Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................2 LO 1.................................................................................................................................................2 P1 Organization's culture, politics and power influence individual and team behaviour and performance -..............................................................................................................................2 LO 2.................................................................................................................................................4 P2 Content and process theories of motivation and motivational techniques enable effective achievement of goals in organizational context.........................................................................4 LO 3.................................................................................................................................................7 P 3 Understanding of what makes an effective team, as opposed to an ineffective team..........7 LO 4...............................................................................................................................................11 P 4 Concepts and philosophies of OB within an organisational context and a given business situation.....................................................................................................................................11 CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................13 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................15 1
INTRODUCTION Organization Behaviour is the observation of individual and group behaviour in response to other individual or bunch of them. The aim is to observe the behaviour of individual or group to evaluate their attitudes towards certain conditions. present study is based on Waitrose company. It is a British super market that operates a retail business and is the largest employee owned business having 353 outlets and 65 little Waitrose convenience shops. They became the fastestgrowingshopsinUKofferingtheirproducts.Reportwillincludetheeffectof organization culture, politics and power on individual and team behaviour and performance, achievement of goals in an organization based on concept and process theories of motivation and motivation techniques,briefof effectiveteamcomparedtothatofineffectiveteamand Organizational Behaviour concept and philosophies for an organization. LO 1 P1 Organization's culture, politics and power influence individual and team behaviour and performance - Organisational culture is the unique social and psychological environment of a company along its values and behaviour(Osland, Devine, and Turner, 2015). The different kind of organization culture namely power, role, task and person culture in Handy's is defines as - Power Culture- In this type of culture power is held by few individuals who influence other people in an organization. There are few rules and regulations in a power culture controlling working conditions and employees are also generally evaluated by what they achieve in an organization rather than their performances of task and role. By the power, employee control is concentrated focusing on few people eliminating the chances of confusion and disputes amongst the workers. This type of culture impact on individual behaviour as people have to work under huge control that makes them demotivated towards firm and they become negative towards business. Hence, 2
negative employee don’t perform well in team which affect performance of business badly. Enforcement of power culture results in influencing of people will focus on achievements at the time of work not by evaluating their performances based on roles and responsibilities resulting in focusing only a few employees in firm (Borkowski, 2016). Role Culture- Organizations with role culture are based on rules. Individuals are aware of their roles and responsibilities in the company. The power flow in firm is based on hierarchical bureaucracy and is determined by a person's role in the company. The poweris commanded by the top management in firm. This type of culture impact on individual behaviour because employees do not get rights to say their views in front of management. This makes them negative and this also badly affect team performance because such negative employee so not support other team members which influence organisational performance to great extent. Implementation of role culture will result in affecting the roles and responsibilities of its employees considering their performances of job responsibilities and evaluating the amount of improvement required. The top management decision, rules and guidances are to be followed by the employees in case of culture dilemma (Miner, 2015). Task Culture Waitrose has this kind of culture where it focuses on team working of employees for matters related to problem solving. The power is derived from expertise when necessary as based on matrix organization, the employees are thus focused on resolving their issues (Handy's Model of Organisational Culture,2018). The task culture of the organization emphasis on solving all the problems by the team or group of Waitrose staff (Osland, Devine and Turner, 2015). This culture promotes and accepts suggestions and directions given by the expertise as per the requirement of the team. Company gives task to each workers as per their abilities and all individuals perform it well. They have rights to make own decisions that makes them positive towards the brand and these staff members perform in team very well. This kind of culture impacts positively on 3
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
