Managing Knowledge

This report discusses the process of managing knowledge in an organization, focusing on the concepts of knowledge and the SECI model. It also explores the types of organizational culture and provides insights from the perspective of ASDA, a leading retailer in the UK.

Managing Knowledge

Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................1
Different concept of knowledge and SECI model..................................................................1
TASK 2............................................................................................................................................4
Types of culture introduced and selection of appropriate culture for organisation................4
TASK 3............................................................................................................................................8
Discussion on communities of practices that generate benefits for organisation...................8
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................11
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................12

INTRODUCTION
Managing knowledge is explicated as a process that it used for creating, using, managing and
sharing knowledge and information of an organisation. This refers to the multidisciplinary
approach for achieving organisational objectives and goals through making best use of
information and knowledge. The main motive of knowledge management is to improve an
organisation efficiency by saving knowledge of organisation. This report is written from
perspective of ASDA and it is one of the second largest retailers of UK and it became of the
largest subsidiary of Walmart family (Alosaimi, Renukappa and Suresh, 2018). Moreover, this
report highlights on concepts of knowledge and SECI model of knowledge creation with
appropriate example. Category of culture according will also be included in this report. In the
last, communities of practice that generate organisational benefits is also include in the upcoming
report.
TASK 1
Different concept of knowledge and SECI model
Knowledge practice refer to the practices that was developed in early 90’s and according to
expert of knowledge management it is identified tacit and explicit are different types of
knowledge system and it characterise organisation knowledge that aids management for
accomplishing high productivity and success by implementing effective knowledge system.
Explicit Knowledge
The term explicit knowledge is one of the most basic form of knowledge and this is easy
to transfer and pass along with their written down and accessible factors. When the data is
processed, structured, interpreted and organised than it is east to transfer information with
implementing system by which all information is easily recorded, communicated and articulated.
From perspective of ASDA explicit knowledge used by authorities for transferring knowledge in
a stored manner for completion of organisation task with easy approach (Bosch and et. al., 2014).
Tacit knowledge
The term tacit knowledge refers to the system that is possess by management for
performing all task with personal experience and context. It’s provide information which is used
to complete work with written down, present, articulate and tangible form. ASDA is a large
organisation and this aids management for performing work under the guidance of professional
1

individuals. Tacit knowledge provide application and it is used by management for completing
work with specific aspects. This also aids management for completion of task with motive of
managing work by use of specific demo.
SECI Model of knowledge- The term SECI model of knowledge dimension is defined as a
model of knowledge that define methods or ways of tacit and explicit knowledge conversion into
organisation knowledge. The SECI model of knowledge is discussed as below:
 Tacit to Tacit (Socialization)- Socialization method id from tacit-to-tacit knowledge and
as word explain that socialization is an important aspect because this is used to share
knowledge. In simple terms, tacit to tacit knowledge refers to the process of transferring
and distributing knowledge. Observation, imitation and practice through use of
apprenticeship. The word apprenticeship stands for work according to instruction of
professional. In context of ASDA, direct interaction with trainer is implemented because
it helps in transferring knowledge with easy approach (Brito and Pratas, 2015).
Moreover, Socialization comes from share of experience by other individuals. Example-
Brainstorming session are conducted by ASDA and it aids management for performing
work through common activities in order to bring together all individuals.
 Tacit to Explicit (Externalization)- With analyse of aspect between explicit and tacit
knowledge through use of externalization include (articulating knowledge and
publishing) developing areas. ASDA utilise externalization method because it embed
combine tacit knowledge because it enable effective communication systems. Like,
image and document support interaction with different kinds. When tacit knowledge is
formulated to convert into explicit then it is more crystallized. With the use of
externalization four different modes to generate knowledge is hold by management and it
results that knowledge easily converted from tacit to explicit concepts.
 Explicit to explicit (Combination)- Explicit to explicit by the use of combination
methods (integrating and organising knowledge) such as for building prototypes.
Moreover, ASDA generates prototypes with combination of different explicit system
(Cho and Korte, 2014). Technology plays an important role because by use of effective
computerised system organised communication network is generated with the support of
database and it support mode of knowledge conversion. ASDA start to operate business
with use of combination method because this helps in gathering information from outside
2

