Monash University V Kapoor Issues 2022

Monash University V Kapoor [1999] vsc 463 (9 December 1999)

Table of Contents
Issue............................................................................................................................................3
Rules...........................................................................................................................................3
Analysis......................................................................................................................................4
Conclusion..................................................................................................................................5
References..................................................................................................................................6

Issue
Monash University has brought an appeal under section 148 of Victorian Civil
and Administrative Tribunal Act 1988 against Uma Tiwari Kapoor. The
complaint was logged on 12 July 1996 by Dr Kapoor under equal Opportunity
Act 1995. The complaint was registered on the ground of discrimination. The
discrimination on the field of marital status, races, personal association,
religion, and claimed victimisation with all against the first-named appellant,
Monash (Austlii, 2019). The complaint was based on marital status and private
association during the time of Tribunal hearings. The tribunal court has
dismissed the claim against Campbell and Dr Kapoor’s status. Monash has
prohibited under1984 Act for discriminating Dr Kapoor on the ground of
Indian races as she was Hindu. Employers are discriminating against a person
with e number of specified ways (Law, 2019). The discrimination is based on
attributes. Children at University with Tribunal found discrimination based on
the quality of parental status as there was no evidence of detriment flowing to
Dr Kapoor as a result. Accordingly, it is found no unlawful behaviour arising
out of subject matters with the complaint. Tribunal of charge with criticisms
levelled by Dr Kapoor of her social attitudes towards lower caste or non-caste
Indian and other employees in MOSA unit. Dr Kapoor with the object of racial
comments, there is no positive findings by Tribunal as said by Dr Kapoor
during the time of employment (Austlii, 2019). The deteriorating relationship
between Ms Curzon Siggers and Dr Kapoor has caused information allegedly,
which was provided by individual students. Non-renewal of complainant's
contract of work which is based on the respondent to be solely for reasons that
complainant's cultural background adversely affected her interaction with
students.
Rules
To deal with cases study, Equal Opportunity Act 1984 under section 17(1) and
section 17(4) on complainant has proven less favourable treatment that is
based on races and religion. Equal Opportunity Act 1984, helps in promoting
equality of opportunity in Western Australia and provides remedies in respect
of discrimination on the ground of sex, races, religious that helps in involving