organisational performance because all individual support each other to meet organisational goal (Lăzăroiu, 2015). Person Culture- Itsharespowerbetweenpeopleestablishingbusinessandpartnership.Employees perform their work individually as they think they are superior in the firm. This type of culture increases conflict situation in the firm which negatively influence individual and team behaviour both. The person culture in Waitrose will develop a sense of responsibility and accountability as people tend to believe they are superior in the organization and will work as if they are accountable of things happening will result in maximum utilization of their efforts thus increase the efficiency of individual as well as team.(Tasselli, Kilduff and Landis, 2018). How power and politics influence organisational behaviour The organizational behaviour in Waitrose is vastly affected by the involvement of power and politics in the functioning of organizational activities and achievement of finalized goals - Power is an important aspect of human civilization, they tend to affect business and decisions heavily. Their are types on power namely Coercive power i.e. the kind that involves use of threat to make people do what ever organisation desires. It basically aims to threaten people to lose something thus develops force on individual to achieve for organization's goals, Reward Power i.e. use of rewards, perks , monitory benefits to motivate people but will not cover all employees as there are several managers and high authority staff involved in the company. The employees will be rewarded on the basis of excellenceoftheirperformancesthusaimtoimproveemployeeperformances. Legitimate power means the power spread out from the official position held by someone like organization, government, etc. This type of power is shortly owned and also is under the control of position head. Expert Power that focus on an individual owned based on skills and an expertise which is of high quality and generally not available and the last 4
one is Referent power that is possessed by celebrities or people having huge fan base amongst masses. The Waitrose must follow reward power in their organization as the employees will be rewarded with perks and several opportunities thus develop their interest in the working conditions and also focuses on creating inner motivation at times as well. Politics in the workforce is the efforts made in intention to upgrade one's status or power in the organization. The Waitrose evaluated that the politics can bring a positive and negative impact in the operations of the organization. The employee performance in Waitrose can have a positive and negative impact on the politics of the organization such as the employees can overcome personnel inadequateness if considered politics as positive aspect and thus help the employees coping up with the change and on the other hand the Waitrose can also be affected by the involvement of politics in their processes such as can affect the job satisfaction factor of the employees working with the Waitrose for promoting favouritism, increase anxiety and stress level of the employees affected by the politics resulting in the employee turnover of Waitrose and decrease the performances of the other employees.(Borkowski, 2015). LO 2 P2 Content and process theories of motivation and motivational techniques enable effective achievement of goals in organizational context Content theory of motivation- The content theory of motivation highlights the change of human needs with the passage of time. David McClelland, Abraham Maslow and other psychologist attempted to explain the reason of change of human needs but not the pattern on how they change. They also highlighted the factors that motivate them as the theory focuses on interconnecting need and motivation that is what pushes us to please our requirements. This can be measured by job satisfaction, job enlargement, job enrichment, fair promotional policies, flexible hours, creating a cooperative 5
environment. The Waitrose as own 353 retail outlets throughout UK and 65 little convenience shops is one of the fastest growing shops in UK as the workforce need to be retained and motivated. The Waitrose promotes good promotional policies, job satisfaction, job enlargements, job enrichment, flexible hour working, employee appreciating policy, creating a cooperative environment (Heinitz, 2018). Maslow's Hierarchy of needs- The theory came in effect in the 1940's and 1950's putting forward hierarchy of needs namely Psychological needs, Safety needs, Social needs, Self Esteem needs, Self Actualisation needs. Psychological needs- The Waitrose takes care of basic psychological needs by providing them food, shelter, sleep, clothing, etc. These facilities including develops a mentality of an individual to work with Waitrose. The mental stability of an employee will result in maximum output of his potential thus ensuring maximum productivity (Lindebaum, and Geddes, 2016). Safety needs- The company promise to provide individuals with the safety needs to keep their work productive and help them achieve mental satisfaction by providing them employment, health, resources, personal security thus will result in maintaining employee stability at work.The waitrose installed several security cameras to ensure no unethical activity is being promoted within their work premises, the employees are provided with basic insurance plans thus are entitled for their safety in the future. It also trains them so that employees can use safety equipment’s easily. This thing makes employees positive and they work hard to meet organisational goal. By this way productivity and profitability of firm gets increases. The employees safety needs in The Waitrose helps them develop a stable mind in performing business activities in more effective and efficient ways and thus help in motivating employees gain organizational goals (Graham, Ziegert, and Capitano, 2015). 6