or inside the workplace and then combine them. Its results new methods are developed
for forming new knowledge.
 Explicit to Tacit (Internalization)- Explicit to tacit methods by formulating aspects to
internalization and this aids person to receive knowledge and application by use of
individual. Learning by doing method is explicated with understand of explicit to tacit
method. This is because person consider areas through which individual enclosed systems
by which all information and data is collected by monitoring work of overall stores. In
the context of internalization method person consider continue and collective reflection
for managing work according to recognise patterns and this aids sense through which
internal workplace of ASDA is designed according to field perspective (Daghfous,
Belkhodja and Ahmad, 2018).
SECI model is introduced by Nonaka and Konno with subsequently methods for performing
work by transferring information. It is created, utilized and shared beliefs through which work is
completed with office space and virtual space and it aids individuals to perform with shared
ideas.
Knowledge creation process
Knowledge is created by practice, interaction and collaboration with use of different
knowledge types that are shared as well as converted. It is also used by management for
managing support with relevant information. ASDA improve knowledge creation process to
improve decisions for creating new knowledge. The ability to generate new knowledge often
relates with heart of organisation and competitive advantage. Moreover, knowledge creation
according to Nonaka’s SECI model is to generate continuous transfer, conversion and
combination. The four steps for knowledge creation process relates with user, interact, learn and
practice. With making distinguish between knowing and knowledge organisation creates
perspective for creating positive conditions and it comes with motive of developing structure that
work for completing task in an organised manner (de Faultrier and Marshall, 2014). Moreover,
knowledge sharing as well as knowledge creation aids towards completion of task with motive of
improving decisions. ASDA generate positive results by performing work to manage and
develop new systems of creation. Some steps that states better knowledge for creation of positive
results is mention as follow:
3

To empower and support information sharing- On the strategic side, as portrayed in the
past subsection, the executives must get where and in what structures information exists. They
should then give the correct gatherings to information to be shared. For unsaid information this
infers a specific accentuation on casual correspondence, while for express information this
suggests an attention on an assortment of IT frameworks. On the key side (to be examined inside
and out later), the executives must make/plan the correct conditions, cycles, and frameworks that
give the methods and eagerness to it to happen.
To establish a reasonable workplace- This incorporates the thought of making a
transaction among information and knowing. It suggests offering significant courses and
training, yet above all permitting new information to be made through association, practice, and
experimentation (Di Iorio and Rossi, 2018). Model highlight the significance of shared
encounters in the information creation measure when managing implied information, and the
requirement for a climate where these can be shaped. SECI talks about how social standards
regularly smother development and new information creation. It advocates conditions where
ASDA perceive that objectives can be made through activity, where instinct is acknowledged
and esteemed, and where experience is just a hypothesis. These ideas take us back to the idea of
hypothesis being used and the acknowledgment and backing of conditions that permit
conceptualizing, experimentation, and unstructured connection for performing work in a proper
manner.
TASK 2
Types of culture introduced and selection of appropriate culture for organisation
Each organisation is different from another and all of them perform work with unique
culture aspects. It refers that work is organised by performing work with organise groups for
individuals. People perform work through making perspective through which work is completed
by combining four types of organisation culture. Quinn and Cameron develop organisation
culture assessment as well as instrument. ASDA perform work by managing task with (OCAI)
methods and it assess about preferred and current organisation culture (Galati, 2015). Further, it
is recognised as a competing value framework so it results that more than 12,000 organisations
utilised organisation culture. It makes presence for performing work which is used to complete
work with another framework. CVF emerge from research and it is used for identifying
4

organisation effectiveness. The criteria for performing work with managing work to analyse
dimension according to internal-external, flexibility-stability factors.
Internal-External dimension- The organisation perform work with motive of managing
work that aids to complete work for completing task that make focus inward on collaboration,
coordination and integration of activities. ASDA management focus on all culture perspective
and it is used by management for completion of task with decided technology. External
orientation, looking at market and focus on latest technology aspects to complete work with
decided competitors and number of customers that is used for diversifying all activities as a
result for managing work according to decided culture. An agile, volatile market is implemented
by management for performing work within a stable environment and it aids management for
performing with internal focus.
Types of culture
 Clan culture- The clan culture is rooted with motive of developing collaboration. All
members share commonalities and it aids person for performing work with the aim of
introducing individuals as a big family (Gonzalez, Martins and Toledo, 2014). This
results more individuals are involved as well as active within organisation for completion
of task according to decided culture. From perspective of ASDA there are various
functions and operations are managed by organisation and it aids management for
completion of work to generate long term bounds. It results leadership takes form of
mentorship and it results that organisation make long term perspective which aids in
managing work according to commitments and tradition. With the analyse of ASDA
functions management make perspective and it rooted teamwork, consensus and
communication. A prominent culture is developed with the motive of managing and
adopting values according to natural-hygiene products. Further, ASDA authorities
formulate respectful relationship with employee’s, supplier and customers. It results
overall stakeholders of respective organisation support management to make accurate and
effective decisions in different situations. Along with this there are various functions and
operation operated by ASDA so with implement of Clan culture positive culture is
formulated among organisation and it aids management to perform all functions in an
appropriate manner (Laudon and Laudon, 2018).
5

