Analyzing Educational Policy Research Papers

This assignment requires you to carefully examine a set of research papers focusing on various aspects of educational policy. You'll need to identify key themes, arguments, methodologies used, and potential implications of these studies. The prompt asks for specific details about the content and focus of each paper, demonstrating your understanding of their contributions to the field of education policy.

PROFESSIONAL STUDIES

Contents
Part 1................................................................................................................................................0
Part 2................................................................................................................................................1
Part 3................................................................................................................................................1
References:.......................................................................................................................................2
Part 1
The education system in UK is facing many changes and alterations these days. The number of
schools has increased having different funding arrangements. As per the law in UK, all the
children from the age of 5 to 16 must obtain education that is full time in nature (Holmes and
Adams, 2006). Till the year of 1988, each and every school have the freedom to decide their
courses and the curriculum that needs to be taught in the school. The only compulsory subject at
that time was religious education. After the launch of Education reform Act 1988, the standard
curriculum that is The National Curriculum of England was developed and was announced in
1992. The major aim of this reform is to ensure that all the pupils can get the balanced education
and knowledge about some of the basic topics. The national curriculum defines that there are
four key stages that falls under primary education and after 11 years of age, the pupil enters the
secondary education schools (Handal and Herrington,2003). Key stage 1 and 2 falls under the
category of primary schools and key stage 3 and 4 falls under the category of secondary
education system. This National Curriculum includes some of the core subjects such as maths,
English and Science. Religious education is also taught but it has local syllabus for every school.
As far as the curriculum of mathematics is considered, it has been analysed that The National
Curriculum for mathematics is based on the content and various types of tests (Priestley and
Humes, 2010).
The National Curriculum (NC) developed simultaneously with the development of national test
(sats) at the end of the Key Stages. The NC introduced Programmes of Study (pos), Attainment
Targets (AT) levels and Statements of Attainment (soa).

The National Curriculum required all schools to address the matter of teaching merely for the
attainment of knowledge and skills in separation from the application of mathematics, and to
develop the approaches of teaching and learning to influence the work in mathematics
(Babadoğan and Olkun, 2006). This was considered as every challenging for the schools as it is
required by The National Curriculum to raise the standards of mathematics for all the students.
The National Curriculum focuses on developing the knowledge of the students to learn about the
calculating methods. It includes the mental methods as well as the methods by using calculators.
At every level, it is required by the teachers to encourage and inspire the students and pupils to
develop their own methods of calculations (Heywood, 2005). This feature of developing own
methods was established by numeracy project and framework for teaching mathematics. It has
been analyzed that even after the revisions were done frequently and so many times in
mathematics but the change is content was observed to be very little (Rowlands, and Carson,
2002). In order to supports the teachers, training materials had been released for the teachers so
that they can effectively teach the pupils properly.
The major aim of the new curriculum system development is to bring fluency, mathematical
reasoning and solving problem methods. There are basically three types of schools in UK:
 Community
 Foundation
 Voluntarily
Community schools are the one in which LEA has the responsibility for admission of the pupils.
They own the staff and the land on which the school building is constructed.
As far as foundation schools are considered, these are the schools in which the governing body
owns the building and has the responsibility for the admission of the pupils. In terms of
ownership of the school land and building it is generally off governing boys or of any charitable
trust (Marsh, 2009).