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Love/Belonging needs- The Waitrose creates a sense of friendship and intimacy creating a sense of connection amongst the organization and it's employees thus eliminate the chance of disputes resulting in organizational bond to achieve its objectives.They support their colleges in several of business activities resulting in increase of employee satisfaction as well as sense of belongingness help them reduce employee turnover and increase better employee satisfaction.The employees also seek help from each other and the management helps them achieve better (Vibert, 2017). Self Esteem needs- This level of pyramid is concerned on having recognisance and reputation in the society. The Waitrose focuses on establishing value by the customers as well as competitors creating a brand image for Waitrose and thus help to achieve organizational goals.The workforce in Waitrose entertain the customer's complaints to priority basis thus increasing its loyalty value amongst its competitors.The firm targets on providing recognition to the employees thus they are motivated towards achieving the organization goal. Self actualization needs- The organization goals are achieved by identifying inner potential and processing them for further progress. Each and every individual in The Waitrose focuses on the inner potential or their field of interest and are made to perform in those specifies areas resulting in maximum output at the time of operations in the expertise field they master (Miller, 2016). Process theory of motivation - The process theory of motivation combines the psychological and behavioural process that motivates an individual to act in a particular manner. These theories will reflect the behaviour of a person to achieve the goals for the needs. Equity theory The employees in this type of motivation asses their comfort level amongst fellow workers and the award they achieve for their effort. If the authoritian fell the differences between 7
the desired and current efforts they will pursue the employees to bring equality amongst each other by adjusting the performance or by taking measures from their co workers. The Waitrose managed to motivate the employees to manage current situations and also motivate them to reduce inequality input change, outcome change as well as level of comparison (Waldman, Ward and Becker, 201). The waitrose access level of effort of individual against fellow workers and the reward they receive for their effort. The gap is filled in the performances by putting on some extra efforts to generate sense of achievement in the organization context. The Waitrose tend to eliminate the gap between the desired and actual outcome thus going back and reviewing the process to bring quality to their work by putting extra efforts resulting in achievement of their ultimate goals and objectives thus setting standards of achievement for other employees to review and learn. LO 3 P 3 Understanding of what makes an effective team, as opposed to an ineffective team Waitrose considered effective team as the individual that participate effective in any task along with distributed leadership emphasizing on goals and internal maintain nance where power is equalised and shared. (Kong, 2016). Effective team of Waitrose firm: Effective team inWaitroseare the group of people focused on steeing of standards as a member of hospitality industry and creates a healthy customer relationship. The effective team as measured have several characteristics such as good communication, better understanding, and many other characteristics that help them in effective achievement of their goals. Waitroseprefers to hire for values that includes hospitality, integrity, leadership, teamwork, ownership and a sense of urgency. They prefer those who are committed to the above mentioned values (Miller, 2016). Ineffective team of Waitrose: 8
Ineffective teams are the ones made by several individual who don't mix up or lack necessary skills to perform variety of work. The includes the lack of people with skills, inadequate communication, mismanagement thus resulting in failure of any task performed. Ineffective team inWaitroseare a bunch of people that devalue the services of the firm by violating the rules or regulations or failed to cope up with the expectations of the consumers. They find it difficult to hire high quality employees and they are to go through extra training to so serve guest from western culture. Several times the employees tend to be job hoppers so the company has to go through the recruitment process again and again and that increases training cost. EffectivenessIneffectiveness Thebrandvalueistakeninto considerationbytheteamwhile providing any goods or services. TheeffectiveteaminWaitroseis motivatedevenbynonmonetary incentive like recognition, leadership, allowances, etc (Vibert, 2017). The brand value holds no importance to these people as their main objective is to earn their pay check. The team inWaitrosefirm is not even motivated by any monetary incentive or raise in the pay check. Truckman theory: ToexplainteamdevelopmentandbehaviourBruceTuck-mandevelopedTeam Development method and it can solveWaitroseflaws and pitfalls in following ways - 9
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
