Mindfulness: Findings, Analysis, and Conclusion

Mindfulness
1

Table of Contents
FINDINGS AND RESULTS 2000..................................................................................................3
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 3000........................................................................................13
CONCLUSION 1000.....................................................................................................................16
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................17
2

FINDINGS AND RESULTS 2000
Hypothesis 1
Anova test
Descriptives
MAAS_diff
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean
Lower Bound Upper Bound
experimental 70 12.4286 8.84418 1.05708 10.3198 14.5374
Control 25 -5.6800 11.55321 2.31064 -10.4489 -.9111
Total 95 7.6632 12.48029 1.28045 5.1208 10.2055
Descriptives
MAAS_diff
Minimum Maximum
experimental -7.00 40.00
Control -33.00 10.00
Total -33.00 40.00
ANOVA
MAAS_diff
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 6040.638 1 6040.638 65.319 .000
Within Groups 8600.583 93 92.479
Total 14641.221 94
T-TEST GROUPS=Group(1 2)
/MISSING=ANALYSIS
/VARIABLES=Income House_Value Savings
/CRITERIA=CI(.95).
3

Interpretation – from above analysis of table it is found that significance value obtained is
P= .000 which is less than P= 0.05. thus, null hypothesis is rejected. It means that there will be
no improvement in mindfulness awareness during 6 week training course compared with
control group. As there are two groups in it that is experimental and control groups. So, it is
evaluated that there is no changes done in course in control groups. Besides that, value
obtained is P= .000 which significant. So, even if training course in increased then also there
will be no improvement in mindfulness of control group people. in this group it included
children, parents, etc who attended training course such as dance class, cycling group, etc. so,
it was found that there is no change in outcomes after 6 weeks training done. The score
obtained by control group was same.
Hypothesis 2
Descriptive Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
MAAS_diff 7.6632 12.48029 95
Income 2.2947 1.35955 95
Savings 1.8211 1.40651 95
House_Value 2.2421 1.05906 95
Correlations
MAAS_diff Income Savings House_Value
Pearson Correlation
MAAS_diff 1.000 .261 .064 .223
Income .261 1.000 .234 .534
Savings .064 .234 1.000 .308
House_Value .223 .534 .308 1.000
Sig. (1-tailed)
MAAS_diff . .005 .270 .015
Income .005 . .011 .000
Savings .270 .011 . .001
House_Value .015 .000 .001 .
N MAAS_diff 95 95 95 95
Income 95 95 95 95
Savings 95 95 95 95
4