This essay compares and evaluates the characteristics of the methodologies and paradigms used in two specific articles and checks if those align with the research study which will be conducted on 'A study on the problems being faced by small business while undertaking financial assistance by Canadian banks.'
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES Introduction Methodology and research paradigm are lie at the heart of any research process, to align with the goals and objectives which the research will be meeting in the due course (Kumar, 2019). Paradigms in research vary according to the methodology of a research. The main idea is that the overview or the assumptions about how things work in general, should comply with the methodology adopted in the research process (Fellows, Fellows & Liu, 2015). The purpose of this essay is to compare and evaluate the characteristics of the methodologies and paradigms used in two specific articles:Saini, D.S. & Budhwar, P.S. (2008) ‘Managing the human resource in Indian SMEs: The role of indigenous realities’. Journal of World Business, 43(4), pp. 417-434., and Şendoğ du, A.A., Kocabacak, A. & Güven, Ş. (2013) ‘The Relationship between Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Commitment: A Field Study’. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, pp. 818- 827, and check if those possibly align with the research study which will be conducted on "A study on the problems being faced by small business while undertaking financial assistance by Canadian banks." Methodologies The article by Saini and Budhwar (2008) focuses on a more qualitative methodology of research. In this, they simply observe from a sample of two small sized businesses one of which happen to be a family business. The objective of the research was to find out how the HRM policies and intervention in SME’s in India play a part in motivating the workforce of the organizations. The research takes in several considerations, such as social support, employeeinvolvementandemployeerelations,andthenanalyseshoweachsample approaches these criteria, to arrive at a qualitative interpretation of the issue. The main advantage of this research methodology is that it is based in human observations and interpretation. However, the disadvantage is that it is highly subject to researcher’s biasness.
2METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES On the other hand, the article by Şendoğ du, Kocabacak, A. and Güven (2013) take a more quantitative approach towards their study of how HRM policies lead to organizational commitment. The research methodology in this case is both qualitative and quantitative, but focusing more on quantitative approach, based on extensive statistical figures. Peffer’s scale of HRM and Moodway and Steers’ organizational commitment scale were used in the researchprocess.Dataintheresearchhasbeenanalysedusingdescriptivestatistics. Correlations, multiple regressions and statistical regressions have been used in order to explore the relationship between the variables in the study. Hence, it can be understood that focus has mainly been on quantitative methodology of research. The advantage of this methodology is that it provides for accurate data and easily understandable data. However, it does not provide an in-depth insight into why a particular thing is happen in the setting. Paradigms Saini and Budhwar (2018) have taken the interpretivism paradigm in their research, as they have used their own interpretation of the people involved in the situation to do the analysis of the qualitative research, from an individual perspective. The advantage of this research is that it supports primary observation and description of real world situations. The disadvantage is however the fact that it is highly subject to researcher’s bias. Şendoğ du, Kocabacak, A. and Güven (2013) on the other hand have used the paradigm of positivism in their research, testing hypothesis with the help of several tools of quantitative data analysis, to arrive at an objective conclusion. The advantage of this research paradigm is that it follows a well-defined structure in research. However, it is subject to change in human behaviour.
3METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES Alignment with research plans While conducting the research on "A study on the problems being faced by small business while undertaking financial assistance by Canadian banks”, it is important to incorporate both of these methodologies into practice for the purpose of making sure that the research process is both rich in observation and comprehensibility in data, also eliminating the risks of researcher’s bias in the process. The paradigm of interpretivism is the main paradigm which aligns with the research plans of the research to be conducted, since observations, literature and statistics will be purely based on the interpretation of the researcher. The only feasibility concerns are resources and permission which will be required to carry out the research.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5METHODS AND METHODOLOGIES References Saini, D.S. & Budhwar, P.S. (2008) ‘Managing the human resource in Indian SMEs: The role of indigenous realities’. Journal of World Business, 43(4), pp. 417-434. Şendoğ du, A.A., Kocabacak, A. & Güven, Ş. (2013) ‘The Relationship between Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Commitment: A Field Study’. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, pp. 818-827. Kumar,R.(2019).Researchmethodology:Astep-by-stepguideforbeginners.Sage Publications Limited. Fellows, R., Fellows, R. F., & Liu, A. M. (2015). Research methods for construction. John Wiley & Sons.