Occupier's Duty to Visitors: Understanding and Discharging the Responsibility
Verified
Added on 2019/09/26
|11
|3087
|164
Report
AI Summary
The assignment content for the Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) is focused on aspects of contract and negligence in business. The unit covers essential elements of a valid contract, principles of liability in negligence, and application of these concepts to various business situations.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Assignment Front Cover QualificationUnit number and title Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) UNIT 5: Aspects of Contract and Negligence For Business – Level 4 Student name and ID numberAssessor name Chi-Ming Tan Date issuedCompletion dateSubmitted on 18thSeptember 2015 13thDecember 2015 by 5.00pm Internal VerifierDr George Panagiotou Assignment titleBusiness Contract Law Instructions An electronic copy of your assessmentmustbe fully uploaded by thedeadline date and time. You must submitonesingle PDF or MS Office Word document. Any relevant images or screenshots must be included within the same MS Office Word or PDF document. The last version you upload will be the one that is marked. Your paper will be marked if you have indicated this as your final submission. Review the mitigating circumstances policy for information relating to extensions. The file sizemustnot exceed 20MB. Answer the criteria in order, clearly indicating the pass criteria number. Ensure that all work has been proof-read and checked prior to submission. Ensure that the layout of your documents are in a professional format with font style Arial, font size 12 for the text, font 14 for sub heading and font 16 for main heading, line spacing 1.5 and justified. Use the Harvard referencing system; otherwise it will be considered as plagiarised work. Ensure that you back-up your work regularly and apply version control to your documents. Ensure that any file you upload is virus-free, not corrupted and not protected by a password otherwise it will be treated as a non- Learner Declaration I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and research sources are fully acknowledged. Student signature:Date: 1 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Introduction and guidance The unit introduces the law of contract, with a particular emphasis on the formation and operation of business contracts. Learners are encouraged to explore the content of these agreements and then develop skills relating to the practical application of business contracts, including offer, acceptance, intention, consideration and capacity. Relevant case law examples will be covered. Learners will consider when liability in contract arises, the nature of the obligations on both sides of the contract, and the availability of remedies when a contract is not fulfilled in accordance with its terms. Additionally, the unit will enable learners to understand how the law of tort differs from the law of contract and examine issues of liability in negligence relating to business and how to avoid it. 2 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015 PLEASE REMEMBER CHECK THAT YOUR ANSWERS MEET THE CRITERIA COMPLETE THE ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA AS YOU GO ALONG DO NOT LEAVE THINGS TO THE LAST MINUTE
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Task One Write a report LO1Understand the essential elements of a valid contract in a business context. LO2Be able to apply the elements of a contract in business situations. Scenario: Bill advertised a printing press in a specialist trade journal for £100,000. Cathy wrote to Bill offering to buy it for £80,000. Bill replied by return of post saying he would accept £90,000. When he heard nothing from Cathy, Bill wrote again saying he would accept £80,000. Bill wrote specifically to Liza offering for sale an office computer for £550. The morning that she received the letter Liza wrote to Bill agreeing to buy for the asking price, she posted the letter later that day. Task One -- Write a Report AsaJuniorLegalExecutiveinasmalllawfirm,writeareporttoyour manager including the following: 1.1What are the essential elements required for the formation of a contract in the UK and explain theirimportance.Include an explanation of what is meant by ‘an invitation to treat’ with reference to the scenario above. 1.2In the report, identify and discuss the main types of contracts that may be entered into in the UK by individuals and businesses and discuss theirimpact. 2.1Discuss the above scenarios in detail and apply various elements of a contract. In other words are the contracts between ‘Bill and Cathy’, and ‘Bill and Liza’ valid? MERITS AND DISTINCTIONS M3 Use a report format throughout task one. D2 In the report, add an exploration and explanation of the term of the term ‘promissory estoppel’using case law to support your explanation. 