Voluntary schools are generally owned or operated by the charitable trusts. These schools are
divided into two types that are aided and controlled. These are almost always church schools and
the
In terms of evolution of mathematics in education system of different schools at UK, it has been
analysed that Math was considered as the core and necessary subject since 19th century
(Hershkowitz, et al. 2002). It has been analysed that there were many lengthy calculation under
the topics of weights and measures in math and reduction in time allotted to numerical
calculations in mathematics have made it problematic for the students to learn. Nearly in 1980’s
the development of electronic calculators raised the concern that using these devices may affect
the mental ability of the pupils to sole the arithmetic issues but eventually and gradually they
become the important tools to be used by the pupils (Mullis, et al. 2012). It has been analysed
that resolving the real life problems are very much complicated than solving the problems that
are academic. But, these issues have made the impression that maths is not relevant to the real
lives. This is the only reason that math has undergone many changes since years but the reforms
were mainly focussed on changing the teaching patterns of the subject and thus required effective
training programs to teach the teachers that how can they educate the students (Aubrey, Godfrey
and Dahl, 2006).
Part 2
Every subject the pupils learn has its impact on their personal, social, economic factors. These
factors also affect the experience of learning the particular subject. Math is considered as the
subject that is very much complicated in nature. This subject is assumed to be very different
from the real life implementation of the subject (Adam, Beck, and Van Loon, 2000). Following
are some of the factors that have their impacts on the education experience of the students
regarding math:
Personal and social factors: It has been analysed that development of negative attitude towards
maths by the pupils in UK is because of the differences in the real life problems and subject

problems of maths (Unit and Britain, 2001). Even though pupils are talented but they have
negative views on maths and face numeracy crisis. In order to improve people as an individual
and the country as a whole, it is required to change the attitude towards the subject to take the
benefit out of it. It has been analysed that UK people have culturally accepted to have negative
thoughts about maths. It is very usual to hear in UK and “I cannot do maths” and it does not
seem strange at all. Maths is seen as the remit of ‘mad scientists’, nerdy boys and socially inept.
Maths is assumed to be the genetic gift that can be innate and cannot be acquired and learnt but
this was really a wrong thinking. Everyone needs math at every point of their life even in
everyday tasks the people perform; maths is very much required (Healy, 2003).
There can be many causes that results in negative attitude of the people towards maths. The first
one is the bad experience of the students in learning the concept of maths that are very basic.
Students also find that the problems in their books is also not relevant to their daily lives I some
cases. Most the student has bad experiences in their math class and thus it continues till their
adulthood. Math also creates anxiety amongst the students (Asheim and Gertler, 2005).
Historical factors: In all the education system, math is considered as the most important and the
key subject to be learnt by the students. It is considered as the ancient science that has been
involved in each and every education system including UK. It has always been taught as the
mandatory subject and is considered to be playing a major role in social selection. This is a
subject with infallible knowledge and logic and thus it is required to be involved ii the education
system with a perfect curriculum design. In earlier times that is sixth and fifth centuries,
Pythagoras believed that this world is ruled by the numbers and nature has mathematical
underground. It has been analysed that the students have the assumption that maths is a very
tough subject and they used to hate maths. Math has always seen as the isolated subject. It is
required to concept and integrates historical aspects in mathematics in order to have better
teaching and learning experiences of the students (D’Este and Patel, 2007). Teaching and
learning mathematics through ancient and discovery perception helps in empowering the
excitement of learning. This helps the students to develop their logical reasoning and problem
solving capability. These are the life skills that can be learnt by understanding the concepts of
maths. Historic maths also deals with looking at the problems that are old. This helps the learners
and the researchers to look for new and interesting ways to solve the problems. There are two

ways in which history can be combined to maths. First strategy is that the topic can be covered
by using the original source out to settle topics that fit I to the curriculum. History suggests that
modern maths is confided as the integration or combination of years of learning ad discovery.
Insights into the evolution and development of maths help in improving the curriculum and
power of the teacher to communicate and stimulate interests.
Economic factors:
The association between attainment of maths and national economy is very complex to be
explained and understood. The interference of government or the political decisions on the
formulation of mathematics curriculum assumes utilitarian view of learning that suggests that the
vocational skills can be taught in the schools (Hoyles and Lagrange, 2010). In developed world,
the skill requirements of employees by the companies are changing and this may be because of
the involvement of technology in the same. The new technological tools at the workplace have
different skill requirements from the person who is using or operating those tools. It has been
analysed that mathematical science is very important for the economy of the country like UK. It
has been analysed that all the topics that are usually covered in the math curriculum such as
algebra, trigonometry, dynamical analysis, mathematical physics etc. are very important for the
everyday life as well as the employment life of the pupils of UK in near future. In order to drive
the economy of UK, it’s required to develop the mathematical skillset across the widest
economic spectrum. It has been observed that very few of the math students opt maths in their
future studies or post graduate level.
It is not the case that the qualified Mathematicians are required only in UK but it’s the case for
all over the world. A report by Mathematical Sciences in 2025, published by the American
National Academy of Sciences, stated ‘Mathematical Sciences is increasingly integrating in other
aspects and has become a very important element in the investigation of different areas such as
biology, social science, medical, economics etc. all these subjects and the investigation in the
same is important and essential for the growth ad development of the economy and this fact
should inform both the nature and scale of funding for the Mathematical Sciences as a whole’8.
Therefore, it has been analysed that UK has to make initiates in this direction of maintaining and
developing Mathematical sciences people pipeline so that it can be competitive in nature at

