Evaluation of Leadership Coaching as a Development Tool

This research report explores the significance of leadership coaching in enhancing the self-efficacy of leaders and building trust among subordinates. The report evaluates the research design, sufficiency of research methods, and sampling techniques used in the study. The report concludes that leadership coaching is an effective tool for enhancing leadership efficacy and building trust among subordinates.

Running head: BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Business Research Method Research Proposal
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author’s Note:

1BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Table of Contents
Question 1: Evaluation of Report....................................................................................................2
Question 2: Critique the Outcome of Research Article...................................................................3
Question 3: Evaluation of Research Design....................................................................................4
Question 4: Evaluation of the Sufficiency of Research Method.....................................................6
Question 5: Evaluation of Sampling................................................................................................7
Reference List..................................................................................................................................9

2BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Question 1: Evaluation of Report
Leadership development has an important role in the robust growth of business
organizations. This research report has explored leadership development as integration strategy
towards helping leaders relating with others, coordinating their efforts, building their
commitments and extending social networks through the application of self-understanding to
organizational and social imperative. From the evaluation of this report, it is evident that
leadership coaching enhances the general feeling of the leaders towards confidence judgment
about their abilities to carry out the behaviors comprising the leadership roles. From the theory of
leaders’ role efficacy, it can be known that leadership coaching improves the quality of
relationship between the leaders and their subordinates through increasing the trust of leaders on
their subordinates (Ladegard and Gjerde 2014). While evaluating the research report in terms of
leaders, it can imply that the leaders can establish and strengthen the psychosocial function of
leader-subordinate relationship. In this way, they can improve the perception of subordinates
regarding their effectiveness and competence. Such increasing trust also enhances the
willingness of the subordinates for continuing with their working relationship. Hence, leadership
coaching has positive implication on the leaders towards enhancing their leadership efficacy and
leader subordinate relationship.
The theory of leadership coaching has also been emphasized on the increased
psychological empowerment and reduced turnover of the employees. It is a custom tailored
process for the leaders for improving the mental wellbeing, workplace wellbeing, resilience and
depression. The theoretical coaching framework has explained the coaching beyond just
behavioral and psychodynamic focused practice, which is also focused on shaping the

3BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
accountability, collaboration, awareness, commitment and action of the leaders (Ladegard and
Gjerde 2014). In this way, the evaluation of the report has completely been focused on goal
directed behavior of the leaders towards meeting the actual organizational goals effectively. The
research report has also explored that facilitative coaching style is highly essential for developing
the leadership traits among the leaders. On the other hand, the theoretical concept of leader-
subordinate relationship assists in extracting the reciprocal nature and trust from the
subordinates. More specifically, this research report implies that the leaders need to trust on the
competence level of the subordinates through delegating some authority to them. It ultimately
enhances the competence level and willingness of the employees to their work.
Question 2: Critique the Outcome of Research Article
The outcome of the research article has revealed that relational leadership establishes
mutually beneficial relationship between the leaders and subordinates. Such trends have led to
the organizational practices through interaction and dialog, where the leaders must be able to
build trust, relationship and more specifically express themselves among the subordinates.
Moreover, leadership coaching leads to mutual influence process in the organizations, where the
leaders must delegate some authority to the subordinates for making their responsible and
efficient at their works (Ladegard and Gjerde 2014). Hence, leadership coaching enhances the
leadership efficacy of the leaders, where the leaders become able to enhance the effectiveness of
the subordinates. In this way, the research has perfectly met its objectives leading to effective
research outcome. On the other hand, the outcome of the research has also indicated that
leadership coaching enhances trust in the subordinates in terms of their reduced turnover
intension and psychological empowerment. Moreover, delegation of authority from the leaders to
the subordinates leads to their increased participation in the organizational decision making

4BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
process. It ultimately builds the trust and empowerment of the subordinates on their concerned
leaders. It has actually met the objective of the research to prove the fact the leadership coaching
influence the leaders’ trusts on the subordinates.
The formative evaluation of the effect of coaching has proved that it reduces the turnover
intension of the subordinates and enhances their psychological empowerment. The coaches of
the leadership coaching challenges the leaders towards setting the goals, action plans, initiating
action and reassume actions to facilitate cognitive learning. Facilitative coaching behavior acts as
an active mechanism in the leadership coaching process, which is extremely essential for the
assessment of leadership efficacy among the leaders. In this way, the higher the number of
coaching session provided to the leaders, the higher the leadership efficacy of the leaders is
enhanced. On the other hand, facilitative coach behavior impact on the trust of the leaders on the
subordinates. The leaders’ propensity to trust on the subordinates is generated in a state that is
actually generated through the leadership coaching process. Furthermore, the objective of the
research was also to explore the importance of facilitative behavior in establishing the trust level
of the leaders on the subordinates (Ladegard and Gjerde 2014). From the research, it is evident
that the leadership coaching helps the leaders in enhancing their confidence to delegate the job
authority to the responsible subordinates. In this way, the research has successfully achieved the
initially established research objectives.
Question 3: Evaluation of Research Design
Research design is the set of procedures and measures, which are actually used in
collecting and evaluating the measures of research variables in the problem research. Moreover,
the research designs are actually created with an intension to find answer and in-depth

5BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
information regarding the problems and research variables within the research (Lewis 2015). The
selection of effective research design is completely dependent on the types of research variables.
Qualitative and quantitative research methods are usually used in designing primary research.
Qualitative method is mostly used for collecting descriptive data regarding research topic.
On the other hand, quantitative research method is usually used for collecting numeric and
quantitative data associated with research variables and overall research topic (Choy, L.T.,
2014). Research study can definitely use mixed method, which is consisted of both qualitative
and quantitative research methods. In mixed method, the mixture of qualitative data and
quantitative data are used for collecting appropriate and authentic information regarding research
topic. In qualitative research method, mostly the descriptive data associated with research topic
is collected. Hence, such method can provide detailed and in depth authentic data related to
research variables. On the other hand, quantitative data provides numeric and objective data
associated with research topic. The numeric nature of the data leads to high level of authenticity
in the collected research data quantitative data is actually collected through survey method
(Dumay and Cai 2015). Hence, it includes close ended information for measuring the behaviors
attitudes and performance instruments related to research topic. The statistical analysis of the
quantitative data can lead to high level of authenticity in the overall research result. Furthermore,
qualitative research method is consisted of open ended information that is usually connected
through focus groups interviews and observations. In this way, qualitative research method can
collect diverse ideas and information regarding the topic of research.
The research design used in this research was quite sufficient for addressing the research
objective. Moreover, this research has used mixed to research method for addressing the research
objectives. The selected coaches for conducting focus group discussion was quite sufficient for

6BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
gathering the information regarding the importance of leadership coaching on the self efficacy
level of the leaders. The number of coaches selected in the research study was sufficient to
collect adequate information about the research study. On the other hand, the field experiment
conducted through survey method was quite sufficient to collect objective information about the
association between leadership coaching and the trust of leaders on the subordinates.
Question 4: Evaluation of the Sufficiency of Research Method
The methods used in this research study to collect data were sufficiently justified and
described enough. Moreover, the research study used focus group and questionnaires for
collecting authentic research information. In case of focus group, the research study selected 7
coaches for conducting focus group discussion. However, out of 7 coaches, it was possible to
gather 5 coaches for having 2 hours focus group discussion (Ladegard and Gjerde 2014). Such
focus group discussion was particularly useful for having comprehensive ideas, understanding
and opinions about the research topic. In this way, focus group discussion was quite effective
than individual interviews. Moreover, focus group discussion was helpful for collecting adequate
and in-depth data from the collection of 5 coaches, which might not be possible in case of
individual interview. Hence, the focus group discussion was sufficient enough for having
detailed descriptive information about the significance of leadership coaching in leaders’ self
efficacy and enhancing trust on the subordinates. From the description of focus group discussion,
it can be found that researcher acted as moderators and took notes during the session for
comparing the ideas of different coaches. From this focus group discussion, it can be found that
the goals have been changed during the coaching process for increasing self reflection and
enhanced self awareness of the leaders about the leadership. In this way, it can be said that the

7BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
description of focus group was sufficient and justified enough for leading authentic research
result.
In the second part, the research conducted field experiment for collecting objective data
through distribution of questionnaires among the leaders of different organizations. Initially, the
research study distributed these survey questionnaires among 34 participants. However,
ultimately the research got responses from 24 participants, who were the leaders in different
organizations. From the participating organizations, the research also received 192 email
addresses from the subordinates, where the research study distributed the questionnaires for
having authentic information about research study (Ladegard and Gjerde 2014). In this way,
adequacy of sample size was sufficient enough for leading the accuracy of research result.
However, in case of questionnaire method, it would be better to have some more samples size for
reducing the biasness in the collected information from the research participants. Such increased
sample size could have resulted in more authentic research result.
Question 5: Evaluation of Sampling
Sampling defines the process used in statistical analysis, where a predetermined number
of observations are selected from a larger population (McCusker and Gunaydin 2015). Moreover,
it is the process or a technique of selecting adequate and suitable sample for gathering authentic
information regarding the research topic. This process is particularly concerned with selection of
units from a large population size for collecting most accurate and relevant information about the
topic of the research. The methodologies that are used in sampling adequate sample size from
larger population are highly dependent on the type of analysis to be performed in the research.
Mostly, two types of sampling methods are used in conducting research study, which are like

8BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
simple random sampling and stratified sampling. This study is basically dependent on simple
random sampling for collecting authentic information about the importance of leadership
coaching on the effectiveness of leaders self efficacy and the trust level on the subordinates. In
case of simple random sampling, all the participants selected in this research study got equal
chance of participation in the whole data collection process (Ladegard and Gjerde 2014).
Moreover, the participants were provided there convenient option to take participation in the data
collection process. Furthermore, in case of questionnaire method, the research distributed the
questionnaires through emails to the participants. Hence, it became quite easier for the
participants to response to the questionnaires without any hindrance. In case of focus group
discussion, the coaches were also gathered at the convenience place for having 2 hours
discussion to collect detailed information about the research topic.
In case of simple random sampling, the research faced huge difficulties in the selection of
sample, because of the dispersed nature of the respondents. The collection of wide sample size
required a lot of time and cost for this research study, which had ultimately increased the overall
cost and time for completing the research. Furthermore, in case of respondents, five respondents
of focus group discussion were quite limited to gather in-depth and detailed information as
required by the research study. On the other hand, 24 respondents was also not sufficient for
having completely bias free information for leading most authentic and accurate research result.
Moreover, the research would have required more numbers of sample size as respondents for
having more authentic research result.

9BUSINESS RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Reference List
Choy, L.T., 2014. The strengths and weaknesses of research methodology: Comparison and
complimentary between qualitative and quantitative approaches. IOSR Journal of Humanities
and Social Science, 19(4), pp.99-104.
Dumay, J. and Cai, L., 2015. Using content analysis as a research methodology for investigating
intellectual capital disclosure: a critique. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1), pp.121-155.
Ladegard, G. and Gjerde, S., 2014. Leadership coaching, leader role-efficacy, and trust in
subordinates. A mixed methods study assessing leadership coaching as a leadership development
tool. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), pp.631-646.
Lewis, S., 2015. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five
approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), pp.473-475.
McCusker, K. and Gunaydin, S., 2015. Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed
methods and choice based on the research. Perfusion, 30(7), pp.537-542.