover and augmented the patient death rate, return and even the market value Applying and Linking AMO Theory to HR-Performance The AMO approach often guides the type of HRM practices to be utilized. Notably, HRM practices may influence an individual’sability(such as using the proper training, and hiring instruments),motivation(such as utilizing performance-linked pay), andopportunity(such as using suggestions systems) in contributing to the organization’s performance. In spite of this fact, AMO strategy can be applied differently, instead of prioritizing on workers’ behavior and attitudes as a result of the implemented HRM practices. Alternatively, AMO theory is linked to the role of line managers in the HRM delivery as it determines the line manager’s performance in applying HRM practices on the work floor. Van Riemsdijk, Bos-Nehles, and Looise, (2013) assert, “we operational- size the AMO factors based on the reasons for ineffective line management perform-
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE6 mance described in the devolution literature (Brewster & Larsen, 2000; Cunningham & Hyman, 1999; Kulik & Perry, 2008; Whittaker & Marchington, 2003), and empirically test the role of the AMO factors in line manage- ers’ effectiveness in implementing HRM practices The AMO approach provides guidelines that HRM practices are chosen and utilized. Furthermore, HRM practices may influence individuals’ “ability” (such as using suitable training and hiring instruments),“motivation”(such as utilizing performance-linked pay), and “opportunity”(using suggestion systems), which contribute to the performance of the company. Notably, the AMO strategy can be applied differently, instead of prioritizing on workers’ behavior and attitude, which affect the implemented HRM practices. Therefore, the line managers’“ability,”“motivation,”and“opportunity”may determine their HRM performance. For instance, the AMO method is linked to the line managers’ role in HRM delivery, which determines their performance in applying HRM practices. Conversely, Van Riemsdijk, Bos- Nehles, and Looise (2013, p.2) assert, “we operational-
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE7 size the AMO factors based on the reasons for ineffective line management perform- mance described in the devolution literature (Brewster & Larsen, 2000; Cunningham & Hyman, 1999; Kulik & Perry, 2008; Whittaker & Marchington, 2003), and empirically test the role of the AMO factors in line manage- ers’ effectiveness in implementing HRM practices
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE8 The AMO approach is occasionally utilized in research on HRM performance. Recent studies indicate that AMO strategy provides guidelines in which an individual can choose the appropriate HRM practice to be utilized. Notably, HRM practice may influence a person’s “ability”(such as suitable training and hiring instruments),“motivation”(such as utilizing performance-linked pay), and“opportunity”(such as suggestion systems), which contribute to the performance of the company. Importantly, the AMO approach may influence lien managers’ “ability,”“motivation,”and“opportunity”that may predict their HRM performance. For instance, the AMO method can be applied to the line managers’ role in HRM delivery, which will determine their performance in applying HRM practices. Alternatively, Van Riemsdijk, Bos- Nehles, and Looise (2013, p.2) assert, “We operationalize the AMO factors based on the reasons forineffectivelinemanagementperformancedescribedinthedevolutionliterature,and empirically test the role of the AMO factors in line managers’ effectiveness in implementing HRM practices.” “Ability”often determines whether the line manager can handle a certain task. Thus, it is dangerous to allocate HR responsibilities that a line manager may not be familiar with. Therefore, it is vital to consider whether the line manager is competent and skilled enough to handle certain HR tasks. Moreover, skilled line managers are effective, and they understand the legal requirements that pertain certain HR tasks. Consequently,“motivation”determines the willingness and desire of the line manager to perform the HRM duties. Importantly, the majority of the managers occasionally feel that HR duties are pushed onto them, and they are reluctant in getting involved. Fortunately, individual incentives may stimulate“motivation,”although line managers indicate little interest in such issues. Conclusion
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE9 Several theories, evidence, and perceptions to establish the existence of connecting between HR and organization performance. Some of the methods are RBV, contingency and AMO methods are fully explained in this paper. Also, several authors have come up with their finding and factor to backs the HR-performance idea. However, there are some blockades to prove the actual connection between the organization's performance and HR routines. The future study should concentrate on the limitations of a genuine relationship between HR practices and organizations performance. But, according toHassan (2016), methodological limitations cannot be averted as they come due to the funding than authors ignorance. References Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2015).Strategy and human resource management(4thed.). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 12-19. Dhanabhakyam, M., & Kokilambal, K. (2014). A study on existing talent management practice anditsbenefitsacrossindustries.InternationalJournalofResearchinBusiness Management,2(7), 23-36. Eniola,A.A.,&Ektebang,H.(2014).SMEfirmsperformanceinNigeria:Competitive advantageanditsimpact.InternationalJournalofResearchStudiesin Management,3(2), 75-86. Hassan, S. (2016). Impact of HRM practices on employee’s performance.International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences,6(1), 15-22.
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE10 Katou, A.A., & Budhwar. (2010). Causal relationship between HRM policies and organisational performance: Evidence from the Greek manufacturing sector.European Management Journal, 28(1), 25-39. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2009.06.001 Kim, K.Y., Pathak, S., & Werner, S. (2015). When do international human capital enhancing practices benefit the bottom line? An ability, motivation, and opportunity perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7), 784-805. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2015.10 Klychova, G. S., Zakirova, A. R., Zakirov, Z. R., & Valieva, G. R. (2015). Management aspects of production cost accounting in horse breeding.Asian Social Science,11(11), 308. Martin-Garcia.J.A.& Tomas, J.M. (2016). Deconstructing AMO framework: A systematic Osman, I., Ho, T. C. F., & Galang, M. C. (2011). The relationship between human resource practices and firm performance: An empirical assessment of firms in Malaysia.Business Strategy Series, 12(1), 41-48. doi:10.1108/17515631111100412 Review.Intangible capital, 12(4),1040-1087 doi; 10.3926/ic.838 Sánchez, A. A., Marín, G. S., & Morales, A. M. (2015). The mediating effect of strategic human resource practices on knowledge management and firm performance.Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa,24(3), 138-148. Van Riemsdijk, M.J., Bos-Nehles, A., & Looise, J.K. (2013). Applying the AMO theory to explain the effectiveness of line managers HRM implementation.Human Resource Management.Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258882090_Employee_Perceptions_of_Line_M anagement_Performance_Applying_the_AMO_Theory_to_
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE11 we operational- ize the AMO factors based on the reasons for ineffective line management perfor- mance described in the devolution literature (Brewster & Larsen, 2000; Cunningham &
HR AND ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE12 Hyman, 1999; Kulik & Perry, 2008; Whittaker & Marchington, 2003), and empirically test the role of the AMO factors in line manag- ers’ effectiveness in implementing HRM practic