global level. This helps the country to attract the other global businesses to set up their operation
in the UK.
Part 3
In the year of 1980’s and 1990’s, the conservative government of UK has brought many reforms
and introduced the market mechanism in the education system of UK. This has been done in
order to raise the strands of schools in UK. The legislation that is the 1988 Education Reform
Act not only bought reform in the education system but also changed the national curriculum of
different subject including maths (Slavin, 2002). The market oriented reform allows the parents
to have their choice about the sate funded schools. As per this, the parents in UK can choose that
which school their children has attended and could be linked with the governing bodies of the
schools. Some of the schools have got the right to take decision over their budget and that budget
is financed by the government of UK. This helps the school governing bodies to have autonomy
in their operations and particular about which student can get the admission and which cannot.
In addition to the parental choice, policy makers of the education system also attempted to
improve the effectiveness of the schools (Barr and Crawford, 2005). For this, league tables were
generated that helped in showing the positions of the schools in comparison to each other.
gradually, the test scores become more accessible and thus the league tables undergone the
refinement that results in focusing on the outcomes instead of just focusing on the examination
attainment and taking account of the previous achievement of children entering a particular
school. (Boud and Solomon, 2001). However even today, the newspapers concentrates on the
pass are of the pupil in the exams and this is the big issue for the parents of those pupils as well.
It has been analysed that most of the organisations of contemporary society believes in old
fashioned skills. Old fashioned skills means the skills that were used to perform the task in older
days that are now altered and the same task is done in different ways now. Different policies
have implemented these days in the organisations that requires the schools to make alteration in
the school curriculum of the students to make them learn better and new skills (Gillborn*, 2005).

(Cochran-Smith and Zeichner, 2009).
As far as some of the recent policies in UK are concerned, it has been analysed that Pupil
Premium program has the objective to reduce the inequalities in between the children and the
education that needs to be provided to them. This can be done by funding the schools for helping
the disadvantaged students. The pupil premium is available to the student who can take free
meals. It is in the hands of the school that how that funding can be used. This was the policy that
is launched in England (Lorenzoni, Nicholson-Cole and Whitmarsh, 2007). In Northern Ireland,
every school is god school is a policy that was launched for making improvements in the school.
This helped in raising the standards and funds for the schools. Teaching Scotland’s Future was
the policy that was launched in order to improve the teaching skills.
As far as Australia is considered, it is found to be the biggest competitor of UK in education
system. In Melbourne, educational goals of for the youth of Australia along with Australian
education minister sets the way in which the education needs to be delivered to the students at
every level. The major focus on Australian education is leadership of the schools. The major
objectives of Australian education includes development of school leadership, improving the
quality of teaching improving the outcomes for the students who falls under the category of
disadvantage society and the last one is improvement in transparency (Henry, et al. 2001). In
order to increase the number of educated population, the agreement has been launched that aims
at engaging more and more students in schooling programs so that the inequalities in the
education can be reduced and more and more people of the country can get the education at
equal level. Most of the programs and the policies in Australia are for the students who belonged
to the community of indigenous society and the one who are from the lower social economic
societies. After that, the national partnership agreement has been launched or released that
focused on setting the milestones of education, outcomes of the same and the strategies for
delivering the education (Sahlberg, 2007). The ASQA seeks better national constancy and
increased rigour in registering training providers, recognizing sequences and monitoring the
excellence of the system. The TEQSA aims to safeguard that students obtain high-quality
education at any higher education organization.