As this theory involves four stages name which are following below: Forming - High dependence on leader is established for guidance and direction whereas the team has little involvement in it. So the roles and responsibilities of individuals team members are unclear and the leader is responsible and accountable for everything. The leader thus manage the work of all the individuals and keep a close track on all the levels of activity so the things might not go wrong in the organisation (Graham, Ziegert and Capitano, 2015). Storming- The team faces issue of different point of views, positional difference and several other emotional issues as the people from different background, caste, culture, mentality come forward and perform their roles and responsibilities. TheWaitrosecompany need to eliminate these types of distraction and focus on the ultimate end results. Norming- Resolved disarrangements and personality clashes results high intimacy and a spirit of co- operation emerges. The team in this case resolves the differences and thus take the small decisions by themselves and the major decisions on the mutual understanding and mutual agreement basis. Thus eliminate the chances of individual differences. By this way everyone in this case feel equally involved in a particular task (Vibert, 2017.). Performing- Performing leads to the performance of the tasks at individual level and by the mutual agreement by the leader and the team members. The members do not look for guidance from their leader, the leader delegate the responsibilities and the task is being performed assistance from leader is being involved for personal and interpersonal development. Adjourning- 10
After the task is being done and the goal is achieved the group is again separated so that everyone can move to their personal work and feel delighted about the previous achievement. As the group gets emotionally involved the partition creates a sense of vulnerability is helpful to feel insecure from this change and that is ultimately a natural attribute (Miller, 2016). Factors affecting team development - Commitment and trust - The members of a team must be fully committed towards achieving the team's mission and goals. Each individual must contribute equal time and energy to proceed towards the aim of theWaitroseand must have trust on all the other members for the same. Mistrust happening due to any reason personal or professional may decrease the output amongst the individual. Communication- An effective team must show confidence and trust amongst each other when it comes to communication. The team ofWaitrosemust have common mode of communication so that every member of the team can contribute thoughts and visions for better understanding. The members of the team must always without any hesitation come up with ideas and beliefs as well as clear all the differences and grudges verbally (Kong, 2016). Teamsize- The size of a team plays an importance role in team development, the right amount of people will achieve in time with better output rather than the excess one wasting resource or the deficit once lacking time. Teamstability- Waitrose firmfocuses on the team stability as the training and development of newly hired staff will take time and resources and slam a pitfall in the progress of the company. Diversity of capabilities - 11
A team with wide range of skills amongst individual each having a unique ability strengthens the effectiveness as a whole. Every individual inWaitrose firmmust trust the skills one possesses and feel valued that their contribution matters (Waldman, Ward and Becker, 2017). Leadership- Leadership inWaitrose firmplays a vital role in team development. As the amount of manpower the company possess controlling them is an important part of the management factor. Leaders are the ultimate motivators for their team/force. Accountability- Teams of the organisation crumble when several people don't hold their own weight, by working together and rewarding each member for their part the team achieved for what they have demanded for (Kong, 2016). Trust- Transparencyis the key factor of trust, a team that point out mistakes of their colleagues not to mock them but to make then know their flaws grows more and to attain their common goal. Honesty brings out essential trust amongst colleagues in theWaitroseorganization. LO 4 P 4 Concepts and philosophies of OB within an organisational context and a given business situation Path goal theory – Path goal theory is a leadership theory. Path goal theory was developed by Robert House first in 1971 and revised in 1996. In path goal theory the behaviour of leaders aims to maximize outcomes of workers by recognising their hard efforts. Path goal theory provides ways for leaders to encourage and support their employees in achieving their goals. The employees as a 12
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
result, will be more satisfied and productive team. Path goal theory has two main aspects, the leaders behaviour & the use of rewards to meet basic needs of subordinates. By path goal theory effective leaders give clear path to the employee ofWaitrosecompany and this type of supervision removes pitfalls & barricades. It also provides coaching, support & guidance to the employees (Graham, Ziegert and Capitano, 2015). There are various leadership styles associated with path goal theory: achievement oriented leadership, directive leadership, participative leadership, supportive leadership. So if management ofWaitrosecompany apply path goal theory in the company there will be many advantages as it gives clear path to employees, such supervision removes obstacles & help the employee to work in correct direction, achieving their goals. So by path goal theory management give rewards to the subordinates ofWaitrose company which will keep them motivated in performing their role. By proper coaching, support & guidance, the employees ofWaitrosecompany will perform much better which will be fruitful for the organisation. Thus, will help the organisation to grow much faster (indebaum and Geddes, 2016). System theory- System