Writing a critical review for the following article "Creating interaction in online learning" Also see attach guildlines along with a article.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Introduction Researcher “Kevin .J. Downing” published a report under the title “Creating interaction in online learning: A case study.” In the prestigious journal of “ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology,” this research report is based on an empirical survey covering the interaction of the students and teachers in an online module that lasted for 16 weeks. This empirical study tried to explore a hypothesis revolving around the “collaboration and concept development” during an online module. The researcher went for exhaustive research to figure out the impact of the tools and online communication protocols to establish a hypothesis that goes as under. Online modules have the capacity to fulfill all the necessary conditions of conceptual learning by creating a collaborative environment to facilitate a learning community that can complete the process of concept development without any significant generation loss. A brief journey from the point of evolution to the conclusion This report covers a journey of the learning that lasted for sixteen weeks. The researchers divided this journey into three phases; they took the support of various previous theories to determine the goals for the group for each phase. In order to compare the results of the endeavor, the researchers also included the notes collected from a blended educational program where web and face to face interaction were present in part. The methodology of the research defined three actors in the process. Student-teacher interaction, student-student interaction and participative interaction were classified as actors. Dashboards,
discussion boards, online chats and the performance during the final exams were taken as the milestones to capture the differences. According to the hypothesis, the posts were divided into the categories of instrumental and social posts. Instrumental posts were considered as the mandatory posts whereas the social posts were treated as an agent to enhance collaboration between the course mates. The instrumental interaction between the teachers and the students ranked at the top level whereas the social interaction between students and teachers find the lowest rank during the three phases. Researchers accepted the fact that online interactions have this potential to increase communication between the stake-holders quite effectively. They fulfill all the necessary conditions related to the three-step model of learning. These three steps are “nurturing of a learning environment by the teacher,” “social interactions among the students to collaborate,” and the “final outcomes of the learning in the environment of “community learning.”The findings of the research support the culture of online learning barring certain fine details related to the cognitive model of learning. Conclusion The findings of the research support the hypothesis. Online tools and the environment has this potential to facilitate a collaborative environment for learning along with the development of a “virtual learning community setup” that can be equated with a real-world learning community. While considering the rebuttal for the main hypothesis, a failure in the creation of a cognitive environment of learning can be taken into an account. This is the area where the future researcher should work and enhance the online tools to facilitate an “effective cognitive environment of learning.”
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
References Downing, K. J. (2007). Creating interaction in online learning: a case study.ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp ( 201-215).