 Adhocracy culture- The adhocracy culture relates with energy and creativity. According
to adhocracy culture engage staff generate risk perspective and this aids persons for
completion of task according to innovative methods. Innovators or entrepreneurs
generates effective perspective and it aids persons for completion of task with using
extermination techniques. ASDA use adhocracy culture and it is used by management for
performing task with use of freedom and ingenuity aspects. Core values engaged by
persons to complete work with less strict instructions.
 The market culture- Culture is built with analyses of dynamic perspective related with
competition and it aids management to perform task according to concrete results.
Moreover, the main focus of market culture is to achieve goals and objectives of
organisation (Lech, 2014). ASDA leaders adopt tough and demanding nature and it
results organisation is able to perform work with adopting features that is beneficial for
achieving common goal. Globalisation is one of the major perspective due to which all
sectors as well as organisation are performing their work at international level.
Profitability and market share are two important factors that is implemented by market
culture for completion of task with more efficiency. Example- ASDA perform their work
as the subsidiary of Walmart it helps person for completion of task in a broad market
area. Result-based workplace generate perspective through which engaged staff
accomplish company goals in decided manner and within stipulated time-period.
 Hierarchy culture- The aspects of hierarchy culture is focused on structure and control
the task by understanding all systems with technique of strict discipline. Formal as well
as professional methods to complete task in an organised manner. Hierarchy culture is
highly effective as it authorities of ASDA to perform work according to their size. Values
perform an important role for management and this make consistency and uniformity
methods. This results organisation perform work and activities by which work is
completed with motive of managing work according to high efficiency. In easy words
Hierarchy culture is also known as control culture and this develop formalised and
structured workplace (Massingham, 2014). Procedures terms define aspects that
management work according to efficiency that aids in completion of task in a smooth
manner.
6

The OCAI reveals better value by performing all task with rare aspects for organisation and this
aids management for sharing equal traits from perspective four culture types. ASDA is a retail
organisation and it provide a large number of products so portfolio for management provides
equal traits by which work within organisation is highly managed with analysing subordinate
systems. Moreover, all departments perform a different role for organisation so this is important
for management to monitor traits for controlling all work by analysing work culture.
Defining a specific or particular culture is difficult and this is because it is based with complex
combination that undertakes shared beliefs and attitudes of persons. ASDA leader gain insight
the dominant culture within their organisation (Mirakhorli and Cleland-Huang, 2015). Along
with this it also aids management for assess the gaps due to which current culture match with
preferred gaps to complete all work as per decided values. There are different task managed and
this aids persons for managing task with OCAI and competing values framework in order to
serve powerful tools which is useful for making empirical comparison between different culture
of organisation to manage task in an organised manner.
From the perspective of ASDA Clan culture is more appropriate for managing task and work for
organisation. Environment plays an important role for each organisation to complete their task
with positive environment. According to present working conditions of ASDA it is identified that
management operate their stores at different geographical areas. Therefore, persons or engaged
staff have a lot of common perspective in organisation due to the same roles and responsibilities.
Example- Individuals who are engage in marketing department perform their work for promotion
of products (Newell, 2015). Therefore, work is completed by management to consider and
complete task through making focus on all sectors that is related with health care, education and
government agency. Some points that justify importance of clan-culture for retail organisation
specifically ASDA is discussed as below:
 Formulation of teams- Clan culture focus on perspective that generates positive team
aspects for organisation. This aids management for completion of work by managing
teams that is used for generate feels that is aids in managing task through use of
figures by which participation among teamwork make efforts to promote teamwork in
all departments.
 Commitment, empowerment and engagement- Clan culture make collaboration among
all departments and it aids management for performing task with decided individuals.
7