It has been analysed that the major aim of every education policy different countries have similar
impact and objectives. His is because each of the government and the governing bodies of the
countries try to improve the education level of the population and aims to remove the inequalities
along with providing equal opportunities to all the people in their country to get the education at
primary and secondary level. Maths is the subject that has been concluding as the most important
subject and its basic language is very much required by every individuals.
References:
Adam, B., Beck, U. and Van Loon, J. eds., 2000. The risk society and beyond: critical issues for
social theory. Sage.
Asheim, B.T. and Gertler, M.S., 2005. The geography of innovation: regional innovation
systems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation.
Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R. and Dahl, S., 2006. Early mathematics development and later
achievement: Further evidence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), pp.27-46.
Babadoğan, C. and Olkun, S., 2006. Program development models and reform in Turkish
primary school mathematics curriculum. International journal for mathematics teaching and
learning, 1(1), pp.1-6.

Barr, N.A. and Crawford, I., 2005. Financing higher education: Answers from the UK. London:
Routledge.
Boud, D. and Solomon, N., 2001. Work-based learning: a new higher education?. McGraw-Hill
Education (UK).
Cochran-Smith, M. and Zeichner, K.M. eds., 2009. Studying teacher education: The report of the
AERA panel on research and teacher education. Routledge.
D’Este, P. and Patel, P., 2007. University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors
underlying the variety of interactions with industry?. Research policy, 36(9), pp.1295-1313.
Gillborn*, D., 2005. Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race
theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), pp.485-505.
Handal, B. and Herrington, A., 2003. Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and curriculum
reform. Mathematics education research journal, 15(1), pp.59-69.
Healy, J.D., 2003. Excess winter mortality in Europe: a cross country analysis identifying key
risk factors. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 57(10), pp.784-789.
Henry, M., Lingard, R., Rizvi, F. and Taylor, S., 2001. The OECD, globalisation and education
policy. Elsevier Science.
Hershkowitz, R., Dreyfus, T., Ben-Zvi, D., Friedlander, A., Hadas, N., Resnick, T., Tabach, M.
and Schwarz, B., 2002. Mathematics curriculum development for computerized environments: A
designer-researcher-teacher-learner activity. Handbook of international research in mathematics
education, pp.657-694.
Heywood, J., 2005. Engineering education: Research and development in curriculum and
instruction. John Wiley and Sons.
Holmes, J. and Adams, J.W., 2006. Working memory and children’s mathematical skills:
Implications for mathematical development and mathematics curricula. Educational
Psychology, 26(3), pp.339-366.

Hoyles, C. and Lagrange, J.B., 2010. Mathematics education and technology: Rethinking the
terrain. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. and Whitmarsh, L., 2007. Barriers perceived to engaging with
climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental
change, 17(3-4), pp.445-459.
Marsh, C.J., 2009. Key concepts for understanding curriculum. Routledge.
Mullis, I.V., Martin, M.O., Foy, P. and Arora, A., 2012. TIMSS 2011 international results in
mathematics. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.
Priestley, M. and Humes, W., 2010. The development of Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence:
amnesia and déjà vu. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), pp.345-361.
Rowlands, S. and Carson, R., 2002. Where would formal, academic mathematics stand in a
curriculum informed by ethnomathematics? A critical review of ethnomathematics. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), pp.79-102.
Sahlberg, P., 2007. Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish
approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), pp.147-171.
Slavin, R.E., 2002. Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and
research. Educational researcher, 31(7), pp.15-21.
Unit, S.E. and Britain, G., 2001. Preventing social exclusion. London: Cabinet Office.