3 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Task Two Short Answers LO1Understand the essential elements of a valid contract in a business context. LO2Be able to apply the elements of a contract in business situations. Scenario A: Opera singer Joyce DiDonato entered into a contact to perform as an opera singer for 3 months for the Royal Albert Hall company. She became ill five days before the opening night and was not able to perform for the first four nights. The Royal Albert Company replaced Joyce DiDonato. Subsequently Joyce DiDonato sued the Royal Albert Hall Company for Breach of contract. Subsequently Joyce DiDonato, agreed by contract to perform as an opera singer for another company. She again became ill and missed 6 days of rehearsals. The employer sacked her and replaced her with another singer. Again Joyce DiDonato sued for Breach of contract. Express and Implied Terms The parties entered an agreement whereby Scammell were to supply a van for £286 on Hire Purchase (HP) terms over 2 years and Ouston was to trade in his old van for £100. There was then some disagreement and Scammel refused to supply the van. The claimant was a farmer who had a tenancy on the defendant's fields. The claimant had planted corn and Barley on the fields and worked the fields to ensure the crops would grow. Before the field was due to be harvested the tenancy was terminated. The claimant then submitted a bill to the defendant for the work and cost of seed spent on the field as was customary in farming tenancies. The defendant refused to pay stating there was nothing in the tenancy agreement stating that such compensation was payable. Task Two: Short Answers The following must be included in your answers: 1.3/2.2Analyseterms in contracts with reference to their meaning and effect. What would be the impact of such terms?Use these in reference to the cases above and apply the law on these terms in these two contracts. 2.3Evaluatethe effect of Expressed and Implied terms using the cases above. 4 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Task Two Short Answers LO1Understand the essential elements of a valid contract in a business context. LO2Be able to apply the elements of a contract in business situations. Scenario B: for Merit and Distinctions ONLY Adriana hires a car from City Cars Rental. When she arrived at the rental depot she was presented with a form which had terms and conditions in small print on the back, and she was asked to sign it. Adriana signed the form straight away and paid the hire charge. When she got into the car, she happened to look in the glove compartment and saw a laminated document titled ‘Limitation of Liability’. This is an exclusion clause.This document says that City Car Rentals will not be liable for any injury caused by a defect in the car unless the defect was as a result of City Cars Rental’s negligence. Whilst Adriana was driving the car home along a busy dual-carriageway, the airbag inflated which caused Adriana to crash. As a result of the crash, Adriana was injured. M1 Assuming that there was no negligence, is the exclusion clause valid and why? D1 “Exclusion clauses are always valid, regardless of when introduced to a contract.” Critically evaluate this statement using case law to explain and justify your answer.Task Three Write a letter LO3Understand principles of liability in negligence in business activities. LO4Be able to apply the principles of liability in negligence in business situations. Scenario Albert wishes to rent a flat. He views 116 High Street and applies to be a tenant. He completes a form giving his accountant’s details. The landlord, Brad, applies to the accountant for a reference relating to Albert’s financial situation. The accountant, Charles, confuses Albert with another client and does not bother to check the file properly. He replies to Brad that Albert is an excellent client with high income and capital and recommends him as a good tenant. In fact, had he looked at the correct file, he would have seen that Albert was continuously in overdraft and had been in serious debt with various banks on and off for several years. Some months later, Albert disappears having taken the flat on and run up several thousand pounds worth of rent arrears. 5 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Task Three Write a Letter Write a letter to Brad and include the following: 4.1Advise Brad as to whether he can recover his losses from Charlesapplyingthe elements of tort of negligenceandstate possible defences from different cases. 3.1 Contrasthow the nature of liability in ‘Contract’ differs from the nature of liability in ‘Tort’? 3.2Explain the nature of liability in negligence with reference to‘Donoghue v Stevenson 1932’ detailing the conditions required to prove negligence. MERITS AND DISTINCTIONS M2 Explain what is meant by ‘strict liability’ in tort with particular reference to ‘Rylands v Fletcher 1868’. 6 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Task Four – Short answers LO3 Understand principles of liability in negligence in business activities LO4 be able to apply the principles of liability in negligence in business activities Scenario 1. Bill, a local milkman, contrary to express prohibition from his employers XYZ Dairies, engaged a 14 year old boy to help him deliver milk. Bill had told the teenager that he was not supposed to hire him but they could keep it between themselves and that he (the teenager) worked directly for Bill. XYZ Dairies become aware of this arrangement but had not done anything about it. As a result of Bill’s careless driving, the boy was injured. Can Bill be sued for negligence, and can XYZ Dairies be held vicariously liable in this situation? 