Long term results are gained with formulation of clan culture through generating
efficiency-based coordination in order to complete task by making effective
interaction between all individuals. Moreover, individuals execute aspects that are
useful for making results with predicting all perspective for organisation.
 Role as a coach- ASDA perform their functions with engagement of various
individuals that belongs to different geographical areas. Respondents are an important
part for individuals and it make positive results for organisation to score statements,
respondents that select participant behaviour in order to reduce conflicts by arranging
and organising meetings with all departments (Romaniuk, Dawes and Nenycz-Thiel,
2014). The engagement process of culture aids persons for minimising time related
with success by completing work according to coach guidance.
TASK 3
Discussion on communities of practices that generate benefits for organisation
Most of the current economic factors runs on knowledge and it define most company work
that is used for capitalise different facts. Cross-functional teams, customer and product based
business units and the work groups. It results organisation forms and capture idea to complete
task with organisational forms. There are different ways exists and it is used for managing work
by organising effective results to make complement about organisation structure with
engagement of different individuals for completing work according to decided knowledge. This
also results organisation formulates an effective organisational structure through which
community and ASDA authorities support each other to perform task according to their
perspective. Some benefits that are obtained by organisation through communication practices is
as follow:
A Paradox of Management
In spite of the fact that networks of training are in a general sense casual and self-putting
together, they profit by development. Like, retail organisation they react to consideration that
regards their tendency (Sparks, 2016). Management can't pull on a cornstalk to cause it to
become quicker or taller, and ASDA shouldn't pull an individual out of the ground to check
whether they are capable and not. In any case, organisation generates and add skills during
project completion, and guarantee that results are generated with the best possible supplements.
8

And keeping in mind that ASDA invite potential candidates for the development of organisation.
The equivalent is valid for all department of organizations that develop networks of training from
its initial phase. This benefits to ASDA that persons perform their work with more efficiency and
it recognize likely networks of training that will upgrade the organization's vital abilities and give
the framework that will support such networks and empower them to apply their skill adequately
in order to gain competitive-edge in minimum time period.
Identify of potential communities
Networks of training ought not be made in a vacuum. As a rule, casual organizations of
individuals with the capacity and the enthusiasm to additionally build up an association's centre
abilities as of now exist. The undertaking is to recognize such gatherings and assist them with
meeting up as networks of training. At Shell, for instance, an individual who needs to build up
another network unites with a specialist and meetings planned individuals. It benefits to ASDA
because now more number of professional are engaged in operations of business. They take a
gander at difficulties and issues that individuals across units and groups share for all intents and
purpose and that would fill in as bases for a network of training. The meetings are not just a
method for gathering data; they additionally produce energy for the undeveloped network.
Subsequent to laying the foundation, the facilitator calls the individuals from the network of
training together, and the gathering starts talking about designs for exercises that will fabricate
individual and gathering capacities and advance the organization's key plan. It benefits to
organisation because all staff participate in organisation function (Wadsworth and Blanchard,
2015). A key assignment is characterizing a network's space. In the event that individuals don't
feel actually associated with the gathering's subject matter and interest whenever it has been
characterized, they won't completely invest in crafted by the network. This results person
perform work by motive of improving work with community engagement that helps to achieve
opportunities in minimum time period.
Giving the Infrastructure.
Networks of training are defence-less on the grounds that they do not have the
authenticity—and the spending plans—of set up offices. To arrive at their maximum capacity, at
that point, they should be incorporated into the business and upheld specifically and it benefits to
organisation because more number of persons are focused towards development of company
9

structure. Senior heads must be set up to put time and cash in helping such networks arrive at
their maximum capacity. That implies interceding when networks face hindrances to their
advancement, for example, IT frameworks that don't serve them, advancement frameworks that
neglect network commitments, and prize structures that debilitate cooperation. It additionally
implies connecting networks to related activities, for example, a corporate sector and retail
organisation such as ASDA gain benefits with developing right infrastructure to complete task
with decided approach.
Benefits to individuals and teams
Making an encouraging group of people for individuals
To supports any association is the individuals inside it. Individuals normally need to
associate with others to discover uphold – this is as obvious inside the work environment for
what it's worth outside of it. This is the reason networks of training and little gatherings will in
general beginning shaping with no support from the association. So the first benefit to team and
individuals is that individuals are motivated for completion of work in a proper manner.
Individuals who don't feel upheld at work rapidly lose inspiration and may leave. Regardless of
whether they remain, they are not giving their best to the association.
Different instances of community pawhere individuals who have moved from the
function of undertaking supervisor to nimble foreman. Some ranking directors accept this is a
characteristic move and that an accomplished task chief can turn into a deft group captain with
small preparing or continuous help – what I would call a "do or die" situation. Tesco a well-
known retail organisation face challenges because they not work according to community
practice.
Quickening skilled improvement for the association
Associations generally very regularly think about expert improvement as an individual
movement and advance it with individual preparing spending plans or solo learning destinations.
While it's helpful to consider proficient improvement for people, it's likewise significant to
consider the expert advancement of a gathering of individuals and the hierarchical capacity it
might bring. Team and their members both gain benefits because skills aids them in completion
of task with more efficiency. Employee’s learn better when individual take in together in light of
the fact that individual get profit by joint effort and expanding on top of one another's thoughts.
10

