This report evaluates the initiatives of Asus for improving performance, culture, and employee engagement. It provides recommendations for enhancing HR strategies.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
People, Cultural and Contemporary Leadership Student’s Name: Student’s ID:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2 Introduction Asus is a multinational electronics organization which was established in 1989 in the city of Taipei in Taiwan and it operates all over the world. It was declared the 5thlargest vendor of PC in terms of unit sales in the year 2017. The report will evaluate the initiatives of Asus for improving the performance of the employees of the company. It will assess the initiatives of Asus for improving the culture of the company. It will also analyze the initiatives of Asus forimproving the employee engagement rates of Asus. Moreover, it will recommend three suggestions to enhance the three HR strategies of Asus. Performance-related initiatives In Asus, people are the base of operations of business, and the characteristics features of the people the traits of Asus shows the main Asus for which the company is famous all over the world. The five principles of Asus are integrity, humility, agility, courage and diligence which shape the business culture of Asus that is moral-based and which reflect the recruitment and assessment of performance of the employees (Iqbal, Anwar and Haider, 2015). The staffs are provided with a healthy and fair work environment motivating excellence and diversified growth, competitive and reasonable salary, compensation and bonus and a comprehensive but flexible employee safety portfolio by Asus. With workplace creativity which foster imagination and motivation, staffs in Asus could balance among work, health and family. It accurately echoes the business philosophy of Asus to motivate, encourage and support the staffs to find out their maximum potentials (Nyberg, Pieper and Trevor, 2016). The performance appraisals are controlled strategically by the HR managers in the organization. Every departments of Asus has monthly and yearly targets. The targets of the departments are used to make monthly and yearly goals of the each employee as well as the teams of that department. Once the performance appraisals are finalized, the HR managers of Asus makes the achieved targets a part of the performance appraisals and every increment in the salary and bonus are associated with these achieved of targets of each employee as well as the teams (Gonget al., 2017).Themethodsoffeedbackandmonitoringaresignificantpartofperformance management of Asus. HR managers properly use the methods of feedback and monitoring to monitor the performances of each of the employees as well as the teams.
4 Engagement-related initiatives The HR managers of Asus manages the employee engagement effectively by various methods such as recruiting, reviewing, retaining, and providing training and motivating to the staffs. These methods helps Asus to keep the staffs engaged and obtain the desired outcomes from them. These methods also helps the HR managers to concentrate on the major areas of the organization and gives opportunities to the company to develop (Conwayet al.,2016). The HR managerskeep the staffsengaged by motivatingthem for high qualityproductivityand managing the turnover of the staffs. The employees are engaged in Asus by building trust among the staffs and the company by the HR managers to fight against the adverse circumstances (Davidsonet al.,2016).The motivated and engaged staffs provide high quality output and enhance the performances of Asus through their works. Asus has improved its efforts on the engagements and communications of the staffs to improve the experiences of the employees. Asus provides friendly and safe working environment along with basic protection to its staffs to keep its workforce engaged. Asus aims to set up a better work environment to make sure that the employees are safe both physically and mentally in its workplace (Baileyet al.,2017). The company provides appropriate training to its staffs to make sure of their safety during emergency and decrease the risks of injures with the help of simulation. All these makes the employees of Asus engaged and provide benefits to the company. The employee engagement initiatives of Asus also has some other measures. The company not only values the growth and benefits of the staffs to keep them engaged, but also provide them relief from the stress of workplace. Asus maintains a happy work atmosphere to allow its staffs to accomplish a balance in their work-life and also take care of their health and family as well as make best use of their potentials (Albrechtet al.,2015). The organization also provides annual free healthcare checkups to its staffs and creates a joint contracts with the hospitals to evaluate the reasons of deformities, offer medical advices and support for more monitoring.
5 Recommendations TheHRmanagersofAsushavetoadoptamulticulturalworkatmosphere.Asthe organization has staffs and subsidiaries from various cultures, it can include the work atmosphere and policies of the company in such a manner that Asus could bring changes in their policies with changes in international laws. The policies of HR need to be improved so that the policies might be executed sooner and planned for retaining the current staffs and encourage new staffs from diverse cultures in the firm The relations among the staffs of firm indicates employee relations in Asus. The HR managers of Asus can organize for regular training where the engaged employees might be able to train and develop their personal skills through training. This development might demonstrate better relationship between the employees of Asus’s different departments and reduce the concerns of the customers which occurs most of the time owing to the conflicts among the Asus’s different departments The HR managers of Asus have to apply the performance appraisal when the employees will expect for their rewards for their performances of the whole year. Asus can utilize rating scales to rate the performance of its employees of various department on the basis of scale from poor to excellent. The rating scales evaluates the different traits of the staffs such as communication skills, teamwork, creativity, work skills, competence and punctuality. These scales can easily be used and interpreted. The HR managers might also utilize 360-degree feedback approach for the performance appraisal of the staffs. The HR managers can set the rules to assess the performances of each of the staffs and then observe the performance appraisals of the juniors analyzed by the seniors. After the appraisals, the HR managers of Asus might manage the unsatisfactory problems from the staffs, who need to be listened and justified appropriately by the HR managers. HR managers need to maintain records and feedbacks of the employees’ the performance appraisals for future purpose. 
6 Conclusion The report concludes that Asus was undertaken for evaluating and accessing the HR-related practicesoftheorganization.IthadanalyzedtheinitiativesofAsusforimprovingthe performance of the employees of the company. The paper alsoevaluated the initiatives of Asus forimproving the culture of the company. It had also assessed the initiatives of Asus for improvingtheemployeeengagementratesofAsus.Moreover,ithadsuggestedthree recommendations for improving the three HR strategies of Asus.The HR department of HR recognize and reward the performance of the employees through incentives. The HR department manages the engagement of the staffs efficiently through various ways.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7 Reference List Alagaraja, M. and Shuck, B., 2015. Exploring organizational alignment-employee engagement linkagesandimpactonindividualperformance:Aconceptualmodel.HumanResource Development Review,14(1), pp.17-37. Albrecht, S.L., Bakker, A.B., Gruman, J.A., Macey, W.H. and Saks, A.M., 2015. Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach.Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance,2(1), pp.7-35. Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K. and Fletcher, L., 2017. The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis.International Journal of Management Reviews,19(1), pp.31-53. Chitrakar,R.,2017.OrganizationCultureandLearnedHelplessness.JournalofHR, Organizational Behaviour & Entrepreneurship Development,1(1), pp.17-20. Conway, E., Fu, N., Monks, K., Alfes, K. and Bailey, C., 2016. Demands or resources? The relationship between HR practices, employee engagement, and emotional exhaustion within a hybrid model of employment relations.Human Resource Management,55(5), pp.901-917. Davidson, C., Heyman, F., Matusz, S., Sjöholm, F. and Chun Zhu, S., 2016. Global engagement, complextasksandthedistributionofoccupationalemployment.ReviewofInternational Economics,24(4), pp.717-736. Girma, S., 2016. The relationship between leadership style, job satisfaction and culture of the organization.International Journal of Applied Research,2(4), pp.35-45. Gong, Y., Wang, M., Huang, J.C. and Cheung, S.Y., 2017. Toward a goal orientation–based feedback-seekingtypology:Implicationsforemployeeperformanceoutcomes.Journalof Management,43(4), pp.1234-1260. Iqbal,N.,Anwar,S.andHaider,N.,2015.Effectofleadershipstyleonemployee performance.Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review,5(5), pp.1-6.