2. A vintage vehicles museum owner asked a friend to drive a vintage bus to Barnstable in Devon where the museum owner was going to take part in a vintage bus rally. The friend drove negligently and damaged Mrs Smith’s car. As the friend was not employed at the Vintage Vehicles Museum can the owner of the museum be held liable? Task Four Short answers 4.2Discuss whether Bill is liable of negligence and if XYZ Dairies can be held vicariously liable. 3.3Explain how a business can be held responsible for the ‘wrongs’ committed by its employees, and give an example of when the employer would not be held vicariously liable for the ‘wrongs’ of its employee. MERITS AND DISTINCTIONS D3 Explain what is meant by the occupier’s duty of care to visitors, and demonstrate what steps can be taken to help discharge this duty. 7 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Merits and Distinctions M1Identify and apply alternative and appropriate solutions to marketing Effective judgements have been made. An effective approach to study and research has been applied. Assuming that there was no negligence, is the exclusion clause valid and why? M2Select / design and apply appropriate methods / Appropriate learning methods/techniques have been applied. Explain what is meant by ‘strict liability’ in tort with particular reference to ‘Rylands v Fletcher 1868’. M3Present and communicate appropriate findings Coherent, logical development of principles/concepts for the intended audience. Communication is appropriate for familiar and unfamiliar audiences and appropriate media have The law says that consideration need not be adequate but it must be sufficient. Write a letter discussing what is meant by considerationusing case law to illustrate your answer. D1Use critical reflection to evaluate own work and justify valid conclusions Conclusions have been arrived through synthesis of ideas and have been justified. Exclusion clauses are always valid regardless of when introduced into a contract. Critically evaluate this statement using case law to explain and justify your answer. D2Take responsibility for managing and organising activities Activities have been managed. Write a report to the Head of Whitman College explaining what is meant by the term‘promissory estoppel’using case law to help your explanation. D3Demonstrate convergent /lateral / creative thinking Convergent and lateral thinking have been applied. Problems have been solved. Explain what is meant by the occupier’s duty of care to visitors, and demonstrate what steps can be taken to help discharge this duty. 8 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology UNIT 5: Aspects of Contract and Negligence in Business Learning outcomes On successful completion of this unit learner will: Learning OutcomeAssessment Criteria LO1 Understand the essential elements of a valid contract in a business context. 1.1 Explain the importance of the essential elements required for the formation of a valid contract. 1.2 Discuss the impact of different types of contract. 1.3 Analyse terms in contracts with reference to their meaning and effect. LO2 Be able to apply the elements of a contract in business situations. 2.1 Apply the elements of contract in given business scenarios. 2.2 Apply the law on terms in different contracts. 2.3 Evaluate the effect of different terms in given contracts. LO3 Understand principles of liability in negligence in business activities. 3.1 Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability 3.2 Explain the nature of liability in negligence 3.3 Explain how a business can be vicariously liable. LO4 Be able to apply the principles of liability in negligence in business situations. 4.1 Apply the elements of the tort of negligence and defences in different business situations. 4.2 Apply the elements of vicarious liability in given business situations. 9 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology UNIT 5: Aspects of Contract and Negligence in Business Reference Material -GUIDES TO RELEVANT CASES Invitation to Treat •Pharmaceutical Society of GB v Boots Cash Chemists [1953] •Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1933 •Fisher v Bell [1961] Advertisements •Partridge v Crittenden [1968] •Harvey v Facey [1893] Not Invitation to Treat -Unilateral Offer •Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] •Biggs v Boyd Gibbins [1971] Offer •Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] •Guthing v Lynn [1831] •Routledge v Grant [1828] Acceptance •Felthouse v Bindley [1863] •Yates v Pulleyn [1975] Consideration •Thomas v Thomas [1842] •Ward v Byham [1956] •Tweddle v Atkinson [1861] •Collins v Godfrey [1831] Promissory estoppel •DC Builders v Rees [1965] General rule of Privity of Contract •Dunlop v Selfridge 1915 Bishop, W. (1982). "Economic loss in tort". Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Phillip G. Sharp ,“Bond Law Review”,( 2005) Vol 17 Issue 2, Article10,207. Elliott,Paul (speaker),“Contract law review, Exemption Clause”(Business LawEducation Center)BLEC, seminar July 1995. 10 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
LondonSchoolof Science & Technology Bant,Elise,“Incapacity, Non Est Factum And Unjust Enrichment”, (2009). http://www.contactlaw.co.uk/can-a-verbal-contract-be-legally-binding.html BPP Learning Media pg. 257- August 2013 All lecture notes can be found on LSST Connect. 11 Pearson BTEC Level 5 HND Diploma in Business (QCF) Aspects of Contract and NegligenceUnit 5Autumn 2015