leadership enables the leaders in the organisation to create favourable conditions where people can work freely and productively to their potential. It uses many sound principle about human behaviour to create models of good leadership, system design and social process. It focuses on achieving the individual as well as overall goals of theWaitrosecompany. So by applying system theory inWaitrosecompany it will assist in creating favourable conditions where the employees of organisation and work productively to their potential and thus will help in increasing the productivity of the firm. It provides leaders with tools that help in predicting the behaviour of people in their organisation. So when management apply system theory inWaitrose company it helps in predicting the behaviour of employees in the company. Thus directs the management to take corrective decision at correct time (Vibert, 2017). System theory also helps in building effective system in organisation which drive productive behaviour. When this theory 13
will be applied inWaitrosecompany it will support in improving the overall productive behaviour of the firm. It helps in leading a more effective realisation of firm's purpose. System theory will support the management in controlling the behaviour and activities of the employees ofWaitrosecompany. Custodial theory – The custodial theory is based on providing economic securities to employees through wages and other benefits. This helps in creating employees loyalty and increase motivation of employees to work in organisation. Many companies provide health benefits, financial packaging of salary. Custodial theory directs to depend on firm rather than boss or managers. Employees are dependent on the organisation under custodial theory. Custodial theory focuses more on money as money is strong motivator which satisfies the needs of employees. Custodial theory says that the employees of the organisation are not allowed to take participation in the process of decision making (Miller, 2016).All these benefits are provided to employees so that they work happily. Firm provide good salary and other benefits to the employees of Waitrosecompany. So that are satisfied with benefits and they keep working hard, achieving the objectives of the firm. Custodial theory says that the organisation will have greater skilled workforce, more motivated employees, and have competitive advantages through employee knowledge and expertise. These are incentives design to attract and retain quality staff. The custodial approach induces the employees to show their loyalty to the company as they are receiving many benefits from the company. The studies show that it is the best way to make employee happy but may not be productive. Custodial model have one downside also that it attracts and retains low performance staff as well. So management follow custodial theory in Waitrosecompany will be beneficial as have many benefits discussed above but has this one downside as well (Kong, 2016). 14
CONCLUSION From the above study it can be concluded that organisational behaviour supports in understanding behaviour of employees so companies can make their strategy to make people positive towards brand. Motivation plays significant role in business unit. It retains skilled workers and supports business in raising productivity and profitability of business unit to great extent. Effective team always supports entity in raising profit of firm and sustaining in market for longer duration. Companies always try to encourage their workers so that people feel happy and put best efforts to meet organisational goal. 15
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
REFERENCES Books and Journals Borkowski, N., 2015.Organizational behavior, theory, and design in health care. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. Borkowski, N., 2016.Organizational behavior in health care. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. Graham, K.A., Ziegert, J.C. and Capitano, J., 2015. The effect of leadership style, framing, and promotion regulatory focus on unethical pro-organizational behavior.Journal of business ethics.126(3). pp.423-436. Heinitz, K., and et.al., 2018. Positive organizational behavior: Longitudinal effects on subjective well-being.PloS one.13(6). p.e0198588. Kong,D.T.,2016.Thepathwaytounethicalpro-organizationalbehavior:Organizational identification as a joint function of work passion and trait mindfulness.Personality and Individual Differences.93.pp.86-91. Lăzăroiu, G., 2015. Work motivation and organizational behavior.Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice.7(2). pp.66-75. Lindebaum, D. and Geddes, D., 2016. The place and role of (moral) anger in organizational behavior studies.Journal of Organizational Behavior.37(5). pp.738-757. Miller, D., 2016. Article Commentary: Response to “Research on the Dark Side of Personality TraitsinEntrepreneurship:ObservationsfromanOrganizationalBehavior Perspective”.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.40(1). pp.19-24. Miner, J.B., 2015.Organizational behavior 4: From theory to practice. Routledge. Osland, J., Devine, K. and Turner, M., 2015. Organizational behavior.Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.pp.1-5. Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M. and Landis, B., 2018. Personality change: implications for organizational behavior.Academy of Management Annals.12(2). pp.467-493. Vibert,C.,2017.TheoriesofMacro-OrganizationalBehavior:AHandbookofIdeasand Explanations: A Handbook of Ideas and Explanations. Routledge. Waldman,D.A.,Ward,M.K.andBecker,W.J.,2017.Neuroscienceinorganizational behavior.AnnualReviewofOrganizationalPsycHandy'sModelofOrganisational Culturehology and Organizational Behavior.4.pp.425-444. Online 16