Individuals in gatherings are likewise ready to gain from the victories and difficulties of others in
the gathering.
Sharing information and building better practice
At the point when a network begins to meet, individuals will begin to share stories and
difficulties. This is an extraordinary spot for them to begin building trust, which is essential for a
network of training to flourish. Sharing stories has various focal points for individuals and the
association. It will diminish duplication of endeavors inside the association as individuals will
find the comparable things they are chipping away at. It will improve critical thinking as a more
extensive scope of individuals will be attempting to unravel each issue. It will prompt better
working practices for the association and also this improve individual and team knowledge by
match them with current practices.
Community Practice - Limitations
Constraints of networks of training arise as far as hierarchical progression and time.
Communities of training have the most potential on the off chance that they appear inside not so
much formal but rather more characteristic structures. It is to their advantage if authoritative
structures are evenly associated, however generally associations are all the more vertically
adjusted. On the off chance that keeping up the progression is of more prominent significance to
people inside the network of training, rather than creating vital capacities, at that point it won't be
fruitful. So it is complex to understand that what Time or any other restricting variable that
impacts networks of training in an unexpected way. This generate limits and create barrier that
reduce covert capacity, time likewise should be accessible for members to take part in casual
cycles with other gathering individuals notwithstanding more conventional ones.
CONCLUSION
In the last, with analyses of above report it is concluded that knowledge management
plays an important role for an organisation to perform their work according to current
knowledge. Explicit and tacit are two types of knowledge management and it is used by
organisation for completing all work with appropriate manner. Clan, market etc. are some types
of culture and it leads business to perform work with decided culture aspects. Further, the report
also concludes about limitation and benefits of community practices in context of firms or
organisation.
11

REFERENCES
Books and journals
Alosaimi, H., Renukappa, S. and Suresh, S., 2018, September. Drivers and Challenges for
Managing Knowledge in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Construction Industry.
In European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 59-XXVI). Academic
Conferences International Limited.
Bosch, F.V.D and et. al., 2014. Governing principles can guide fungicide-resistance
management tactics. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 52, pp.175-195.
Brito, P.Q. and Pratas, J., 2015. Tourism brochures: Linking message strategies, tactics and
brand destination attributes. Tourism Management, 48, pp.123-138.
Cho, T. and Korte, R., 2014. Managing knowledge performance: testing the components of a
knowledge management system on organizational performance. Asia Pacific Education
Review, 15(2), pp.313-327.
Daghfous, A., Belkhodja, O. and Ahmad, N., 2018. Understanding and managing knowledge
transfer for customers in IT adoption. Information Technology & People.
de Faultrier, B. and Marshall, D., 2014. Co-operation in the supermarket aisle: young children’s
accounts of family food shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution
Management.
Di Iorio, A. and Rossi, D., 2018. Capturing and managing knowledge using social software and
semantic web technologies. Information Sciences, 432, pp.1-21.
Galati, F., 2015. At what level is your organization managing knowledge?. Measuring Business
Excellence.
Gonzalez, R.V.D., Martins, M.F. and Toledo, J.C., 2014. Managing knowledge in a service
provider: a network structure-based model. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.P., 2018. Management information systems: managing the digital
firm. Pearson Education Limited.
Lech, P., 2014. Managing knowledge in IT projects: a framework for enterprise system
implementation. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Massingham, P., 2014. An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 2–managing
knowledge flows and enablers. Journal of Knowledge Management.
Mirakhorli, M. and Cleland-Huang, J., 2015. Detecting, tracing, and monitoring architectural
tactics in code. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 42(3), pp.205-220.
Newell, S., 2015. Managing knowledge and managing knowledge work: what we know and
what the future holds. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), pp.1-17.
Romaniuk, J., Dawes, J. and Nenycz-Thiel, M., 2014. Generalizations regarding the growth and
decline of manufacturer and store brands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer
Services, 21(5), pp.725-734.
Sparks, L., 2016. 14 Spatial-structural change in food retailing in the UK. A Stakeholder
12

Approach to Managing Food: Local, National, and Global Issues, p.200.
Wadsworth, M.B. and Blanchard, A.L., 2015. Influence tactics in virtual teams. Computers in
Human Behavior, 44, pp.386-393.
13