Addressing Poor Employee Performance

This assignment delves into the critical issue of poor employee performance within organizations. It examines various contributing factors such as training, resources, and motivation. The report highlights the importance of effective communication and motivation in addressing this challenge. Furthermore, it offers practical recommendations for improving employee performance and mitigating the negative impact on organizational success.

Running head: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Human Resource Management
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note

1
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................2
Literature Review............................................................................................................................2
Recommendations............................................................................................................................5
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................7
References........................................................................................................................................8

2
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Introduction
Performance management is a vital part of the job of every manager and it implies that
managers need to manage and deal with poor performance of the employees. Managers most of
the time consider this as one of the most undesirable responsibilities that is a part of the job, as
most often the perception of handling poor performance is troubled by feelings of stressed,
uncomfortable conditions that might end up in denial, anger or finger pointing. It should be
understood by the managers that poor performance requires immediate addressing (Pollitt 2013).
This report would be acting as a brief of the issue of poor performing employees that has brought
about challenges in the organization. The approach of the paper would be focused on providing
the latest evidence related to the issue and accordingly provide feasible recommendations.
Literature Review
Management of poor employee performance must not be a huge event, it must be fast and
comparatively painless for both parties, the managers and the employees, and anything that is
carried out incrementally at the first sign of deviance in an expected conduct. If poor
performances remains unaddressed for long time periods and often, it might become a huge issue
and be apparent itself inside a situation which could go out of control. Significantly, managers
need to understand that poor performances that do not get addressed easily is actually considered
by the employees as being condoned by managers. It is due to the fact that people respect what is
inspected and not what is expected. Consequently, the team, the people pays attention to what the
managers pay attention to (Bach 2012). In an organization, low performers are looking for a
leader or a manger who takes a hands-off approach and treats each employee equally. They look
for managers who are not keeping track, who ignore performance issues and do not instruct on
what to do and how to do. Low performers are the greatest beneficiaries of under management. A

3
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
typical hands off manager eludes dealing with any kind of performance problems until they can
no more be ignored. However, regular engagement with problems solving would solve most of
the performance problems quickly and easily, or they can be avoided altogether (Buckingham
and Goodall 2015).
Identification of the problem
In spite of individual preferences or abhorrence, managers must work on being objective,
focus on the lead (not the personality) and ask in the matter of why are they not executing as they
are depended upon them to. Particularly a manager must choose whether there is some sort of
task interference or consequence imbalance happening (Haines and St-Onge 2012).
Task interference implies anything that shields the agent from playing out their business
to a typical standard. This can be something as essential as another procedure or structure that
has influenced the delegate to be less productive, or it can be something that the specialist doesn't
have, as suitable resources, contraptions, capacities or training (this fuses managerial support)
(Novakovic et al. 2013).
Workers experience consequence imbalance when there's a muddle between their
exercises and the consequences of those exercises, for instance, a manager fail to follow up when
they said they would. By and large managers may see that the team is performing outstandingly,
yet if they haven't put aside a couple of minutes to before long watch who are and aren't the bona
fide drivers of team performance, they praise everyone. To the poor performers, this fortifies
their deficient direct and for the best performers it can influence them to address why they should
work harder and convey more, just to have their justified affirmation given to others (Van
Dooren, Bouckaert and Halligan 2015). Along these lines, a consequence imbalance happens

4
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
when negative lead is insistently adjusted (e.g. no move is made to address it) or when positive
direct makes a negative outcome (e.g. no affirmation or feedback) (Samnani and Singh 2014).
Factors contributing to poor work performance
Training and skills
Short of training performance of high bore and benchmark is completely unimaginable,
that is the reason every affiliation has human resource change section to guarantee that their
work compel obtain the principal aptitudes to play out their occupations. Performance of raised
desire and quality only depends upon all around talented work. Nonappearance of data can be
dangerous to the specialist's employment (Driskell and Salas 2013).
Resources
Each association should be resourced to accomplish its destinations and objectives
effectively. Absence of resources hampers the production no matter what (Daley 2012).
Motivation
Astoundingly enthusiastic people proportional to performance of restrictive necessity
while in contrast people with low soul counterparts to poor work performance. This ends up
being sure that people's thriving is continually key for the affiliation's performance (Maslach and
Jackson 2013).
Poor performance has undesirable concerns in the affiliation and besides to the photo of
people. It similarly happened that poor performance should be tended to with incite affect
consequently in case it is not overseen it has horrible consequences. Poor performance ought not
to be ignored in light of the way that it can incite unfixable situation. Poor work performance

5
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
stains the photo of the affiliation and runs the work put boisterous and discourage people that are
steady representatives. A long way past people were convinced to be mortified to be connected
with the poor performing affiliation (Pinder 2014).
How to improve employee performance
Communication expect a noteworthy part in the relationship to ensure that people
comprehend their parts and obligations the affiliation they are working for. The path in which the
rules are given to people is moreover crucial to check misguided judgment. It similarly unfurled
in the examination that once in a while communication is unclear influencing people to execute
wrong bearings (Vogelgesang, Leroy and Avolio 2013). Extraordinarily vivacious people make
extraordinary end product and executes at a strange state. Motivation is one of the interferences
to invigorate irregular state performance. Regulating for most extraordinary performance as the
necessity to direct performance sufficiently at either individual level or the work team following
lessons stay fixated on the general target while evaluating evidence regarding performance that
develops the groundwork of the past lessons. Constructing a strong team, constructing trust and
obligation, managers are to safeguard the laborers are significantly enthusiastic by perceiving the
exertion they put to elevate the performance standard (Manzoor 2012).
Recommendations
The revelations exposed that the aspects affecting the performance ought to be tended to
with provoke affect and be seen over some extend of time to guarantee moderate viable
development in refining the performance of the people named on operational environment.
Interferences are to be completed to train, rouse and invigorate the people thus enhancing their
affirmation. Incite intercession from Cluster and Provincial level would moreover be

6
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
commended with the relationship of the Employee Health and Wellness Services for certainty
enable activities, to work relations for information conferring to business related issues, for
instance, punitive techniques, and Legal Services for honest to goodness gauges to train the
personnel thorough of the station organization about. It is thus recommended -
 Poor performance is focused to instantly relating the right strategies (Buckingham and
Goodall 2015).
 Interventions that would enable members to achieve better to be realized, for instance,
enhanced work relations with the organization,
 Improved working circumstances, capacities and capitals assigned at the affiliations be
come back to, which implies the part is fitting to perform viably.
 Affiliation lectures to inform members with the new progressions inside the affiliation.
 Exclusivity of each environment be tended to with respect to boundlessness and
framework.
 Enlistment assurance and courses of action of occupants should address the field of work.
Amend probability for precise livelihoods.
 Organization to guarantee that communication or relationship with members is kept up to
fabricate trust and to win their devotion (Pollitt 2013).
 Office propriety is kept up continually, for example organization does not call members
names and approach to manage adolescents is especially essential.
 Organization to perceive incredible work by members.
 Members are incorporated and organization tunes in to their duties.
 Organization produces the sentiment proprietorship by opening talk tables where the
members work together with the organization on the dangerous domains.

7
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
 Organization to exploit the leadership capacities efficiently and proficiently.
 Affiliation realizes retainment method specific for the members that the affiliation has
contributed some unprecedented aptitudes.
 Affiliation perceives also increased tertiary education by members.
Conclusion
On a concluding note it has been understood that performance management is a vital part
of the job of every manager and it implies that managers need to manage and deal with poor
performance of the employees. Some major factors have been identified that contribute towards
the poor work performance of employees. Some of these factors are training, resources and
motivation. For improving poor employee performance communication and motivation are
identified as the most important elements. This report acted as a brief of the issue of poor
performing employees that has brought about challenges in the organization. The approach of the
paper was focused on providing the latest evidence related to the issue and accordingly provided
feasible recommendations.

8
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
References
Bach, S., 2012. Performance management. Managing Human Resources: Human Resource
Management in Transition, pp.219-242.
Buckingham, M. and Goodall, A., 2015. Reinventing performance management. Harvard
Business Review, 93(4), pp.40-50.
Daley, D.M., 2012. Strategic human resources management. Public Personnel Management,
pp.120-125.
Driskell, J.E. and Salas, E. eds., 2013. Stress and human performance. Psychology Press.
Haines III, V.Y. and St-Onge, S., 2012. Performance management effectiveness: practices or
context?. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(6), pp.1158-1175.
Manzoor, Q.A., 2012. Impact of employees motivation on organizational effectiveness. Business
management and strategy, 3(1), p.1.
Maslach, C. and Jackson, S.E., 2013. A social psychological analysis. Social psychology of
health and illness, 227.
Novakovic, D., Vasic, N., Novakovic, S., Kostic, D. and Bianchini, R., 2013. Deepdive:
Transparently identifying and managing performance interference in virtualized environments.
In Proceedings of the 2013 USENIX Annual Technical Conference (No. EPFL-CONF-185984).
Pinder, C.C., 2014. Work motivation in organizational behavior. Psychology Press.
Pollitt, C., 2013. The logics of performance management. Evaluation, 19(4), pp.346-363.

9
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Samnani, A.K. and Singh, P., 2014. Performance-enhancing compensation practices and
employee productivity: The role of workplace bullying. Human Resource Management
Review, 24(1), pp.5-16.
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. and Halligan, J., 2015. Performance management in the public
sector. Routledge.
Vogelgesang, G.R., Leroy, H. and Avolio, B.J., 2013. The mediating effects of leader integrity
with transparency in communication and work engagement/performance. The Leadership
Quarterly, 24(3), pp.405-413.